These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Combat Drone Operation Being Effectively Removed from the Game

First post First post
Author
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#141 - 2014-05-11 14:20:51 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
I dont understand why rumour- and panic mongering threads such as this are allowed to exist at all

Especailly when they are effectively redundant repetitions of previous nonsense


because with every skill change, people fail at basic english and have to have the changes explained to them multiple times in ever simplified words so they understand what's going on.
do you not remember the mewling over the skill changes a while back when people didn't understand how the dessy/bc split worked?


Well yes my remembering of that is exactly fuelling my confusion and despair at these threads not being locked on sight.

THe mechanism of change here is almost exactly the same, and as its not been released yet, if people are going to make an assumption, why is it they cannot assume it will happen exactly the same way?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#142 - 2014-05-11 14:34:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Come to think of it, what are the actual skill removals and switch-overs we've seen in the game (i.e. not counting mere prereq changes or pure name changes)?

Learning skills — outright removed, SP reimbursed, no replacement mechanic.
[Division] Connections — outright removed, SP reimbursed (ostensibly to be spent on new skills doing roughly the same thing).

Ethnic Relations — replaced 1:1 by Diplomatic Relations.
Destroyers — replaced 1–4:1 by [Racial] Destroyer, depending on other skills.
Battlecruisers — replaced 1–4:1 by [Racial] Battlecruiser, depending on other skills.
Scout Drone Ops. — replaced 1–4:1 by Drone Avionics, Light Drones, Medium Drones, depending on other skills.
Combat Drone Ops. — replaced 1.5:1 by Light Drones, Medium Drones.

Any more?
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#143 - 2014-05-11 15:18:12 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Ethnic Relations should have been reimbursed. It was a skill that was trained out of necessity, turned into a superfluous skill almost nobody needed. They should have had the option to use those skillpoints on something else, or turned back into the new skill if they so chose. I still don't understand why CCP didn't do this - it's the obvious course of action seeing as the skill did something entirely different after the change.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Jarod Garamonde
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#144 - 2014-05-11 17:28:10 UTC
(Jarod Garamonde and Saiyuki Harada's reaction upon seeing what's inside this thread)

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Audrey UntzUntz
Doomheim
#145 - 2014-05-11 18:27:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Audrey UntzUntz
Shouldn't changes strive to be balanced? In a competitive PVP game, balance is key.

If they make the new drone skills split off the level of SDO only and refund CDO, everyone will receive the same bonus SP. Since it's more than 5 days until the patch is released, releasing a new dev blog stating this info would allow the rare person with CDO V but SDO under V to train up SDO V in time.

Why is this more balanced? Consider any scenario where SDO is trained as high or higher than CDO (most people)
- In the current setup, two players who have invested X amount of SP between SDO/CDO but in different ratios will receive a different amount SP when you subtract old SP in relevant skills from new SP in relevant skills.
- In the suggested setup, two players who have invested X amount of SP between SDO/CDO but in any ratio will always receive the same amount of SP when you subtract old SP in relevant skills from new SP in relevant skills.
- In the rare scenario where CDO is trained higher than SDO, the CDO player in fact still gets less bonus SP than the above players.

As such I argue my changes are more balanced.

In summary: The changes I'm suggesting either provide the same amount of bonus SP to players or still provide less bonus SP to players who have trained CDO V due to the dev blog. By keeping it as is, you are simply increasing that discrepancy. It's like, "one punch isn't enough, here's another".
Riyria Twinpeaks
Perkone
Caldari State
#146 - 2014-05-11 18:43:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Riyria Twinpeaks
Audrey UntzUntz wrote:
Shouldn't changes strive to be balanced? In a competitive PVP game, balance is key.

If they make the new drone skills split off the level of SDO only and refund CDO, everyone will receive the same bonus SP. Since it's more than 5 days until the patch is released, releasing a new dev blog stating this info would allow the rare person with CDO V but SDO under V to train up SDO V in time.

[...]


You are requiring that every player (edit: who has SDO lower than CDO) must read the dev blogs to not be at a disadvantage compared to other players.
How is that different from expecting players who -do- read the dev blogs and react to the changes, to keep themselves informed in case those changes will be modified, if they want to have the maximum advantage?

If they only trained CDO to profit from the changes, they could have kept themselves informed and stopped training it in time to "lose" almost nothing.
If they had CDO trained before for different reasons, they already considered the skill worth training, so they profited from their training already.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#147 - 2014-05-11 18:58:06 UTC
Audrey UntzUntz wrote:
Shouldn't changes strive to be balanced? In a competitive PVP game, balance is key.
…and the solution they picked is about as balanced as it gets. No-one loses any equipment or bonuses, at most a few people gain a fairly minute jump compared to where they were before, and no-one is being punished for failing to follow the dev blogs obsessively.

