These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ganking miners - What do you get from it?

First post
Author
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#241 - 2014-06-22 17:17:08 UTC
Matilda Cecilia Fock wrote:
To the point, some people just want to mine. It's not for everyone but it's why they pay money to CCP. And maybe CCP is right to tell them "PvP like the 20% or quit! Your way is not allowed in our precious game!" But then they should be a bit more frank about it and don't allow it to happen. Remove asteroids and mining altogether. Why the heck, remove PvE too! Don't let anyone think he can just PvE in EVE Online.

the idea is, in short, 'have npcs do the work of players, better than players could do themselves, so i don't have to put effort into it'

and, uh, i don't even know what the quoted paragraph is. who said anything about removing mining? as far as i know, noone, until you did. ccp didn't tell people to pvp or quit, either.
Myles Wong
The One's Who Matter
#242 - 2014-06-22 17:25:16 UTC
I've played off and on since 2009. This last time was the first time I had been ganked while mining. I'm not a pvp player so I didn't understand what had happened and why. So I googled CODE and found my answer. If you actually read what it is they do, It can help you defend yourself from their sillyness. They do bring a liveliness to an otherwise boring profession. Now I use d-scan which I had never done, I tank my miners and use drones. This wasn't how I played before, but I could've been ganked by anyone. It just happened to be one of the best organized groups of people I've seen in an MMO. I don't like what they do but it is a part of the game. I have very unsuccessfully tried 'white knighting' against them, but that in and of itself is a very large challenge. Several code supporters insist everyone play the way they think it sould be done. That is an option. Don't like it or them, do something about it. Don't be a part of the problem. Try being a part of the solution.Ugh
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#243 - 2014-06-22 17:29:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Myles Wong wrote:
I've played off and on since 2009. This last time was the first time I had been ganked while mining. I'm not a pvp player so I didn't understand what had happened and why. So I googled CODE and found my answer. If you actually read what it is they do, It can help you defend yourself from their sillyness. They do bring a liveliness to an otherwise boring profession. Now I use d-scan which I had never done, I tank my miners and use drones. This wasn't how I played before, but I could've been ganked by anyone. It just happened to be one of the best organized groups of people I've seen in an MMO. I don't like what they do but it is a part of the game. I have very unsuccessfully tried 'white knighting' against them, but that in and of itself is a very large challenge. Several code supporters insist everyone play the way they think it sould be done. That is an option. Don't like it or them, do something about it. Don't be a part of the problem. Try being a part of the solution.Ugh

This is a post that I can support wholeheartedly, this man has learnt from his experience, applied the lesson to his gameplay and is actually playing the game Big smile

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#244 - 2014-06-22 17:29:49 UTC
Myles Wong wrote:
I've played off and on since 2009. This last time was the first time I had been ganked while mining. I'm not a pvp player so I didn't understand what had happened and why. So I googled CODE and found my answer. If you actually read what it is they do, It can help you defend yourself from their sillyness. They do bring a liveliness to an otherwise boring profession. Now I use d-scan which I had never done, I tank my miners and use drones. This wasn't how I played before, but I could've been ganked by anyone. It just happened to be one of the best organized groups of people I've seen in an MMO. I don't like what they do but it is a part of the game. I have very unsuccessfully tried 'white knighting' against them, but that in and of itself is a very large challenge. Several code supporters insist everyone play the way they think it sould be done. That is an option. Don't like it or them, do something about it. Don't be a part of the problem. Try being a part of the solution.Ugh

i like you.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#245 - 2014-06-22 17:32:49 UTC
malcovas Henderson wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
malcovas Henderson wrote:
I am not asking for change in EVE. I have nothing against gankers. I'm just saying some of their arguments are wrong. simple as
How is advising people to actually tank their ships wrong? It's not a 100% effective way of not exploding, nothing is short of never undocking, but it's most definitely a very effective method of minimising the risk of doing so.

quoted you but for all above.

Tanking is a good idea, Not being AFK is a good idea. Yes it lessens the chances of being ganked, but does not stop you from being ganked.


