These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer.

First post First post
Author
LtCol RTButts
Abandon AII Hope
#141 - 2014-07-28 21:57:41 UTC
2pt wrote:
LtCol RTButts wrote:
your comment and problems with different kind of ships doing differnet things shows me only that you [quote=LtCol RTButts]your comment and problems with different kind of ships doing differnet things shows me only that you have no clue about how to manage things. and you are right, your advantages with ISBoxer are very limited.

but anyways, time to create a legal bomb squad.



You failed to address any thing I wrote except an example of what happened to me when I thought multiboxing was as easy as you seem to thinki it is and then criticized my managerial skills.

My managerial skills are so bad that I can win a vanguard mission in lo or null with eight ships fitted for a VG incursion and a reserve fleet fitted for PVP standing off to warp in and run off or destroy any fleet which comes into the mission after I have started it. I always scan and never go in to contest a site, but will not be chased out of a site and never have been.

CCP seeks equality for accounts not people. Each of everyone's accounts can vote in CSM elections, gets a Christmas gift, can petition, can post likes on forums, costs a plex to play, got 5000 ISK and a crappy ship.

You continue to hold out the example of having a race between a single mult-boxer with multiple accounts and a single player without multi-boxer with multiple accounts. You are pitting player against player and not account against account. Your argument is as valid as complaining that your three accounts with rookie ships cannot win against three supers. Rookie ships are allowed, Supers are allowed and get your brain wrapped around this - multiboxers are allowed as long as they do not provide automation, stored key strokes and alll the other things that come along with bots,

Nothing happens with a ship in a multiboxed fleet untill a human presses a key or maneuvers a mouse. Bots operate from a script when the "player" is afk getting laid or on a waterski vacation in the Persian Gulf.

Pit a multi-boxer with ten accounts & ten ships against ten players with each having a single account and if all else is equal - training, equipment, etc, the two teams of ships will basically accomplish the same amount in the same amount of time - they are equal because the multiboxer will be pressing one key at about the same time as each of the individual players will be pressing the same key..

If you take a single ship on a single account from the non- boxer and from the boxer with the same assignment, such as mine five Veldspar asteroids in a full belt each account will perform nearly the same given they both have the same skills and ships and modules. The Boxer player using boxer commands will not have an advantage over the non boxer account as they will be pressing the same keys at about the same times. Add another player with single nonboxer account and another account belinging to the boxer and do the experiment again. The two teams will finish at about the same time. Keep doing that and at some point the boxer account will not be able to perform as quickly as the same number of single player accounts each on a different computer. Even if the boxer has multiple computers which are comparable to each of the single player computers, the boxer will eventually slow

The hair you are splitting is not a hair for which CCP has a concern for how well it is split.

It is time to stop using ISBoxer as the universal term for all multi-boxing software. It is like calling every computer an IBM


The OP called for a an uprising of the CSM against multiboxing, but what has happened is the sound of crickets and many supporting multi-boxing or ar at least not finding it in contravention with the EULA..



Are you familiar with the term luddite?

Oh wait, you are a crusader fighting for Eve to be played the way it oughta be played - according to you.

I've already given you cordial wishes for god luck and happiness in another post, which went unnoticed I guess, so that is taken care of. Oh look, Don Quixote, A Windmill!


okay, let us adress something.

your 10 vs 10 example.

ISBoxer fleet
- no command calls needed because you as FC will do them by yourself. zero time delay for aligning, locking, shooting, warping, whatever ...
- fire is always an alpha in the same server time frame. it is not delayed between the accounts so no chance to place a rep cycle for the enemy logistics, same for logistics + you can group all reppers onto a single button to get max reps in the same server time frame
- the rate of fire is ecaxtly the ROI of your guns = highest possible damage for the complete fleet

10 people fleet
- time delay because the FC has to tell 9 people the command and broadcast targets or alignment points. there is a time delay for every pilot of some seconds (server will add some time because of the server time frames)
- fire command is always delayed, somebody is pressing the button at zero, somebody else a second later, the third 1.1 second later and he ends up in the next server time frame equal to 2 seconds, fourth guy has a ****** ping because he lives L.A. and the FC has pressed the button at -1 seconds. fire is delayed over four seconds .... enough time for a lucky rep cycle.
- your ROI depends on the people and is delayed for the resons above.

your example looks really equal to both ?
but yeah, keep explaining me that such things are equal.

btw., you shouldn't be to sure with your interpretation with the EULA, CCP will never tell you that a third party software is fine with the EULA. if you don't belife me, just open a petition.


Calvin Recline
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#142 - 2014-07-28 23:32:14 UTC
Lothros Andastar wrote:
ian papabear wrote:
im one of those duders who re upped my alt so that i could use isboxer, why would ccp ban it expecially when it only encourages people to purchase more accounts

Bots also purchase more accounts.



