These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

'winning'

Author
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#21 - 2011-11-17 00:57:34 UTC
Silent Lamb wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Quote:
I have 7 (yes seven) active accounts that are mine that I pay for,




You see that's the problem right there.


In order to "win" at EvE you need to have multiple accounts.

Multiple accounts because you need scouts to go anywhere in 0.0 as there is nothing left for most of the people out there to do but kill anything that is not blue.
Multiple accounts because you can't trust anyone to buy or sell with without getting scammed so you make your own stuff
Multiple accounts because you can't trust strangers in your corp because of corp theft and spies
Multiple accounts because you need an alt for every role whereas one pays for the other or supports the other: an indie alt, a PVP alt, a scouting alt, a mining alt, a missioning alt - did I miss anything?
Multiple accounts because when one is camped into a station you need another one to play on.
Multiple accounts because you need that (possibly neutral) RR
Multiple accounts because fleeting up with more than 2 people is like herding cats


Could it be that there are a lot of flaws in this game due to mechanics and general asshattery that is "solved" with multiple accounts?

And how does such a game survive in a global economy that is going to the dogs?

How many people leave this game because they end up thinking "Ok so the only way to play this game is to pay for more accounts? And who makes the money for those extra subs, the people who made the game such that you need extra subs? What kind of scam is that? Screw this".


Things are going to have to change if there is to be a future. Because even now, a 7 sub player is cheezed at something and if it's not the game itself, there goes 7 subs. Perhaps this game will die if say 40,000 players leave, because how many subs do they have?

CCP needs to find a way to make this game appeal to INDIVIDUAL players and lots of them. When it's "multiple subs or die", it looks like a scam.





no, actually. 4 pvp based toons, 2 that are with goons currently, 1 that's in an npc corp now (my nyx pilot) (used him to spy on the SC back when the nc/sc wars existed/mattered), and 1 that's in a high sec war dec oriented corp. 3 indy accounts with one of the accounts having 2 effective toons to help boost in production, with the other 3 being hulk pilots with one of them having the capabilities of piloting an orca at perfect. I have trained other hulk alts on 2 of those accounts, and moved them over to my pvp accounts to help boost in mineral acquisition for production. I don't have a toon for each role in EVE. I have no desire or need to have a toon for each role in EVE. I do have a crapload of people I trust, one of them being my current room mate, who I actually only know because of this game. I've gotten to trust many many people, who are effectively 'pets' of sorts, and they know this, and don't really care considering I take care of them and compensate them more than necessary for their efforts.

yes, I am a bitter vet. and I have attempted to adapt and change as the times have progressed while keeping the playing style I had in previous times.... it's just that CCP doesn't provide new material for me to continue with my playing style while taking away the capability of maintaining the old ones.



I see where you are coming from - perhaps then you should consider that you have done it all, won EvE, and then move on?


As for the game being idiot proof I would disagree. The idiots are ruining the game now more than ever.


Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Silent Lamb
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2011-11-17 00:59:08 UTC


lol..... try 9 monitors, 7 for EVE while having 12 towers and the additional 2 laptops for when i'm not at home and need multiple computers. I program for the US DoD.... I would never have a setup that small or laughable.... although I like the shirt, I would wear it outside the entire storm trooper outfit, not just wear the helmet.

Where are they taking the hobbits?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=VznlDlNPw4Q

Silent Lamb
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2011-11-17 01:00:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Silent Lamb
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Silent Lamb wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Quote:
I have 7 (yes seven) active accounts that are mine that I pay for,




You see that's the problem right there.


In order to "win" at EvE you need to have multiple accounts.

Multiple accounts because you need scouts to go anywhere in 0.0 as there is nothing left for most of the people out there to do but kill anything that is not blue.
Multiple accounts because you can't trust anyone to buy or sell with without getting scammed so you make your own stuff
Multiple accounts because you can't trust strangers in your corp because of corp theft and spies
Multiple accounts because you need an alt for every role whereas one pays for the other or supports the other: an indie alt, a PVP alt, a scouting alt, a mining alt, a missioning alt - did I miss anything?
Multiple accounts because when one is camped into a station you need another one to play on.
Multiple accounts because you need that (possibly neutral) RR
Multiple accounts because fleeting up with more than 2 people is like herding cats


Could it be that there are a lot of flaws in this game due to mechanics and general asshattery that is "solved" with multiple accounts?

