These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Restrict NPC Corporation Posting Abilities.

First post First post
Author
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#241 - 2014-05-20 16:21:06 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Dear La Nariz, don't like to read NPC posts?

Then don't.

If only all of Eve was this easy to fix.


Are you trying to make a point or thread defecating?

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#242 - 2014-05-20 16:24:34 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but, your main objection is that it will get some false positives and take mains instead of npc troll alts? How would you change this up to avoid that?

My objection is based in 3 parts:

1. Incidental removal of the ability for active characters to post
2. Degradation of the remaining forum sections where those characters can post since the majority of topics would be off topic for the areasleft available
3. Unlikely long term affect. Even in the case of CAOD it should be noted that the bar is set far higher in that a single player would need 4 accounts to meet CAOD posting requirements without help, but only an empty character slot and another 2 minutes compared to now to bypass the proposed change.

As far as how to avoid the one you specifically asked about, I'm not sure. Activity is a difficult bar as people do a lot of different things in the course of play and tagging and one aspect alone is begging to be exploited. Corp membership is easier to track, but arguably more east to "exploit".

Reputation is another potential way, but that usually serves more as a tool to bury dissent to commonly accepted ideas rather than promote good posting.

In the end I'd have to say I don't have an answer since everything can be gamed and is more likely to be gamed by people who want to be disruptive than those who don't.


I've thought about this and I still feel the :effort: wall is high enough at 10+ active accounts in a corporation. I agree that reputation/karma is a bad idea for reasons the goonspiracy crowd would love to shout and that activity is to nebulous to become a metric. I think the best way to address your objections would be to make NPC corporations worse and player corporations better so that there is a significant reason to join/start one in the first place. However that's much more of a game balance thing than this thread tries to address.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#243 - 2014-05-20 17:07:57 UTC  |  Edited by: hmskrecik
La Nariz wrote:

I did show this from the OP:

The OP wrote:

There has already been a precedent set for this idea by CAOD; in CAOD NPC alts cannot post and the quality of that forum is significantly better than other forums albeit slower.


The only thing that would be abuse is if people are somehow using this to doxx you or harass you in real life. Which if that's the case contact your local law enforcement and CCP to handle it.

Non-consensual pvp, which is one of many potential consequences, is not abuse and its up to the GM team to determine if its harassment.

I'm not commenting about CAOD because I'm not following it and after short searching I couldn't find anything resembling description of posting rules.

Even then I think this particular forum being special case where it might be argued there is no place for members of NPC corps. On other forums I see no need for such restrictions for reasons I see no point repeating. Since you expressed similar stance from your side, let's agree to disagree.

[Edit] But I'm still against the original proposal though.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#244 - 2014-05-20 17:18:51 UTC
hmskrecik wrote:

I'm not commenting about CAOD because I'm not following it and after short searching I couldn't find anything resembling description of posting rules.

Even then I think this particular forum being special case where it might be argued there is no place for members of NPC corps. On other forums I see no need for such restrictions for reasons I see no point repeating. Since you expressed similar stance from your side, let's agree to disagree.


ISD LackOfFaith gave us an idea of how the CAOD restriction works.

ISD LackOfFaith wrote:

Also, I feel that I should note that CAOD is not only restricted by only allowing people in player corps to post, but also that those corps have to have 10+ (or so) active accounts in them, or something of the sort. A simple player-corps-only restriction wouldn't do anything than make McTrollAlt in The Scope join the corp McTrollAltDOT and carry on.


There are exceptions like F&I, new citizens, recruitment, and the bazaar for a reason because:

-Its part of how the bazaar works,
-Everyone deserves a voice in EVE's direction hence F&I.
-Newbies start in an NPC corporation and they need to be able to access resources to help them, hence new citizens.
-Everyone needs to be able to find a corporation if they want one so recruitment needs to be open.

However my point still stands that the rest of the forum needs the suggested changes to improve their quality.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#245 - 2014-05-20 17:22:26 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
afkalt wrote:


But none of that address the question of: If the trolling can be mitigated - what benefit does it bring?

It might even be better that peoples corps are hidden and posts are taken on merit.




@Prince Kobol: You know nothing about me, stop judging because I'm arguing the devils advocate and I can see the bigger picture. It's funny, you think I'm a risk averse carebear because I post with an ancient alt - so ancient it's never been through the portrait generator. But yes, I'm totally "hiding" in an NPC corp because I'm scared. It is simply a convenient mask which means my other business interests may go on unimpeded. I make an effort to not troll, to post constructive and considerately and for the most part I believe I do so.