No they actually don't. Bots use stolen credit cards and make fraudulent purchases costing ccp money. If you weren't a complete idiot and actually did your homework, you'd already know that.
Calvin Recline
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#143 - 2014-07-28 23:33:04 UTC
Skelee VI wrote:
CPP wont ban isboxer for simple reason that they don't give a hoot about the individual player scraping up funds to pay for one account. They like the guy who pays for 5 accounts to win eve! Isboxer is cheating because you are getting an advantage over someone who isn't running it. You can sugar coat it all you want and twist the words but one person controlling 5 or more accounts with one press of a button has an advantage.



If you have to 'scrape funds' together to play the game, then you had really best rethink your life priorities.
ashley Eoner
#144 - 2014-07-29 20:57:42 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
LtCol RTButts wrote:

okay, let us adress something.

your 10 vs 10 example.

ISBoxer fleet
- no command calls needed because you as FC will do them by yourself. zero time delay for aligning, locking, shooting, warping, whatever ...

In reality there's unexpected delays because individual clients lagged without you realizing it so part of your fleet warped off properly and the other part is in a different system now. or even better one or more of your clients bugged and stuck the overview to the mouse (happens a lot sometimes) throwing off your entire UI till you can log off all your clients restore settings from a backup and then log back in and resetup each client. Or while you were panic fighting you accidently clicked a little too far up so your overviews are completely out of synch resulting in part of your fleet shooting yourself. You wonder why you're suddenly taking so much damage... THe only way to avoid that is to use the in game tagging system while making all movements slow and precise which at that point you're slower then a normal fleet in delays.

Sometimes it can be a pain to just warp your fleet through highsec. The unreliable nature of CCP's UI and the unpredictability of system/isp lag can cause a lot of problems with repeaters.

Just once more in case you missed it. You CANNOT move quickly with an isboxer fleet. IF you do you WILL have issues as clients desynch. When you're playing only one account you can issue commands many many times faster without worry. Trying to do that with an isboxed fleet is suicide.

Quote:
- fire is always an alpha in the same server time frame. it is not delayed between the accounts so no chance to place a rep cycle for the enemy logistics, same for logistics + you can group all reppers onto a single button to get max reps in the same server time frame

- the rate of fire is ecaxtly the ROI of your guns = highest possible damage for the complete fleet

Unless of course you don't tag and your overview decides to be silly. EVen when you sort them properly clients will desynch. EVen in vanguards I find some of my ships shooting the wrong romi randomly. In an ideal situation yes you can do perfect alpha. SO can player fleets via the same method.

I have no idea what program you are using to put all your reps on one button. That sounds like an illegal macro program. Anyway the logistics comment is irrelevant as I have a nkey rollover keyboard that allows me to press as many buttons as I want at the same time. I can hit 7 reps at the same time without any program.


Quote:
10 people fleet
- time delay because the FC has to tell 9 people the command and broadcast targets or alignment points. there is a time delay for every pilot of some seconds (server will add some time because of the server time frames)
- fire command is always delayed, somebody is pressing the button at zero, somebody else a second later, the third 1.1 second later and he ends up in the next server time frame equal to 2 seconds, fourth guy has a ****** ping because he lives L.A. and the FC has pressed the button at -1 seconds. fire is delayed over four seconds .... enough time for a lucky rep cycle.
- your ROI depends on the people and is delayed for the resons above.


IF you have anything resembling a real time delay then your fc and fleet is BAD BAD BAD. TS/mumble/vent/jabber and more allow for almost instant communication. If you're using tags you're just as fast as an isboxer fleet with none of the risks.


Quote:
fire command is always delayed, somebody is pressing the button at zero, somebody else a second later, the third 1.1 second later and he ends up in the next server time frame equal to 2 seconds, fourth guy has a ****** ping because he lives L.A. and the FC has pressed the button at -1 seconds. fire is delayed over four seconds .... enough time for a lucky rep cycle
.

Fire command is just as delayed as with the isboxer setup above since shooting yourself is bad and stuff. THe rest of your complaint is irrelevant as you're assuming the isboxer player has a magical computer with no system lag with a magical connection next to ccp while you give the non isboxer fleet a bunch of handicaps.
Okogawa Shaishi
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#145 - 2014-07-30 09:56:36 UTC
I have to say I agree with ISboxer being advantage to one guy over many. Having an alt booster or two? Thats fine, yet even there people talk about on grid boosters. Having alts mean you have to alt+tab to other window or have more screens to use those alts. Having Isboxer is just too easy. This is multiplayer game, what is the point having massive multiplayer game where one guy can have 10+ characters with almost perfect sync and therefore for others the whole multiplayer effect is kinda deleted?


Its not that bad yet but imagine if there would be a corp (and it might happen sooner or later) where few people would isbox 20+ characters. You chould have 200 man PvP fleet with just 10 people running it. I don't know how about you, but I play games so I can PvP and I don't like the idea of being in a fleet with other people, all of them dedicating theirs free time to a game they love and yet they can get smashed by one guy simply because of a program.

We all understand that CCP likes money, they are a company after all. But I've played quiet a few MMOs and all MMOs with botting or multiboxing were by a lot of players I've met considered bad, not worth theirs time because there is no meaing to play against something when you stand almost no chance. When I started to play MMOs most people didn't have alts and than it was growing and growing, changing some games I've played by that a lot towards more farming and solo like games. Like I said, now there is not so many of them, but if it would grow isboxers will probably become a problem which won't help CCP attract new players at all it would most likely deter them from playing.

