These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

RE: Links Still Broken

First post
Author
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#81 - 2014-06-12 01:51:23 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:

Why would there be tears?



You must be new.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Jessica Danikov
Network Danikov
#82 - 2014-06-12 01:57:14 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Jessica Danikov wrote:
I like how people whine about a mechanic they refuse to use out of some mistaken sense of e-honour.


Refusing to pay for an extra account just so you can keep warping an extra alt everywhere you go to fight has nothing to do with e-honor.


Remiel Pollard wrote:
I refuse to pay a second subscription fee. That's all it is. Why should I have to buy a second account just to compete with someone that chooses to spend more money? I've fought linked 'solo' players before and still beat them. This is not about honour, but balance.


EVE combat is not balanced with solo players in mind. Choosing to limit yourself by flying solo is e-honor and success wouldn't command nearly as much respect if it were made to be easy and balanced. Solo is all about fighting against the odds (in the process stacking them back in your favour as much as possible) and succeeding where success seems improbable.

Nobody said you had to fly solo, success is certainly not guaranteed, nor do you need to pay for a second account to make friends and fly with them.

That isn't to say that links don't require attention regarding the effortless application of links to a group over an entire solar system which make it very hard for a gang to target the links (not to mention the above par resilience of link-providing ships on top of that). Just that solo is an inherently unbalanced position and thus cannot be balanced for.
Jarod Garamonde
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2014-06-12 01:59:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Jarod Garamonde
Zappity wrote:

I'm happy to say that you're wrong. Here is some transcribed text originally posted here:



I'm NOT wrong, because I stated a personal opinion, and did not portray any of it as fact.

That is how I feel about off-grid boosting, and I don't agree with any solution to it but the ones I gave.
Nowhere in there did I put forth anything as though fact. I am allowed to have whatever opinion I want, and you are allowed to deal with it.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#84 - 2014-06-12 02:06:33 UTC
Jessica Danikov wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Jessica Danikov wrote:
I like how people whine about a mechanic they refuse to use out of some mistaken sense of e-honour.


Refusing to pay for an extra account just so you can keep warping an extra alt everywhere you go to fight has nothing to do with e-honor.


Remiel Pollard wrote:
I refuse to pay a second subscription fee. That's all it is. Why should I have to buy a second account just to compete with someone that chooses to spend more money? I've fought linked 'solo' players before and still beat them. This is not about honour, but balance.


EVE combat is not balanced with solo players in mind. Choosing to limit yourself by flying solo is e-honor and success wouldn't command nearly as much respect if it were made to be easy and balanced. Solo is all about fighting against the odds (in the process stacking them back in your favour as much as possible) and succeeding where success seems improbable.

Nobody said you had to fly solo, success is certainly not guaranteed, nor do you need to pay for a second account to make friends and fly with them.

That isn't to say that links don't require attention regarding the effortless application of links to a group over an entire solar system which make it very hard for a gang to target the links (not to mention the above par resilience of link-providing ships on top of that). Just that solo is an inherently unbalanced position and thus cannot be balanced for.


I am entirely aware of what it is to fight solo in EVE, but thanks for the beginners tutorial. I'm not saying it should be risk free, I'm saying that in ANY given situation, solo or otherwise, combatants need the ability to quantify the risks they are up against. Because as it is, many fights are going unfought as a result of paranoia from one party or another over what the other party might be hiding. A lot of PVP is going to waste because of it.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#85 - 2014-06-12 02:09:55 UTC
Jessica Danikov wrote:


EVE combat is not balanced with solo players in mind. Choosing to limit yourself by flying solo is e-honor and success wouldn't command nearly as much respect if it were made to be easy and balanced. Solo is all about fighting against the odds (in the process stacking them back in your favour as much as possible) and succeeding where success seems improbable.

Nobody said you had to fly solo, success is certainly not guaranteed, nor do you need to pay for a second account to make friends and fly with them.