As I've said, the forum issue is trolling - I see no point in changing stuff once that is fixed. The whole NPC corp issue is a different ballgame and it's not a debate I've any interest in partaking further in with you as you're fixated in your beliefs and there's little point in further discourse. These corps have a place in the game, that you hate that is your right, but I believe that place is useful.


You have to be kidding me, that question you pose is answered in the OP it will increase forum quality which makes it a more valuable resources for literally everyone in the game.


No, it's not.

You missed my point.

If we got rid of trolling (let's say by empowering ISD), what point does this serve? It's a sledgehammer to crack a nut, throwing the baby out the the bathwater - pick your cliche.

There are means to mitigate trolls and people posting crap that do not remove the valuable uses for masked posting.
hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#246 - 2014-05-20 17:25:40 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
hmskrecik wrote:

I'm not commenting about CAOD because I'm not following it and after short searching I couldn't find anything resembling description of posting rules.

Even then I think this particular forum being special case where it might be argued there is no place for members of NPC corps. On other forums I see no need for such restrictions for reasons I see no point repeating. Since you expressed similar stance from your side, let's agree to disagree.


ISD LackOfFaith gave us an idea of how the CAOD restriction works.

ISD LackOfFaith wrote:

Also, I feel that I should note that CAOD is not only restricted by only allowing people in player corps to post, but also that those corps have to have 10+ (or so) active accounts in them, or something of the sort. A simple player-corps-only restriction wouldn't do anything than make McTrollAlt in The Scope join the corp McTrollAltDOT and carry on.


There are exceptions like F&I, new citizens, recruitment, and the bazaar for a reason because:

-Its part of how the bazaar works,
-Everyone deserves a voice in EVE's direction hence F&I.
-Newbies start in an NPC corporation and they need to be able to access resources to help them, hence new citizens.
-Everyone needs to be able to find a corporation if they want one so recruitment needs to be open.

However my point still stands that the rest of the forum needs the suggested changes to improve their quality.

- Alts are legal in game and so should be on forum.
- Being a member of NPC corp is legal in game and so should be on forum.

After all it's you who say the forum and game should be the same thing where choices in one bear consequences in the other.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#247 - 2014-05-20 17:26:31 UTC
afkalt wrote:


No, it's not.

You missed my point.

If we got rid of trolling (let's say by empowering ISD), what point does this serve? It's a sledgehammer to crack a nut, throwing the baby out the the bathwater - pick your cliche.

There are means to mitigate trolls and people posting crap that do not remove the valuable uses for masked posting.


Yes that post answered the question you asked "what benefit would it bring" if you were trying to ask a different question you need to be more careful of the wording. The benefit it brings is that it increases forum quality.

Why should you be entitled to masked posting with zero effort in the first place? I know I have to work to keep my cover during awoxing, thefts and ganks. Why should you be given free zero effort masked posting?

Why wouldn't this improve forum quality? Also where is your alternative suggestion that will improve forum quality? You've basically just said "its bad I don't like it."

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#248 - 2014-05-20 17:30:59 UTC  |  Edited by: La Nariz
hmskrecik wrote:

- Alts are legal in game and so should be on forum.
- Being a member of NPC corp is legal in game and so should be on forum.

After all it's you who say the forum and game should be the same thing where choices in one bear consequences in the other.


Okay then how do I enact a consequence on the npc alt that was created and never undocks yet comes to my thread in whatever subforum then derails it until its locked? How do I manage the person, that happens to be in a competing organization, that is posting horrible feedback about a service I am providing while hiding behind a faceless npc alt?

The answer is really simple its to restrict their posting abilities. NPC corporation members are restricted from many things in game and posting should be no different. You can look at the first page in GD and see why its such a problem.

E: Remember this doesn't prevent them from logging into the forum and reading posts.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#249 - 2014-05-20 17:32:16 UTC
La Nariz wrote:

Why should you be entitled to masked posting with zero effort in the first place? I know I have to work to keep my cover during awoxing, thefts and ganks. Why should you be given free zero effort masked posting?

Why should you be entitled to effortless unmasking of such person? Didn't you mention in this thread that you Goons have spy network superior to anything else existing in the game? Use it.
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#250 - 2014-05-20 17:40:45 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
afkalt wrote:


No, it's not.

You missed my point.

If we got rid of trolling (let's say by empowering ISD), what point does this serve? It's a sledgehammer to crack a nut, throwing the baby out the the bathwater - pick your cliche.

There are means to mitigate trolls and people posting crap that do not remove the valuable uses for masked posting.


Yes that post answered the question you asked "what benefit would it bring" if you were trying to ask a different question you need to be more careful of the wording. The benefit it brings is that it increases forum quality.

