These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Xenuria: CSM 10

First post First post
Author
HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#141 - 2015-01-16 17:16:04 UTC
ChYph3r wrote:
HarlyQ wrote:

Why don't you run for CSM I'd vote for you over xenuria anytime. Along with my massed accounts that I obviously buy.



OMG I love you, will you marry me and then we can use our combined bought accounts!

Of course I will start spending my 190k for new accounts today so that I can have them set up for voting time.
Alexa Machavela
KarmaFleet University
#142 - 2015-01-16 18:56:32 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
KuroVolt wrote:
Xenuria wrote:



If I worked for CCP my name would be

CCP Zarathustra

Okay, I'll bite.

The **** does that mean?


Zarathustra was a messianic iconoclast that enlightened people through science.



I also want to add that if I am elected to the CSM I will not resign.


I had absolutely no intention of voting for you anyway, so I can't truly say I am less likely to vote for you now. 'Less than zero' works in math as negative numbers, but in the case of voting, unfortunately, you cannot receive less than zero votes. That said, your comment about Zarathustra, more commonly known as Zoroaster, really goes to show what sort of person you are.

Zoroaster's many teachings are more accurately described as mythology, not science. Unless you have some sort of proof that obesity is really caused by a race of evil humanoids who forcibly interbred with humans, and who are living on the 'inner crust' of the earth under the light of the 'inner sun' burning at the center of the earth, and who can be found by walking through a cave complex that begins in the balmy center of the garden of eden (located at the north pole) and ends in the airy, temperate center of the earth, or that any of his other, less plausible, teachings are true, refrain from calling his teachings scientific.

I suppose the same magical thinking is what convinced you that all non-voting players in EVE want exactly the same things you want in game and that Goons have somehow kept them from voicing their wants and needs. (Coincidentally, the assumption that others want/think/need/feel what you want/think/need/feel is called 'projection'.

While Wikipedia isn't the absolute authority on any give topic, this particular article is rather accurate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

So long, and thanks for all the isk.

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#143 - 2015-01-16 21:27:05 UTC
Alexa Machavela wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
KuroVolt wrote:
Xenuria wrote:



If I worked for CCP my name would be

CCP Zarathustra

Okay, I'll bite.

The **** does that mean?


Zarathustra was a messianic iconoclast that enlightened people through science.



I also want to add that if I am elected to the CSM I will not resign.


I had absolutely no intention of voting for you anyway, so I can't truly say I am less likely to vote for you now. 'Less than zero' works in math as negative numbers, but in the case of voting, unfortunately, you cannot receive less than zero votes. That said, your comment about Zarathustra, more commonly known as Zoroaster, really goes to show what sort of person you are.

Zoroaster's many teachings are more accurately described as mythology, not science. Unless you have some sort of proof that obesity is really caused by a race of evil humanoids who forcibly interbred with humans, and who are living on the 'inner crust' of the earth under the light of the 'inner sun' burning at the center of the earth, and who can be found by walking through a cave complex that begins in the balmy center of the garden of eden (located at the north pole) and ends in the airy, temperate center of the earth, or that any of his other, less plausible, teachings are true, refrain from calling his teachings scientific.

I suppose the same magical thinking is what convinced you that all non-voting players in EVE want exactly the same things you want in game and that Goons have somehow kept them from voicing their wants and needs. (Coincidentally, the assumption that others want/think/need/feel what you want/think/need/feel is called 'projection'.

While Wikipedia isn't the absolute authority on any give topic, this particular article is rather accurate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

the sad part is, not only are you in goonswarm, but you arent agreeing with Xenuria, which obviously means you just didnt "read the OP" are "asking questions already answered to the most impeccable of standards", and "are just disagreeing to keep your firm grip on the CSM away from the 'silent majority'".

Dont worry Xenuria, I'll post for ya so you dont have to waste time with these "adherents to the status-quo"
Mikey Aivo
Original Sinners
Pandemic Legion
#144 - 2015-01-16 21:45:08 UTC
I listened to your interview from capstable. There seems to be alot past history with certian members of goons. Given that, would you listen to what a member in goons, or the cfc has to stay? The feeling i get from listening to you is theres alot of grrrr goonies just because of what a couple of people that we part of that group has done.
A second question for you, do you really feel that in a game that allows scaming, cheating, stealing and backstabbing, that having ccp police yet another aspect of the game is a good thing? I am reffering to your call to reform with the csm. Do you think the players themselves can and do keep everyone in check? The current csm 9 is, i think, an example of the players controlling the csm. They all as far as i can tell have done a pretty good job
Xenuria
#145 - 2015-01-16 23:49:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Xenuria
Mikey Aivo wrote:
I listened to your interview from capstable. There seems to be alot past history with certian members of goons. Given that, would you listen to what a member in goons, or the cfc has to stay? The feeling i get from listening to you is theres alot of grrrr goonies just because of what a couple of people that we part of that group has done.
A second question for you, do you really feel that in a game that allows scaming, cheating, stealing and backstabbing, that having ccp police yet another aspect of the game is a good thing? I am reffering to your call to reform with the csm. Do you think the players themselves can and do keep everyone in check? The current csm 9 is, i think, an example of the players controlling the csm. They all as far as i can tell have done a pretty good job


I would listen to what ANY player has to say in the context of the CSM.
Goon or not.


