These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Xenuria: CSM 10

First post First post
Author
Swanky nutjob
Holding Inc.
#121 - 2015-01-13 12:52:50 UTC
Xenuria, you say people bought votes or paid for plex to make accounts to vote rig. Do you realise how utterly ludicrous that sounds? Lets do some math and assume that for me to get into the CSM I need 9000 votes.

If we assume plex is 900m ISK, for me to get 9000 votes I'd need to spend 8,100,000,000,000 ISK on plex to go with that theory. Even if we take plex (or 30 day time codes) prices from several years ago at 450m a pop, that is still a rather large sum. The only people that could likely afford that sort of ISK are also the sort of people that can send out a Jabber ping asking their coalition to vote for them and not have to resort to buying accounts to vote for themselves. I don't think it's even worth discussing the amount of time it would take to sign up, sign in and vote on even 100 accounts let alone 9k.

Ok, so that idea is pretty preposterous. How about we use real money to buy 9000 plex. At today's prices that's just shy of 180,000 USD. OK, so that idea is pretty silly as well. Even if we just assume to get 1000 votes from these methods the numbers and effort is quite ridiculous.

Yes, CCP said that in one instance that there was a mention of people using ISK to buy votes however that was pretty public when the player claimed they'd do it and I don't believe they ever followed through with it and it was back in 2011.

Lorkin Desal
That Hole Over There
#122 - 2015-01-13 12:59:20 UTC
So if I put you in a room with a load of "smug socially validated eve players" and then moved you to a room with normal people, what would happen?

A: Nothing, you simply manage to alienate yourself and offend every single social group in EVE, evidenced by your recent appearance on capstable.


Does your mere presence emasculate people? You must be in the wrong job?

How would you regard your comments of last year when you called an employee of CCP Games "F**ktarded stupid"? Are you ready to quit flinging mud at people you dont like or don't agree with?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YptZn2M7AoQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5tIApvVfGY

(Thats the person you'll be voting for btw, would not vote, sharp knees etc)
Xenuria
#123 - 2015-01-13 15:00:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Xenuria
Lorkin Desal wrote:
So if I put you in a room with a load of "smug socially validated eve players" and then moved you to a room with normal people, what would happen?

A: Nothing, you simply manage to alienate yourself and offend every single social group in EVE, evidenced by your recent appearance on capstable.


Does your mere presence emasculate people? You must be in the wrong job?

How would you regard your comments of last year when you called an employee of CCP Games "F**ktarded stupid"? Are you ready to quit flinging mud at people you dont like or don't agree with?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YptZn2M7AoQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5tIApvVfGY

(Thats the person you'll be voting for btw, would not vote, sharp knees etc)


I explained in the interview that (Former CCP) Dolan was not taking the process seriously. He banned me from participating because he claimed I did damage to CCP servers in a cyber attack. When asked for proof he cited a post on 4chan.

"The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact." -4chan disclaimer


I recommend you do some research before mincing contexts and content like they were some kind of ~Distraction Milkshake~.

Swanky nutjob wrote:
Xenuria, you say people bought votes or paid for plex to make accounts to vote rig. Do you realise how utterly ludicrous that sounds? Lets do some math and assume that for me to get into the CSM I need 9000 votes.

If we assume plex is 900m ISK, for me to get 9000 votes I'd need to spend 8,100,000,000,000 ISK on plex to go with that theory. Even if we take plex (or 30 day time codes) prices from several years ago at 450m a pop, that is still a rather large sum. The only people that could likely afford that sort of ISK are also the sort of people that can send out a Jabber ping asking their coalition to vote for them and not have to resort to buying accounts to vote for themselves. I don't think it's even worth discussing the amount of time it would take to sign up, sign in and vote on even 100 accounts let alone 9k.

Ok, so that idea is pretty preposterous. How about we use real money to buy 9000 plex. At today's prices that's just shy of 180,000 USD. OK, so that idea is pretty silly as well. Even if we just assume to get 1000 votes from these methods the numbers and effort is quite ridiculous.