Quote:
If they make the new drone skills split off the level of SDO only and refund CDO, everyone will receive the same bonus SP.
No. Only the people who had trained into drones would receive any “bonus SP” and they would be given it twice for no good reason. This is hardly balanced. It becomes particularly silly when people try to frame it as a “refund” since it is nothing of the kind. They lose nothing. They gain a lot. There is absolutely nothing to refund.

Quote:
As such I argue my changes are more balanced.
How is it more balanced that some players will be given nearly two weeks worth of skills they didn't train for; that some will also be given an additional full week of SP that they can do anything they want with, even though they have already gained all the abilities that come with that training time; and that some will be left in the lurch and gain nothing? It seems about as imbalanced and arbitrary as something possibly could be — in every way much worse than what they're actually going to do, which is to essentially let everyone keep the abilities and bonuses they have.

Quote:
By keeping it as is, you are simply increasing that discrepancy. It's like, "one punch isn't enough, here's another".
No. By keeping it as it is, everyone gets treated the same and no-one loses out. It's actually a case of “here's a very kind gift, and here's another”. Moreover, by keeping it the way it is, people aren't required to parse every letter of a dev blog to just keep playing as usual — it happens automatically.
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#148 - 2014-05-11 23:26:59 UTC
People gambled a week or so of training on the basis of a dev blog about possible changes and it did not pay off.

How is that any different to investing in BPCs or even grinding LP on the basis of a dev blog only to have it not pay off?


Some people are far to SP obsessed. If your getting uptight about these relatively minor changes you need to pause your skill queue for a week and take a holiday from EVE.

Xasnevian
sadfadsfadsadsf
#149 - 2014-05-12 07:14:21 UTC
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
How is that any different to investing in BPCs or even grinding LP on the basis of a dev blog only to have it not pay off?

Some people are far to SP obsessed. If your getting uptight about these relatively minor changes you need to pause your skill queue for a week and take a holiday from EVE.


It's different in that if I grind LP before the patch, I still have those LP after the patch (depending on the type of change of course). The trained SP are basically lost.

People are uptight about it, because this situation is very similar to situations in which CCP DID return SP to the players.

Beofryn Sedorak
#150 - 2014-05-12 07:23:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Beofryn Sedorak
Xasnevian wrote:
It's different in that if I grind LP before the patch, I still have those LP after the patch


You seem to be having trouble with reading comprehension here so I'll repeat this for the Nth time.

If you Trained the 5% damage per level skill, You WILL have the 5% damage per level skills after the patch.

If you Trained the 5k drone control range skill, you will still have the 5k drone control range skill after the patch. You will also get a bonus of the 5% damage per level skills to ensure you can continue using your t2 drones if you had them unlocked before the patch.

NO ONE is losing SP. Everyone with EITHER skill at any level, is GAINING SP. You can completely fail at comprehending this to the end of time, but your inability to understand it doesn't make it any less true.
Xasnevian
sadfadsfadsadsf
#151 - 2014-05-12 09:20:31 UTC
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:
You seem to be having trouble with reading comprehension here so I'll repeat this for the Nth time.


It seems that you don't like the way other people think, but repeating your argument for the Nth time will not do anything. Personally, I think your way of thinking is flawed, but I don't keep on saying it all the time.

Beofryn Sedorak wrote:
NO ONE is losing SP. Everyone with EITHER skill at any level, is GAINING SP. You can completely fail at comprehending this to the end of time, but your inability to understand it doesn't make it any less true.


You're not wrong. But if I trained a skill other than Combat drone operations in a parallel universe, my character in the parallel universe has more SP after the patch than this character (that did train Combat drone operation). Therefore, I could have had more SP. Therefore, people regard this as 'losing' SP.
Beofryn Sedorak
#152 - 2014-05-12 09:25:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Beofryn Sedorak
Xasnevian wrote:
It seems that you don't like the way other people think, but repeating your argument for the Nth time will not do anything. Personally, I think your way of thinking is flawed, but I don't keep on saying it all the time.


My problem isn't with the way they think, It's when they try to convince other people of bad/wrong/false information born of ignorance. I don't care if someone chooses to ignore simple immutable facts on their own time, Just don't impose that willful ignorance onto others. It's bad for anyone that you manage to convince, and it's bad for yourself as you deny yourself personal growth.

Xasnevian wrote:
people regard this as 'losing' SP.


You can regard something in any way you like. However, the truth of the matter isn't decided by your regard.