Why should you be entitled to masked posting with zero effort in the first place? I know I have to work to keep my cover during awoxing, thefts and ganks. Why should you be given free zero effort masked posting?

Why wouldn't this improve forum quality? Also where is your alternative suggestion that will improve forum quality? You've basically just said "its bad I don't like it."


I've done no such thing - I've provided examples of why it is a bad move. I have said that the fundamental issue is trolling and THAT can be addressed through other means.

Here is another one - a half dozen players rolling as mercs can't advertise.
Some of the best advice in mission and complexes comes from NPC members - I get you're not going to care about this forum, but it would be a crying shame to kill that resource.


As to how to stop trolling: give ISD teeth. Job done.

So, one more time, if we empower ISD why would the standard NOT rise without taking away all the good stuff this provides?
hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#251 - 2014-05-20 17:41:27 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
hmskrecik wrote:

- Alts are legal in game and so should be on forum.
- Being a member of NPC corp is legal in game and so should be on forum.

After all it's you who say the forum and game should be the same thing where choices in one bear consequences in the other.


Okay then how do I enact a consequence on the npc alt that was created and never undocks yet comes to my thread in whatever subforum then derails it until its locked? How do I manage the person, that happens to be in a competing organization, that is posting horrible feedback about a service I am providing while hiding behind a faceless npc alt?

The answer is really simple its to restrict their posting abilities. NPC corporation members are restricted from many things in game and posting should be no different. You can look at the first page in GD and see why its such a problem.

E: Remember this doesn't prevent them from logging into the forum and reading posts.

How do I enact a consequence on the scammer who never undocks? What makes forum so different that there character has to be exposed?

You manage the same way like you manage a parrot alt badmouthing you in local: you don't as long as they operate within rules.

This is why I stand by my opinion that what you proposed is not a solution to the problem. The problem should be solved where it belongs: at forum level.
Dave Stark
#252 - 2014-05-20 17:43:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
hmskrecik wrote:
How do I enact a consequence on the scammer who never undocks?

expose his scam, thereby ruining his reputation and preventing him from continuing doing what he's doing.

alternatively, educating you not to be so foolish in the future isn't something that really requires retribution...
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#253 - 2014-05-20 17:46:44 UTC
hmskrecik wrote:

Why should you be entitled to effortless unmasking of such person? Didn't you mention in this thread that you Goons have spy network superior to anything else existing in the game? Use it.


So I take it you cannot answer my questions since you decided to ignore them and pose your own? We can and do but, not everyone can do this and it would be better for the game as a whole if it was available to everyone.

For example:

A newbie decides they want to be mercenaries and starts a mercenary corporation. They recruit like minded people and post their advertisement in C&P. They get a few contracts some good client feedback and continue to play mercenary. One of their competitors begins to think that they are stealing business and makes an npc alt then posts unfounded crap in their thread. The newbies being unaware try to deal with this mysterious poster but, cannot stop the terrible posting because they do not have the methods/resources to handle it. Instead the jobs begin to dry up as clients are now leery of hiring these mercenaries and the newbie mercenary corporation closes its doors. The competitor gains a small increase in business and has no consequences for their actions.

~They did not have access to the same resources people like me have access to and they could not cope with the problem which eventually killed their corporation.

Now with the suggestion:

A newbie decides they want to be mercenaries and starts a mercenary corporation. They recruit like minded people and post their advertisement in C&P. They get a few contracts some good client feedback and continue to play mercenary. One of their competitors begins to think that they are stealing business and posts unfounded crap in their thread. The newbies decide to attack this competitor and through the display the put on during the conflict attract more clients. The conflict ends with the competitor incurring some losses and the newbies having a wonderful tale to tell their new recruits as well as some new clients.

~They had access to the same resources everyone else did and used them to enact consequences for behavior they did not like. This created content and allowed them a chance at success.

Compare the two situations.

In situation one nothing could be done and they died. While in situation two something could be done and they may have died or may have survived but, they created content for everyone.

NPC troll alts do nothing to benefit the game and restricting their posting privileges can only improve the forum quality.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#254 - 2014-05-20 17:47:56 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
hmskrecik wrote:
How do I enact a consequence on the scammer who never undocks?

expose his scam, thereby ruining his reputation and preventing him from continuing doing what he's doing.

And this is different from exposing a troll in what ways?
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#255 - 2014-05-20 17:51:55 UTC
afkalt wrote:


I've done no such thing - I've provided examples of why it is a bad move. I have said that the fundamental issue is trolling and THAT can be addressed through other means.