That isn't to say that links don't require attention regarding the effortless application of links to a group over an entire solar system which make it very hard for a gang to target the links (not to mention the above par resilience of link-providing ships on top of that). Just that solo is an inherently unbalanced position and thus cannot be balanced for.


I agree with this

I dont have a problem with Remiel, or anyone else who isnt a sebiestor for that matter (except Dino Palamino), but I do agree with the above

I dont think account numbers is anything to do with what people dont like about this issue and its.... disingenuous to claim otherwise

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#86 - 2014-06-12 02:20:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
And I would also just like to remind anyone that might think otherwise that I'm not arguing in support of the OP for a nerf to links, I just want to see them on grid.

A little while ago, I was trying out a Ferox fit. Having never flown a Ferox before, and being the kind that likes to learn for himself, I dove into lowsec for some solo PVP. None of my corp was around, and there were no active blues in the area to help me. I was completely alone, expecting to die, but determined to try to kill something anyway. I knew the risk I was taking - I could be hotdropped by bait, lured into any number of traps or just simply blobbed by a surprise butsexx gatecamp.

Lo, eventually I grew bored, stopped roaming and started ratting, waiting for a neutral to enter system and either hunt me or go ratting himself, so I could hunt him. It wasn't long before a Cynabal entered system.

I waited, not entirely sure how my fit would fair against a Cynabal, but keen to find out. He landed on grid - he was hunting me, which I love - and we engaged. I actually had him in very low armour when two more neutrals entered local.

Turned out, he was mutliboxing two logi, an exeq and an aug. Was I ******? Sure, no one likes being duped. You would be ****** too. Did I get over it? Of course I did. Do I have a problem with multiboxing or logi? Hell no, he did what he could to win. So what? If I'd had friends available, I would have called them in the moment the neutrals entered local.

I'm not saying that PVP needs to be 'fair'. The 'unfairness' is half the excitement. The potential for it is what makes PVP in EVE so unique. It's why your heart races when you engage.

But what if he'd brought an off-grid booster in and parked it in a safe instead after the fight had begun? It probably would have made no difference to my predicament on that particular occasion, but if I'd had friends around, they could have come help me deal with the logi. The booster? It'd take time to probe, and he could just bounce around the system avoiding the probes and any chance of being stopped. Would I have even known the new neutral in local was a booster? << This last one is the main problem, I'd have no way to quantify the risk and weigh up my opponent.

There would have been other ways my friends could have helped me of course, but the way they are now, links are providing a huge benefit with little risk. I don't want the benefit gone, I want the risk to be balanced.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Nero Pantera
Whale Girth
#87 - 2014-06-12 02:25:56 UTC
Links were nerfed to all hell with t3's not boosting for **** and remaining outside the pos shield.
WHY DONT WE ALL JUST FLY IBIS'S
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#88 - 2014-06-12 02:42:28 UTC
Nero Pantera wrote:
Links were nerfed to all hell with t3's not boosting for **** and remaining outside the pos shield.
WHY DONT WE ALL JUST FLY IBIS'S

Because the Velator rocks. Ibis is rubbish.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#89 - 2014-06-12 02:51:49 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Zappity wrote:

I'm happy to say that you're wrong. Here is some transcribed text originally posted here:



I'm NOT wrong, because I stated a personal opinion, and did not portray any of it as fact.

That is how I feel about off-grid boosting, and I don't agree with any solution to it but the ones I gave.
Nowhere in there did I put forth anything as though fact. I am allowed to have whatever opinion I want, and you are allowed to deal with it.

Well that's true and I apologise. I'll rephrase: I'm glad that your opinion does not seem to be shared by the devs.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#90 - 2014-06-12 03:40:26 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:

Why would there be tears?



You must be new.

Not particularly.