EvE is known for a wonderful and live universe with many possibilities, for big fights, for politics, economy etc. Let it be known for that in the future as well and not for one guy rolling over many with just few clicks.
Drachen Protectorate
TSOE Po1ice
TSOE Consortium
#146 - 2014-07-30 13:55:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Drachen Protectorate
Thanks forums for killing my responses.

Okogawa Shaishi wrote:
I have to say I agree with ISboxer being advantage to one guy over many. Having an alt booster or two? Thats fine, yet even there people talk about on grid boosters. Having alts mean you have to alt+tab to other window or have more screens to use those alts. Having Isboxer is just too easy. This is multiplayer game, what is the point having massive multiplayer game where one guy can have 10+ characters with almost perfect sync and therefore for others the whole multiplayer effect is kinda deleted?

Its not that bad yet but imagine if there would be a corp (and it might happen sooner or later) where few people would isbox 20+ characters. You chould have 200 man PvP fleet with just 10 people running it. I don't know how about you, but I play games so I can PvP and I don't like the idea of being in a fleet with other people, all of them dedicating theirs free time to a game they love and yet they can get smashed by one guy simply because of a program.

We all understand that CCP likes money, they are a company after all. But I've played quiet a few MMOs and all MMOs with botting or multiboxing were by a lot of players I've met considered bad, not worth theirs time because there is no meaing to play against something when you stand almost no chance. When I started to play MMOs most people didn't have alts and than it was growing and growing, changing some games I've played by that a lot towards more farming and solo like games. Like I said, now there is not so many of them, but if it would grow isboxers will probably become a problem which won't help CCP attract new players at all it would most likely deter them from playing.

EvE is known for a wonderful and live universe with many possibilities, for big fights, for politics, economy etc. Let it be known for that in the future as well and not for one guy rolling over many with just few clicks.


You agree because you're a dumbass.

Because you - like many others - assign multiboxers magical properties and lack of handicaps that are present for everyone.

According to you, a normal person is handicapped by lack of synchronization, lag, system unresponsivness, latency issues, random disconnects, random socket closures, client crashes and plain old miss-clicks.
Multiboxers using ISBoxer however are safe from all those things apparently and they win battles with a single click. Well, it's not that simple.

Have you tried ISBoxer with 26+ toons so you can rightfully claim it's "too easy" ? If you have tried and found it's not instant plex pinata, then you've already failed in your wrong assumption that ISBoxer is the magical wand that transforms your legion of accounts into an active and coherent contribution to the bad aspects of this game. - If you haven't, then you're talking out of your arse. See above.

The point of having a massive multiplayer game is so multiple people from all four winds can geet together and do fun things. Even us multiboxers like to get together, mine in super-massive fleets and do other stuff that people like you just don't understand. And our dedication and hard work is well rewarded. And we pay CCP the same as you do. One plex per account. It's not like we get chars with bazillion of SP and free of charge. We have to skill them up just like you do. Facing the same problems. Everything in EVE costs ISK and since there's just one toon actually providing the funds, guess what?

Why do you think it's going to be bad? There are whole Corporations and Alliances out there who are built out of JUST people who multibox toons. And there are fleets out there (not necessarily PVP, since multiboxing isn't as rewarding in PvP as it is in industry-mining-PI) consisting of 200+ characters with reality of only 10 people behind them. And why is that bad? Have you seen the size of the Universe EVE is based in? Have you even explored it towards its edges? Over 50% of so called "claimed space" is empty and devoid of life. Nobody forces you to hang around us who multibox. Go out there, make a glorious time for youself or your friends. Nobody is preventing you from carving out your own piece of destiny.

Saying you've played "quite a few MMOs" and saying you haven't encountered multiboxing is talking out of your anus. I've played multiple MMO's and wherever multiboxing was permitted, I've done it. So have others.
However, people who multibox (by using ISBoxer or not) don't dissuade new players from continuing to play. It's the under-dregs of society in EVE & lack of a helping hand on the side of EVE that does that quite well. Funny how multiboxers are blamed for deterring new players, but none of that blame is put at the feet of scammers, thieves, pirates, gankers and awoxers.

I have a feeling you're butt-hurt becuse you by yourself aren't willing to dedicate so much of your free time and money, to have a fun and better experience at this game. And that makes you angry.

Quit whining and learn to play?
Okogawa Shaishi
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#147 - 2014-07-30 18:26:51 UTC
Drachen Protectorate wrote:
Thanks forums for killing my responses.

Okogawa Shaishi wrote:
I have to say I agree with ISboxer being advantage to one guy over many. Having an alt booster or two? Thats fine, yet even there people talk about on grid boosters. Having alts mean you have to alt+tab to other window or have more screens to use those alts. Having Isboxer is just too easy. This is multiplayer game, what is the point having massive multiplayer game where one guy can have 10+ characters with almost perfect sync and therefore for others the whole multiplayer effect is kinda deleted?

