These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Recognition of Highsec Power Projection

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Aiyshimin
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#21 - 2014-07-03 22:52:08 UTC
Clara Pond wrote:
I I agree there are many measures of dominance, but running industry jobs and shooting red crosses and rocks are not among them. Let the criteria be PVP related. PVE aficionados are in it for ISK, not for metagame dominance, and recognising particularly efficient multiboxing ratters as "dominating" an area would be meaningless.


Only problem is that there is no PVP in hi sec, and some minerhumpers "dominating" an area would be even more meaningless.

If you want to play this game, get out of the safe zone, or continue bending over to CONCORD like the little bears you are.
Vincent Stargrave
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2014-07-11 05:27:03 UTC
I think this would be a great idea, so long as it is coupled with another "real world" consequence...the corp or alliance is categorized as a terrorist group, its assets frozen and seized, and its members subject to "arrest" (i.e., destruction by Concord). Of course, game mechanics don't allow some of that, so a simple case of having the corp flagged with a -10 security status would do. No empire could allow a private corp to claim some form of sovereignty, particularly using military actions, over their own space.

If you want to play criminals, and gain recognition for criminal acts, then you should also suffer the consequences of being criminals.
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#23 - 2014-07-16 21:22:06 UTC
Aiyshimin wrote:
Only problem is that there is no PVP in hi sec


When did CCP remove wardecs, ganking, duels, awoxing, the market, contracts, mining, missions, exploration etc from high sec?

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Previous page12