And how does such a game survive in a global economy that is going to the dogs?

How many people leave this game because they end up thinking "Ok so the only way to play this game is to pay for more accounts? And who makes the money for those extra subs, the people who made the game such that you need extra subs? What kind of scam is that? Screw this".


Things are going to have to change if there is to be a future. Because even now, a 7 sub player is cheezed at something and if it's not the game itself, there goes 7 subs. Perhaps this game will die if say 40,000 players leave, because how many subs do they have?

CCP needs to find a way to make this game appeal to INDIVIDUAL players and lots of them. When it's "multiple subs or die", it looks like a scam.





no, actually. 4 pvp based toons, 2 that are with goons currently, 1 that's in an npc corp now (my nyx pilot) (used him to spy on the SC back when the nc/sc wars existed/mattered), and 1 that's in a high sec war dec oriented corp. 3 indy accounts with one of the accounts having 2 effective toons to help boost in production, with the other 3 being hulk pilots with one of them having the capabilities of piloting an orca at perfect. I have trained other hulk alts on 2 of those accounts, and moved them over to my pvp accounts to help boost in mineral acquisition for production. I don't have a toon for each role in EVE. I have no desire or need to have a toon for each role in EVE. I do have a crapload of people I trust, one of them being my current room mate, who I actually only know because of this game. I've gotten to trust many many people, who are effectively 'pets' of sorts, and they know this, and don't really care considering I take care of them and compensate them more than necessary for their efforts.

yes, I am a bitter vet. and I have attempted to adapt and change as the times have progressed while keeping the playing style I had in previous times.... it's just that CCP doesn't provide new material for me to continue with my playing style while taking away the capability of maintaining the old ones.



I see where you are coming from - perhaps then you should consider that you have done it all, won EvE, and then move on?


As for the game being idiot proof I would disagree. The idiots are ruining the game now more than ever.




I did not say the game was idiot proof, I've been complaining that the game is idiot friendly. I completely agree.... they are ruining the game more than ever.

EDIT:

also, no one can 'win' in this game... there was a time where you could effectively claim you had 'won' ... but that doesn't exist these days. no one will be able to start from scratch and achieve what I've done with today's mechanics. today's mechanics actually prevent that sort of effect from ever happening. I would whole heartedly love for a newer player to have the ability to get to where I am, but considering it hasn't been possible to do it for the past 3 or 4 years unless you were already there disallows for that to occur. I am not against new players, I am against the idiot friendly nature EVE has become... especially since I know people in RL who would love to achieve things I have, but literally are not capable due to game mechanics put in place years ago.

Where are they taking the hobbits?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=VznlDlNPw4Q

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#24 - 2011-11-17 01:03:58 UTC
As a vet, I understand that there is a concept known as Skill Caps which negates older player advantges.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.

Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Doomheim
#25 - 2011-11-17 01:04:01 UTC
So you play (or used to) a game with a hypercapitalistic economy...

And you get mad because there's competition?
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2011-11-17 01:06:34 UTC
Silent Lamb wrote:


I did not say the game was idiot proof, I've been complaining that the game is idiot friendly. I completely agree.... they are ruining the game more than ever.


How could idiots possibly ruin your game ? They are idiots that simple fact should give you tremendous advantage.

Or am i missing something there ?
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#27 - 2011-11-17 01:07:04 UTC
Seems to me the whole argument here is that the game isn't fun because it doesn't reward you for being a bittervet as much as you'd like. A lot of your OP centers around newer players like me having too much fun and the fact that older players like you aren't in charge of everything. Forgive me if I don't sympathize.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#28 - 2011-11-17 01:22:17 UTC  |  Edited by: FloppieTheBanjoClown
I was typing out point-by-point response to the second post made by the OP, when I realized something: he just needs his ego stroked because Eve is failing to do it. He wants a universe where only the elite with perfect skills, intimate knowledge of game mechanic (ab)uses, and the dedication to a game to set alarms for the sake of skill training are rewarded with success. He's not satisfied with Eve now because lowly newcomers like myself aren't staring up in awe at him. He wants a game where balance and accessibility are eschewed in favor of players who deem themselves "hardcore".

