These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Combat Drone Operation Being Effectively Removed from the Game

First post First post
Author
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#301 - 2014-05-15 17:17:42 UTC
Removed some off topic posts. Please keep it on topic and civil. Thank you.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

Marc McIntyre Crendraven
Brave Empire Inc.
Brave United
#302 - 2014-05-15 17:57:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Marc McIntyre Crendraven
I have read several pages here and I have yet to see someone do this simple math. Follow this carefully.

Pilot A has trained scout drone operation to V and combat drone operation to II, taking him roughly 6 days to do.
After the new drone skills are applied he gets:
scout drone operation to V,
medium drone operation to V ,
light drone operation to V,

This effectively gives him a total of roughly 20 days training total. Yay for him!

Now pay attention to how Pilot B gets ripped off.

Pilot B has trained Scout Drone operation to V and combat drone operation to V, taking him roughly 16 days to do.
After the skill changes he gets the same skills as Pilot A, Yay he lost nothing.

Pilot A training time was 6 days, Pilot B was 16, but they have the same after the expansion.
This means that Pilot B lost 10 days of training time. See how that sucks? It is completely unfair.

Eat Lead!!! Err....Antimatter...whatever!

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#303 - 2014-05-15 18:12:18 UTC
Marc McIntyre Crendraven wrote:
This effectively gives him a total of roughly 20 days training total.
Or, to put it in more accurate terms, his ~4 days of training is turned into ~15, so he earns about 11 days.

Quote:
Now pay attention to how Pilot B gets ripped off.
His ~11 days of training is also turned into 15, so he only earns 4 days. This puts him ahead of where he was before, and as such he doesn't get ripped off. None of his training days are wasted since they all turn out to be earn him more SP than is normally possible.
Radric Davids
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#304 - 2014-05-15 18:15:15 UTC
Marc McIntyre Crendraven wrote:
I have read several pages here and I have yet to see someone do this simple math. Follow this carefully.

Pilot A has trained scout drone operation to V and combat drone operation to II, taking him roughly 6 days to do.
After the new drone skills are applied he gets:
scout drone operation to V,
medium drone operation to V ,
light drone operation to V,

This effectively gives him a total of roughly 20 days training total. Yay for him!

Now pay attention to how Pilot B gets ripped off.

Pilot B has trained Scout Drone operation to V and combat drone operation to V, taking him roughly 16 days to do.
After the skill changes he gets the same skills as Pilot A, Yay he lost nothing.

Pilot A training time was 6 days, Pilot B was 16, but they have the same after the expansion.
This means that Pilot B lost 10 days of training time. See how that sucks? It is completely unfair.


Pilot B did not lose anything. His "loss" is relative to the other pilot, and not on an absolute basis. The reason for this is because pilot A could use the same drones as pilot B, so any other way would be unfair for Pilot A (an absolute loss). The base damage of drones is being increased to the level that combat drone operation currently gives you (i think), so pilot A gains that damage, while pilot B already had it and continues to have it. Pilot A gains (in line with the gains that the skill change is giving to all drone damage), but pilot B keeps what he had.
Gavin Dax
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#305 - 2014-05-15 18:36:30 UTC
The argument from Tippia and others is "too bad, be happy with your cookie". So the problem is acknowledged but ignored. It is ridiculously clear to anyone with half a brain that there is simply a better way to make these changes, and that those who did redundant training should have that compensated.

Just because you "OR" two skills together does not make it right to ignore the cases where people lose out (relative to themselves - i.e. what they could have trained instead). You can very easily construct similar examples with much more lengthy skills to train in the game, and it's plainly obvious what the problem with no reimbusrement is.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#306 - 2014-05-15 19:18:42 UTC
Gavin Dax wrote:
The argument from Tippia and others is "too bad, be happy with your cookie". So the problem is acknowledged but ignored. It is ridiculously clear to anyone with half a brain that there is simply a better way to make these changes, and that those who did redundant training should have that compensated.

Just because you "OR" two skills together does not make it right to ignore the cases where people lose out (relative to themselves - i.e. what they could have trained instead). You can very easily construct similar examples with much more lengthy skills to train in the game, and it's plainly obvious what the problem with no reimbusrement is.

The only problem here is that people are miffed that some people COME OUT FURTHER AHEAD than others, and choose to ignore that they are benefiting either way.

That is what we call greed gentlemen, and while that is a worthy thing to aspire to in game it reflects poorly on you here in the real world.

Time to put a cork in it, you're starting to look more than a little bit foolish.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Gavin Dax
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#307 - 2014-05-15 19:27:29 UTC
I trained CDO V on an alt that already had SDO V. I did this using dual character turning, with a plex that I paid actual money for. I did this shortly before the original devblog came out (so I was not "speculating"). That character has remained docked, so I did not even use CDO V.