Yes, CCP said that in one instance that there was a mention of people using ISK to buy votes however that was pretty public when the player claimed they'd do it and I don't believe they ever followed through with it and it was back in 2011.


In most other games the impracticality of a caper or play is a deterrent, in EvE it's a challenge. You have to understand that people in eve throw money around in some of the most irresponsible ways imaginable. No fit too shiney, no election too costly.
saranhealer
Geordie Boys on Tour
GEORDIE BOYS
#124 - 2015-01-13 16:01:24 UTC  |  Edited by: saranhealer
Xenuria wrote:
Lorkin Desal wrote:
So if I put you in a room with a load of "smug socially validated eve players" and then moved you to a room with normal people, what would happen?

A: Nothing, you simply manage to alienate yourself and offend every single social group in EVE, evidenced by your recent appearance on capstable.


Does your mere presence emasculate people? You must be in the wrong job?

How would you regard your comments of last year when you called an employee of CCP Games "F**ktarded stupid"? Are you ready to quit flinging mud at people you dont like or don't agree with?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YptZn2M7AoQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5tIApvVfGY

(Thats the person you'll be voting for btw, would not vote, sharp knees etc)


I explained in the interview that (Former CCP) Dolan was not taking the process seriously. He banned me from participating because he claimed I did damage to CCP servers in a cyber attack. When asked for proof he cited a post on 4chan.

"The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact." -4chan disclaimer


I recommend you do some research before mincing contexts and content like they were some kind of ~Distraction Milkshake~.

Swanky nutjob wrote:
Xenuria, you say people bought votes or paid for plex to make accounts to vote rig. Do you realise how utterly ludicrous that sounds? Lets do some math and assume that for me to get into the CSM I need 9000 votes.

If we assume plex is 900m ISK, for me to get 9000 votes I'd need to spend 8,100,000,000,000 ISK on plex to go with that theory. Even if we take plex (or 30 day time codes) prices from several years ago at 450m a pop, that is still a rather large sum. The only people that could likely afford that sort of ISK are also the sort of people that can send out a Jabber ping asking their coalition to vote for them and not have to resort to buying accounts to vote for themselves. I don't think it's even worth discussing the amount of time it would take to sign up, sign in and vote on even 100 accounts let alone 9k.

Ok, so that idea is pretty preposterous. How about we use real money to buy 9000 plex. At today's prices that's just shy of 180,000 USD. OK, so that idea is pretty silly as well. Even if we just assume to get 1000 votes from these methods the numbers and effort is quite ridiculous.

Yes, CCP said that in one instance that there was a mention of people using ISK to buy votes however that was pretty public when the player claimed they'd do it and I don't believe they ever followed through with it and it was back in 2011.


In most other games the impracticality of a caper or play is a deterrent, in EvE it's a challenge. You have to understand that people in eve throw money around in some of the most irresponsible ways imaginable. No fit too shiney, no election too costly.


the CSM voting should not be letting 2 of the same corp or allinace be members of , which is not fair to be having same people in same corp and most of it is cfc

Think the CSM is bad idea
i am 2evil
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#125 - 2015-01-13 16:06:58 UTC
Swanky nutjob wrote:
Xenuria, you say people bought votes or paid for plex to make accounts to vote rig. Do you realise how utterly ludicrous that sounds? Lets do some math and assume that for me to get into the CSM I need 9000 votes.

If we assume plex is 900m ISK, for me to get 9000 votes I'd need to spend 8,100,000,000,000 ISK on plex to go with that theory. Even if we take plex (or 30 day time codes) prices from several years ago at 450m a pop, that is still a rather large sum. The only people that could likely afford that sort of ISK are also the sort of people that can send out a Jabber ping asking their coalition to vote for them and not have to resort to buying accounts to vote for themselves. I don't think it's even worth discussing the amount of time it would take to sign up, sign in and vote on even 100 accounts let alone 9k.

