These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

An interesting view of the reclaiming

Author
Ascentior
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#21 - 2011-11-17 12:22:09 UTC
Pax Thar wrote:
This "reclaiming" is nonsense. You cannot reclaim what was never rightfully yours. If you steal your neighbors sugar from his home in the night, does that make it your sugar, or does it make you a thief? When your neighbor takes his sugar back can you rightfully reclaim it? You may attempt to take it back by force, only this time your neighbor is ready for you and it gets ugly.

Perhaps learn about a topic before you start foaming at the mouth trying to argue. This world was created by God, and we are reclaiming it for Him. It was never yours, nor mine. It was, is, and forever will be, His. I am not stealing my neighbour's sugar. I am returning God's sugar. It isn't my neighbour's house, God built it, and let him live in it, and will continue to let him live in it, but under His rules.

Jason Galente wrote:
Right..

The problem of your theory is when you relate beating, raping and enslaving these people to somehow shoving them out of the path of a bus or towards an oasis that for whatever reason, like Aracturus said, they can't see.

The issue of poor treatment of slaves is not relevant here. I agree that they shouldn't be raped, or beaten (unless for extreme crimes), and so do most of my compatriots. But we simply cannot police that while we are facing a group of revolutionist 'heroes'. So once we get this rebellion under control, we can then start making sure you are all well looked after.

Admiral of PIE Inc., Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris (See 'PIE Public' for recruitment)

Honorary Fabricator-General of the Imperial Navy

Chosen by God to serve the Empire.

Ran'shad
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2011-11-17 12:55:11 UTC
Ascentior wrote:
The issue of poor treatment of slaves is not relevant here. I agree that they shouldn't be raped, or beaten (unless for extreme crimes), and so do most of my compatriots. But we simply cannot police that while we are facing a group of revolutionist 'heroes'. So once we get this rebellion under control, we can then start making sure you are all well looked after.


It is unfortunate that a small handfull of the faithful have lost their way and so blatantly mistreat their slaves. There is no room for the random beatings, the midnight searches for contraband, the sexual assaults. This is not Gods way.

Law and order must be maintained in any community and the cruel and unsual punishment works best as a deterent, making an example of the criminal. I often attend many of public lashings delivered to violent criminals amongst my slaves, and am pleased to say that crime is on a downward trend as a result of the public use of force. However these acts are not done lightly or often. Only in extreme circumstances and a fair evidence-based process are corporal punishment methods used.

High Lord Ran'Shad CEO Imperial Manufacturing and Engineering Regiment Elemental Tide Alliance

Kazzzi
Heathen Legion
Iron Men of the Hood
#23 - 2011-11-17 13:34:36 UTC
You lost me at 'hover-bus'
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#24 - 2011-11-17 14:00:42 UTC
Ascentior wrote:
I saw an infant try to get into a slaverhound's cage once, the child was very upset when I pulled it away, kicked and screamed.


Perhaps that Infant sought an Oasis that was invisible to you.

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#25 - 2011-11-17 15:04:21 UTC
Ascentior wrote:
The issue of poor treatment of slaves is not relevant here. I agree that they shouldn't be raped, or beaten (unless for extreme crimes), and so do most of my compatriots. But we simply cannot police that while we are facing a group of revolutionist 'heroes'. So once we get this rebellion under control, we can then start making sure you are all well looked after.



Not like you could police it before, either. And I have to applaud your attempt to insinuate that the only reason slaves are being mistreated, is because some of us refuse to accept you forcing your beliefs on us. I guess you subscribe to the Big Lie school of propaganda.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#26 - 2011-11-17 15:21:27 UTC
There's this recurring discussion on this fine forum about how the Amarr mistreat their slaves, and how they don't really do that but only some irresponsible people among them do. That discussion is irrelevant, as it does not matter to the demands to let our people go whether you treat them well or not.

If you want the most basic demand, that would be the unlimited option for all Minmatar to return to their kin as they choose. We can do compromises on the time scale of that, but we won't compromise on the basic request.