The Facts:

  1. 0 pilots will lose SP over this change.

  2. Anyone that trains a skill, chooses to do so of their own free will.

  3. CCP DID NOT TELL ANYONE TO TRAIN THE SKILL. All they did was provide information on the coming change.You're the one in control of your "Apply" button.[/b]
Medalyn Isis
Doomheim
#153 - 2014-05-12 10:32:28 UTC
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:
My problem isn't with the way they think, It's when they try to convince other people of bad/wrong/false information born of ignorance. I don't care if someone chooses to ignore simple immutable facts on their own time, Just don't impose that willful ignorance onto others. It's bad for anyone that you manage to convince, and it's bad for yourself as you deny yourself personal growth.

Lol. The trolling nonsense is strong with this one. +1 for making me laugh though.
Xasnevian
sadfadsfadsadsf
#154 - 2014-05-12 10:36:55 UTC
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:
You can regard something in any way you like. However, the truth of the matter isn't decided by your regard.

The Facts:

  1. 0 pilots will lose SP over this change.

  2. Anyone that trains a skill, chooses to do so of their own free will.

  3. CCP DID NOT TELL ANYONE TO TRAIN THE SKILL. All they did was provide information on the coming change.You're the one in control of your "Apply" button.[/b]


You are not wrong! But you fail to see that these 3 points are not the only bullet points that matter, as argued in previous pages of this thread.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#155 - 2014-05-12 10:50:48 UTC
Xasnevian wrote:


Beofryn Sedorak wrote:
NO ONE is losing SP. Everyone with EITHER skill at any level, is GAINING SP.


You're not wrong. But if I trained a skill other than Combat drone operations in a parallel universe, my character in the parallel universe has more SP after the patch than this character (that did train Combat drone operation). Therefore, I could have had more SP. Therefore, people regard this as 'losing' SP.


Sorry, you can't say he's "not wrong" and then proceed to say the exact opposite.

He's right, you know he's right, so its pretty obvious who's trolling who here.

1) You, to him

2) THIS THREAD AND ITS DUPLICATE, TO US ALL

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Xasnevian
sadfadsfadsadsf
#156 - 2014-05-12 11:03:02 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Sorry, you can't say he's "not wrong" and then proceed to say the exact opposite.

He's right, you know he's right, so its pretty obvious who's trolling who here.

1) You, to him

2) THIS THREAD AND ITS DUPLICATE, TO US ALL


I don't even know what to respond to this. Maybe I should start using capital letters as well.
Black Panpher
CastleKickers
Rote Kapelle
#157 - 2014-05-12 12:31:18 UTC
People who invested time training there skills for an advantage should still hold an advantage after a skill change be it in skill level or sp.

I maxed out my drone skills on multiple characters years ago for an "advantage" over the lack luster skill trainers so why should they be put on a level pegging for no work?

The way this should be handled seems pretty clear to me and I have faith CCP will choose the right path to go down.... NOT
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#158 - 2014-05-12 12:35:26 UTC
Xasnevian wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Sorry, you can't say he's "not wrong" and then proceed to say the exact opposite.

He's right, you know he's right, so its pretty obvious who's trolling who here.

1) You, to him

2) THIS THREAD AND ITS DUPLICATE, TO US ALL


I don't even know what to respond to this. Maybe I should start using capital letters as well.


If you are shouting because you are frustrated with people refusing to understand, and continuing redundant threads beyond logical rationality, then please do.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#159 - 2014-05-12 13:41:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Black Panpher wrote:
People who invested time training there skills for an advantage should still hold an advantage after a skill change be it in skill level or sp.
Good news: they will. It'll be a slightly different advantage compared to before, but it'll still be there.

I'm in the worst-case category as well, and even then, I'm gaining half a week of training. Complaining about that or thinking that this gain is in any way a loss is nothing short of silly.

Xasnevian wrote:
But you fail to see that these 3 points are not the only bullet points that matter

Yes they are. All other points are ignorance, senseless entitlement, and plain old nonsense — none of which matter.
Xasnevian
sadfadsfadsadsf
#160 - 2014-05-12 14:19:23 UTC
Tippia wrote:
I'm gaining half a week of training. Complaining about that or thinking that this gain is in any way a loss is nothing short of silly.


You're gaining half a week of training which grants you no extra ability at all, besides the ability to having to pay more for medical clones.

If you didn't have Combat drone operation 5, but only Scout drone operation 5, you would actually gain abilities you didn't have before AND you would be able to put your SP that didn't went into Combat drone operation elsewhere.

Your logic and strong arguments astound me.