If you're that badly in need of affirmation, go talk to yourself in a mirror. Tell yourself over and over "I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggonit, people like me." Nevermind that the last part is a lie--people don't care for arrogant pricks. The rest of us are here to play a game, not make it a way of life.

edit:
Silent Lamb wrote:
I would never have a setup that small or laughable

This says everything you need to know about this guy.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Jita Alt666
#29 - 2011-11-17 01:26:11 UTC
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
So you play (or used to) a game with a hypercapitalistic economy...

And you get mad because there's competition?


A true hyper-capitalist environment allows the creation of monopolies.
Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Doomheim
#30 - 2011-11-17 01:26:58 UTC
Jita Alt666 wrote:
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
So you play (or used to) a game with a hypercapitalistic economy...

And you get mad because there's competition?


A true hyper-capitalist environment allows the creation of monopolies.


And then they can be broken. Which is what happened.
Apollo Gabriel
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#31 - 2011-11-17 01:28:36 UTC
OP,

Every week or so we get someone here having their own vagina monologue about how eve is too easy now, and new players get it too good and eve is wowifying ... blah blah blah. The common thread is these posters rarely know how to use the enter key and they rarely if ever give specific examples. They state reason X and Y although they are barely comprehendible and often just WRONG.

So please take 5 minutes to present ONE point, and I am sure some of us will answer you with reason.

Also, you should take a look at !EVE games to see what idiofication is all about.

Best,
AG
Always ... Never ... Forget to check your references.   Peace out Zulu! Hope you land well!
Handsome Hussein
#32 - 2011-11-17 01:35:21 UTC
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
Jita Alt666 wrote:
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
So you play (or used to) a game with a hypercapitalistic economy...

And you get mad because there's competition?


A true hyper-capitalist environment allows the creation of monopolies.


And then they can be broken. Which is what happened.

Also, OP is refering to the advantage gained from an artificial monopoly (only a limited number of BPOs ever), which is hardly capitalist in that no one (or very few) can ever challenge that monopoly.

Leaves only the fresh scent of pine.

adopt
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2011-11-17 01:56:19 UTC
bittervet is bitter

Why so bitter man, the "young" players control a miniscule amount of 0.0, that'd be GoonSwarm Federation and TEST mostly, but you think that most, if not all of NCdot, Raidendot, WNdot, PL and other ~elitepvp~ organisations are as bitter as you bro? you sound like some ex-BOB guy man, go be bitter somewhere else
Silent Lamb
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2011-11-17 02:23:36 UTC
Handsome Hussein wrote:
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
Jita Alt666 wrote:
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
So you play (or used to) a game with a hypercapitalistic economy...

And you get mad because there's competition?


A true hyper-capitalist environment allows the creation of monopolies.


And then they can be broken. Which is what happened.

Also, OP is refering to the advantage gained from an artificial monopoly (only a limited number of BPOs ever), which is hardly capitalist in that no one (or very few) can ever challenge that monopoly.


that's right... it's not capitalist... I'm not complaining about a lack of a capitalistic ecconomy, I'm complaining that it's not even possible to have an effective monopoly in the game period. I made my isk and 'power' in game through being able to manipulate multiple monopolies in over 80% of literally ALL regions. the others who were like me have quit EVE, their max researched t2 BPO collections forever gone in the wind. I have quite a few t2 bpos, one of them being a 'max researched' mackinaw bpo that I stole out of a wreck before the 'official' looter could get it in a raid that the old GoonSwarm did way way way back in the day. Considering the fact that I had indy alts, also had various toons in VENOM at the time (alt alliance of the old GoonSwarm) etc... when it was found out no one really cared... I was assisting them in the attempt to monopolize things and prevent others from obtaining the same.

