Intergalactic Summit

I wouldn't hold my breath for that one.

Hmm, well I'm all about family. I have extensive one.

As for hedonistic practices, well my siblings did not make themselves, so for these event that lead to their birth I am grateful.

Anyway, I like you more when you had hair, Mr Chronoxi sir. Without dashing blonde locks you look much sterner. Is no good. Does not suit you as well.

You are very welcome for compliment, sir.

You like to drink tea? I prefer to drink a coffee, especially caramel synth-latte. Is my favorite. I have my assistant put in a little sugar,and insist on pouring in milk before the water because it makes it so much more creamy, ah.

Anyway. I think you go on wrong track with your fashion outlook. I give free advice for you, Mr Chronoxi. You, sir, strike me as man on mission. Not some person who relax, care-free and let world breeze past you like some wind over scalp. You have strong faith, you have firm beliefs, you see much in society which disgust you and you want to set it right and send message to everyone. You are messenger for your God. For this purpose you need to spend much time working closely on appearance as it is wrapper that you message come inside of, ah. Channel your faith, sir, don't just broadcast it in a message - be the message. I do not share your faith sir, in all respect, but I admire your passion.

Anyway.

I know thing or two of fashion, but far less about hedonistic practice. Although I experience such thing before and sometime was a lot of fun, other times no so much. Depend on other person really. But why is it so bad and sinful, is this act of intercourse a sacred thing? And if so then why it sacred and not a simple foot massage sacred, when both stem from physical pleasure. I even heard of people who enjoy foot rub so much that they even ... uhhmm, well ... mhm. What is it that separate sexual act from other form of non-sexual physical pleasure to make it such grievous sin, sir?

We all need a little refuge from the troubles of our worlds at times, like a cup of tea for instance.

An act of intercourse is considered one of the most intimate interaction between two person, as such it really should be reserved to the one that you value and love most. By practicing monogamy it deepens the connection between two person, and thus a stronger bond and better satisfaction. Foot massages are totally different, there are no intrusive actions unless the one performing the service are punching a hole through your feet. I am sure that, when I shake another's hand, I am not performing a sexual service to the person. If there's some kind of perverted sense of pleasure that can be derived from a hand shake, it is not my fault, and the other person should consider contacting medical/psychological professionals. These would be the explanation that I would give to those not of faith, there's more to it than what my explanation offers.

Also there are several types of physical pleasures. Sleeping causes relaxation of muscles (in most case), as such it can be said to be a physical pleasure as well.

Hmm, interesting, sir.

So for you interpretation of your faith the thing that make pleasure sinful is if person have multiple partners for pleasure, or some form of ... ufff.. how to say about this with age-filters on Galnet, ah? What I mean is you saying that one person need to be inside other person for it to be sinful thing?

So ... stay outside other person, and only do pleasure things with that one person, and is ok with your God?

Still leave many, many open ground, Mr Chronoxi, sir.



Mhm, I know and is ok. He make me curious so I talk with him, is nothing.

But thank you Kellie.

Hmm, when we talk of this you seem to change your angle and the 'conditions', for lack of better term, almost as often as I change my wardrobe, ah.

Love is a subjective, and arguable thing that very hard to define.

What of people who cannot conceive?

What of people who indulge in pleasure of the external, or oral nature?

Your interpretation leave very, very much open to exploitation and misunderstanding and leave me to believe you are not fully versed in the faith you claim to be. This compounded also by your points seeming to change often when you try to explain boundaries of 'sin' to me.

I tend more towards knowing about the latter rather than the former. To be quite honest, I'll admit that I am probably the last person anyone should go to for fashion advice! (Except maybe Diana Kim but I digress...)

The original author of this thread wanted advice on the *best* ship to convert into a mobile pleasure hub/brothel and I humbly offerred my experience and the wisdom of choosing an Amarr vessel. They stand out in so many ways and I offerred some good points above but there are more!

I forgot to add that Amarr ships come fully equipped with torture stations... how useful could that be on a cruise you may wonder??? Well those stations are designed elicit repentence. So for instance a crew member who failed to do his mandatory prayers or had even a hint of insubordination would be made to beg for Divine Forgiveness while their pitiful wails are broadcast throughout the ship. Ultimately begging to be reaped to heaven for the mercy that only death can bring, their blood is drained via a blood-sucking machine for use by the Death cult 'Blood Raiders'... I don't need to go into details...

Now with a little modification those torture chambers can be turned into a fetish theme park for guests who enjoy that sort of thing! Catering to all points of view could be a major tourist attraction! Those blood sucking machines with a little tinkering could be reversed and made into excellent Quafe dispensers. Not only could you offer self-abuse and Quafe drinking but the excellent audio quality of the internal ship broadcast system means that any kind of music could be played throughout the ship. From the somber to the serene. The classics to the modern!

Think outside the box folks! Amarr ships definitely make the best Pleasure Hubs!

Ah, and you see here this is problem.

I would dearly like to expand on example I give to form argument. But I am restricted by age-filter protocols on Galnet forums. I have young sentient such as my own sisters who see such things and I do not believe it appropriate that I elaborate further on the intimate acts that I reference above.

In any event, I'm sure my sister not mean offense when she mention Mr Naupli. I know your beliefs are different, and that is ok. But is from similar cultural background, he is simply very extremist. But with Mr Naupli, when he talk of his beliefs, he have very strong convictions and solid argument to put forward - an answer for almost every criticism, ah.

But when you talk of your convictions sir, well I do not feel the same strength. What you say is arguable, the points you make debatable, the boundaries you proclaim for sin very broad and loose, open to much interpretation. Now, when I take that, and combine it with concerns raised by my sister, then I have very genuine cause to believe there is something not right about you.

Nauplius is a heretic not an extremist, if I compare him to some blooders he is actually rather soft and definitely not an extremist. His words have strength because he speaks with the intent of imposing his perverted thoughts on you. I do not wish to impose anything on you yet, just trying to explain briefly what my stance is.

I do not believe I proclaimed anything, I am not a prophet nor an emperor. I state what I believe in.

As for the points I made, I believe that I had made it clear that I believe sexual intercourse that are done with no intent of reproducing = sin. Extramarital sexual intercourse = sin. Addiction to pleasure = sin. Feeling pleasure = not sin. Sexual pleasure for material compensations = sin.

Miss Dusette, I'm not disputing the importance of fashion I am merely making the simple statement of fact that it is not my forte. My home, my pod, my ship's computer does not demand too much of me in the way of fashion sense, so I have none. I am however, blessed and cursed with a strong sense of humour... I distract myself in ways that may offend others. Others can offend me by presuming that I hold their views...

Don't get me wrong either. I love the Amarr! They are so beset by paradoxes their belief system creates I find it both entertaining and disturbing. Usually though my sense of humour gets the better of me and I'll choose to be entertained by them... other times... less so...

A wh*re?? I would never presume to call anyone such a thing! What is that anyway?? Is it something like a "sin"? If so then it is nothing more than mere opinion and as such both concepts can be easily dismissed. In any case, I am Gallente and I don't judge. I'll add too that from my experience that particular term is most widely, nay almost exclusively used by the females of our specie... In quite a few spheres of life, men are far less judgmental than women... that one in particular.

You are absolutely correct about when you state that "Mr Chronoxi could learn a thing or two"... from you! I find the morally certain are usually the most close-minded and among the most dangerous members of humanity in the galaxy.

Heretic or not your views are refreshing and it has been a pleasure chatting with you.