These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[news] Federal Government announces handover of Arcurio

Author
Jandice Ymladris
Aurora Arcology
#61 - 2014-06-12 18:18:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Jandice Ymladris
You know folks, let us refocus on the good news. Ishukone managed to reclaim 3 major cities on Caldari Prime for the Caldari people, without resorting to violence.
I'm aware Ishukone has to pay the Gallente federation something substantial in return, part of this could be taking over (part) of the costs for the salvage, cleaning & scrubbing operation currently ongoing on Caldari prime to remove the debris, waste & rubble from the Titan Crashsite.

I also took the liberty on publishing a more in-depth article on the Arcurio take-over bid: Caldari Prime, the road to peace

Let us hope that these diplomatic talks between Ishukone and the Senate are but the first steps on peace between the State and Federation.

Providing a new home for refugees in the Aurora Arcology

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#62 - 2014-06-12 20:16:50 UTC
Jandice Ymladris wrote:
You know folks, let us refocus on the good news. Ishukone managed to reclaim 3 major cities on Caldari Prime for the Caldari people, without resorting to violence.
I'm aware Ishukone has to pay the Gallente federation something substantial in return, part of this could be taking over (part) of the costs for the salvage, cleaning & scrubbing operation currently ongoing on Caldari prime to remove the debris, waste & rubble from the Titan Crashsite.

I also took the liberty on publishing a more in-depth article on the Arcurio take-over bid: Caldari Prime, the road to peace

Let us hope that these diplomatic talks between Ishukone and the Senate are but the first steps on peace between the State and Federation.


Completely agree, and if Ishukone needs a hand bearing the cost of returning Home to the Caldari, I'd be pleased to make a donation.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#63 - 2014-06-12 20:34:47 UTC
Likewise. What helps Ishukone helps us all.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#64 - 2014-06-12 22:16:00 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Politically speaking, the Senate representatives involved are building themselves the mother of all re-election campaigns - "we ended the Second Gallente-Caldari War! We brought you peace and safety! We gave Caldari Prime back to the Caldari!" That sort of prestige is essentially a free vote from 90% of the Intaki population in their constituencies, a significant majority of the Gallentean and Jin-Mei votes, a pretty solid section of the Minmatar voter bloc and might even a few Mannar votes as well. It pretty much goes without saying that this will please Caldari citizens of the Federation immensely. It also dumps an immense amount of clout into their hands - you don't get flippant with the people who solved the largest and most costly threat to the Federation's security.

From a far more cynical perspective, handing over Arcurio - a huge city with a strong demographic Caldari majority, devastated by the Shiigeru impact - could easily be seen as a pragmatic way of giving a problem case to somebody else. Arcurio no doubt has deep cultural and historical significance to the State, but it's also kind of a mess right now - a mess that the Federation now no longer has to worry about spending as much money, time and personnel cleaning up.

Other factors include exchange of money, contacts, intelligence, resources, technology or other favours.

You're quite right. The Senate is getting something good out of this, and I, as with many others, would very much like to know what.

I cannot agree with every point in your assessment of the “politics” related to recent events on Caldari Prime. I have every confidence that the Senate has and will see to the strategic interests of the Federation and its citizenry both collectively and individually.

While I agree that the overwhelming majority of the Gallente electorate desires an equitable peace. They also remember the many sacrifices made in our struggle with the State.

The beneficence shown by the Gallente people as represented by their Senate thus has its limits. Soon enough the benefits of such actions need to manifest or support will falter. The price was high thus the peace cannot be seen to be one sided.

I congratulated the parties on the peaceful transfer of Arcurio to Ishukone. Many are now watching to see how this change will be implemented.
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#65 - 2014-06-13 04:10:46 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Likewise. What helps Ishukone helps us all.

