These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Industry expansion - Industry problem

Author
Anna Jameson
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2014-06-08 19:57:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Anna Jameson
With the upcoming changes to industry it revitalised my interest in the game when it was beginning to wane and i decided to skill into production and manufacturing but i noticed a problem. I recently began to look at what is profitable to build and one item stood out.

The procurer.

In order for me to manufacture a procurer it would cost me around 30-40% more than buying one from the market place and after a little digging around it appears this is the fallout from when you added the extra material costs to manufacturing over 2 years ago!

At the time of the change people were inquiring about the same thing i have noticed and at that time people were speculating there was a 6 month supply of procurers. However, here we are approaching 3 years later and they are still there in abundance.

There are forum posts from as little as a few months ago with a single person who has thousands of them to sell and this trend looks like it has the capability to carry on for not months but years.

No doubt some people will try to defend the situation but is it really your intention to let the people who took advantage of this situation to effectively cut out not only myself but everyone else, new and old who might take an interest in manufacturing from producing this ship and being able to sell it without incurring a loss until this supply has ran out?
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#2 - 2014-06-08 20:03:22 UTC
Are you saying that producing a type of ship should always yield profit?

That's now how business works.

Make things the right way yeah, but first make sure that you are producing the right things.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Komi Toran
Perkone
Caldari State
#3 - 2014-06-08 20:24:51 UTC
Anna Jameson wrote:
No doubt some people will try to defend the situation but is it really your intention to let the people who took advantage of this situation to effectively cut out not only myself but everyone else, new and old who might take an interest in manufacturing from producing this ship and being able to sell it without incurring a loss until this supply has ran out?

If I may suggest a non-Dev oriented solution?

Catalysts are cheap.

If there is too much supply, then you need to increase demand.
Anna Jameson
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2014-06-08 20:24:54 UTC
Arya Regnar wrote:
Are you saying that producing a type of ship should always yield profit?

That's now how business works.

Make things the right way yeah, but first make sure that you are producing the right things.


No what i am saying is that people taking advantage of a patch change shouldn't shut someone out of producing something in the game for years to come.

I'm not saying everything i produce should be able to be sold at a profit, if someone wants to sell at a loss they can but give me a single reason why a patch change should shut out everyone from producing something and being able to sell it at cost price?

When the change was made the procurer cost ~2m isk to build if i sell it at a loss of 80%-90% the people who took advantage of the change are still making a profit.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#5 - 2014-06-08 20:27:38 UTC
It's very simple, by the way.

The current stock exists from when the material costs were cheaper, as you mentioned.

And then you realize that since the barge buff, they almost never die. The turnaround rate on these ships is ridiculously low. So people with existing stocks can sell for a price that drives out any potential competition without an existing stock of their own.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Anna Jameson
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2014-06-08 20:29:46 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
It's very simple, by the way.

The current stock exists from when the material costs were cheaper, as you mentioned.

And then you realize that since the barge buff, they almost never die. The turnaround rate on these ships is ridiculously low. So people with existing stocks can sell for a price that drives out any potential competition without an existing stock of their own.



I understand and that is the issue i am trying to draw attention to. Why should this item remain out of reach for people dipping their toes into production purely because people took advantage of a patch change years ago?


Why should the changes of that patch still prevent people from manufacturing that item years later and most likely for years to come?
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#7 - 2014-06-08 20:41:19 UTC
Anna Jameson wrote:

I understand and that is the issue i am trying to draw attention to. Why should this item remain out of reach for people dipping their toes into production purely because people took advantage of a patch change years ago?


Why should the changes of that patch still prevent people from manufacturing that item years later and most likely for years to come?


Because the only way to fix it would be to divest everyone of their existing stock, or implement price controls.

Neither of which is happening.

So your actual solution is to pick a different product to make and sell.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Anna Jameson
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2014-06-08 20:48:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Anna Jameson
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Anna Jameson wrote:

I understand and that is the issue i am trying to draw attention to. Why should this item remain out of reach for people dipping their toes into production purely because people took advantage of a patch change years ago?


Why should the changes of that patch still prevent people from manufacturing that item years later and most likely for years to come?


Because the only way to fix it would be to divest everyone of their existing stock, or implement price controls.

Neither of which is happening.

So your actual solution is to pick a different product to make and sell.


With inflation on minerals if you reprocessed the stock that was made prior to the change the people who took advantage of it would still make a profit.

Why is the answer to any issue raised by people towards aspects of this game perceived as unfair rightly or wrongly suck it up and move along?
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#9 - 2014-06-08 20:52:33 UTC
Anna Jameson wrote:

With inflation on minerals if you reprocessed the stock that was made prior to the change the people who took advantage of it would still make a profit.


