These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

post crius bawl thread
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Kuroi Aurgnet
Celestial Phoenix Industries
#1 - 2014-07-22 18:19:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Kuroi Aurgnet
Title speaks for itself. as a note to CCP- this is meant to be amusement for people who are patching and have nothing better to do, since your patches are always pretty large.


Post your post-crius tears. Cynicism and satire are allowed (and encouraged). Don't break forum rules, though, because I want this to last more than 10 minutes. I have nothing better to do than this right now.


my example:

WHEN I REPROCESS THINGS I AM NOT GETTING FULL YIELD. WHAT THE HECK CCP. MINERAL COMPRESSION AND MISSION LOOT AND STUFF. WAH

Just that hint of cynicism the world needs now and then.
Shizuken
Venerated Stars
#2 - 2014-07-22 18:26:04 UTC
In before the lock.

7. Post constructively.
Kuroi Aurgnet
Celestial Phoenix Industries
#3 - 2014-07-22 18:28:46 UTC
there's no such thing as a constructive post on GD. on any game. But yes, I'm fully aware its going to be locked. the point was to be sarcastic and flippant for amusement while waiting for the game to be patched. think of it as a forum game, we have tons of those already

Just that hint of cynicism the world needs now and then.
Nalelmir Ahashion
Industrial Management and Engineering
Mouth Trumpet Cavalry
#4 - 2014-07-22 18:33:58 UTC
Posting in stealth "Begging for tears" Thread.
Kuroi Aurgnet
Celestial Phoenix Industries
#5 - 2014-07-22 18:36:04 UTC
you guys have literally no sense of humor lol where are the fun, sarcastic people when one needs them. well ccp you might as well lock this now =P No one wants to have a laugh

Just that hint of cynicism the world needs now and then.
Hiply Rustic
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2014-07-22 18:37:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Hiply Rustic
Kuroi Aurgnet wrote:
the point was to be sarcastic and flippant for amusement


When does the amusement part of that plan get going?

Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the strong-willied need apply.
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2014-07-22 18:37:23 UTC
CCP I will have you know I am highly offended that you went and changed the requirements on Starbase Defense Management from Anchoring V to Anchoring IV. I know this was done specifically to spite me, as an individual, and I hereby demand reimbursement for those skill points, or you will be hearing from my lawyers.

These bait and switch tactics will not stand, CCP. THEY WILL NOT STAND, DO YOU HEAR ME!!!?!?!?!?!@#!@!#!?$@$!@<#!@#%R@#%!@!$!

oh crap, I htink I may have just stroked out...

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.
Kuroi Aurgnet
Celestial Phoenix Industries
#8 - 2014-07-22 18:38:10 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:
CCP I will have you know I am highly offended that you went and changed the requirements on Starbase Defense Management from Anchoring V to Anchoring IV. I know this was done specifically to spite me, as an individual, and I hereby demand reimbursement for those skill points, or you will be hearing from my lawyers.

These bait and switch tactics will not stand, CCP. THEY WILL NOT STAND, DO YOU HEAR ME!!!?!?!?!?!@#!@!#!?$@$!@<#!@#%R@#%!@!$!

oh crap, I htink I may have just stroked out...


actually that was perfect. thank you

Just that hint of cynicism the world needs now and then.
Hiply Rustic
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2014-07-22 18:39:56 UTC
Kuroi Aurgnet wrote:
De'Veldrin wrote:
CCP I will have you know I am highly offended that you went and changed the requirements on Starbase Defense Management from Anchoring V to Anchoring IV. I know this was done specifically to spite me, as an individual, and I hereby demand reimbursement for those skill points, or you will be hearing from my lawyers.

These bait and switch tactics will not stand, CCP. THEY WILL NOT STAND, DO YOU HEAR ME!!!?!?!?!?!@#!@!#!?$@$!@<#!@#%R@#%!@!$!

oh crap, I htink I may have just stroked out...


actually that was perfect. thank you


I think you missed the part where De'Veldrin was completely serious...

Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the strong-willied need apply.
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2014-07-22 18:40:50 UTC
On a totally unrelated topic, if I have schizophrenia, is that like having alts in real life? And if one of them logs in can I get banned for account sharing?

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.
Kuroi Aurgnet
Celestial Phoenix Industries
#11 - 2014-07-22 18:41:35 UTC
Hiply Rustic wrote:
Kuroi Aurgnet wrote:
De'Veldrin wrote:
CCP I will have you know I am highly offended that you went and changed the requirements on Starbase Defense Management from Anchoring V to Anchoring IV. I know this was done specifically to spite me, as an individual, and I hereby demand reimbursement for those skill points, or you will be hearing from my lawyers.

These bait and switch tactics will not stand, CCP. THEY WILL NOT STAND, DO YOU HEAR ME!!!?!?!?!?!@#!@!#!?$@$!@<#!@#%R@#%!@!$!

oh crap, I htink I may have just stroked out...


actually that was perfect. thank you


I think you missed the part where De'Veldrin was completely serious...

I think you miss the point where this thread was intentionally set up to be a farce

Just that hint of cynicism the world needs now and then.
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2014-07-22 18:42:14 UTC
Hiply Rustic wrote:
Kuroi Aurgnet wrote:
De'Veldrin wrote:
CCP I will have you know I am highly offended that you went and changed the requirements on Starbase Defense Management from Anchoring V to Anchoring IV. I know this was done specifically to spite me, as an individual, and I hereby demand reimbursement for those skill points, or you will be hearing from my lawyers.

These bait and switch tactics will not stand, CCP. THEY WILL NOT STAND, DO YOU HEAR ME!!!?!?!?!?!@#!@!#!?$@$!@<#!@#%R@#%!@!$!

oh crap, I htink I may have just stroked out...


actually that was perfect. thank you


I think you missed the part where De'Veldrin was completely serious...


Lol

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.
Kuroi Aurgnet
Celestial Phoenix Industries
#13 - 2014-07-22 18:44:47 UTC
y'all need (insert religious prophet here)

amarr legion!

Just that hint of cynicism the world needs now and then.
Hiply Rustic
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2014-07-22 18:44:50 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:
On a totally unrelated topic, if I have schizophrenia, is that like having alts in real life? And if one of them logs in can I get banned for account sharing?



That's brilliant, I'm stealing...err...appropriating...that at some point.

Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the strong-willied need apply.
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#15 - 2014-07-22 18:45:11 UTC
Relevance Level: 9001.







Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Kuroi Aurgnet
Celestial Phoenix Industries
#16 - 2014-07-22 18:50:46 UTC
this thread is actually turning out exactly like I hoped. thank you eve community- you work in mysterious ways

Just that hint of cynicism the world needs now and then.
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2014-07-22 18:56:15 UTC
Kuroi Aurgnet wrote:
this thread is actually turning out exactly like I hoped. thank you eve community- you work in mysterious ways

You're welcome unknown forum poster. Without you, this thread would never have been possible.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.
Kuroi Aurgnet
Celestial Phoenix Industries
#18 - 2014-07-22 18:58:57 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:

You're welcome unknown forum poster. Without you, this thread would never have been possible.


I go by many names..... but most just call me.... the loser *dramatic music plays*

Just that hint of cynicism the world needs now and then.
Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#19 - 2014-07-22 19:35:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Khergit Deserters
I'm here to cry on behalf of my alt, if needed. He spent about a year of work and 2/3rds of his SP toward becoming a T2 Inventor. Is he still OK, or do I need to cry?
Kuroi Aurgnet
Celestial Phoenix Industries
#20 - 2014-07-22 19:40:10 UTC
Khergit Deserters wrote:
I'm here to cry on behalf of my alt, if needed. He spent about a year of work and 2/3rds of his SP toward becoming a T2 Inventor. Is he still OK, or do I need to cry?

Yes. Cry like you've never cried before!

in all seriousness, it's not too bad. I mean, yeah, some of the things suck. But it's not going to end the game or anything. Some of the things are great even. Depends how you utilize them and what connections you have

Just that hint of cynicism the world needs now and then.
123Next page