Go find us a supertanked DST that was ganked.

Also freighters can get almost 1 million ehp now, good luck ganking that for a profit.
Matilda Cecilia Fock
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#246 - 2014-06-22 17:49:26 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
Matilda Cecilia Fock wrote:
To the point, some people just want to mine. It's not for everyone but it's why they pay money to CCP. And maybe CCP is right to tell them "PvP like the 20% or quit! Your way is not allowed in our precious game!" But then they should be a bit more frank about it and don't allow it to happen. Remove asteroids and mining altogether. Why the heck, remove PvE too! Don't let anyone think he can just PvE in EVE Online.

the idea is, in short, 'have npcs do the work of players, better than players could do themselves, so i don't have to put effort into it'

and, uh, i don't even know what the quoted paragraph is. who said anything about removing mining? as far as i know, noone, until you did. ccp didn't tell people to pvp or quit, either.


Well, I don't say that it should be effortless. It should cost at least as much as ganking, ISK per ISK.

So let's say that you spend (bravely) 12 million ISK wort hof PvP ships to destroy my 250 million worth of PvE ship.

Make me spend (cowardly) 12 million ISK to destroy 250 million worth of your PvP ships.

How is that NOT balanced?

Oh, I guess: you're brave whereas I am a coward. Make me pay twice, then. I shall pay 24 million ISK, to destroy 125 million worth of your ships. Is that balanced enough?

No, it isn't. All in all, I am doign PvE, I am earning money faster than you!

But then... well... maybe you should not PvP me? There are many ways to enjoy PvP against less costly targets. RvB, FAI.

Or maybe just let it be like is now. You can spend peanuts to destroy hundreds of millions and I can't do anythign but do the same as you and **** other miners, or hand out billions to other players for nothing as they can't protect me and you can just stay docked if they happen to be a credible threat.

Very well balanced if you're in it for the PvP. Not so well balanced for anything else.P

Q: Should we be worried? A: Nope. (...) Worry a lot if Fozzie, Masterplan, Rise, Veritas, Bettik, Ytterbium, Scarpia, Arrow, or even Greyscale leaves. Worry a little if Punkturis, karkur, SoniClover, Affinity, Goliath, or Xhagen leaves.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#247 - 2014-06-22 17:57:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Matilda Cecilia Fock wrote:
Well, I don't say that it should be effortless. It should cost at least as much as ganking, ISK per ISK.

So let's say that you spend (bravely) 12 million ISK wort hof PvP ships to destroy my 250 million worth of PvE ship.

Make me spend (cowardly) 12 million ISK to destroy 250 million worth of your PvP ships.

How is that NOT balanced?

Oh, I guess: you're brave whereas I am a coward. Make me pay twice, then. I shall pay 24 million ISK, to destroy 125 million worth of your ships. Is that balanced enough?

No, it isn't. All in all, I am doign PvE, I am earning money faster than you!

But then... well... maybe you should not PvP me? There are many ways to enjoy PvP against less costly targets. RvB, FAI.

Or maybe just let it be like is now. You can spend peanuts to destroy hundreds of millions and I can't do anythign but do the same as you and **** other miners, or hand out billions to other players for nothing as they can't protect me and you can just stay docked if they happen to be a credible threat.

Very well balanced if you're in it for the PvP. Not so well balanced for anything else.P
There is so much wrong with this post that I don't even know where to start.

I'll let others deal with it, because, quite frankly, your post is so terrible I can't be bothered to actually dissect it.

It would be a waste of my time to do so :popcorn:

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#248 - 2014-06-22 18:05:32 UTC
Matilda Cecilia Fock wrote:

So let's say that you spend (bravely) 12 million ISK wort hof PvP ships to destroy my 250 million worth of PvE ship.

Make me spend (cowardly) 12 million ISK to destroy 250 million worth of your PvP ships.

How is that NOT balanced?

both earned the isk. one expends effort to use it.