So, you think you get to ask CCP to strip away their hard work? Just because you want to have it instead of them?

Quote:

Why is the answer to any issue raised by people towards aspects of this game perceived as unfair rightly or wrongly suck it up and move along?


Probably because of the shocking amount of entitlement on display on your part. You think this situation is unique? You think this is the only market that some few people have cornered? Psh.

They earned it. You didn't. So stop asking CCP to take something away from other people, and go earn something for yourself instead of asking for space welfare.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Anna Jameson
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2014-06-08 20:57:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Anna Jameson
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
So, you think you get to ask CCP to strip away their hard work? Just because you want to have it instead of them?


Your logic isn't very good. I dont want their hard work, i dont want a leg up, i want an equal footing.

Give me a single reason why you think a patch change should shut out the entire player base from an aspect of the game?

Anna Jameson wrote:

Why is the answer to any issue raised by people towards aspects of this game perceived as unfair rightly or wrongly suck it up and move along?


Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

Probably because of the shocking amount of entitlement on display on your part. You think this situation is unique? You think this is the only market that some few people have cornered? Psh.

They earned it. You didn't. So stop asking CCP to take something away from other people, and go earn something for yourself instead of asking for space welfare.



Entitlement? The only entitlement on show in this discussion is from people trying to justify a monopoly on a market, a market that has been enjoyed and taken advantage of for years.

They didn't "earn" anything, they took advantage.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#11 - 2014-06-08 21:07:50 UTC
Anna Jameson wrote:

Your logic isn't very good. I dont want their hard work, i dont want a leg up, i want an equal footing.

Give me a single reason why you think a patch change should shut out the entire player base from an aspect of the game?


Why should a patch change take away everyone's stock of ships? Like I said, this is not a unique situation, there are plenty of small markets dominated by a particular group. Goonswarm, for example, is widely reputed to have control of nearly 90% of Hulk production in the entire game.

So, you can't break into that market? Tough luck, that's capitalism. Something that very heavily defended by the devs, by the way. The only time they really screw with the market is with PLEX prices, and even then it's very carefully because it's such a contentious subject.


Quote:

Entitlement? The only entitlement on show in this discussion is from people trying to justify a monopoly on a market, a market that has been enjoyed and taken advantage of for years.

They didn't "earn" anything, they took advantage.


Taking advantage is how you earn things in EVE.

And yes, it is your entitlement, not anyone else's. You think you are entitled to be able to compete in a market just because you want to, and to that effect you want to strip away existing stocks of ships from other players just because they can afford to sell lower than you can.

That is so much entitlement I'd be surprised you can even blow your nose.

Nevermind that it would be a godawful idea to forcibly reprocess them, as that would probably cause a mineral prices crash.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Anna Jameson
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#12 - 2014-06-08 21:28:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Anna Jameson
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Why should a patch change take away everyone's stock of ships?


I've already given you my arguments as to why and now you answer me with a question? so you don't actually have a reason as to why things should remain as they are other than "they earned it"

Well i have an easy answer for your question.

Because the patch change and resulting stockpile of ships has removed the possibility for people to produce an item in the game for years and most likely for years to come and so far your only argument to defend the status quo is because they "earned" it.

Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Like I said, this is not a unique situation, there are plenty of small markets dominated by a particular group. Goonswarm, for example, is widely reputed to have control of nearly 90% of Hulk production in the entire game.


I dont have a problem with people cornering a market. That is capitalism

Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

So, you can't break into that market? Tough luck, that's capitalism. Something that very heavily defended by the devs, by the way. The only time they really screw with the market is with PLEX prices, and even then it's very carefully because it's such a contentious subject.


Yeah, you don't understand what capitalism is.

This situation hasn't arisen out capitalism - it is the result of state interference.

Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

Taking advantage is how you earn things in EVE.

And yes, it is your entitlement, not anyone else's. You think you are entitled to be able to compete in a market just because you want to, and to that effect you want to strip away existing stocks of ships from other players just because they can afford to sell lower than you can.

That is so much entitlement I'd be surprised you can even blow your nose.

Nevermind that it would be a godawful idea to forcibly reprocess them, as that would probably cause a mineral prices crash.



Wanting to Compete in a market isn't entitlement. If you think i shouldn't be able to compete in a market that isn't me who wants entitlement, that is you protecting entitlement.

