These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Proposal] Option to set -10 standings to those we war dec.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#81 - 2014-08-03 20:39:17 UTC
NightmareX wrote:
No, read what i wrote over in my quote. You are still wrong.
No, in fact, you are wrong. And you are too self-centred to see it. Luckily for me, people that matter can see it, so your inane ramblings and incredible rage posts won;t get taken seriously, so they won't screw up the overview with your dumb ideas..

NightmareX wrote:
Oh, now when youare done with my topic again, will i see you in a new corp tomorrow Lol?
Certainly not. Just much like the earlier point in this thread when I left it for a bit, I see no point in wasting the CSM members time with you repeating yourself. The whole thread is already a waste of their time, and I'd rather keep your walls of text to a minimum.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
NightmareX
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#82 - 2014-08-03 20:53:43 UTC  |  Edited by: NightmareX
Lucas Kell wrote:
NightmareX wrote:
No, read what i wrote over in my quote. You are still wrong.
No, in fact, you are wrong. And you are too self-centred to see it. Luckily for me, people that matter can see it, so your inane ramblings and incredible rage posts won;t get taken seriously, so they won't screw up the overview with your dumb ideas..

NightmareX wrote:
Oh, now when youare done with my topic again, will i see you in a new corp tomorrow Lol?
Certainly not. Just much like the earlier point in this thread when I left it for a bit, I see no point in wasting the CSM members time with you repeating yourself. The whole thread is already a waste of their time, and I'd rather keep your walls of text to a minimum.

Nope, you are wrong, because my proposal fixes the issues with war targets in overview. It also fixes the same issues by manually setting the corps / alliances you get war dec'ed by to -10 to take advantage of the proposed fix that makes you see the war targets in the correct overview tab you have configured.

There is absolutely no problems with my proposal at all. It just makes it easier for peoples to be able to sort out their war targets only in a seperate overview tab if they want that. If they don't want to change on somethings on the overview, then they can't expect to see the war targets sorted out in a seperate overview tab either.

So to sum it up.

1. For war dec'ers, this will only fix the issues with sorting out war targets only in the right overview tab for those who want's it.

2. For those who gets war dec'ed, they can still manually adjust their standings towards the war dec'ers to -10 as you rarely comes over that someone gets war dec'ed more than 20 times at most every weeks. So it's super easy to modify standings to 20 corps / alliances every weeks for those who gets war dec'ed over adjusting standings to over 200 corps or alliances each weeks as it is now for those who sends out war decs.

3. Those who doesn't bother to change anything will still see their war targets on the overview exactly the same way as they do for them now in the default overview tab.

4. This change is for the most part meant for those who sends out war decs so they can more easily decide to put their war targets to -10 standing as it's a pain for alliances to manually adjust standings to over 200 corps / alliances that get's war dec'ed (like from us).

5. As most corps or alliances almost never gets war dec'ed from more than 20 corps / alliances as the most, my proposal will rule out the need for war dec'ers to struggle with the standings just to be able to sort out war targets correctly in the overview while it still will be easy peasy for those who are war dec'ed to manually adjust standings towars those they gets war dec'ed by.

Those who gets war dec'ed now have to adjust their standings anyways to be able to sort out war targets in a seperate overview anyways now. So it wont be any more hassle for them with my proposal. It will only take away one thing for the war dec'ers that makes it a better experience to war dec someone and to get a better way of sorting out war targets in the overview.

Profit???

Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:

1: Asteroid Madness

2: Clash of the Empires

3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#83 - 2014-08-03 21:01:24 UTC
NightmareX wrote:
It also fixes the same issues by manually setting the corps / alliances you get war dec'ed by to -10 to take advantage of the proposed fix that makes you see the war targets in the correct overview tab you have configured.
NightmareX wrote:
There is absolutely no problems with my proposal at all.
Those 2 quotes don't make sense together. How can there be "no problems" if you have to set things manually. Your whole complaint now is that you have to set things manually, so you are fine with other people having to set things manually, as long as it's not you. Selfish.

So to sum it up.

1. This is only a fix for Marmite
2. The existing workaround works for everyone else
3. You are too lazy to use the existing workaround
4. Your idea would create inconsistent behaviour and cause issues in several circumstances.
5. You could just have less wardecs instead.
6. The amount of effort for this temporary fix is probably on par with a fix for the real behaviour.
7. You are unable to take criticism on even a basic level, and so shouldn't be posting in this section of the forum.

So no. Bad idea.
Back later!

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
NightmareX
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#84 - 2014-08-03 21:05:41 UTC  |  Edited by: NightmareX
Lucas Kell wrote:
NightmareX wrote:
It also fixes the same issues by manually setting the corps / alliances you get war dec'ed by to -10 to take advantage of the proposed fix that makes you see the war targets in the correct overview tab you have configured.
NightmareX wrote:
There is absolutely no problems with my proposal at all.
Those 2 quotes don't make sense together. How can there be "no problems" if you have to set things manually. Your whole complaint now is that you have to set things manually, so you are fine with other people having to set things manually, as long as it's not you. Selfish.

So to sum it up.

1. This is only a fix for Marmite
2. The existing workaround works for everyone else
3. You are too lazy to use the existing workaround
4. Your idea would create inconsistent behaviour and cause issues in several circumstances.
5. You could just have less wardecs instead.
6. The amount of effort for this temporary fix is probably on par with a fix for the real behaviour.
7. You are unable to take criticism on even a basic level, and so shouldn't be posting in this section of the forum.

So no. Bad idea.
Back later!

Nope, as you compares those who gets war dec'ed who have to manually set standings towards like 15-20 corps / alliances as most to fix the issue anyways, it wont change anything for those who gets war dec'ed as they have to do the same thing anyways today. And because comparing those who gets war dec'ed by like 15-20 others at max against someone that sends out over 200 wars every weeks doesn't belongs anywhere.

For those who gets war dec'ed, nothing changes from how it is today. And for those who war decs, my proposal will only remove one issue where you have to put in -10 standings to 100-200+ corps / alliances you are war decing to be able to sort out the war targets in the overview.

In the end, only one bottleneck gets removed while everything else stays the same as today.

So you still don't understand the core issue here. That's pretty freaking insane considering i have been explaining every details to you on how this things works pages after pages.

You can't be genious.

Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:

1: Asteroid Madness

2: Clash of the Empires

3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#85 - 2014-08-04 00:35:52 UTC
Thread closed due to heavy off topic posting and attacks.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department