The basic demand of the Amarr is for us to follow their will and to "reclaim" us, whether we want to or not (despite the handful of Amarrians on IGS continuously claiming they don't really wanna do that), and I suspect they will not compromise on that demand, either. So we'll end up fighting over it. Pity that, but here we are.


As for the slavery question - for all I care, you can be as cruel or as kind to your Amarrian slaves as you like. If you make videos of it, I'm sure you can make some extra money out of it, too.
Kazzzi
Heathen Legion
Iron Men of the Hood
#27 - 2011-11-17 16:36:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Kazzzi
Ran'shad wrote:
Only in extreme circumstances and a fair evidence-based process are corporal punishment methods used.


Did you just make that up just now? Yeah, you did.

Arkady Sadik wrote:

As for the slavery question - for all I care, you can be as cruel or as kind to your Amarrian slaves as you like. If you make videos of it, I'm sure you can make some extra money out of it, too.

Racist.
Alistair Cononach
The Legion of Spoon
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#28 - 2011-11-17 18:11:26 UTC
Freedom and Liberty is better than Dogma and Tyrany.

With that said, along with freedom and liberty, is the freedom of the individual to take and control something, like a solar system. You're free to like it, and visit, not like it, and breeak the rules, or not like it and not visit or try and take it from him.

As such, perhaps the real solution is to stop talking so damn much, and do something if somethings needs done, eh?

So many words here, so little actual deeds.
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#29 - 2011-11-17 21:10:51 UTC
Alistair Cononach wrote:
Freedom and Liberty is better than Dogma and Tyrany.

With that said, along with freedom and liberty, is the freedom of the individual to take and control something, like a solar system. You're free to like it, and visit, not like it, and breeak the rules, or not like it and not visit or try and take it from him.

As such, perhaps the real solution is to stop talking so damn much, and do something if somethings needs done, eh?

So many words here, so little actual deeds.


This is one reason why I have at the very least some respect for people who sign up for the TLF, even if they are annoying, at least they are out there doing something, which is probably more than most capsuleers can claim, in fact I would say most capsuleers are content to stay safe and stuff their wallets while they decry the treatment of their 'people' from afar.
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#30 - 2011-11-17 21:37:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Arkady Sadik
ValentinaDLM wrote:
in fact I would say most capsuleers are content to stay safe and stuff their wallets while they decry the treatment of their 'people' from afar.
Yeah, I sometimes get the impression that the most ethically appalling thing some Amarr have ever done was their post on IGS.

Not sure that applies to this thread, though. At least the original poster of this thread fights for his Reclaiming in space quite regularly, and I do recognize a number of names here from their actions in space. Not all, but quite a few. So not sure why it should be an either/or question.
Kithrus
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#31 - 2011-11-18 19:42:58 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
ValentinaDLM wrote:
in fact I would say most capsuleers are content to stay safe and stuff their wallets while they decry the treatment of their 'people' from afar.
Yeah, I sometimes get the impression that the most ethically appalling thing some Amarr have ever done was their post on IGS.

Not sure that applies to this thread, though. At least the original poster of this thread fights for his Reclaiming in space quite regularly, and I do recognize a number of names here from their actions in space. Not all, but quite a few. So not sure why it should be an either/or question.


I don't fight for the reclaiming that is not my duty in life.

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#32 - 2011-11-18 20:20:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
ValentinaDLM wrote:
Alistair Cononach wrote:
Freedom and Liberty is better than Dogma and Tyrany.

With that said, along with freedom and liberty, is the freedom of the individual to take and control something, like a solar system. You're free to like it, and visit, not like it, and breeak the rules, or not like it and not visit or try and take it from him.

As such, perhaps the real solution is to stop talking so damn much, and do something if somethings needs done, eh?

So many words here, so little actual deeds.


This is one reason why I have at the very least some respect for people who sign up for the TLF, even if they are annoying, at least they are out there doing something, which is probably more than most capsuleers can claim, in fact I would say most capsuleers are content to stay safe and stuff their wallets while they decry the treatment of their 'people' from afar.