Old enough to know the difference between those that will come and whinge in the forum and those that will just get on with adapting to changes in the game.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#91 - 2014-06-12 05:09:53 UTC
Nero Pantera wrote:
Links were nerfed to all hell with t3's not boosting for **** and remaining outside the pos shield.
WHY DONT WE ALL JUST FLY IBIS'S

Links were barely touched in the last round of changes. The ship bonuses were next to nothing compared to the Mindlink & Skill bonuses, and the Navy Mindlinks actually buffed off grid boosters. Since now all 6 links an OGB gives are at maximum boost rather than only 3 at max boost. T3's boost just fine, there is like .5% or something between a T3 & a CS due to the weighting of the bonuses.
Ab'del Abu
Atlantis Ascendant
#92 - 2014-06-12 07:13:16 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
booster? It'd take time to probe, and he could just bounce around the system avoiding the probes and any chance of being stopped. Would I have even known the new neutral in local was a booster? << This last one is the main problem, I'd have no way to quantify the risk and weigh up my opponent.


Well if you try to avoid being scanned by moving around a lot, you won't be running your links much amirite :>

Anyway, seems CCP has set their mind to bringing links on the grid ...
Grunanca
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#93 - 2014-06-12 07:29:19 UTC
Phaade wrote:
Links are still blatantly overpowered. They have been since their conception. They are game breaking. There is a general consensus on this point; anyone with any sense, that has been the victim of link stupidity knows just how bad they are.

The Garmur is a shining example of how broken links currently are. A ship that, otherwise, may have some semblance of balance, is utterly and completely overpowered when coupled with links. If you think a ship should be able to project 140 dps 60km while moving 8km/s (unhittable by ANYTHING, including missiles) while pointing almost 70km, you have lost your damn mind.

The utter lunacy of links is well demonstrated in numerous pvp videos, where a skilled pilot in a great fit is able to take on, sometimes, up to 10 times his numbers by simply brawling them down, due almost purely to links and their ridiculous bonuses. Without links, they would be in a pod perhaps taking 1-2 with them rather than clearing the field. Yes, it's THAT bad.

How this glaring problem exists right before CCP's eyes, with no resolution in sight, is baffling.

The suggestions to make links reasonable are already well known and well discussed. Please, implement the changes your community desires, and fix a broken piece of your game.

DEATH TO LINKS.


Only problem with links is the fact that they work anywhere not on the grid. Also, 150 dps... LOL!
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#94 - 2014-06-12 08:22:24 UTC
If only you could scan down offgrid boosters...
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#95 - 2014-06-12 08:40:50 UTC
Ab'del Abu wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
booster? It'd take time to probe, and he could just bounce around the system avoiding the probes and any chance of being stopped. Would I have even known the new neutral in local was a booster? << This last one is the main problem, I'd have no way to quantify the risk and weigh up my opponent.


Well if you try to avoid being scanned by moving around a lot, you won't be running your links much amirite :>

Anyway, seems CCP has set their mind to bringing links on the grid ...


I'm aware, and I'm happy that they are but, even if they weren't, I would deal with it as I've always done. I would continue making my case against off-grid links, and I would continue to PVP regardless.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Maeltstome
Ten Thousand Days
#96 - 2014-06-12 11:00:45 UTC
This is turning into a new-age "Please don't nerf my Falcon Alt" thread. The non-arguments of the people who want the status quo haven't changed in years.
Vanadia Ernaga
Blunderbuss.
#97 - 2014-06-12 11:20:17 UTC
Lloyd Roses wrote:
If only you could scan down offgrid boosters...



If only Links didnt work when the Booster is forced into Warp......
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#98 - 2014-06-12 11:59:28 UTC
Links are overpowered but countermeasures do exist.

Namely, scan down the boosting ship, blow it up, then send the pilot a trollmail.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#99 - 2014-06-12 12:46:06 UTC
If and when you have a serious and well worded proposal for the betterment of EvE, please feel free to post it in the Features & Ideas Discussion part of the forum.

Thread locked.

The Rules:
3. Ranting is prohibited.

A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)