In terms of reform and policing, I think that if CCP wanted to reverse their decision of impersonation and misrepresentation than I wouldn't have much of a precedent to stand on. That said they likely will not and as such the CSM should NOT be exempt from this policy.

Alexa Machavela wrote:


I had absolutely no intention of voting for you anyway, so I can't truly say I am less likely to vote for you now. 'Less than zero' works in math as negative numbers, but in the case of voting, unfortunately, you cannot receive less than zero votes. That said, your comment about Zarathustra, more commonly known as Zoroaster, really goes to show what sort of person you are.

Zoroaster's many teachings are more accurately described as mythology, not science. Unless you have some sort of proof that obesity is really caused by a race of evil humanoids who forcibly interbred with humans, and who are living on the 'inner crust' of the earth under the light of the 'inner sun' burning at the center of the earth, and who can be found by walking through a cave complex that begins in the balmy center of the garden of eden (located at the north pole) and ends in the airy, temperate center of the earth, or that any of his other, less plausible, teachings are true, refrain from calling his teachings scientific.

I suppose the same magical thinking is what convinced you that all non-voting players in EVE want exactly the same things you want in game and that Goons have somehow kept them from voicing their wants and needs. (Coincidentally, the assumption that others want/think/need/feel what you want/think/need/feel is called 'projection'.

While Wikipedia isn't the absolute authority on any give topic, this particular article is rather accurate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection


You make a great deal of assumptions and leaps of logic for somebody so otherwise eloquent. By the way the psychological term you are looking for is "Proteus Effect", Not Psychological Projection.
Alexa Machavela
KarmaFleet University
#146 - 2015-01-17 02:53:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Alexa Machavela
Xenuria wrote:
Alexa Machavela wrote:


I had absolutely no intention of voting for you anyway, so I can't truly say I am less likely to vote for you now. 'Less than zero' works in math as negative numbers, but in the case of voting, unfortunately, you cannot receive less than zero votes. That said, your comment about Zarathustra, more commonly known as Zoroaster, really goes to show what sort of person you are.

Zoroaster's many teachings are more accurately described as mythology, not science. Unless you have some sort of proof that obesity is really caused by a race of evil humanoids who forcibly interbred with humans, and who are living on the 'inner crust' of the earth under the light of the 'inner sun' burning at the center of the earth, and who can be found by walking through a cave complex that begins in the balmy center of the garden of eden (located at the north pole) and ends in the airy, temperate center of the earth, or that any of his other, less plausible, teachings are true, refrain from calling his teachings scientific.

I suppose the same magical thinking is what convinced you that all non-voting players in EVE want exactly the same things you want in game and that Goons have somehow kept them from voicing their wants and needs. (Coincidentally, the assumption that others want/think/need/feel what you want/think/need/feel is called 'projection'.

While Wikipedia isn't the absolute authority on any give topic, this particular article is rather accurate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection


You make a great deal of assumptions and leaps of logic for somebody so otherwise eloquent. By the way the psychological term you are looking for is "Proteus Effect", Not Psychological Projection.


So, what you are saying is that you keep misunderstanding others and assuming all your thoughts, feelings, wants, and needs are actually not yours, but theirs, because they use avatars in EVE? Your inability to fathom the concept that not everyone is your mental and emotional clone is actually the fault of ... pixels?

Interesting. Perhaps you can explain how a man who dreamed up a multitude of other races and a home for them at the earth's center and how you perceive such obvious mythology as science is the fault of his non-existent avatar. I'm all ears.

So long, and thanks for all the isk.

HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#147 - 2015-01-17 03:35:16 UTC
Alexa Machavela wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
Alexa Machavela wrote:


I had absolutely no intention of voting for you anyway, so I can't truly say I am less likely to vote for you now. 'Less than zero' works in math as negative numbers, but in the case of voting, unfortunately, you cannot receive less than zero votes. That said, your comment about Zarathustra, more commonly known as Zoroaster, really goes to show what sort of person you are.