Taking into account Ixiris goal, according to his own words, to "Kill all Caldari", it is rather interesting, how Ishukone will contribute to his plan.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Claudia Osyn
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#66 - 2014-06-14 03:42:33 UTC
This thread was going places. Good thing Kim showed up to prevent that. Roll

Anyway, Grats on Arcurio. It will be amusing to see what comes after Caldari Prime is turned over completely.

A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.

Ollie Rundle
#67 - 2014-06-14 07:16:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Ollie Rundle
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I'm trying to imagine a problem large enough that the State and the Federation together couldn't solve it. Drawing a big blank.


Free independent capsuleer/clone soldier alliances, unshackled of current technological and legislative restrictions in a post-CONCORD era.
Claudia Osyn
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#68 - 2014-06-14 22:24:28 UTC
Ollie Rundle wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I'm trying to imagine a problem large enough that the State and the Federation together couldn't solve it. Drawing a big blank.


Free independent capsuleer/clone soldier alliances, unshackled of current technological and legislative restrictions in a post-CONCORD era.

Someday......

A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#69 - 2014-06-14 23:02:01 UTC
Ollie Rundle wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I'm trying to imagine a problem large enough that the State and the Federation together couldn't solve it. Drawing a big blank.


Free independent capsuleer/clone soldier alliances, unshackled of current technological and legislative restrictions in a post-CONCORD era.


As if the State and Federation wouldn't be able to profit immensely of that, to an even greater degree than they already do now. There's a reason so many of us are given a free ride, ships and certificates without even a hint towards a corporate contract in return.

There are a lot of us who know which side our bread is buttered on, who remain loyal to our causes without a shackle to force it. You could take the entirety of the capsuleer population and you still couldn't take on an entire nation. Now try it with capsuleer loyalists in the way.

The problem with removing all the technological and legislative restrictions on capsuleers is that all you end up with are several thousand different causes going up against several thousand different causes, which will never be enough to constitute a problem the State and Federation couldn't deal with.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Ollie Rundle
#70 - 2014-06-15 09:33:36 UTC
Firstly, thank you for your considered response Jinari. I would note that what follows is personal opinion based upon my observations over the last decade of our existence and my attempts to clarify and understand what I've stood witness to. I'm not trying to persuade you or anyone else of anything you're not already considering - rather, like someone else who did this a few years into the capsuleer era, I'm trying to provide a scouted path for others of a like mind to follow. Pieter's question and the answer I gave have been on my mind recently.

Jinari Otsito wrote:
As if the State and Federation wouldn't be able to profit immensely of that, to an even greater degree than they already do now. There's a reason so many of us are given a free ride, ships and certificates without even a hint towards a corporate contract in return.

One of the reasons we are given all these things is to perpetuate the very human tangle of loyalties and ties we all carry with us beyond death. In doing so we are encouraged to forget - or at least not consider - what it is we actually are and how tenuously linked with humanity that makes us.

Profit margins are really only of interest to the living. The majority of humanity has a fragile and finite existence that many capsuleers lose concern for mere days after obtaining their license.

As an example, we indulge in events such as the annual Alliance tournaments that involve using weapons of mass destruction to vaporise the ships of opposing capsuleers. We call this sport, we cheer for the spectacle and the splendour and pay little heed to the large numbers of human lives lost to feed our need for such entertainment.

To make a profit from a deal you actually need something to gain leverage with. How will the State, the Federation or any other human-administered faction one cares to name bargain with an entity that fields several thousand pilots or soldiers that are effectively immortal, that are independently wealthy beyond the dreams of most non-capsuleers, that subsequently have no fear of death, no fear of sanction, no need to bend a knee and seek only to take by force what isn't yet theirs?

Quote:
There are a lot of us who know which side our bread is buttered on, who remain loyal to our causes without a shackle to force it. You could take the entirety of the capsuleer population and you still couldn't take on an entire nation. Now try it with capsuleer loyalists in the way.

Your assertion that the entirety of the capsuleer population couldn't take on an entire nation is clearly a strongly held belief and I'll refrain from arguing against it - respectfully, I think it might continue to be held despite any projections I might be able to make that dispute it.