Respect for the militias ? The same militias composed of 90% of thieves and privateers that spend their time endlessly to kill each other and whatever else appears on their sensors, hiding behind a flag to have a free pass to devote themselves even more to their bloodlust ? And even for the few honorable ones, to what purpose ? A meaningless and wasteful proxy war ?

And at the same time, no respect for the capsuleers that "stuff their wallets" by eliminating outlaw factions or the incursions of the Sansha Nation ?

I am experiencing difficulties to understand your logic.
Mikkel Lybecker
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2011-11-19 22:49:04 UTC
The title of this thread is "An interesting view of the reclaiming".

I feel cheated.
Astrid Stjerna
Sebiestor Tribe
#34 - 2011-11-19 22:58:10 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
ValentinaDLM wrote:

This is one reason why I have at the very least some respect for people who sign up for the TLF, even if they are annoying, at least they are out there doing something, which is probably more than most capsuleers can claim, in fact I would say most capsuleers are content to stay safe and stuff their wallets while they decry the treatment of their 'people' from afar.


Respect for the militias ? The same militias composed of 90% of thieves and privateers that spend their time endlessly to kill each other and whatever else appears on their sensors, hiding behind a flag to have a free pass to devote themselves even more to their bloodlust ? And even for the few honorable ones, to what purpose ? A meaningless and wasteful proxy war ?

And at the same time, no respect for the capsuleers that "stuff their wallets" by eliminating outlaw factions or the incursions of the Sansha Nation ?

I am experiencing difficulties to understand your logic.


I think the point is that the TLF militia, while composed of 'thieves and privateers', as you put it, are actively engaged in combat -- the majority of non-enlisted capsuleers that I've encountered won't get involved unless it directly impacts their day-to-day business dealings.

I have great respect for capsuleers of all types -- but Valentina makes a good point nonetheless.

I can't get rid of my darn signature!  Oh, wait....

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2011-11-20 08:25:34 UTC
Ascentior wrote:
Perhaps learn about a topic before you start foaming at the mouth trying to argue. This world was created by God, and we are reclaiming it for Him. It was never yours, nor mine. It was, is, and forever will be, His. I am not stealing my neighbour's sugar. I am returning God's sugar. It isn't my neighbour's house, God built it, and let him live in it, and will continue to let him live in it, but under His rules.


None of us believe in your God. It's your God, not ours, and quite apart from the fact that its nonexistence is a matter of logical fact, it has no claim to anything of mine, or anything outside of the Amarr Empire. Your religion does not give you the right to covet what is ours, no matter how loudly you trumpet it.

Ascentior wrote:
The issue of poor treatment of slaves is not relevant here. I agree that they shouldn't be raped, or beaten (unless for extreme crimes), and so do most of my compatriots. But we simply cannot police that while we are facing a group of revolutionist 'heroes'. So once we get this rebellion under control, we can then start making sure you are all well looked after.


Ah yes, the old familiar lie - "we'd be treating our slaves better if it weren't for those pesky rebels!". GIve it a rest - it's a falsehood so brazen not even other Amarrians believe it. Your flagrant mistreatment of slaves - ****, murder, torture, poisoning, theft, genocide - is the reason the rebellion happened in the first place - and the rebellion is over. The Republic successfully cast you out and formed its own nation - what you are seeing here is what happens after the rebellion - righteous retribution.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#36 - 2011-11-20 11:03:35 UTC
Astrid Stjerna wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
ValentinaDLM wrote:

This is one reason why I have at the very least some respect for people who sign up for the TLF, even if they are annoying, at least they are out there doing something, which is probably more than most capsuleers can claim, in fact I would say most capsuleers are content to stay safe and stuff their wallets while they decry the treatment of their 'people' from afar.


Respect for the militias ? The same militias composed of 90% of thieves and privateers that spend their time endlessly to kill each other and whatever else appears on their sensors, hiding behind a flag to have a free pass to devote themselves even more to their bloodlust ? And even for the few honorable ones, to what purpose ? A meaningless and wasteful proxy war ?

And at the same time, no respect for the capsuleers that "stuff their wallets" by eliminating outlaw factions or the incursions of the Sansha Nation ?

I am experiencing difficulties to understand your logic.


