These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Why I think the Epithal and Krystallos are superior industrials

Author
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2014-04-28 18:15:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Reaver Glitterstim
I'm gonna start by saying that cargo expanders should at least have a stacking penalty. I'm not saying nerf maximum cargohold, I think the base amount should be buffed. The worst thing about industrial fits is that they don't have any free low slots. Also, they really can't haul enough to compete with freighters. The only people I see hauling in industrials are the ones with low SP or are just not hauling much stuff.

I like using an industrial because I don't have enough to fill a freighter, and I like to fly something small and fast, with a bit of armor to fend off suicide gankers. The industrial buff was definitely precedented. Unfortunately, only the Gallente line wound up with a nice arrangement. The little industrials are great for hauling general cargo, but the big ones are still too squishy even after getting a HP buff, and they don't even carry as much cargo as you can tow in some of the redesigned Iteron hulls.

But my real purpose for being here is to share with you my experience flying a Krystallos industrial. I use it on my alt when I mine ice. It holds 64,500 m3 of reprocessed ice products. I can really stock up for a while, and then haul all of that to town at once. That saves a lot of time since I mine ice pretty far away from Jita. And best of all, I have all those low slots free to fit a good tank because Jita is full of gankers, so fitting tank is really important.

I got really tired of losing industrials to gankers back before the industrial buff. People said I just need to fit better tank but that never worked. It wasn't possible to fit enough! Well now it is...well almost. I still got ganked once and that was really annoying. So I think industrials need slightly more HP or maybe more slots.

Anyway, end rant. What do you guys like about each industrial?

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#2 - 2014-04-28 18:16:56 UTC

--> Ships & Modules

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Liam Inkuras
Furnace
Thermodynamics
#3 - 2014-04-28 18:17:21 UTC
Kryos*

I wear my goggles at night.

Any spelling/grammatical errors come complimentary with my typing on a phone

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2014-04-28 18:18:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Reaver Glitterstim
Liam Inkuras wrote:
Kryos*

thanks. Oops.

Doc Fury wrote:
I'm also discussing tactics here. I think it fits where I put it.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Jur Tissant
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2014-04-28 18:21:33 UTC
It's no secret that Gallente dominates T1 haulers. I use an Epithal for low-sec PI hauling and it hasn't failed me yet.
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#6 - 2014-04-28 18:22:15 UTC
I really like the wreathe for hauling smaller volume cargo around. It aligns in just under 4 seconds, room for 5.8k m3, warps at 6.5 AU/s and sports around 25k EHPs. YMMV, depending on your fit and skills. I think it's a nice little convenient steam train to have around. CHOO CHOO !
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2014-04-28 18:23:11 UTC
i'm going to go offtopic straight away and express the opinion that all of the indies should have been designed with 'special' bays (unexpandable general cargos) plus small normal cargo bays so that they weren't designed around filling all their slots with expanders

industrials are boring enough anyway without designing them all around having one fit
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2014-04-28 18:27:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Reaver Glitterstim
I don't see anything wrong with having expanders make a difference. And if they had a stacking penalty, it could be that the expanders are useful to a point but you wouldn't use more than 3 or 4 of them max.

It's on topic because this thread covers all that stuff. I didn't want to put it in S&M or F&ID because it covers topics on both sides as well as in between and elsewhere. Plus, what else is this forum actually good for, anyway?

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2014-04-28 18:36:12 UTC
even then, though, you're kinda designing the thing around 'it's going to have three expanders'

i'd prefer it something like '18,000m3 special bay +2k per level (that still carries everything), 500m3 cargobay'

then start exploring some more interesting bonuses than 'agility or velocity' and more interesting slot layouts than 'tons of lows plus some mids for the shield tank we both know you're going to use'
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#10 - 2014-04-28 19:06:37 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Liam Inkuras wrote:
Kryos*

thanks. Oops.

Doc Fury wrote:
I'm also discussing tactics here. I think it fits where I put it.


--> Warfare & Tactics

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2014-04-28 20:12:08 UTC
Looks like my thread fits just about everywhere.

I don't see a problem with needing 3 or 4 cargo expanders to max the cargohold. You can use rigs to do it, for one. Alternatively, you can use only one or two, and still get the majority of the max possible cargo. It's really the first two that make the biggest difference. And still, even with none, you still have over half the max cargohold. I think a person should have to give a little to get a little.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#12 - 2014-04-28 20:25:35 UTC
well, as long as there's still spare slots to keep the ship interesting. since we're argreeing on the problem i shouldn't be arguing about a "better" solution, sorry Sad
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2014-04-28 21:51:37 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
well, as long as there's still spare slots to keep the ship interesting. since we're argreeing on the problem i shouldn't be arguing about a "better" solution, sorry Sad
Nonsense. A healthy debate is always a good thing. A thousand people can notice an obvious problem but if none of them proposes a good fix, then they aren't helping as much as one person noticing and giving a great solution.

The more people you have looking at solutions and talking with each other, the better the net solutions you come up with.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Mildew Wolf
#14 - 2014-04-28 22:01:16 UTC
Nereus is pretty fun for fighting frigs and stuff
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2014-04-28 22:43:30 UTC
Mildew Wolf wrote:
Nereus is pretty fun for fighting frigs and stuff


With good fitting skills a Nereus can pack a large shield extender and still fit a MWD/Cloak some Warp Stabs, nanos and a bunch of Hob IIs. Good little lowsec tramp steamer.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#16 - 2014-04-28 22:46:13 UTC
As an addendum to what people are saying about the Nereus, if you are hauling in highsec and getting ganked, the Nereus can be fitted to tank 500+ dps easily. That ship is obscene.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Doireen Kaundur
Doomheim
#17 - 2014-04-28 22:51:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Doireen Kaundur
T3 Haulers!!

Make it happen, CCP.

_[center]For your Freighter **sized shipping needs, contact _[u]Lord Chanlin[/u].** _ Fast, affordable, reliable service._

https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Lord%20Chanlin[/center]

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2014-04-28 22:56:14 UTC
Doireen Kaundur wrote:
T3 Haulers!!

Make it happen, CCP.


That's freighters, its just someone misplaced the subsystems. You know got lost in the last restructure.
Freight Dee Kat
Sapphire Dragon Industries
#19 - 2014-04-28 23:03:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Freight Dee Kat
Uhh...What drugs are you on?

The Kryos doesn't haul refined ice products. Just verified it, in case there was some weird change recently. Refined ice products only fit in regular cargoholders such as the Itty 5, badger, bestower, etc.

The Kryos only holds minerals in its Mineral bay.

FDK

PS. You may be thinking of the Miasmos, which CAN haul UNPROCESSED/UNREFINED ice from ice belts to station (not "town") in it's ore bay.
Solecist Project
#20 - 2014-04-28 23:31:22 UTC
This sounds like you're enjoying the fact that the hauler in question
has built-in cargo that carries large amounts of expensive goods,
without sacrificing tank.

You're not a greedy person either.


Anyhow, prices may change some day.


That was a great read. *sips peppermint tea*

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

12Next page