Its not that bad yet but imagine if there would be a corp (and it might happen sooner or later) where few people would isbox 20+ characters. You chould have 200 man PvP fleet with just 10 people running it. I don't know how about you, but I play games so I can PvP and I don't like the idea of being in a fleet with other people, all of them dedicating theirs free time to a game they love and yet they can get smashed by one guy simply because of a program.

We all understand that CCP likes money, they are a company after all. But I've played quiet a few MMOs and all MMOs with botting or multiboxing were by a lot of players I've met considered bad, not worth theirs time because there is no meaing to play against something when you stand almost no chance. When I started to play MMOs most people didn't have alts and than it was growing and growing, changing some games I've played by that a lot towards more farming and solo like games. Like I said, now there is not so many of them, but if it would grow isboxers will probably become a problem which won't help CCP attract new players at all it would most likely deter them from playing.

EvE is known for a wonderful and live universe with many possibilities, for big fights, for politics, economy etc. Let it be known for that in the future as well and not for one guy rolling over many with just few clicks.


You agree because you're a dumbass.

Because you - like many others - assign multiboxers magical properties and lack of handicaps that are present for everyone.

According to you, a normal person is handicapped by lack of synchronization, lag, system unresponsivness, latency issues, random disconnects, random socket closures, client crashes and plain old miss-clicks.
Multiboxers using ISBoxer however are safe from all those things apparently and they win battles with a single click. Well, it's not that simple.

Have you tried ISBoxer with 26+ toons so you can rightfully claim it's "too easy" ? If you have tried and found it's not instant plex pinata, then you've already failed in your wrong assumption that ISBoxer is the magical wand that transforms your legion of accounts into an active and coherent contribution to the bad aspects of this game. - If you haven't, then you're talking out of your arse. See above.

The point of having a massive multiplayer game is so multiple people from all four winds can geet together and do fun things. Even us multiboxers like to get together, mine in super-massive fleets and do other stuff that people like you just don't understand. And our dedication and hard work is well rewarded. And we pay CCP the same as you do. One plex per account. It's not like we get chars with bazillion of SP and free of charge. We have to skill them up just like you do. Facing the same problems. Everything in EVE costs ISK and since there's just one toon actually providing the funds, guess what?

Why do you think it's going to be bad? There are whole Corporations and Alliances out there who are built out of JUST people who multibox toons. And there are fleets out there (not necessarily PVP, since multiboxing isn't as rewarding in PvP as it is in industry-mining-PI) consisting of 200+ characters with reality of only 10 people behind them. And why is that bad? Have you seen the size of the Universe EVE is based in? Have you even explored it towards its edges? Over 50% of so called "claimed space" is empty and devoid of life. Nobody forces you to hang around us who multibox. Go out there, make a glorious time for youself or your friends. Nobody is preventing you from carving out your own piece of destiny.

Saying you've played "quite a few MMOs" and saying you haven't encountered multiboxing is talking out of your anus. I've played multiple MMO's and wherever multiboxing was permitted, I've done it. So have others.
However, people who multibox (by using ISBoxer or not) don't dissuade new players from continuing to play. It's the under-dregs of society in EVE & lack of a helping hand on the side of EVE that does that quite well. Funny how multiboxers are blamed for deterring new players, but none of that blame is put at the feet of scammers, thieves, pirates, gankers and awoxers.

I have a feeling you're butt-hurt becuse you by yourself aren't willing to dedicate so much of your free time and money, to have a fun and better experience at this game. And that makes you angry.

Quit whining and learn to play?


I said I have encountered multiboxing, and mostly only people who think its ok is the people doing it.

Now thieves, pirates, scammers, gankers and awoxers are in real life as well. Yet they can't clone themselves to whatever numbers they want.

I think you seem to feel threaten by people who do not like what you are doing, your easier way of making isks, pvping etc. And I don't feel butt-hurt I'm simply stating my opinion. I've never liked too much multiboxing since I've seen it can make bad changes to the games I've played. I bet if I'd be using ISBox I'd be fine with ti and defending it as you do.

P.S. If by learning to play you mean use a program which can make me do the same as 10 or more other players, thats not learning how to play, thats learning how to "cheat" the multiplayer to play it solo. No thank you.
ashley Eoner
#148 - 2014-07-30 19:21:51 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
Okogawa Shaishi wrote:
I said I have encountered multiboxing, and mostly only people who think its ok is the people doing it.

Now thieves, pirates, scammers, gankers and awoxers are in real life as well. Yet they can't clone themselves to whatever numbers they want.

I think you seem to feel threaten by people who do not like what you are doing, your easier way of making isks, pvping etc. And I don't feel butt-hurt I'm simply stating my opinion. I've never liked too much multiboxing since I've seen it can make bad changes to the games I've played. I bet if I'd be using ISBox I'd be fine with ti and defending it as you do.

P.S. If by learning to play you mean use a program which can make me do the same as 10 or more other players, thats not learning how to play, thats learning how to "cheat" the multiplayer to play it solo. No thank you.

