These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Procurer vs Mackinaw ore yield

Author
Speed Destiny
Cluelix
Wrecktical Supremacy.
#1 - 2014-05-28 12:03:59 UTC
There is something I don't understand...

In my Procurer with:

1x Modulated Strip Miner II (Crystal II)
2x Mining Laser Upgrade II

I get the following yield 3228 m3.

However if I monkey with Mackinaw in EveHQ, and add to it:

2x Modulated Strip Miner II (Crystal II)
3x Mining Laser Upgrade II

I get 3518 m3

This is very odd since it has two miners, why the difference is so low?
Tam Arai
Mi Pen Rai
#2 - 2014-05-28 12:10:00 UTC
re: procurer

With that in mind, the designers could only make space to fit one mining or ice harvesting module. To mitigate the effect this would have on the ship's mining output, they came up with a unique loading system that allows this one module to work at triple efficiency.
Speed Destiny
Cluelix
Wrecktical Supremacy.
#3 - 2014-05-28 12:33:07 UTC
Yes, ok... I agree, it says so...

But from this point of view Mackinaw is almost no upgrade from Procurer... OK, it has a larger ore hold, I agree, but to fill it and make the same production with two miners, you will need to find big asteroids or constantly move it to new ones, which does not make it for a larger ore hold.

Or am I missing something?

Shiloh Templeton
Cheyenne HET Co
#4 - 2014-05-28 13:06:46 UTC
CCP purposely made the yield about the same. Advantage of Procurer is much more tank. Advantage of Retriever is much bigger ore hold. Hulk has the most yield, but tiny ore hold.

Most miners have gone with Retriever(and especially Mackinaw) so CCP is re-balancing the mining ships with the next release.
Speed Destiny
Cluelix
Wrecktical Supremacy.
#5 - 2014-05-28 13:41:11 UTC
I was expecting that a T2 ship is more efficient than a T1...

Rebalancing in what way?

trevormax
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#6 - 2014-05-28 14:00:26 UTC
Speed Destiny wrote:
There is something I don't understand...

In my Procurer with:

1x Modulated Strip Miner II (Crystal II)
2x Mining Laser Upgrade II

I get the following yield 3228 m3.

However if I monkey with Mackinaw in EveHQ, and add to it:

2x Modulated Strip Miner II (Crystal II)
3x Mining Laser Upgrade II

I get 3518 m3

This is very odd since it has two miners, why the difference is so low?


You must be doing something wrong. I can get 4016m3 with my mack. this is with exhumers 5, 3 MLU's, no links or implants. Maybe you need to take skills into account.

The Mack and Skiff gets a 1% / level yield bonus with each exhumer skill level which the proc does not get. The mack has an extra low for the 3rd MLU that a skiff and proc does not have. I am not fully up to date with the coming changes but I believe the skiff (and possibly the proc) will get an extra low.
Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
#7 - 2014-05-28 14:00:47 UTC
Speed Destiny wrote:
I was expecting that a T2 ship is more efficient than a T1...

Rebalancing in what way?





Seriously go read the ship descriptions and dev blogs before asking more stupid questions.
Speed Destiny
Cluelix
Wrecktical Supremacy.
#8 - 2014-05-28 14:22:47 UTC
Thanks! I will go read dev blogs...

Speed Destiny
Cluelix
Wrecktical Supremacy.
#9 - 2014-05-28 14:29:03 UTC
Well, after 3 pages, I got nothing on the subject... I thought this is what community is for to help with specific questions... Google rendered posts from 2012-2013... I guess would have been easier to just answer instead of saying my questions are stupid.

I don't want to know what devs are planning, I just wanted to know what to buy for my next miner and since someone mentioned rebalancing, I thought someone can give me a hint of what's coming about ships I was asking...

Well, never mind. Nice community, and thanks for help.

Speed Destiny
Cluelix
Wrecktical Supremacy.
#10 - 2014-05-28 14:56:27 UTC
trevormax wrote:
Speed Destiny wrote:
There is something I don't understand...

In my Procurer with:

1x Modulated Strip Miner II (Crystal II)
2x Mining Laser Upgrade II

I get the following yield 3228 m3.

However if I monkey with Mackinaw in EveHQ, and add to it:

2x Modulated Strip Miner II (Crystal II)
3x Mining Laser Upgrade II

I get 3518 m3

This is very odd since it has two miners, why the difference is so low?


You must be doing something wrong. I can get 4016m3 with my mack. this is with exhumers 5, 3 MLU's, no links or implants. Maybe you need to take skills into account.

The Mack and Skiff gets a 1% / level yield bonus with each exhumer skill level which the proc does not get. The mack has an extra low for the 3rd MLU that a skiff and proc does not have. I am not fully up to date with the coming changes but I believe the skiff (and possibly the proc) will get an extra low.


No, I was calculating with MY CURRENT skills. I will check in EveHQ what can I train to get more... But thanks...
Speed Destiny
Cluelix
Wrecktical Supremacy.
#11 - 2014-05-28 15:00:21 UTC
Yes, I get 4015 m3 but IMHO costs and skills to switch are too low to worth it for me. from 3228 m3 to 4015 m3 clearly not does not justify for me buying the Mackinaw. Seems that Retriever is much better and seems cheaper as I have all T2 modules for it.

Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#12 - 2014-05-28 15:07:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Bronson Hughes
OP: This post from the F&I forum may help.

When CCP re-aligned the ORE line, they consciously chose to make yield more a property of which ship hull you chose, not T1 vs T2.

