These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Alternative to banning players...

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#61 - 2014-04-23 19:04:45 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
A better alternative would be nerfing highsec. For example we can remove concord which will make it much easier to punish those bad people.

Makes no sense.

Removing CONCORD will buff highsec a lot more than you would believe.

People will band together and protect themselves. Idiots will leave the game
and more hardcore players will come in. New players would finally get around to
actually GET the game and learn to survive within a matter of hours,
because other players will see the need of teaching of them.

It would be far more cutthroat and realistic, as in much better
mirroring natures laws instead of having people wrongly assume they are safe anyway.

People would also spread out more and not concentrate that much in highsec,
because nobody would want to be around where many unaffiliated others are.

It would be much better than most weaklings try to make us believe.

Would it cost subs? Yes. Would it pay off? Most likely!


Since its a highsec buff then it needs to be done now, surely the faction police will appreciate this increase in usefulness.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2014-04-23 19:09:04 UTC
Doireen Kaundur wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
A better alternative would be nerfing highsec. For example we can remove concord which will make it much easier to punish those bad people.


If you ever decide to name another toon, may I suggest : Las Nalgas? Big smile


I was going to go with Las Nalgas Gordas or Culo Gordo.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Doireen Kaundur
Doomheim
#63 - 2014-04-23 19:33:39 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Doireen Kaundur wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
A better alternative would be nerfing highsec. For example we can remove concord which will make it much easier to punish those bad people.


If you ever decide to name another toon, may I suggest : Las Nalgas? Big smile


I was going to go with Las Nalgas Gordas or Culo Gordo.



LOL!!

Excellent choices. Blink

_[center]For your Freighter **sized shipping needs, contact _[u]Lord Chanlin[/u].** _ Fast, affordable, reliable service._

https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Lord%20Chanlin[/center]
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#64 - 2014-04-23 19:42:48 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Solecist Project wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
A better alternative would be nerfing highsec. For example we can remove concord which will make it much easier to punish those bad people.

Makes no sense.

Removing CONCORD will buff highsec a lot more than you would believe.

People will band together and protect themselves. Idiots will leave the game
and more hardcore players will come in. New players would finally get around to
actually GET the game and learn to survive within a matter of hours,
because other players will see the need of teaching of them.

It would be far more cutthroat and realistic, as in much better
mirroring natures laws instead of having people wrongly assume they are safe anyway.

People would also spread out more and not concentrate that much in highsec,
because nobody would want to be around where many unaffiliated others are.

It would be much better than most weaklings try to make us believe.

Would it cost subs? Yes. Would it pay off? Most likely!


Since its a highsec buff then it needs to be done now, surely the faction police will appreciate this increase in usefulness.



So at best you get a day or two of gleeful gankfest.

Tell me, do you sit around dreaming of this stuff?

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Brusanan
Sons of Seyllin
Sedition.
#65 - 2014-04-23 20:06:43 UTC
Perma-blinky, limit them to highsec and don't allow them to dock. When they get podded they should be immediately ejected from the station in an Alpha clone.
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#66 - 2014-04-23 20:09:01 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Another way we could punish players is force them to do cosplay at fanfest. But that could harm a lot of bystanders. Shocked


Danger, Will Robinson. You don't want a certain space detective on your case for torturing people.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Solecist Project
#67 - 2014-04-23 20:15:05 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Another way we could punish players is force them to do cosplay at fanfest. But that could harm a lot of bystanders. Shocked


Danger, Will Robinson. You don't want a certain space detective on your case for torturing people.

Now I wonder if anybody shows up as Inspecteur Clueless at fanfest...

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#68 - 2014-04-23 20:42:28 UTC
Doireen Kaundur wrote:
How about just making them permanent blinky?

May as well let the community have some fun.

This would be attractive to some players.... I do not like the idea of subsidizing poor behavior.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#69 - 2014-04-24 00:38:49 UTC
If and when you have a serious and well worded proposal for the betterment of EvE, please feel free to post it in the Features & Ideas Discussion part of the forum.

Thread locked.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)