It's blatantly obvious that you and some people in this thread have never tried to use isboxer. You really should try it some day. I guarantee you'll find the reality of multiboxing to be nothing like the fantasy put forth by you and others like you. Hours/days/weeks/months are spent setting up UIs tweaking settings, overviews and control schemes. The frustration of realizing that a window stuck to the cursor on one of the clients despite everything being pinned. The joy of lag causing one or more of your cursors to be off target. The joy of sending half your fleet the wrong direction because you clicked a little too quickly. The realization that you HAVE to do everything much slower then normal so you don't end up killing yourself horribly. etcetcetc

If you want to have a real discussion about isboxer and other repeaters you first need to acknowledge the reality of their usage.


EDIT : BTW my first real MMO was trade wars and even in that game people had alts. Every single game I've played online has had alts... You're deluding yourself if you think that alts are a new thing or that they are a problem.

If you really think that alts are causing games to focus on farming then you really are new to the scene. Try playing UO or Lineage2 or any number of old school MMOs. Everquest was called Evercrack for a reason.. Those were REAL farming games and guess what.... Eve is from the same era.
Okogawa Shaishi
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#149 - 2014-07-30 20:46:45 UTC
ashley Eoner wrote:
Okogawa Shaishi wrote:
I said I have encountered multiboxing, and mostly only people who think its ok is the people doing it.

Now thieves, pirates, scammers, gankers and awoxers are in real life as well. Yet they can't clone themselves to whatever numbers they want.

I think you seem to feel threaten by people who do not like what you are doing, your easier way of making isks, pvping etc. And I don't feel butt-hurt I'm simply stating my opinion. I've never liked too much multiboxing since I've seen it can make bad changes to the games I've played. I bet if I'd be using ISBox I'd be fine with ti and defending it as you do.

P.S. If by learning to play you mean use a program which can make me do the same as 10 or more other players, thats not learning how to play, thats learning how to "cheat" the multiplayer to play it solo. No thank you.

It's blatantly obvious that you and some people in this thread have never tried to use isboxer. You really should try it some day. I guarantee you'll find the reality of multiboxing to be nothing like the fantasy put forth by you and others like you. Hours/days/weeks/months are spent setting up UIs tweaking settings, overviews and control schemes. The frustration of realizing that a window stuck to the cursor on one of the clients despite everything being pinned. The joy of lag causing one or more of your cursors to be off target. The joy of sending half your fleet the wrong direction because you clicked a little too quickly. The realization that you HAVE to do everything much slower then normal so you don't end up killing yourself horribly. etcetcetc

If you want to have a real discussion about isboxer and other repeaters you first need to acknowledge the reality of their usage.


EDIT : BTW my first real MMO was trade wars and even in that game people had alts. Every single game I've played online has had alts... You're deluding yourself if you think that alts are a new thing or that they are a problem.

If you really think that alts are causing games to focus on farming then you really are new to the scene. Try playing UO or Lineage2 or any number of old school MMOs. Everquest was called Evercrack for a reason.. Those were REAL farming games and guess what.... Eve is from the same era.


Guess what I played Lineage 2 and Ragnarok online without alts for a long time. I made them only because everyone had them and therefore I couldn't find any support characters to level with. And sure I had groups of people I played with but many of them were finding solo with alt better. I'm just not a fan of many alts and multiboxing, nothing can change my mind in this matter.

And no I won't try something I don't want others to use. :) Though I've seen plenty videos on it, have read some stuff and met couple isboxing fleets. And alts are not new thing today, but when I was playing back than only few people had them. Than it spread and I've noticed the changes.

And btw, if ISBoxer would be so bad to use and you would lose your fleet sending it wrong way why would people use it? Because it doesn't happen as often I guess as huge isk income or very unfair PvP. But I guess today PvP is Player vs Program.
ashley Eoner
#150 - 2014-07-30 21:08:17 UTC
Okogawa Shaishi wrote:
ashley Eoner wrote:
Okogawa Shaishi wrote:
I said I have encountered multiboxing, and mostly only people who think its ok is the people doing it.

Now thieves, pirates, scammers, gankers and awoxers are in real life as well. Yet they can't clone themselves to whatever numbers they want.

I think you seem to feel threaten by people who do not like what you are doing, your easier way of making isks, pvping etc. And I don't feel butt-hurt I'm simply stating my opinion. I've never liked too much multiboxing since I've seen it can make bad changes to the games I've played. I bet if I'd be using ISBox I'd be fine with ti and defending it as you do.

P.S. If by learning to play you mean use a program which can make me do the same as 10 or more other players, thats not learning how to play, thats learning how to "cheat" the multiplayer to play it solo. No thank you.

It's blatantly obvious that you and some people in this thread have never tried to use isboxer. You really should try it some day. I guarantee you'll find the reality of multiboxing to be nothing like the fantasy put forth by you and others like you. Hours/days/weeks/months are spent setting up UIs tweaking settings, overviews and control schemes. The frustration of realizing that a window stuck to the cursor on one of the clients despite everything being pinned. The joy of lag causing one or more of your cursors to be off target. The joy of sending half your fleet the wrong direction because you clicked a little too quickly. The realization that you HAVE to do everything much slower then normal so you don't end up killing yourself horribly. etcetcetc

If you want to have a real discussion about isboxer and other repeaters you first need to acknowledge the reality of their usage.