Zoroaster's many teachings are more accurately described as mythology, not science. Unless you have some sort of proof that obesity is really caused by a race of evil humanoids who forcibly interbred with humans, and who are living on the 'inner crust' of the earth under the light of the 'inner sun' burning at the center of the earth, and who can be found by walking through a cave complex that begins in the balmy center of the garden of eden (located at the north pole) and ends in the airy, temperate center of the earth, or that any of his other, less plausible, teachings are true, refrain from calling his teachings scientific.

I suppose the same magical thinking is what convinced you that all non-voting players in EVE want exactly the same things you want in game and that Goons have somehow kept them from voicing their wants and needs. (Coincidentally, the assumption that others want/think/need/feel what you want/think/need/feel is called 'projection'.

While Wikipedia isn't the absolute authority on any give topic, this particular article is rather accurate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection


You make a great deal of assumptions and leaps of logic for somebody so otherwise eloquent. By the way the psychological term you are looking for is "Proteus Effect", Not Psychological Projection.


So, what you are saying is that you keep misunderstanding others and assuming all your thoughts, feelings, wants, and needs are actually not yours, but theirs, because they use avatars in EVE? Your inability to fathom the concept that not everyone is your mental and emotional clone is actually the fault of ... pixels?

Interesting. Perhaps you can explain how a man who dreamed up a multitude of other races and a home for them at the earth's center and how you perceive such obvious mythology as science is the fault of his non-existent avatar. I'm all ears.


That is some spooky stuff. Does that mean when I meet xenuria he should behave act and look like his avatar? If so I would need an adult.
Alexa Machavela
KarmaFleet University
#148 - 2015-01-17 04:59:43 UTC
HarlyQ wrote:
That is some spooky stuff. Does that mean when I meet xenuria he should behave act and look like his avatar? If so I would need an adult.


I suggest more than one adult. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGmegh8PUAs#t=2mo07s

So long, and thanks for all the isk.

HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#149 - 2015-01-17 05:09:05 UTC
Alexa Machavela wrote:
HarlyQ wrote:
That is some spooky stuff. Does that mean when I meet xenuria he should behave act and look like his avatar? If so I would need an adult.


I suggest more than one adult. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGmegh8PUAs#t=2mo07s

I'm never going to anything xenuria is, that was creepy.
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#150 - 2015-01-17 10:08:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Reaver Glitterstim
Xenuria wrote:
You make a great deal of assumptions and leaps of logic for somebody so otherwise eloquent. By the way the psychological term you are looking for is "Proteus Effect", Not Psychological Projection.

Actually Alexa Machavela described Psychological Projection, and you seem to do that a LOT. The Proteus Effect has nothing to do with anything that Alexa Machavela was talking about.

Interesting effect though. I'm glad you brought it up, am now reading the wiki page on it and am glad I can now give a name to this effect.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Xenuria
#151 - 2015-01-17 17:25:51 UTC
I think all the armchair psychologists should stay on topic lest they provide more cringe for actual psychologists...

HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#152 - 2015-01-17 17:44:50 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
I think all the armchair psychologists should stay on topic lest they provide more cringe for actual psychologists...


I could have sworn that talking about your CSM beliefs and how you project them onto other people was staying on topic. I guess you don't like people telling you to stop thinking you know what they want. Also did you bring up the proteus effect because you are starting to act like the character Xenuria instead of the person that plays her on a game?
Xenuria
#153 - 2015-01-17 18:38:05 UTC
HarlyQ wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
I think all the armchair psychologists should stay on topic lest they provide more cringe for actual psychologists...


I could have sworn that talking about your CSM beliefs and how you project them onto other people was staying on topic. I guess you don't like people telling you to stop thinking you know what they want. Also did you bring up the proteus effect because you are starting to act like the character Xenuria instead of the person that plays her on a game?


All of that is on you, as I said before you are making assumptions without any prompting. How you choose to imagine me in your own head cannon is not a subject of import here. Please try and stay on topic.
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#154 - 2015-01-18 18:11:42 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
HarlyQ wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
I think all the armchair psychologists should stay on topic lest they provide more cringe for actual psychologists...


I could have sworn that talking about your CSM beliefs and how you project them onto other people was staying on topic. I guess you don't like people telling you to stop thinking you know what they want. Also did you bring up the proteus effect because you are starting to act like the character Xenuria instead of the person that plays her on a game?


All of that is on you, as I said before you are making assumptions without any prompting. How you choose to imagine me in your own head cannon is not a subject of import here. Please try and stay on topic.

There are only 2 ways for a politically-based discussion is (and this is one). Either you answer all questions, no matter how redundant or pointless, to the best of your abilities, or people will start making assumptions based on you avoiding answering said question which requires you to provide evidence to sufficiently dispel aforementioned assumptions.

Right now all your doing is making yourself look silly. Besides that, you need to realize at this point, based on your forum history over the years, you "opinion" has become a little joke in the EVE community. You should realize at this point based on that past history the chances of you getting onto the CSM are mediocre at best, and frankly even assuming you DID, I wouldnt imagine you lasting long, since so far you havent expressed the greatest skill in working or communicating with others.