1/3rd of the money I spent to train that character was entirely wasted. This is not relative to anyone else. It was simply wasted as it did nothing for me and it should be reimbursed. It's amazing how many people cannot grasp this simple concept.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#308 - 2014-05-15 19:29:20 UTC
Gavin Dax wrote:


1/3rd of the money I spent to train that character was entirely wasted. This is not relative to anyone else. It was simply wasted as it did nothing for me and it should be reimbursed. It's amazing how many people cannot grasp this simple concept.


You dont even grasp the concept of what you are talking about.

Please surrender now before others jump to the cyno I have just lit on grid with you

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#309 - 2014-05-15 19:33:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Gavin Dax wrote:
I trained CDO V on an alt that already had SDO V. I did this using dual character turning, with a plex that I paid actual money for. I did this shortly before the original devblog came out (so I was not "speculating"). That character has remained docked, so I did not even use CDO V.

1/3rd of the money I spent to train that character was entirely wasted. This is not relative to anyone else. It was simply wasted as it did nothing for me and it should be reimbursed. It's amazing how many people cannot grasp this simple concept.

How about you pay them a bit more to reimburse CCP for the extra training time they are willing to give you for free...

( I will give you credit for the creativity to come up with a scenario that actually made is seem like you lost something though, good effort).

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Gavin Dax
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#310 - 2014-05-15 19:42:36 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Gavin Dax wrote:


1/3rd of the money I spent to train that character was entirely wasted. This is not relative to anyone else. It was simply wasted as it did nothing for me and it should be reimbursed. It's amazing how many people cannot grasp this simple concept.


You dont even grasp the concept of what you are talking about.

Please surrender now before others jump to the cyno I have just lit on grid with you


So, basically I just refuted your point and you have no logical response.

Please eplain how in my case time was not wasted, or why you think it's a good thing for this to be the case. Why is it *better* that people in this situation do not get reimbursed?

And Ranger Corp, this scenario is perfectly valid and it also happens to be true. I will be ok with paying more to "reimburse CCP" for the extra training time they give me, as long as everyone else does as well.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#311 - 2014-05-15 19:53:16 UTC
Gavin Dax wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Gavin Dax wrote:


1/3rd of the money I spent to train that character was entirely wasted. This is not relative to anyone else. It was simply wasted as it did nothing for me and it should be reimbursed. It's amazing how many people cannot grasp this simple concept.


You dont even grasp the concept of what you are talking about.

Please surrender now before others jump to the cyno I have just lit on grid with you


So, basically I just refuted your point and you have no logical response.

Please eplain how in my case time was not wasted, or why you think it's a good thing for this to be the case. Why is it *better* that people in this situation do not get reimbursed?

And Ranger Corp, this scenario is perfectly valid and it also happens to be true. I will be ok with paying more to "reimburse CCP" for the extra training time they give me, as long as everyone else does as well.

Good luck with that. I'm pretty sure most people will be content with just saying "Thank you" instead of begging for more. Blink

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#312 - 2014-05-15 19:54:36 UTC
Gavin Dax wrote:


So, basically I just refuted your point and you have no logical response.

Please eplain how in my case time was not wasted, or why you think it's a good thing for this to be the case. Why is it *better* that people in this situation do not get reimbursed?

And Ranger Corp, this scenario is perfectly valid and it also happens to be true. I will be ok with paying more to "reimburse CCP" for the extra training time they give me, as long as everyone else does as well.

Your time was wasted by YOU!
You trained a skill you had no intent on using for months & months. You even admitted you trained it before the Dev blog, so chose to not undock & make use of the skill in the mean time.

So the only person you have any right to be mad at is YOU!
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#313 - 2014-05-15 19:57:43 UTC
Gavin Dax wrote:


So, basically I just refuted your point and you have no logical response


I didnt make a point, you simpleton

I wasn't who you were replying to

I simply stated you are factually incorrect and hinted that others would be here momentarily to explain to you why

Cya

*cloaks*

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#314 - 2014-05-15 20:51:00 UTC
Gavin Dax wrote:
I trained CDO V on an alt that already had SDO V. I did this using dual character turning, with a plex that I paid actual money for. I did this shortly before the original devblog came out (so I was not "speculating"). That character has remained docked, so I did not even use CDO V.

1/3rd of the money I spent to train that character was
…turned into exactly the amount of SP you'd come to expect from that timeframe, and even 50% extra on top if we just look at that particular bit of training on its own. If you didn't want that SP, why did you train it? If you wanted that SP, you got it, you keep it, and you get more of it, so what's the problem?