Here is another one - a half dozen players rolling as mercs can't advertise.
Some of the best advice in mission and complexes comes from NPC members - I get you're not going to care about this forum, but it would be a crying shame to kill that resource.


As to how to stop trolling: give ISD teeth. Job done.

So, one more time, if we empower ISD why would the standard NOT rise without taking away all the good stuff this provides?


You can do goonspiracy and call me callous all you want it makes no difference in the context of this suggestion. That's the first time you posed that last question and it could be another part of the solution. There's no reason why only one or the other can occur. Both occurring would improve forum quality.

Tyberius Franklin raised the issue that player corporations need to be advantageous to all play styles over NPC corporations and I agree with him.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#256 - 2014-05-20 17:53:12 UTC  |  Edited by: afkalt
La Nariz wrote:
troll alts do nothing to benefit the game and restricting their posting privileges can only improve the forum quality.


This is the summary of the entire issue and has precisely nothing to do with the corp.

Empower ISD, the problem goes away. If I am wrong and it does not, then we revisit.


And please, stop acting like I give a hoot about your corp. I'd reply the same way if it was NPC - I treat posts on their merit, I all but ignore the who/where from.



Edit: Also I should add that no effort wall will prevent people trolling or derailing with an agenda, the only thing there is ISD. So some of the things you think it might fix, I'm pretty sceptical of.
Dave Stark
#257 - 2014-05-20 17:56:04 UTC
hmskrecik wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
hmskrecik wrote:
How do I enact a consequence on the scammer who never undocks?

expose his scam, thereby ruining his reputation and preventing him from continuing doing what he's doing.

And this is different from exposing a troll in what ways?


because scams and trolling don't work the same way, for a start.

although if i have to explain basic differences like that to you, this conversation is going to take longer than i'm willing to give it.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#258 - 2014-05-20 17:59:25 UTC
hmskrecik wrote:

How do I enact a consequence on the scammer who never undocks? What makes forum so different that there character has to be exposed?

You manage the same way like you manage a parrot alt badmouthing you in local: you don't as long as they operate within rules.

This is why I stand by my opinion that what you proposed is not a solution to the problem. The problem should be solved where it belongs: at forum level.


I'll answer this with an example:

We've got an isk doubler in Jita that you've decided to enact consequences upon. This person doesn't pvp through conventional methods and instead is using chicanery. You have a few options the first of which is to expose the scam and highlight key parts that are the obvious tells of a scam. The other obvious option is to pre-emptively educate people about scams. The less obvious option is to do things that are likely to make people trust that character less like counter advertising and placing a bounty on the character. The goal is prevention and is something you can meaningfully accomplish even with each of these tools' efficacy being dependent upon the situation.

The difference however is that we cannot do anything to prevent an NPC troll alt from doing anything. There is literally nothing anyone aside from an ISD/CCP Community manager can do to prevent and NPC alt from derailing a thread.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#259 - 2014-05-20 18:02:29 UTC
afkalt wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
troll alts do nothing to benefit the game and restricting their posting privileges can only improve the forum quality.


This is the summary of the entire issue and has precisely nothing to do with the corp.

Empower ISD, the problem goes away. If I am wrong and it does not, then we revisit.


And please, stop acting like I give a hoot about your corp. I'd reply the same way if it was NPC - I treat posts on their merit, I all but ignore the who/where from.


If you read my original OP I use the precedent that enacting the restrictions improved CAOD, which they did, so we can apply the same restrictions to every forum aside from the specific ones I excluded to improve the forum quality.

Buddy you've been trying to dogwhistle goonspiracy in here from the beginning don't get angry that I called you on it.

Again I've said this is part of the solution there's enough room for both suggestions and combined I think they have the potential to do a lot of good for the forums.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#260 - 2014-05-20 18:03:15 UTC  |  Edited by: hmskrecik
La Nariz wrote:
hmskrecik wrote:

Why should you be entitled to effortless unmasking of such person? Didn't you mention in this thread that you Goons have spy network superior to anything else existing in the game? Use it.


[....]

Compare the two situations.

In situation one nothing could be done and they died. While in situation two something could be done and they may have died or may have survived but, they created content for everyone.

NPC troll alts do nothing to benefit the game and restricting their posting privileges can only improve the forum quality.

Interesting example, thanks. I get your point. However what prevents these competitors' alt to create and join a disposable one-man-corp? We're back at square one. So probably the bar should be raised? But corpies can help and join with their disposable alts too. Maybe they could even throw at it a PLEX for good measure.

Let it be clear, I'm not defending trolls and if there is a way of eradicating them I'm all for it. I just don't believe it can be achieved through technical solutions.