Procurer & Skiff are meant to be the tankiest ships, Retreiver & Mackinaw are meant to be the AFK-iest ships, and Covetor & Hulk are meant to be the yield-iest ships. CCP misjudged the draw of the AFK-iness of the Retreiver & Mack, so they're boosting the Procurer & Skiff and Covetor & Hulk to compensate.

Keep in mind, when you jump up from Mining Barges to Exhumers, you also gain slots and T2 shield resists.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Shiloh Templeton
Cheyenne HET Co
#13 - 2014-05-28 15:10:42 UTC
Speed Destiny wrote:
Well, never mind. Nice community, and thanks for help.
Don't be put off so easily. Sometimes people are gruff, but give good advice. Sometimes they're just gruff - tune those people out. Learning to read dev blogs is very useful, but more of an advanced skill.

Back to your question, the procurer is for tank, the retriever is for big ore hold, and covetor is for max yield. The T2 versions of each of these ships bulks up their intended strength.

Personally, I'm a fan of a tanked procurer when you are first starting as it makes you MUCH safer. Once you know what you're doing go for the retriever (or have both ships) if you feel like you're wasting too much time dropping off your ore at a station.

But the larger answer to your question is what do you want to do in Eve? Unless you really like mining you might be better off stopping at a T1 mining ship and start applying skill points towards other aspects of the game.

Finally, the upcoming changes are fairly subtle and won't change your decision for a solo miner.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#14 - 2014-05-28 15:11:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Velicitia
except that the retriever is more squishy.

You should also read the Fanfest 2014 devblog ... and watch the rebalancing video(s) from CCP Rise and Fozzie... as they're getting re-balanced again in July.

Proc / Skiff -- more tank, less yield
Ret / Mack -- less yield
Cov / Hulk -- more yield / range.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Aerie Evingod
Midwest Miners LLC
#15 - 2014-05-28 15:15:07 UTC
Speed Destiny wrote:
I was expecting that a T2 ship is more efficient than a T1...

Rebalancing in what way?



Because the mackinaw has to fly back to station less often thus it gets a yield boost by having its lasers on longer.

Also, you are comparing a procurer to a mackinaw but you should compare procurer to a skiff or retriever to a mackinaw. Procurer and skiff have the same role while retriever and mackinaw have the same role, just T1 vs T2.
Shiloh Templeton
Cheyenne HET Co
#16 - 2014-05-28 15:16:51 UTC
Speed Destiny wrote:
Yes, I get 4015 m3 but IMHO costs and skills to switch are too low to worth it for me. from 3228 m3 to 4015 m3 clearly not does not justify for me buying the Mackinaw. Seems that Retriever is much better and seems cheaper as I have all T2 modules for it.


Difference is that a retriever can be ganked by 1 catalyst. Mackinaw takes 2 cats. Why was I ganked? But many people think a T1 miner is a less attractive target and much cheaper to replace.

Don't forget to factor in the ore dump off time difference in calculating total yield between Procurer & Retriever.
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#17 - 2014-05-28 15:18:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Bronson Hughes
Velicitia wrote:
except that the retriever is more squishy.

You should also read the Fanfest 2014 devblog ... and watch the rebalancing video(s) from CCP Rise and Fozzie... as they're getting re-balanced again in July.

Proc / Skiff -- more tank, less yield
Ret / Mack -- less yield
Cov / Hulk -- more yield / range.


Yeah, I'm excited about this range bonus. They may need to dump their ore more often, but they won't spend as much time slowboating between rocks. Big smile

Shiloh Templeton wrote:
Difference is that a retriever can be ganked by 1 catalyst. Mackinaw takes 2 cats. Why was I ganked? But many people think a T1 miner is a less attractive target and much cheaper to replace.


This is why the only Exhumer I will ever fly will be a Skiff. Something about an expensive ship with a paper-thin tank just turns me off.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Aerie Evingod
Midwest Miners LLC
#18 - 2014-05-28 15:19:03 UTC
Speed Destiny wrote:
Yes, ok... I agree, it says so...

But from this point of view Mackinaw is almost no upgrade from Procurer... OK, it has a larger ore hold, I agree, but to fill it and make the same production with two miners, you will need to find big asteroids or constantly move it to new ones, which does not make it for a larger ore hold.

Or am I missing something?



Yes, in null sec there are arkonor, bistot, crokite and spodumain asteroids 100,000 units large, and at 16m3 per unit, those asteroids are 1,600,000m3 in size.
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#19 - 2014-05-28 15:35:27 UTC  |  Edited by: SurrenderMonkey
Speed Destiny wrote:


Or am I missing something?



You're mining, so odds are you're missing a lot of things.Lol

As others have noted, though, the barges are geared toward particular roles.

The procurer and skiff can sport battleship-grade tanks. They're designed to give a decent yield while being relatively "safe" from suicide ganking, etc.

The retriever and mackinaw have huge ore holds, making them good for AFK mining (provided you don't get suicide ganked).

The covetor and hulk get the best yield, but are very fragile. These are good for fleet mining ops, where their bonus yield will be further magnified by fleet boosts, and their small ore holds are a non-issue thanks to dedicated haulers, etc.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Quadpush
Doomheim
#20 - 2014-05-28 15:40:46 UTC
From my long mining experience, the only ships you need are (in order of progression):
Venture->Procurer->Skiff

If there was no ganking, I'd consider a retriever/mackinaw. The reason why hulks and covetors are bad is their tiny ore hold.

If you consider yeilds, consider also costs of losing ship repeatedly due to suicide and time to travel to station.
12Next page