EDIT : BTW my first real MMO was trade wars and even in that game people had alts. Every single game I've played online has had alts... You're deluding yourself if you think that alts are a new thing or that they are a problem.

If you really think that alts are causing games to focus on farming then you really are new to the scene. Try playing UO or Lineage2 or any number of old school MMOs. Everquest was called Evercrack for a reason.. Those were REAL farming games and guess what.... Eve is from the same era.


Guess what I played Lineage 2 and Ragnarok online without alts for a long time. I made them only because everyone had them and therefore I couldn't find any support characters to level with. And sure I had groups of people I played with but many of them were finding solo with alt better. I'm just not a fan of many alts and multiboxing, nothing can change my mind in this matter.

And no I won't try something I don't want others to use. :) Though I've seen plenty videos on it, have read some stuff and met couple isboxing fleets. And alts are not new thing today, but when I was playing back than only few people had them. Than it spread and I've noticed the changes.

And btw, if ISBoxer would be so bad to use and you would lose your fleet sending it wrong way why would people use it? Because it doesn't happen as often I guess as huge isk income or very unfair PvP. But I guess today PvP is Player vs Program.
Leveling in lineage 2 without a buffbot was stupid. Fortunately there were plenty of prophets and such who were willing to sell their buffs in leveling areas. RO on the other hand was easily playable with no alts but yet many MANY were made. In RO the support characters were stupid hard to level solo (same for lineage 2 in those days) so unless you have friends or a good guild you wouldn't run into many leveling solo. Hell my guild on chaos had guild support characters that trusted members of the guild could log in on at any time (usually hocus mage/bard/dancer/etc).

I knew people with +10 accounts in the first years of eve. Just because you didn't notice them and/or didn't know what to look for back then doesn't mean they weren't there.

I watched videos and read many a website on brain surgery. Does that mean I can operate on you now? Watching and reading is one thing but actually doing is a whole other experience.

Isboxer has MANY downsides but generally I can work around them well enough to keep my stuff alive. Then again I can almost play my fleet without the usage of a repeater. The upsides are strong though such as superior client resource management and such.

As for pvp an isboxer fleet is at a disadvantage in almost every situation as long as the non isboxer fleet isn't being absolutely stupid.

As for "unfair pvp" well that's the goal of almost every single pvper out there. People don't really want a fair fight. They want the illusion of a fair fight that they win. SOme people are even honest enough to admit that they don't even want the illusion they straight up fight only when it's fair to them. You're never going to get rid of unfair pvp and blaming boxers for that is silly.



LtCol RTButts
Abandon AII Hope
#151 - 2014-07-31 17:48:15 UTC
ashley Eoner wrote:

Fire command is just as delayed as with the isboxer setup above since shooting yourself is bad and stuff. THe rest of your complaint is irrelevant as you're assuming the isboxer player has a magical computer with no system lag with a magical connection next to ccp while you give the non isboxer fleet a bunch of handicaps.


keep ignoring how a server works, you really don't understand what i am talking about or you just ignoring it.
but, you start complaining about "problems with the thrid party software" .... yeah, you don't even understand how the internet works and lag from different clients spread out in the world. but yeah, unimportant for you because you are only one client with one IP. you keep ignoring that exactly this is your main advantage for the perfect alpha.

i know how ISBoxer works and when i read all your replys i really know that you have no clue how to use it propper. for you it is just a nice window management application, nothing more, nothing less.
Iain Cariaba
#152 - 2014-07-31 19:10:50 UTC
Wow, apparently the anti-ISBoxers are just as bad as the nerf-ganking group. All I've read from this thread is this:

Anti-ISBoxer: whaaa, unfair, whine, advantage, whimper, ban, cry, make people play the way I want them to
The 'let people play how they want' group: Here's how you're wrong.
Anti-ISBoxer: whaaa, unfair, whine, advantage, whimper, ban, cry, make people play the way I want them to
The 'let people play how they want' group: Here's how you're wrong.
Anti-ISBoxer: whaaa, unfair, whine, advantage, whimper, ban, cry, make people play the way I want them to

Nope, no more. I rage quit this thread.
You can haz all my posts for this thread.
Lol
Drachen Protectorate
TSOE Po1ice
TSOE Consortium
#153 - 2014-08-01 15:28:26 UTC
Quote:
I'm just not a fan of many alts and multiboxing, nothing can change my mind in this matter.


You're not a fan of alts or multiboxing, but you are pressing for the matter to have ISboxer banned outright. Hmm.. seems to be you're not just "not a fan" but outright hate the thing with a vengeance.

Quote:
And no I won't try something I don't want others to use. :) Though I've seen plenty videos on it, have read some stuff and met couple isboxing fleets. And alts are not new thing today, but when I was playing back than only few people had them. Than it spread and I've noticed the changes.