I think the point is that the TLF militia, while composed of 'thieves and privateers', as you put it, are actively engaged in combat -- the majority of non-enlisted capsuleers that I've encountered won't get involved unless it directly impacts their day-to-day business dealings.

I have great respect for capsuleers of all types -- but Valentina makes a good point nonetheless.


And being actively engaged in combat (piracy, privateering, combat for the sake of fighting) is a good thing according to you ?
Astrid Stjerna
Sebiestor Tribe
#37 - 2011-11-21 16:22:55 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:

And being actively engaged in combat (piracy, privateering, combat for the sake of fighting) is a good thing according to you ?


Now, don't put words in my mouth. I don't think that piracy or privateering is necessarily good. Given the choice, however, I'd take a second tour in the TLF rather than fall to the self-interested ISK-pinching that many capsuleers embrace. Too many of them only get involved if it suits their business purposes; otherwise, they're content to sit in a cargo by somewhere and count the daily reciepts.

I can't get rid of my darn signature!  Oh, wait....

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#38 - 2011-11-21 16:52:05 UTC
Astrid Stjerna wrote:

Now, don't put words in my mouth. I don't think that piracy or privateering is necessarily good.


I won't.


Astrid Stjerna wrote:

I have great respect for capsuleers of all types


Sabik now, Sabik forever

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#39 - 2011-11-21 21:53:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Astrid Stjerna wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:

And being actively engaged in combat (piracy, privateering, combat for the sake of fighting) is a good thing according to you ?


Now, don't put words in my mouth. I don't think that piracy or privateering is necessarily good. Given the choice, however, I'd take a second tour in the TLF rather than fall to the self-interested ISK-pinching that many capsuleers embrace. Too many of them only get involved if it suits their business purposes; otherwise, they're content to sit in a cargo by somewhere and count the daily reciepts.


Maybe this is all about self-interest for ISK for many high-sec capsuleers that you seem to refer to, but eventually only the results matter, and these results are that they are well payed by CONCORD or other officials to get rid of threats like conventionnal pirate attacks, or even to fight Nation Incursions. So yes, maybe it is definitly self-interested, but this is only a motivator for them to do what is needed.

At the contrary, Militias do not seem to have grasped that concept and as a result we still see more than 90% of them being full of useless or counterproductive people that are actually even more self interested, and who do not even show any benefit in their actions that mainly consist in killing each other, their crews included, with little if no loyalty at all for the faction they swore to defend.
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#40 - 2011-11-21 22:16:05 UTC
Astrid Stjerna Understood my point, whereas I don't quite think you did Lyn, The TLF actually fights against Amarrian forces, and not just noncapsuleer forces, they are quite happy to kill me too since, at the moment I am in a corporation, that works with the Crusade.

The point, wasn't that they are worthy of respect because they destroy things, the point is they put themselves on the line and actually fight for something, rather than complain from afar. The results even don't matter as much as that someone as the expression goes puts their money where their mouth is. If you are really opposed to reclaiming, then oppose it, and that is exactly what they do.

Of Course, in general I respect CVA and their allies in providence too, if they think that the region needs to be held for the Empire, and they actually put their crews, their isk, and their clones on the line to defend it, certainly this is something worthy of respect,

And Yes Lyn, perhaps the milita is full of "pirates", I can't honestly say that I hold the moral values that the empire holds, but you know what, even the pirates and thieves there are still doing more than the some of the holders that talk oh so loud about how the empire needs to reclaim, yet do absolutely nothing to accomplish this.

Quote:
And at the same time, no respect for the capsuleers that "stuff their wallets" by eliminating outlaw factions or the incursions of the Sansha Nation ?


No, I will never have respect for those that oppose incursions, because of my own personal feelings towards Sansha's Nation. And those that oppose the other "outlaw" factions, rarely take any serious risk to do so, and those who don't take risks aren't worthy of my respect, so only a small percentage would I actually respect. Also, these so called "outlaw" factions are by and large misunderstood, while I think the Angel Cartel and the Guristas are more or less just up to no good, for the sake of acquiring isk, the others all have motivations, that I think are at least as good as the "emprie" factions.