Ok, so that idea is pretty preposterous. How about we use real money to buy 9000 plex. At today's prices that's just shy of 180,000 USD. OK, so that idea is pretty silly as well. Even if we just assume to get 1000 votes from these methods the numbers and effort is quite ridiculous.

Yes, CCP said that in one instance that there was a mention of people using ISK to buy votes however that was pretty public when the player claimed they'd do it and I don't believe they ever followed through with it and it was back in 2011.



kinda fixed the CSM voting as we allready know who will win even before it is casted as goons all vote for them self and cfc would also vote for them self,
Swanky nutjob
Holding Inc.
#126 - 2015-01-13 17:25:15 UTC
The CSM vote isn't fixed. Asking your alliance to vote for you is not fixing it, it's simply asking your party members to vote for you. Your saying that it's fixed if all Tory or Republican party members vote for the Tory or Republican party?

Xenuria wrote:

In most other games the impracticality of a caper or play is a deterrent, in EvE it's a challenge. You have to understand that people in eve throw money around in some of the most irresponsible ways imaginable. No fit too shiney, no election too costly.


I don't think you have a true grasp on reality if you seriously think anyone on the CSM, past or present actually paid either ISK or real money to get onto it. It's just not that important, pays off well enough or can't be gained in other ways like pre-populated polls (in years past) or a simple jabber ping saying please vote for this list, in this order.

Or possibly you don't understand communities and what binds them means they don't have to buy votes. Its the Gevlon Goblins of this world that would have to resort to paying or those candidates without an alliance behind them who can't rely on a free backing. If you think that a Goon or PL candidate had to pay when they have a free source of willing voters, enough to get them in without a worry, you're barking up the wrong tree.
HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#127 - 2015-01-13 20:34:41 UTC
Swanky nutjob wrote:
The CSM vote isn't fixed. Asking your alliance to vote for you is not fixing it, it's simply asking your party members to vote for you. Your saying that it's fixed if all Tory or Republican party members vote for the Tory or Republican party?

Xenuria wrote:

In most other games the impracticality of a caper or play is a deterrent, in EvE it's a challenge. You have to understand that people in eve throw money around in some of the most irresponsible ways imaginable. No fit too shiney, no election too costly.


I don't think you have a true grasp on reality if you seriously think anyone on the CSM, past or present actually paid either ISK or real money to get onto it. It's just not that important, pays off well enough or can't be gained in other ways like pre-populated polls (in years past) or a simple jabber ping saying please vote for this list, in this order.

Or possibly you don't understand communities and what binds them means they don't have to buy votes. Its the Gevlon Goblins of this world that would have to resort to paying or those candidates without an alliance behind them who can't rely on a free backing. If you think that a Goon or PL candidate had to pay when they have a free source of willing voters, enough to get them in without a worry, you're barking up the wrong tree.


Why don't you run for CSM I'd vote for you over xenuria anytime. Along with my massed accounts that I obviously buy.
ChYph3r
A Murder Of Crows.
Homicidal Tendencies.
#128 - 2015-01-14 02:50:02 UTC
HarlyQ wrote:

Why don't you run for CSM I'd vote for you over xenuria anytime. Along with my massed accounts that I obviously buy.



OMG I love you, will you marry me and then we can use our combined bought accounts!

Want to find all the podcasts around EVE Online visit http://evepodcasts.com @chyph3r  on Twitter

Jayne Fillon
#129 - 2015-01-14 06:40:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Jayne Fillon
Swanky nutjob wrote:
If we assume plex is 900M ISK, for me to get 9000 votes I'd need to spend...
fwiw the amount of votes you needed to get elected last year was 830, which makes that number a lot more reasonable. Still insane, but within the realm of possibility. I mean, 700B is easily doable, for example that was the sponsorship that IWantISK provided to #EVE_NT.

Maybe the gambling websites should just elect their own members? Ahahaha.... I don't like where this is going. What?

Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.