If you won't try it out yourself, it means you're talking out of your ass. Talking about stuff you've only seen or heard about and at that, you've only seen people who successfully do stuff. You don't see videos of people who failed miserably at using it, just like there aren't many PvP videos of people losing battles. Same will killboards. There's a ton of kills missing so certain corporations killboards would look positive.

Quote:
And btw, if ISBoxer would be so bad to use and you would lose your fleet sending it wrong way why would people use it? Because it doesn't happen as often I guess as huge isk income or very unfair PvP. But I guess today PvP is Player vs Program.


ISBoxer looks simple, but it's not. You need to take a good lot of time to set everything up. That's the basic thing that is also pointed out in the readme. Set it up first. It's not like Windows Explorer, install and it works. Hell no. You need to set it up. Try it. Tweak it for different toons, etc etc. And like I told you in the quotation above, nobody shows the videos of how they failed with ISboxer. Nor are people willing to admit they spent 3 real time days to set EVERYTHING up properly, so it's just net profit from now on.
Okogawa Shaishi
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#154 - 2014-08-01 17:15:10 UTC
Quote:
You're not a fan of alts or multiboxing, but you are pressing for the matter to have ISboxer banned outright. Hmm.. seems to be you're not just "not a fan" but outright hate the thing with a vengeance.


ISBoxer ain't really just an simple alt is it.

Quote:
If you won't try it out yourself, it means you're talking out of your ass. Talking about stuff you've only seen or heard about and at that, you've only seen people who successfully do stuff. You don't see videos of people who failed miserably at using it, just like there aren't many PvP videos of people losing battles. Same will killboards. There's a ton of kills missing so certain corporations killboards would look positive.


Quote:
ISBoxer looks simple, but it's not. You need to take a good lot of time to set everything up. That's the basic thing that is also pointed out in the readme. Set it up first. It's not like Windows Explorer, install and it works. Hell no. You need to set it up. Try it. Tweak it for different toons, etc etc. And like I told you in the quotation above, nobody shows the videos of how they failed with ISboxer. Nor are people willing to admit they spent 3 real time days to set EVERYTHING up properly, so it's just net profit from now on.


Yea sure defenders of ISBoxer say how hard it is to set up. I guess people get that program for losing isks, right? Oh wait, thats not true they get it cause they can get tons of isks by its help or blob someone solo. So for 3 days you have a bit rough time with it but than you can easily do anything solo. Why playing multiplayer game anyway? Just find yourself some nice sci-fi strategy.

Crying how bad is the ISBoxer when everyone knows for little trouble it gives you a huge advantage. Just wow. Why not make ok trade bots for example? I'm too lazy to trade properly so I'd like one. You also need to set it up so I guess it would be ok, right?
ashley Eoner
#155 - 2014-08-01 20:16:57 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
Okogawa Shaishi wrote:
Quote:
You're not a fan of alts or multiboxing, but you are pressing for the matter to have ISboxer banned outright. Hmm.. seems to be you're not just "not a fan" but outright hate the thing with a vengeance.


ISBoxer ain't really just an simple alt is it.

Quote:
If you won't try it out yourself, it means you're talking out of your ass. Talking about stuff you've only seen or heard about and at that, you've only seen people who successfully do stuff. You don't see videos of people who failed miserably at using it, just like there aren't many PvP videos of people losing battles. Same will killboards. There's a ton of kills missing so certain corporations killboards would look positive.


Quote:
ISBoxer looks simple, but it's not. You need to take a good lot of time to set everything up. That's the basic thing that is also pointed out in the readme. Set it up first. It's not like Windows Explorer, install and it works. Hell no. You need to set it up. Try it. Tweak it for different toons, etc etc. And like I told you in the quotation above, nobody shows the videos of how they failed with ISboxer. Nor are people willing to admit they spent 3 real time days to set EVERYTHING up properly, so it's just net profit from now on.


Yea sure defenders of ISBoxer say how hard it is to set up. I guess people get that program for losing isks, right? Oh wait, thats not true they get it cause they can get tons of isks by its help or blob someone solo. So for 3 days you have a bit rough time with it but than you can easily do anything solo. Why playing multiplayer game anyway? Just find yourself some nice sci-fi strategy.

Crying how bad is the ISBoxer when everyone knows for little trouble it gives you a huge advantage. Just wow. Why not make ok trade bots for example? I'm too lazy to trade properly so I'd like one. You also need to set it up so I guess it would be ok, right?

3days till forever. I'm still tweaking my setup and I've had it for years. I also still have to deal with every single thing I stated above. If I can go a day without having to restore from backups then it's been a good day.

I can get tons of isk a lot easier without isboxer. I actually isbox for the challenge. The isk I make in the process is enough to cover losses (which happen frequently) with a tidy profit left over. You can ban isboxer and I'd still multibox. People would still get blobbed soloed. Eve isn't about fairness and almost no one REALLY looks for a fair pvp fight. Like I said earlier some look for "fair" fights but what they want is the illusion of fairness not an actual fair fight.

BOT that's where you should of stopped with your inane trade bot comment.