You got exactly what you were training for, so it was not wasted from that standpoint. You got more SP than you were training for, so it's definitely not wasted from that standpoint. Asking for a “refund” — in reality, another 512k SP on top of the 256k you already been given for free — is such a bizarre concept that it beggars belief.

You come out ahead. There are no two ways about it. Why on earth should you receive “compensation” for being handed more training time than you originally had? Greed doesn't even begin to describe it. I've likened it to Enron accounting because it's really the only thing that comes close.

Quote:
It is ridiculously clear to anyone with half a brain that there is simply a better way to make these changes
Is there? Please provide one that fulfils the only relevant condition: no-one must lose any abilities or bonuses they currently possess.

In other words:
• If you have SDO trained, you must gain LDO and MDO at the same level, or you will lose access to the T1 and T2 drones.
• If you have SDO trained, you must gain DAv at the same level, or you will lose access to the range bonuses.
• If you have CDO trained, you must gain LDO and MDO at the same level, or you will lose access to the damage bonuses.

Since anyone with half a brain can come up with a way to accomplish it, please explain how to do this without incurring the current set of (non)issues.
Marsha Mallow
#315 - 2014-05-15 20:51:55 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
The only problem here is that people are miffed that some people COME OUT FURTHER AHEAD than others, and choose to ignore that they are benefiting either way. That is what we call greed gentlemen, and while that is a worthy thing to aspire to in game it reflects poorly on you here in the real world.

So much this. I have so many accounts, if I had jumped in early and trained the longer skill then found things changed, I'd have wasted billions in training time. Still wouldn't be whining like this, I'd probably grumble once then flounce off to consider my own stupidity. It's patch speculation and SP - as demonstrated by a lot of these remarks - is a valuable commodity. If you gamble pre-patch during discussion phase there is a chance you might lose. I still might, don't care, my choice which I can take responsibility for.

Ranger 1 wrote:
Time to put a cork in it, you're starting to look more than a little bit foolish.

I dunno, the remarks are entertaining. I particularly like how they'll rage here but be all humble and submissive towards the Devs and despite the opportunity, avoid confronting Fozzie direct. Why don't they just shout directly at the Dev who has responded numerous times with "But it's not faiiiiiiir CCP" and wave their little arms in outrage. Rather than babbling here. Scared he might answer back and make them look silly/petty/whiny/entitled?

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#316 - 2014-05-15 20:55:11 UTC
Why would Fozzy try and duplicate the work of people who are doing such a good job already?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Marsha Mallow
#317 - 2014-05-15 21:01:03 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Why would Fozzy try and duplicate the work of people who are doing such a good job already?

I'll go yell. Slap hand on desk etc, see what happens

brb

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

beakerax
Pator Tech School
#318 - 2014-05-15 21:04:04 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Uh, Command Ships didn't give people an SP advantage. It's actually faster for a new player to train to CS than it was before. And the pre-skills are useful in any ship when a squad commander now. At least know what you are talking about when you complain about things.

Command Ships required Battlecruisers V which was split into 4 skills. Futhermore, the way in which Command Ship pilots were grandfathered in means that I can now fly (four) T2 ships despite never having trained the required skills.

I apologize for confusing you, though.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#319 - 2014-05-15 21:13:55 UTC
beakerax wrote:
Command Ships required Battlecruisers V which was split into 4 skills. Futhermore, the way in which Command Ship pilots were grandfathered in means that I can now fly (four) T2 ships despite never having trained the required skills.
Actually, you can probably fly eight, unless you mean that you only incidentally had unlocked one of the CS subclasses, and the ships still require you to have the relevant BC skill V so there's little real change there. Blink

Anyway, iirc, there was no specific handouts for the CS skill, only for the BC split — the new ship access was just a result of removing some pretty silly prereqs in favour of ones that made sense.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#320 - 2014-05-15 21:28:29 UTC
Tippia wrote:
beakerax wrote:
Command Ships required Battlecruisers V which was split into 4 skills. Futhermore, the way in which Command Ship pilots were grandfathered in means that I can now fly (four) T2 ships despite never having trained the required skills.
Actually, you can probably fly eight, unless you mean that you only incidentally had unlocked one of the CS subclasses, and the ships still require you to have the relevant BC skill V so there's little real change there. Blink

Anyway, iirc, there was no specific handouts for the CS skill, only for the BC split — the new ship access was just a result of removing some pretty silly prereqs in favour of ones that made sense.

CS pilots weren't actually grand fathered in, & yes Tippia is right, no skills were given.
They changed the entire skill system at the same time which means you only need the top tier of pre-reqs now to fly any ship. Meaning a lot of things are possible now when they might not have been before. Mostly dealing with people who fail to update clones of course. But it wasn't specific to CS pilots, it was everyone.