Nostromo Fidanza
Blueprint Mania
#130 - 2015-01-14 15:54:25 UTC
The people who cry "fixed" are the ones who can't win it outright to begin with. Instead of admitting they weren't good enough or no one voted for me they play the fixed card. Typical.
Xenuria
#131 - 2015-01-14 17:29:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Xenuria
Nostromo Fidanza wrote:
The people who cry "fixed" are the ones who can't win it outright to begin with. Instead of admitting they weren't good enough or no one voted for me they play the fixed card. Typical.

I never said it was fixed.

The only thing typical is the percentage of posters here that didn't bother reading anything before clicking "POST".

Jayne Fillon wrote:
Swanky nutjob wrote:
If we assume plex is 900M ISK, for me to get 9000 votes I'd need to spend...
fwiw the amount of votes you needed to get elected last year was 830, which makes that number a lot more reasonable. Still insane, but within the realm of possibility. I mean, 700B is easily doable, for example that was the sponsorship that IWantISK provided to #EVE_NT.

Maybe the gambling websites should just elect their own members? Ahahaha.... I don't like where this is going. What?


Satirical or not, this is kind of my point. CCP has such robust methods to shut down bot and RMT farms; yet these same methods are not used for vote farming. The legitimacy of voting blocs is not in question.

I take issue with the reality that according to CCP and the CSM WhitePaper, there is not a single policy prohibiting the wholesale purchase and plexing of accounts for the sole purpose of vote power. Buying loads of accounts and actually playing them or using them is entirely different than only ever logging them in to plex them.
HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#132 - 2015-01-14 19:18:15 UTC
I am looking forward to seeing how small a percentage of eve votes for you.Lol
Suede
State War Academy
Caldari State
#133 - 2015-01-14 22:31:04 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Nostromo Fidanza wrote:
The people who cry "fixed" are the ones who can't win it outright to begin with. Instead of admitting they weren't good enough or no one voted for me they play the fixed card. Typical.

I never said it was fixed.

The only thing typical is the percentage of posters here that didn't bother reading anything before clicking "POST".

Jayne Fillon wrote:
Swanky nutjob wrote:
If we assume plex is 900M ISK, for me to get 9000 votes I'd need to spend...
fwiw the amount of votes you needed to get elected last year was 830, which makes that number a lot more reasonable. Still insane, but within the realm of possibility. I mean, 700B is easily doable, for example that was the sponsorship that IWantISK provided to #EVE_NT.

Maybe the gambling websites should just elect their own members? Ahahaha.... I don't like where this is going. What?


Satirical or not, this is kind of my point. CCP has such robust methods to shut down bot and RMT farms; yet these same methods are not used for vote farming. The legitimacy of voting blocs is not in question.

I take issue with the reality that according to CCP and the CSM WhitePaper, there is not a single policy prohibiting the wholesale purchase and plexing of accounts for the sole purpose of vote power. Buying loads of accounts and actually playing them or using them is entirely different than only ever logging them in to plex them.



Get my vote any time,
saranhealer
Geordie Boys on Tour
GEORDIE BOYS
#134 - 2015-01-14 22:32:22 UTC
other vote here
HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#135 - 2015-01-15 06:50:28 UTC  |  Edited by: HarlyQ
You should post with your mains like Xenuria wants us to.
Smile

I wonder could Xenuria be using mass amounts of accounts to vote for him. Shocked
Praetoris Domitian
Eiheiji Monastery
#136 - 2015-01-16 03:22:14 UTC
I'll start by saying I know next to nothing about you outside of seeing the animosity goons have for you in the TMC comment section.

So I've read your OP, and listened to the podcast. This is what I've come away with about your platform.

- STV voting system is corruptible.
- Vote buying
- System gives advantage to large sovnull blocs

- CSM candidates are allowed to misrepresent themselves

- Need term limits

- RMTing is bad

- Botting is bad

So it seems pretty safe to say the summation is that you don't like cheating, or things that smack of cheating.