I am complaining that CCP has removed the effectiveness of certain aspetcs out of the game, to make it new player friendly, which I'm not entirely agaist, as it does provide a more challenging aspect to the game in some ways.... however I am 100% against the WoW mentality comeing to EVE, and then the dev's and GM's catering to that mentality and making it easier to get into more advanced ships by lessening skill point requirements, giving everyone the effectiveness of having all 11 learning skills, then removing said skills from the game, nerfing the elite ships that take forever to get into.... etc.

considering that I 'own' 7 active accounts, pay for them yearly, that's over 700 dollars a year I spend on EVE. I have had 7 active accounts since 2006, with different ones being older, with the oldest being started in feb of 04. from 2006 to present, with a low estimate of 700 dollars a year I have spent over 4200 USD on my subscriptions, adding a few more hundred for a low estimate, and adding about another 750 to 1K or more for the other accounts that were made before that. What do I get out of investing my time and money that I work hard to obtain in RL to spend on a game such as this? I get nerfed, my playing style gets taken away, I lose friends that don't like it being done (as they quit EVE) and I effectively have drasticly less to do along the lines of how I play. I also get no new ships that add onto the skill types I have (minus the orca and rorq for industry) as there are not any more skill heavy ships being brought into game deliberately. see, I'm not 100% against the nerfs done, I am somewhat, but not 100%.... but CCP doesn't come up with anything heavy skill intense for the older guys to get into.... they just come up with more lower skill required things to get into.... while making them just as effective if not more effective as the ships the older players spent years training for. for the past 5 and a half years I have not had anything I've said 'ooh! gotta train this and this and this and this and this up to fly (insert skill heavy ship here)' while adding up everything and seeing that for that specific ship it would take over a year to skill up for. no, I do not fly a titan, nor do I want to since they don't have AOE DD's anymore. I have a Wyvern Pilot that I sold the wyvern off of... and still have a Nyx on my Nyx pilot, they have the various support skills all at 5. My nighthawk pilot has all it's skills at 5, and has moved into the vastly easier to train for Tengu (while also training for a loki and Broadsword as well) getting all the various support skills up to 5 as well.... and it took less time to do all of those than to get into that nighthawk and train the nighthawk's support skills to 5.

someone made a claim I hadn't made valid points to state that EVE is WoWifying... in WoW, everyone has the ability to get on equal footing within a short amount of time. I've said various things on how new players and idiots can get on similar footing in less time than the older players have taken in different parts of my posts over my posts in this topic. if you haven't seen them yet it's because you haven't read my posts yet.

also, considering that EVE is a time based skill allocation and not an event based skill allocation, shouldn't it just be obvious that with that theory the older players should have advantages over 1 and 2 year old toons? even with effective skill caps at 5, CCP has broken the purpose of putting time into skills by giving newer players ships that don't take anywhere near as long to train for that have equal or more power than the ships the older players trained for that took forever to obtain. and yes, the older players can get in these new ships, but that's not the point. that's actually the problem.

also, to the guy who accused me of being an infadelic bob member... I've stated I was in the original GS with support accounts in VENOM, and having spy accounts in the SC. you need to learn to read.

Where are they taking the hobbits?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=VznlDlNPw4Q

Handsome Hussein
#35 - 2011-11-17 02:34:49 UTC
Silent Lamb wrote:
that's right... it's not capitalist... I'm not complaining about a lack of a capitalistic ecconomy, I'm complaining that it's not even possible to have an effective monopoly in the game period.

I really don't give a **** whether you are a capitalist or not. I was referring to Jita Alt666's statement about a hyper-capitalist environment.

All I get from your OP is that you're a whiny little self-entitled rich kid who's pissed that they had their "IWIN" button taken away. Cool story.

Leaves only the fresh scent of pine.

Fluffman
Pulling The Plug
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
#36 - 2011-11-17 02:41:42 UTC
Actually he said - "you 'sound' like some ex-BOB guy man"

I agree with what you are saying about the command ships, having invested virtually the last year and half in them and still a t3, which took no time at all to train for, wtfpwns them at most things. annoying.

It sounds to me like you burnt out all your options by overdoing things man.