You aren't defending capitalism you are actively working against it.
Axe Coldon
#13 - 2014-06-08 21:28:49 UTC
Anna Jameson wrote:
With the upcoming changes to industry it revitalised my interest in the game when it was beginning to wane and i decided to skill into production and manufacturing but i noticed a problem. I recently began to look at what is profitable to build and one item stood out.

The procurer.

In order for me to manufacture a procurer it would cost me around 30-40% more than buying one from the market place and after a little digging around it appears this is the fallout from when you added the extra material costs to manufacturing over 2 years ago!

At the time of the change people were inquiring about the same thing i have noticed and at that time people were speculating there was a 6 month supply of procurers. However, here we are approaching 3 years later and they are still there in abundance.

There are forum posts from as little as a few months ago with a single person who has thousands of them to sell and this trend looks like it has the capability to carry on for not months but years.

No doubt some people will try to defend the situation but is it really your intention to let the people who took advantage of this situation to effectively cut out not only myself but everyone else, new and old who might take an interest in manufacturing from producing this ship and being able to sell it without incurring a loss until this supply has ran out?


Well I get your dilemma but if you are serious about production..just find something else to make that is profitable. There is nothing ccp can do if there are a bunch of hulls on the market below cost.

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

Ray Kyonhe
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2014-06-08 21:34:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Ray Kyonhe
As a convinced opponent of such kind of metagaming I'm ready to lend OP's my support on his crusade. It actually should had been done back then. Sadly, this will hardly happen anyway. +1

Survey/voting system inbuilt to the game client: link_Reforming corp and taxation system: link_New PvE content (reward collective gameplay): link

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#15 - 2014-06-08 21:35:43 UTC
Anna Jameson wrote:
[
Because the patch change and resulting stockpile of ships has removed the possibility for people to produce an item in the game for years and most likely for years to come and so far your only argument to defend the status quo is because they "earned" it.


They did earn it. They certainly have more right to it than you do.

And it does not, by the way, make it impossible for you to produce Procurers. Merely impossible for you to produce them at a profit for yourself.

And like I said several times already, this situation exists all across the game, and CCP is completely fine with it.

Quote:

I dont have a problem with people cornering a market. That is capitalism


Yes, you do. You are literally arguing that people who have cornered a market be severely punished for doing so. And all because it makes you sad that you can't build Procurers to sell.

Quote:

Competing in a market isn't taking advantage.


Yeah, it is. If you think otherwise, you aren't doing it right.

Quote:

If you think i shouldn't be able to compete in a market that isn't me who wants entitlement, that is you protecting entitlement.

You aren't defending capitalism you are actively working against it.


No, I'm not working against capitalism. That would be you, since you are demanding that CCP alter the game to allow you to compete when you otherwise could not.

You seriously need to get over yourself.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Anna Jameson
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2014-06-08 21:37:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Anna Jameson
Axe Coldon wrote:
Well I get your dilemma but if you are serious about production..just find something else to make that is profitable. There is nothing ccp can do if there are a bunch of hulls on the market below cost.


Why? why should this ship be out of reach for everyone for years and most likely for years to come just because some people took advantage of a patch years ago?

Dont tell me there is nothing they can do. There is.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#17 - 2014-06-08 21:38:25 UTC
Anna Jameson wrote:

Why? why should this ship be out of reach for everyone just because some people took advantage of a patch years ago?


It's not out of reach of everyone. Hyperbole does not add to your argument, especially when it's as obvious as that.

Nothing stops you from making one yourself.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Anna Jameson
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2014-06-08 21:40:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Anna Jameson
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
It's not out of reach of everyone. Hyperbole does not add to your argument, especially when it's as obvious as that.

Nothing stops you from making one yourself.


Yeah well strawmen and false dichotomies don't add to yours.

I never said i couldn't make one my issue is with my inability to enter the market because of a patch change made two years ago.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#19 - 2014-06-08 21:43:12 UTC
Anna Jameson wrote:

Yeah well strawmen and false dichotomies don't add to yours.

I never said i couldn't make one my issue is with my inability to enter the market because of a patch change made two years ago.


I haven't given either of those two.

You said "why should this ship be out of reach for everyone..."

And it's not out of reach for everyone. That sentence is pure hyperbole.

And if that's your issue, which is what I have been addressing by the way, the answer is too bad. CCP is not going to divest players of their rightfully gained property just because you cry about them winning at the market.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2014-06-08 21:48:42 UTC
Tieracide screwed the market in many ships for a long time, but this was because before tieracide different tiers of ships required different amounts of minerals.

This caused good ships after tieracide to become stockpiled and some stockpiles are still being depleted.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

123Next pageLast page