From what little I understand of the day to day process of the CSM, it's mostly CCP coming to the CSM with their own ideas, and asking the CSM what they think about them, so they can gauge possible player (customer) reaction to changes. It seems like those ideas are focused on game mechanics, and possibly appearance. If that is what happens, and they don't come to you asking about the CSM election process, RMTing, or botting, but instead about game mechanics, what kind of experience do you have in game?

You seem to take the position that you have no in-game loyalties to any organizations, and at the same time you've been in all parts of the game (i.e. WHs, Null, FW, Hi-sec, etc.). So here are my questions-

What experience do you have in what parts of space?

What kinds of organizations have you been a part of?

Have you held positions of responsibility in said organizations, and what were they?

Are there mechanics you've found through those experiences that you'd like to see fixed, and what are the fixes you'd prefer?

Do you have any theories, or preferences on how sovnull mechanics should be changed?
Blue spy
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#137 - 2015-01-16 11:39:49 UTC
Can you offer any kind of guarantee that if I were to vote for you; that my vote would be more wasted than if I were to simply vote for the leading goon candidate?
Swanky nutjob
Holding Inc.
#138 - 2015-01-16 13:32:48 UTC
Xenuria wrote:


I take issue with the reality that according to CCP and the CSM WhitePaper, there is not a single policy prohibiting the wholesale purchase and plexing of accounts for the sole purpose of vote power.


Probably because the very concept is so utterly daft they didn't bother to waste the time to write something.
Xenuria
#139 - 2015-01-16 14:43:40 UTC
Praetoris Domitian wrote:
I'll start by saying I know next to nothing about you outside of seeing the animosity goons have for you in the TMC comment section.

So I've read your OP, and listened to the podcast. This is what I've come away with about your platform.

- STV voting system is corruptible.
- Vote buying
- System gives advantage to large sovnull blocs

- CSM candidates are allowed to misrepresent themselves

- Need term limits

- RMTing is bad

- Botting is bad

So it seems pretty safe to say the summation is that you don't like cheating, or things that smack of cheating.

From what little I understand of the day to day process of the CSM, it's mostly CCP coming to the CSM with their own ideas, and asking the CSM what they think about them, so they can gauge possible player (customer) reaction to changes. It seems like those ideas are focused on game mechanics, and possibly appearance. If that is what happens, and they don't come to you asking about the CSM election process, RMTing, or botting, but instead about game mechanics, what kind of experience do you have in game?

You seem to take the position that you have no in-game loyalties to any organizations, and at the same time you've been in all parts of the game (i.e. WHs, Null, FW, Hi-sec, etc.). So here are my questions-

What experience do you have in what parts of space?

What kinds of organizations have you been a part of?

Have you held positions of responsibility in said organizations, and what were they?

Are there mechanics you've found through those experiences that you'd like to see fixed, and what are the fixes you'd prefer?

Do you have any theories, or preferences on how sovnull mechanics should be changed?


-What experience do you have in what parts of space?-

I have been in every kind of space at least once, the area of space where I have the least amount of experience is probably wormholes. When I do anything in-game or otherwise and I encounter something that confuses me I research it, it's a reflex.

-What kinds of organizations have you been a part of?-
Hydra Reloaded, Pasta/Pizza, DTF (Incursion),PL OG.
I have been in many different orgs, some of which were doing interesting stuff and others not so much. I still spent the time to learn about it either way.

-Have you held positions of responsibility in said organizations, and what were they?-
I was the acting director of Hydra Reloaded for a awhile, I started a rather amusing task force to protect carebears from gate camps. It worked really well because gate campers just warped off when they saw our fleet.

I was an albatross for PIZZA/PASTA several times. I was really good at being in he right place at the right time.

When in PL I just played ARMA 3 with some of the people on mumble and learned about what they do in-between dropping fleets on people.

I participated in a incursion caper with Darious III, wherein we would kill the mothership to prevent people from farming isk in incursion systems. I like doing things that are challenging yet fascinating.

