These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester is pulling the plug on his blog

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#441 - 2014-06-03 17:47:16 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

A better idea though is to scam more, gank more, awox more, laugh and say "HTFU" more to every noob that enters the game. Strictly keeping to the rules, push every carebear to the point of tears then link them CCP HTFU song. At the end of the day, the only reason some people wanted E1 out is because he was a scammer and they had been scammed and thought "hey, this is a way to get our own back", so the best way to deal with those people is to make it worse than before.


This the route I took.

And I make sure that every. last. one. of them knows exactly why.


This pleased me so much I nearly smiled

Thats torture

Reported


I'll make sure and forward this information to the CSM Anti-Carebear Activities Committee, as well.
Dave stark
#442 - 2014-06-03 17:53:08 UTC
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Just because E1 got away with it in the past doesn't mean it should have continued.

yes, it should have.

either what he was doing was acceptable, and fine to carry on with.
or it was not, and he should have been banned from the outset.

it shouldn't be a case of "it's fine until some one starts a witch hunt".
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#443 - 2014-06-03 18:04:03 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:

it shouldn't be a case of "it's fine until some one starts a witch hunt".


Which, unfortunately, is the situation we are still left with.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#444 - 2014-06-03 18:09:49 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
I do not, nor have I ever posted that I favour one sec of the game over another in terms of game balance

I have never asked or suggested that any sec space be altered or amended in any way shape or form.

I do not, nor have I ever hated Ero, I have posted that I found him to be mildly amusing at times and mildly annoying at times.

I did not ask that, or suggest that he be banned from the game.

You really should think before you post dearie.

Still, just posting words to the effect of, "but I'm hard innit" does not require any thinking on your part.
lol, yeah, you're just a neutral bystander, suuuuure you are. You may not have stated your thoughts explicitly, but you made you position in this very clear.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#445 - 2014-06-03 18:10:14 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:

it shouldn't be a case of "it's fine until some one starts a witch hunt".


Which, unfortunately, is the situation we are still left with.

What, like that one IZ startedBlink

Murderers of Negotiable Motivations

=]|[=
Josef Djugashvilis
#446 - 2014-06-03 18:10:23 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Just because E1 got away with it in the past doesn't mean it should have continued.

yes, it should have.

either what he was doing was acceptable, and fine to carry on with.
or it was not, and he should have been banned from the outset.

it shouldn't be a case of "it's fine until some one starts a witch hunt".


I should imagine that Ripard is very flattered that you credit him with so much influence and power over CCP.

I know I would be Smile

This is not a signature.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#447 - 2014-06-03 18:13:29 UTC  |  Edited by: BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Just because E1 got away with it in the past doesn't mean it should have continued.

yes, it should have.

either what he was doing was acceptable, and fine to carry on with.
or it was not, and he should have been banned from the outset.

it shouldn't be a case of "it's fine until some one starts a witch hunt".


I should imagine that Ripard is very flattered that you credit him with so much influence and power over CCP.

I know I would be Smile

Then what was the point of his article other than to create bad blood in the community? I personally believe that CCP would have banned Ero anyways with or without Ripard's interference, but that just makes the whole thing worse.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!
Dave stark
#448 - 2014-06-03 18:14:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Just because E1 got away with it in the past doesn't mean it should have continued.

yes, it should have.

either what he was doing was acceptable, and fine to carry on with.
or it was not, and he should have been banned from the outset.

it shouldn't be a case of "it's fine until some one starts a witch hunt".


I should imagine that Ripard is very flattered that you credit him with so much influence and power over CCP.

I know I would be Smile


you'd be flattered if anyone thought of you as anything more than a bumbling fool.
don't be flattered.

not to mention that we've demonstrated what affect his article had due to his blog popularity and CSM seat. Then again, i didn't expect you to be able to read the articles that were created from his sensationalised blog post but you should have at least been aware of them.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#449 - 2014-06-03 18:14:24 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:

it shouldn't be a case of "it's fine until some one starts a witch hunt".


Which, unfortunately, is the situation we are still left with.

What, like that one IZ startedBlink


On himself, you mean.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
Josef Djugashvilis
#450 - 2014-06-03 18:23:41 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
I do not, nor have I ever posted that I favour one sec of the game over another in terms of game balance

I have never asked or suggested that any sec space be altered or amended in any way shape or form.

I do not, nor have I ever hated Ero, I have posted that I found him to be mildly amusing at times and mildly annoying at times.

I did not ask that, or suggest that he be banned from the game.

You really should think before you post dearie.

Still, just posting words to the effect of, "but I'm hard innit" does not require any thinking on your part.
lol, yeah, you're just a neutral bystander, suuuuure you are. You may not have stated your thoughts explicitly, but you made you position in this very clear.


You have the advantage over me good sir, my degree was in History, not Mind Reading Smile

This is not a signature.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#451 - 2014-06-03 18:30:02 UTC
Having scanned this thread and having done a rough estimation on the time investment that would be involved in cleaning it up (i.e. removing all rule breaking posts and those quoting them), added to the fact that most of the thread is a rehash of various volatile discussions that have taken place previously on this forum, it gets a lock.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)