These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Enough with 3rd party super trading

First post
Author
Infrequent
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2014-05-28 12:17:26 UTC
-1. No, just no. You're clearly unwilling to listen to reason, this is apparent in your mindless replies to mynna. So I wont even bother to tell you why this idea is terrible.
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2014-05-28 12:50:14 UTC
As Mags so eloquently said earlier in the thread:

Malcanis wrote:
tl;dr: hahaha no, get out

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Rias Bane
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#23 - 2014-05-29 10:41:17 UTC
I have to say that this thread is representative of why the CMS is in danger of becoming pointless, I accept that the OP has taken personal issue with the fact that the first person to contest the suggestion was a Goon...seriously OP, if you want to make a legitimate suggestion and hope that it obtains credibility and support from other members of the community in an endeavor to improve the game, don't act like a child just because you are not allied with the detractors on the subject.

This thread lacks constructive discussion, I believe that the OP has a point, they are asking for a security measure to be implemented to protect all parties in the sale of a commodity that is intrinsically risky to sell. Do I believe that the suggestion is ideal, no...but is it at least a suggestion. Does it run the risk of having a negative impact on the activities of some third parties? Yes, of course it does, will it eliminate their revenue stream no, because if there were singular locations in each region where supers could dock you can bet your bottom dollar they will be watched permanently if not camped as such, and therfore taking your multi billion ship to such a location will carry with it risks, as such it will not replace the existing meta game, but in fact alter it, and it is for this reason I would say that I would not personally support it, modifying the game and eliminating meta gaming elements is not the way of eve imho.

I would add, Most of the replies are not constructive in picking both the merits and failures of this suggestion they are in the main, childish, I have to say Malcanis, I voted for you and I have to say that your conduct here is not in keeping with what I would hope for an elected individual whom I voted for, TBH, it's disappointing and I am embarrassed that I contributed to you getting the credibility to have a CSM tab against your name and afforded the opportunity to respond with such a pointless reply as TL:DR...really?!

The CSM need to remember; when you reply in here, you reply with the player base voice, not your own, it's a privelidge and a responsibility which has been obtained through the support of your peers...this thread does not do that justice...you can all do so much better, please work on it peeps Smile



DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#24 - 2014-05-30 04:58:59 UTC
Not a goon, was only blue to goon once and that was back in the IAC vs FiX war.

And i side with the goons. This idea is pointless and not needed. Supers and titans don;t need to dock.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Previous page12