I'll be back for the silly post by LtCol RTButts later. It always cracks me up when someone claims they are the sole expert on computer systems and networks. Bonus points for claiming to be an expert with a program and activity that he clearly has no real experience with.
dark heartt
#156 - 2014-08-02 02:41:58 UTC
Oh god I go away for a year, and this is still an issue?
ashley Eoner
#157 - 2014-08-02 20:10:20 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
LtCol RTButts wrote:
ashley Eoner wrote:

Fire command is just as delayed as with the isboxer setup above since shooting yourself is bad and stuff. THe rest of your complaint is irrelevant as you're assuming the isboxer player has a magical computer with no system lag with a magical connection next to ccp while you give the non isboxer fleet a bunch of handicaps.


keep ignoring how a server works, you really don't understand what i am talking about or you just ignoring it.
but, you start complaining about "problems with the thrid party software" .... yeah, you don't even understand how the internet works and lag from different clients spread out in the world. but yeah, unimportant for you because you are only one client with one IP. you keep ignoring that exactly this is your main advantage for the perfect alpha.

i know how ISBoxer works and when i read all your replys i really know that you have no clue how to use it propper. for you it is just a nice window management application, nothing more, nothing less.
I'm complaining about the eve client and the servers. Unless somehow it's been decided that the eve client is a third party program. If anyone is ignoring how servers, systems and the internet works it's you. It's blatantly obvious you've never tried to use isboxer to manage a fleet. Also you have either never used more then one client at the same time or you're just pretending everything was perfect. I'm going to assume you're not a willful liar trying to make a point through deception. As such I'll attempt to help you see what really happens when you multibox.

You know how when you're running one eve client that sometimes the game will freeze for anywhere from a microsecond to many seconds? Don't try to claim that eve never lags on you. I've seen top end I7 systems with solid SSD setups exhibit the system lag/freeze (albeit very briefly). This momentary lag is even more likely when you're in a fleet combat situation. Since many times more assets are required to load when fleets are fighting. Now take that times however many clients you're running. When you're running a fleet overall system responsiveness decreases greatly compared to a single client. So it's extremely easy for the mouse cursor to lag just enough on one or more clients to cause the wrong target to be selected or for the wrong warp off destination to be selected etc. Since you're forced into using the overview for target selection even a slight lag can result in you shooting yourself. Then there's the whole issue of having to wait on the slowest client in your weapons/ewar/etc setup before you can fire again. Even with a boss system you will experience varying levels of system AND internet/server lag on each client. THAT is why you're forced into making slow deliberate movements of the mouse and why you're required to delay clicking up to several seconds. Compared to a single client you're moving MUCCCH slower and clicking a LOT slower as a multiboxer.

Speaking of a problem that afflicts us all (server/internet lag). I can't tell you the number of times I've had partial socket resets on my fleets. Anywhere from one to the majority of clients can just socket reset for no apparent reason. The pings between CCP and I can look absolutely beautiful and yet a client or more will d/c out of 10 clients. Hell I've had two clients running on a beautiful day and one client will just be sloppy when it comes to responding. These issues hit multiboxed fleets harder because we're just one person trying to get however many clients to agree on doing the same thing. THe more complex your isbox setup the more vulnerable you are to crashes and such.

I follow the KISS rule in life when it comes to many things including computers. I keep my isbox setup simple because going complex just leaves me more vulnerable to various things. Granted my complex setup does run sites a bit smoother assuming everything is going well. Once something minor goes wrong though that complex setup can be difficult to recover with. Being an oldschool multiboxer I'm very skilled in the handling of multiple clients with none of the fancy stuff anyway.
strong96
Perkone
Caldari State
#158 - 2014-08-04 02:06:40 UTC
My Opinion.

I don't worry about what or how others want to play their game.
It is a game right?

If they spend more time and money, then they have more. Isn't that life too?
All the power to them. And I move on with my game. It's just that simple.

If I'm not having fun playing a game. Whats the point. Big smile
Drachen Protectorate
TSOE Po1ice
TSOE Consortium
#159 - 2014-08-04 07:40:06 UTC
Exactly.

But there's people complaining what all ruins the game in THEIR perspective, as everyone "should be on equal footing".

If you want everyone on equal footing, go complain how the t2 bpo's are no longer obtainable and how people who have them are making a fortune with little to no effort.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#160 - 2014-08-04 10:19:32 UTC
I love that this argument is still going on.
Listen up guys: ISBoxer is here to stay. Even if the CSM championed this idea, there's no way in hell CCP are going to go forward with a ban of ISBoxer. Aside from the enormous amount of effort it would be to tell if people are using it, the loss of accounts that would result from the banning of ISBoxer would be staggering. We're talking thousands of accounts here, not a handful of disgruntled players.

If CCP wanted to ban ISBoxer they would have had to do it right at the beginning. As they haven't, and people have built whole ISBoxer armies, it would be too devastating to CCPs income to go back and remove it now.

At the end of the day you just have to live with the fact that it exists, accept that it affects most players pretty much to the sum of zero, and move on.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.