To address the next point we must agree that in an otherwise balanced conflict between clones and humans the supply of the latter will eventually be exhausted and humanity will either have to appeal for ceasefire or face extinction.

There are a lot of capsuleers who profess loyalty and there are nearly as many who back that up with actions, this is true. Once we accept the above, however, what you're inevitably describing is a typical clone war.

The large null-sec alliances in such a conflict are far better positioned to both withstand the attacks of loyalists and effectively counter with their own objectives. The reason is simple - they've given up on humanity, they simply don't care about it or its trappings. To most of them the destruction of a space station, the orbital bombardment of a planet, the extinction of all human life within a system, region, constellation or even the cluster itself are nothing but numbers on an unimportant spreadsheet. They don't care if it's people in their own systems or those in their enemy's systems that are being massacred. Further, they enjoy - even thrive on - the reactions of those who do care. For them, that's a morale boosting response even as it saps the morale of those they're fighting.

In a clone war those with the least to lose in terms of ideology will inevitably emerge victorious, all other things being equal.

Quote:
The problem with removing all the technological and legislative restrictions on capsuleers is that all you end up with are several thousand different causes going up against several thousand different causes, which will never be enough to constitute a problem the State and Federation couldn't deal with.

Amusingly, the existence of large capsuleer power-blocs within null-sec both supports and argues against these assertions. While I disagree on the numbers you've alluded to - that is, I don't believe there would be several thousand different causes squaring off with one another - I do agree that most of these blocs are currently notoriously unstable. Certainly none have yet demonstrated nearly enough stability to establish empires that will rival the current ones in longevity or legacy.

That said, it does not take a determined beast long to rampage through and permanently destroy a porcelain shop, even if said business has stood and prospered since ancient times. Curiously, the only time these large alliances appear rock-solid in their stability is when a strong, charismatic leader issues a call-to-arms that appeals to either their bloodlust or their need for 'lulz'.

Witness the battle of 5-R5RB and imagine something on a similar scale occurring with little more than a few hours warning in Luminaire or Jita or over and across any of the homeworlds of the Federation, the State, the Empire or the Republic. Then imagine it happening every few weeks or months for no other reason than somebody deciding it was an enjoyable way to pass time.

Any gains capsuleer alliances make in this way are unlikely to be of any real permanency for the alliances involved but this does not necessarily argue against them being eventually fatal wounds to the groups they are struck against.
Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#71 - 2014-06-15 18:07:22 UTC
Ollie Rundle wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I'm trying to imagine a problem large enough that the State and the Federation together couldn't solve it. Drawing a big blank.


Free independent capsuleer/clone soldier alliances, unshackled of current technological and legislative restrictions in a post-CONCORD era.

So basically, capsuleers would be unstoppable if only the empires tied their hands behind their backs and threw away their most potent means of controlling us?
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#72 - 2014-06-15 19:28:30 UTC
I am aware I am quite late on responding to this development, but I believe this is worth a few words.

As always the actions of Ishukone continue to be a beacon of hope for New Eden. Let us hope others are watching and learning, so we may continue to move toward a peaceful resolution to the conflict that plagues not only the State and Federation, but the countless conflicts throughout our cluster that could be ended in a instant should a diplomatic hand be extended.

Ishukone Loyalist - Private Contractor

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned."

Ollie Rundle
#73 - 2014-06-16 04:07:31 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Ollie Rundle wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I'm trying to imagine a problem large enough that the State and the Federation together couldn't solve it. Drawing a big blank.


Free independent capsuleer/clone soldier alliances, unshackled of current technological and legislative restrictions in a post-CONCORD era.

So basically, capsuleers would be unstoppable if only the empires tied their hands behind their backs and threw away their most potent means of controlling us?