In short, my faith in you as a representative or even a political figure is below that of Mittens (at least he could ACT like a politician)
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#155 - 2015-01-18 19:52:00 UTC
I have proof that Xenuria's voterbase is 90% female. I am 90% female and 10% male, and I voted for Xenuria.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Xenuria
#156 - 2015-01-18 20:18:27 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
HarlyQ wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
I think all the armchair psychologists should stay on topic lest they provide more cringe for actual psychologists...


I could have sworn that talking about your CSM beliefs and how you project them onto other people was staying on topic. I guess you don't like people telling you to stop thinking you know what they want. Also did you bring up the proteus effect because you are starting to act like the character Xenuria instead of the person that plays her on a game?


All of that is on you, as I said before you are making assumptions without any prompting. How you choose to imagine me in your own head cannon is not a subject of import here. Please try and stay on topic.

There are only 2 ways for a politically-based discussion is (and this is one). Either you answer all questions, no matter how redundant or pointless, to the best of your abilities, or people will start making assumptions based on you avoiding answering said question which requires you to provide evidence to sufficiently dispel aforementioned assumptions.

Right now all your doing is making yourself look silly. Besides that, you need to realize at this point, based on your forum history over the years, you "opinion" has become a little joke in the EVE community. You should realize at this point based on that past history the chances of you getting onto the CSM are mediocre at best, and frankly even assuming you DID, I wouldnt imagine you lasting long, since so far you havent expressed the greatest skill in working or communicating with others.

In short, my faith in you as a representative or even a political figure is below that of Mittens (at least he could ACT like a politician)


There are rules here on the forum that preclude me from properly tending to some of the more wild elements of this thread. I am not the first CSM candidate to ignore trolls and flame bait.
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#157 - 2015-01-18 22:59:59 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
HarlyQ wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
I think all the armchair psychologists should stay on topic lest they provide more cringe for actual psychologists...


I could have sworn that talking about your CSM beliefs and how you project them onto other people was staying on topic. I guess you don't like people telling you to stop thinking you know what they want. Also did you bring up the proteus effect because you are starting to act like the character Xenuria instead of the person that plays her on a game?


All of that is on you, as I said before you are making assumptions without any prompting. How you choose to imagine me in your own head cannon is not a subject of import here. Please try and stay on topic.

There are only 2 ways for a politically-based discussion is (and this is one). Either you answer all questions, no matter how redundant or pointless, to the best of your abilities, or people will start making assumptions based on you avoiding answering said question which requires you to provide evidence to sufficiently dispel aforementioned assumptions.

Right now all your doing is making yourself look silly. Besides that, you need to realize at this point, based on your forum history over the years, you "opinion" has become a little joke in the EVE community. You should realize at this point based on that past history the chances of you getting onto the CSM are mediocre at best, and frankly even assuming you DID, I wouldnt imagine you lasting long, since so far you havent expressed the greatest skill in working or communicating with others.

In short, my faith in you as a representative or even a political figure is below that of Mittens (at least he could ACT like a politician)


There are rules here on the forum that preclude me from properly tending to some of the more wild elements of this thread. I am not the first CSM candidate to ignore trolls and flame bait.

your also not the first CSM candidate to NOT get elected because you treat EVERY question you dont feel like answering as a troll or flamebait.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#158 - 2015-01-18 23:18:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcanis
To be fair, Ankhthingummy did get elected wit that strategy. But she was about 8000x more politically deft than Xenuria.

Although she was also equally batshit insane, ofc.

EDIT: http://eve-search.com/search/author/Ankhesentapemkah, that was her name. Man that was some quality drama.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#159 - 2015-01-19 03:58:42 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
HarlyQ wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
I think all the armchair psychologists should stay on topic lest they provide more cringe for actual psychologists...


I could have sworn that talking about your CSM beliefs and how you project them onto other people was staying on topic. I guess you don't like people telling you to stop thinking you know what they want. Also did you bring up the proteus effect because you are starting to act like the character Xenuria instead of the person that plays her on a game?


All of that is on you, as I said before you are making assumptions without any prompting. How you choose to imagine me in your own head cannon is not a subject of import here. Please try and stay on topic.

Didn't you bring up proteus effect? Oh wait you did ;) so how am I off topic?
Jenshae Chiroptera
#160 - 2015-01-20 06:17:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Xenuria wrote:
....few people would disagree with my goal to reform the way in which the CSM functions.
I agree there is something wrong that null sec holds the majority of CSM seats.

This is the first time I have noticed your thread. Although ... your methods are ... interesting. Here is a bump. At least we agree there is something wrong with the voting mechanism.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.