Vachir Khan
Rugged Ruff and Ready
#37 - 2011-11-17 02:50:33 UTC
So all this hubbub about how special you are and all you've done is be in Goonswarm and Venom, that's.. not necessarily a good resume when one states "I know what I'm doing, bow to me". I started playing in 2004 (was in beta actually but it sucked so hard I didn't play from the start), Does that entitle me to anything special? No, not at all.

While I can understand that forming/managing a cartel like the old T2 in and of itself is a cool idea/goal to have (we all define our own "end game") and being successful with that created a form of "power play" which one might like (and had to work hard for), so yeah... with invention that castle kinda crumbled. All in all that type of playstyle is mostly gone as everything is in abundance these days.

So if you're unhappy about there not being any more "end game" play style you used to do then I can agree to that, there's many things these days in EVE that have changed and a lot of them not for the betterment off the game but rather for the marketing department who can't grasp beyond "must be like wow" and "bigger is always better".

But I won't agree to the "I'm older ingame thus i should be better/more/smarter" entitled nonsense, as that's just silly and very dumb.
Silent Lamb
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#38 - 2011-11-17 03:20:19 UTC
Fluffman wrote:
Actually he said - "you 'sound' like some ex-BOB guy man"

I agree with what you are saying about the command ships, having invested virtually the last year and half in them and still a t3, which took no time at all to train for, wtfpwns them at most things. annoying.

It sounds to me like you burnt out all your options by overdoing things man.



finally, someone to post something along the lines of what I'm trying to get at. I'm not trying to get at the 'I'm uber ur fail bow to me' I'm trying to get at the fact that I have effectively nothing new to do, and that the vast majority of my friends have already left years ago because of that same problem. I have done literally everything in EVE, and honestly am wondering when something that is truly and effectively new will take place. Incursions are just different types of effective missions that allow for both solo (the scout sites I've been soloing for a while) and team efforts depending on which type of site it is. the WH stuff is just a different low sec with some elements of 0.0 such as the option for bubbles and bombs while not allowing 'regular' transportation, yet effectively most of them have static K-Space exits... with a lot of them, including C4 and above, having the 'regular' statics in high sec and then random ones popping up for low sec/0.0. effectively nothing new... since it merely carries current aspects in game into different physical space in game.... while not really allowing for new/different mechanics.

I'm glad Fluffyman made that post. he's realized I wasn't really complaining about me not having the monopolies, but having nothing to replace them with. I kinda don't care if it's a monopoly or not.... but if you take away valid mechanics, nerf everything else... eventually you need to put some new mechanics in to keep those who like a difficult game in game. out of my original group of over 200 individual people, which each had inbetween 2 to 5 accounts each, I am down to 1 'old' friend in game that I can talk to on my level, knowing and going through and doing the same things I've done, and wondering when/if CCP is ever going to come up with a new mechanic, instead of nerfing and taking mechanics and forms of playing away. and after re-reading the thing, Fluffman, you're right... he wasn't accusing me of being an ex-bob, and after re-reading everything I've posted in this topic.... he's right... I kinda do sound like one. people are right. I should take a 'real' and legit break from EVE. lol, I make too much money (in RL) for my own good. everything I do I do full on with full force, and don't hold back in any way. When EVE first came out it was fine, as it did take me years to do stuff. but now that I've effectively done everything (minus titans) I really don't have anything new to do. I just don't want to admit to myself that I know CCP probably won't make anything new... ever, since how they have been setting EVE up to attract players for a few years and then don't attempt to keep the majority of them, instead replacing them with other players that are new.

i don't know.

Where are they taking the hobbits?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=VznlDlNPw4Q

Killmeded
Conkord Everything
#39 - 2011-11-17 03:44:18 UTC
When EVE began we had

Steve Jobs
Johnny Cash
Bob Hope

Today we have . . .

no jobs
no cash
no hope

(I hope Kevin Bacon never dies)

Guristas should have "BIGGER" Skull Bunnies in the default paintjob. Guristas and all other pirates should get custom ships like angels (or at LEAST fix the HIDEOUS Moa/Gila hull).

Russell Casey
Doomheim
#40 - 2011-11-17 04:08:09 UTC
If this is what it means to win, I'm glad I'm a loser.