Quote:
Oh, I guess: you're brave whereas I am a coward. Make me pay twice, then. I shall pay 24 million ISK, to destroy 125 million worth of your ships. Is that balanced enough?


you're still not doing anything to earn the destruction of another player's ship.

Quote:
No, it isn't. All in all, I am doign PvE, I am earning money faster than you!


not if you're mining you're not, poor.

Quote:
But then... well... maybe you should not PvP me? There are many ways to enjoy PvP against less costly targets. RvB, FAI.


you're not a costly target since you don't do anything to defend yourself.

Quote:
Or maybe just let it be like is now. You can spend peanuts to destroy hundreds of millions and I can't do anythign but do the same as you and **** other miners, or hand out billions to other players for nothing as they can't protect me and you can just stay docked if they happen to be a credible threat.

Very well balanced if you're in it for the PvP. Not so well balanced for anything else.P

you can do a lot of things already, you just choose not to for some reason. that's no cause to let you destroy other players' ships without expending the isk and effort required to do so.

if you don't like the game EVE Online, i can recommend some games you might be more comfortable with. i've heard of one based on a popular series of fantasy realtime strategy games.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#249 - 2014-06-22 18:09:08 UTC
Matilda Cecilia Fock wrote:

Well, I don't say that it should be effortless. It should cost at least as much as ganking, ISK per ISK.


Isk does not equate to effort.


Quote:

So let's say that you spend (bravely) 12 million ISK wort hof PvP ships to destroy my 250 million worth of PvE ship.

Make me spend (cowardly) 12 million ISK to destroy 250 million worth of your PvP ships.

How is that NOT balanced?


Because you aren't actually going out and doing it yourself. You're suggesting NPCs should do it for you.

Why can't you just do it yourself? I mean, you've railed about how ganking has such a low barrier to entry and is so cheap, why not just go kill the guy?

Oh, that's right, I forgot. Because if you stopped mining it would hurt your isk/hr. Roll


Quote:
But then... well... maybe you should not PvP me? There are many ways to enjoy PvP against less costly targets. RvB, FAI.


Never once has "maybe I should try putting some effort into defending myself" crossed your mind, has it?

Quote:

Or maybe just let it be like is now. You can spend peanuts to destroy hundreds of millions and I can't do anythign but do the same as you and **** other miners, or hand out billions to other players for nothing as they can't protect me and you can just stay docked if they happen to be a credible threat.

Very well balanced if you're in it for the PvP. Not so well balanced for anything else.P


You're doing it wrong if any of those things are true.

For instance, it costs about three times as much isk to kill a Skiff as the Skiff itself costs.

So why don't you just fly one of those if this is such a big problem for you? Oh, wait, I forgot. It would impact your isk/hr. Roll

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#250 - 2014-06-22 18:11:15 UTC
The real problem I'm seeing here is, the carebears still think it's all about their 'entitlement' to the isk they've made or spent. It's easy to forget the first unwritten rule of EVE, but let me summarise it for you: don't undock what you're not prepared to lose. You aren't entitled to anything that you can't defend. If someone wants to take something of yours, they will try, and if you aren't able to defend it, they will succeed.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#251 - 2014-06-22 18:12:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Benny Ohu
one more thing:

Matilda Cecilia Fock wrote:
Or maybe just let it be like is now. You can spend peanuts to destroy hundreds of millions and I can't do anythign but do the same as you and **** other miners, or hand out billions to other players for nothing as they can't protect me and you can just stay docked if they happen to be a credible threat.


yes. you can hire other players if you want. yes, what they can do to help is limited if you're untanked and afk. and if they make gankers stay docked, then mission success, you can mine safely.

perhaps that should be "safely" in non-quote quotemarks, since you're still untanked and afk
Baneken
Arctic Light Inc.
Arctic Light
#252 - 2014-06-22 18:31:32 UTC
What do I get from ganking miners ?
Thrill of the chase for one, assuming they are at the keyboard and if not well I just made WH living a tad more dangerous for them and they were rewarded with a pod express back home for their lapse in security. Pirate
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#253 - 2014-06-22 18:32:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Benny Ohu wrote:
perhaps that should be "safely" in non-quote quotemarks, since you're still untanked and afk
But her ship cost more than yours did, of course she should be safe from the predations of people in cheaper ships Roll