No, it has nothing to do with the empires doing anything quite so proactive.
Claudia Osyn
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#74 - 2014-06-16 16:54:44 UTC
Ollie Rundle wrote:
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Ollie Rundle wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I'm trying to imagine a problem large enough that the State and the Federation together couldn't solve it. Drawing a big blank.


Free independent capsuleer/clone soldier alliances, unshackled of current technological and legislative restrictions in a post-CONCORD era.

So basically, capsuleers would be unstoppable if only the empires tied their hands behind their backs and threw away their most potent means of controlling us?

No, it has nothing to do with the empires doing anything quite so proactive.

Is there another way to achieve said utopia?

A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#75 - 2014-06-18 11:35:32 UTC
Claudia Osyn wrote:
Ollie Rundle wrote:
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Ollie Rundle wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I'm trying to imagine a problem large enough that the State and the Federation together couldn't solve it. Drawing a big blank.


Free independent capsuleer/clone soldier alliances, unshackled of current technological and legislative restrictions in a post-CONCORD era.

So basically, capsuleers would be unstoppable if only the empires tied their hands behind their backs and threw away their most potent means of controlling us?

No, it has nothing to do with the empires doing anything quite so proactive.

Is there another way to achieve said utopia?

If you want for Federation and State to live in peace without destroying the Federation...

Just remove all gallenteans from the Federation and remove name "Gallente" from "Gallente Federation".

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Claudia Osyn
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#76 - 2014-06-18 20:27:36 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:

If you want for Federation and State to live in peace without destroying the Federation...

Just remove all gallenteans from the Federation and remove name "Gallente" from "Gallente Federation".

Can we take the Caldari out of caldari state, too?

A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#77 - 2014-06-18 20:42:04 UTC
Claudia Osyn wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:

If you want for Federation and State to live in peace without destroying the Federation...

Just remove all gallenteans from the Federation and remove name "Gallente" from "Gallente Federation".

Can we take the Caldari out of caldari state, too?


Oh! Do you think she meant taking the Gallente out of the Federation and the Caldari out of the State AND MAKING A BRAND NEW political bloc? That's bold and radical, Kim-haani.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Claudia Osyn
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#78 - 2014-06-18 21:08:10 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Claudia Osyn wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:

If you want for Federation and State to live in peace without destroying the Federation...

Just remove all gallenteans from the Federation and remove name "Gallente" from "Gallente Federation".

Can we take the Caldari out of caldari state, too?


Oh! Do you think she meant taking the Gallente out of the Federation and the Caldari out of the State AND MAKING A BRAND NEW political bloc? That's bold and radical, Kim-haani.

But how to run it?

A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#79 - 2014-06-18 21:16:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
Claudia Osyn wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Claudia Osyn wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:

If you want for Federation and State to live in peace without destroying the Federation...

Just remove all gallenteans from the Federation and remove name "Gallente" from "Gallente Federation".

Can we take the Caldari out of caldari state, too?


Oh! Do you think she meant taking the Gallente out of the Federation and the Caldari out of the State AND MAKING A BRAND NEW political bloc? That's bold and radical, Kim-haani.

But how to run it?


Easy. You whine and complain and we'll crush you under our jackbooted efficiency. No! Even better! We all hold a vote to see who'll be Executor and then we depose him the day after!

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Claudia Osyn
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#80 - 2014-06-18 22:04:01 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Claudia Osyn wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Claudia Osyn wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:

If you want for Federation and State to live in peace without destroying the Federation...

Just remove all gallenteans from the Federation and remove name "Gallente" from "Gallente Federation".

Can we take the Caldari out of caldari state, too?


Oh! Do you think she meant taking the Gallente out of the Federation and the Caldari out of the State AND MAKING A BRAND NEW political bloc? That's bold and radical, Kim-haani.

But how to run it?


Easy. You whine and complain and we'll crush you under our jackbooted efficiency. No! Even better! We all hold a vote to see who'll be Executor and then we depose him the day after!

So basically we just let the Black Eagles take over?

A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.