-Are there mechanics you've found through those experiences that you'd like to see fixed, and what are the fixes you'd prefer?-
Since CCP Seagull rose to power within CCP, most of the changes I would have advocated for happened already. There are still things I would change or see changed, but I will defer to my peers who have more experience in those areas. My stretch goal is the HD Texture Packs that CCP has been alluding too for years now. Some of the clothing items look like they were rendered in second life, the texture quality is practically anachronistic when compared to the other assets of eve.

-Do you have any theories, or preferences on how sovnull mechanics should be changed?-

I think occupancy based sov is the best sov. This gives other player entities a chance to carve out a place of their own.

HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#140 - 2015-01-16 17:14:03 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Praetoris Domitian wrote:
I'll start by saying I know next to nothing about you outside of seeing the animosity goons have for you in the TMC comment section.

So I've read your OP, and listened to the podcast. This is what I've come away with about your platform.

- STV voting system is corruptible.
- Vote buying
- System gives advantage to large sovnull blocs

- CSM candidates are allowed to misrepresent themselves

- Need term limits

- RMTing is bad

- Botting is bad

So it seems pretty safe to say the summation is that you don't like cheating, or things that smack of cheating.

From what little I understand of the day to day process of the CSM, it's mostly CCP coming to the CSM with their own ideas, and asking the CSM what they think about them, so they can gauge possible player (customer) reaction to changes. It seems like those ideas are focused on game mechanics, and possibly appearance. If that is what happens, and they don't come to you asking about the CSM election process, RMTing, or botting, but instead about game mechanics, what kind of experience do you have in game?

You seem to take the position that you have no in-game loyalties to any organizations, and at the same time you've been in all parts of the game (i.e. WHs, Null, FW, Hi-sec, etc.). So here are my questions-

What experience do you have in what parts of space?

What kinds of organizations have you been a part of?

Have you held positions of responsibility in said organizations, and what were they?

Are there mechanics you've found through those experiences that you'd like to see fixed, and what are the fixes you'd prefer?

Do you have any theories, or preferences on how sovnull mechanics should be changed?


-What experience do you have in what parts of space?-

I have been in every kind of space at least once, the area of space where I have the least amount of experience is probably wormholes. When I do anything in-game or otherwise and I encounter something that confuses me I research it, it's a reflex.

-What kinds of organizations have you been a part of?-
Hydra Reloaded, Pasta/Pizza, DTF (Incursion),PL OG.
I have been in many different orgs, some of which were doing interesting stuff and others not so much. I still spent the time to learn about it either way.

-Have you held positions of responsibility in said organizations, and what were they?-
I was the acting director of Hydra Reloaded for a awhile, I started a rather amusing task force to protect carebears from gate camps. It worked really well because gate campers just warped off when they saw our fleet.

I was an albatross for PIZZA/PASTA several times. I was really good at being in he right place at the right time.

When in PL I just played ARMA 3 with some of the people on mumble and learned about what they do in-between dropping fleets on people.

I participated in a incursion caper with Darious III, wherein we would kill the mothership to prevent people from farming isk in incursion systems. I like doing things that are challenging yet fascinating.

-Are there mechanics you've found through those experiences that you'd like to see fixed, and what are the fixes you'd prefer?-
Since CCP Seagull rose to power within CCP, most of the changes I would have advocated for happened already. There are still things I would change or see changed, but I will defer to my peers who have more experience in those areas. My stretch goal is the HD Texture Packs that CCP has been alluding too for years now. Some of the clothing items look like they were rendered in second life, the texture quality is practically anachronistic when compared to the other assets of eve.

-Do you have any theories, or preferences on how sovnull mechanics should be changed?-

I think occupancy based sov is the best sov. This gives other player entities a chance to carve out a place of their own.


Been in every kind of space once that makes you understand how the system works? Dumbest thing I have read from you on here yet.

when did you act as a director of Hydra reloaded?

Explain albatross for pizza, because honestly it only sounds like a cooler word for scout or tackler.

I don't think anyone cares about you playing ARMA 3 with PL because who doesn't.

Incursion I guess that's cool? I mean we ran an entire incursion down in less than 16 hours.