*Dear NSA this is sarcasm, I hope it didn't break your sarcasm detector.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#254 - 2014-06-22 18:35:44 UTC
Matilda Cecilia Fock wrote:
Well, I don't say that it should be effortless. It should cost at least as much as ganking, ISK per ISK.
Avoiding ganks is easy, and free.

If highsec pilots were a tiny bit competent, ganks would be impossible with current mechanics.

Behold the balance right there.

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Chewytowel Haklar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#255 - 2014-06-22 18:53:21 UTC
Someone has to put the resources on the market, so if they want to so you can buy it from them and do as you please with those resources then why bother killing them? The more miners you kill the less mining that is carried out.

But I do completely understand the frustration of hunting down actual players and failing to kill them because they are vastly better skilled then you in pvp. That fact alone makes me personally want to pick an easy target just to satiate my desire for a kill. At least at the moment that is how I feel.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#256 - 2014-06-22 19:07:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Chewytowel Haklar wrote:
Someone has to put the resources on the market, so if they want to so you can buy it from them and do as you please with those resources then why bother killing them? The more miners you kill the less mining that is carried out.
Conversely miners that are disengaged from the game tend to sell their minerals to the best buy order, because they want instant ISK (gratification), thus driving down the income of miners in general. The more miners that die, the more the ore and ice that I refine and stockpile is worth.

That may seem a little mercenary, but that's the nature of the game we're playing.

Quote:
But I do completely understand the frustration of hunting down actual players and failing to kill them because they are vastly better skilled then you in pvp. That fact alone makes me personally want to pick an easy target just to satiate my desire for a kill. At least at the moment that is how I feel.
The easy solution is not to be an easy target, dissuade the gankers from ganking you by being a damn sight harder to kill than the other guy.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Mag's
Azn Empire
#257 - 2014-06-22 19:17:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
[sarcasm] Competition in a PvP centric game is over rated and should be stopped or curbed.[/sarcasm]

Edit: Damn it, steam is slow tonight. Evil

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#258 - 2014-06-22 19:36:58 UTC
At the end of the day, its legal

You dont get banned for ganking people

Therefore, working as intended

If you dont like it, write CCP a letter about how little you think if their rules in their game

Im sure they will give it the consideration its due

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Matilda Cecilia Fock
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#259 - 2014-06-22 19:41:35 UTC
(Funny note: my main flies a Skiff since I found out that no amount of Orca bonus would allow it to earn a PLEX with a Mackinaw... so I stopped taking chances and traded ISK for safety. Dunno how the new Skiff will perform, though).

With that point settled, let's get back to the core of the issue as I see it.

PvE itself is not a viable way to play the game, and that hurts CCP's subscriptions, but also is the result of design choices which render certain player choices wrong for no gain.

Nobody wins when a miner is forced to play wrong (being inefficent because of "safety") or play the way he doesn't wants (PvP), whereas other players can just play the way they want without being forced to being inefficent (say, no T2 allowed for ganking) or play something they dont want (like, PvE).

Theoretically at least. Of course, CCP's course is set and no amount of GD discussion will change it...

Q: Should we be worried? A: Nope. (...) Worry a lot if Fozzie, Masterplan, Rise, Veritas, Bettik, Ytterbium, Scarpia, Arrow, or even Greyscale leaves. Worry a little if Punkturis, karkur, SoniClover, Affinity, Goliath, or Xhagen leaves.

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#260 - 2014-06-22 19:46:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Ralph King-Griffin
Hi Matilda,Big smile
sorry about the delay,
you see,im not really allowed to deal with this sort of thing yetSad ,
but if you bear with me ill have my supervisor come round an see to that you're dealt withPirate.