These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Drug Booster Balancing issues

First post First post
Author
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#241 - 2011-11-25 17:17:30 UTC
Zendoren wrote:
Does anyone have a serious proposal to the booster issue that i can debate with instead of this e-peen contest over profitability?

We need some focus here. CCP has given us some time to debate this issue and come to a consensus on a viable fix. I have a solution up for debate but only one person has shown support for it which leads me to believe that most of you in here have some issues with it.



There really wasn't a "booster issue" until someone discovered the change on SiSi. This is whats been fascinating to me about this thread. Before the booster change was discovered, hardly anyone was complaining about how boosters needed to be nerfed / buffed / turned into harmless candy. Now that the spotlight is on them, people are starting to throw out ideas for overhauling them now that they think there's some kind of "problem". This debate just didn't exist prior to a week or two ago, certainly not compared to all the the other fixes in the game that needed attention first.

Assault ships, EAF, fixing nullsec sov mechanics and Sanctums / Haven nerfs, hybrid weapons (still not totally balanced according to the threadnaughts), faction warfare, and a thousand other items all ranked much higher than boosters on the triage list of stuff needing attention. Hence, the almost universal negative reaction when CCP went to go fiddle with them. It caught everyone by surprise, because most people here that use or make boosters were quite happy with how they were working, and didn't understand why this took priority in Winter Expansion over all the other items that didn't make it into the expansion.

If you've got ideas for improvement, great! I for one am interested in hearing them. I like boosters, and make them, but I still think there's lots of ways to make them cooler. I (and a lot of others here too) just never really considered them "broken" to begin with. But that's no reason for people not to share whatever they've come up with. CCP will monitor this thread I'm sure, I just hope that in the end they use their resources wisely and address the player base's top list of fixes first, before they go on to fiddling with minor features of the game that were working just fine before.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#242 - 2011-11-25 17:33:33 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:

And no, the burden is not on me as a booster salesman to reveal my numbers. I have everything to lose by explaining to everyone else how I run my business (even though I've shared most of it already in the name of education and healthy debate) but they have nothing to lose by proving me wrong if they actually have the numbers to back up their claim that booster production is conducted at a net loss, which it isn't.


Right, so you can just make up whatever you want and call it truth.

I've seen this type of argument before, "I happens, I don't need to prove it"


Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:


There really wasn't a "booster issue" until someone discovered the change on SiSi. This is whats been fascinating to me about this thread. Before the booster change was discovered, hardly anyone was complaining about how boosters needed to be nerfed / buffed / turned into harmless candy. Now that the spotlight is on them, people are starting to throw out ideas for overhauling them now that they think there's some kind of "problem". This debate just didn't exist prior to a week or two ago, certainly not compared to all the the other fixes in the game that needed attention first.


Just because you didn't participate in it didn't mean the debate didn't exist.

Lots of people complain, they're stupid as is, because the penalties are most often ********, even with maximum skills, you often somehow always end up with the worst possible penalty to have in the ship you are in.

Its a waste of money and a waste of time, I can get more out of a Tengu boosting alt than a can with a Strong Blue Pill, with no chance of loosing a dickton of shields in the process.



Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:

Assault ships, EAF, fixing nullsec sov mechanics and Sanctums / Haven nerfs, hybrid weapons (still not totally balanced according to the threadnaughts), faction warfare, and a thousand other items all ranked much higher than boosters on the triage list of stuff needing attention. Hence, the almost universal negative reaction when CCP went to go fiddle with them. It caught everyone by surprise, because most people here that use or make boosters were quite happy with how they were working, and didn't understand why this took priority in Winter Expansion over all the other items that didn't make it into the expansion.

Because it was a boost to lowsec and Nullsec profitability? Anything that makes either of those areas more desirable to live in is a good thing.

Unless of course it cuts into your profits right?

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#243 - 2011-11-25 18:26:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Hans Jagerblitzen
Grath Telkin wrote:


Right, so you can just make up whatever you want and call it truth.

I've seen this type of argument before, "I happens, I don't need to prove it"

Just because you didn't participate in it didn't mean the debate didn't exist.

Lots of people complain, they're stupid as is, because the penalties are most often ********, even with maximum skills, you often somehow always end up with the worst possible penalty to have in the ship you are in.

Its a waste of money and a waste of time, I can get more out of a Tengu boosting alt than a can with a Strong Blue Pill, with no chance of loosing a dickton of shields in the process.

Because it was a boost to lowsec and Nullsec profitability? Anything that makes either of those areas more desirable to live in is a good thing.

Unless of course it cuts into your profits right?


You have provided zero evidence yourself, which you could easily do with no risk to losing a competitive edge because you claim you're not involved with booster manufacturing. You're asking me to potentially compromise my operation simply to prove a point, I won't. You've had every opportunity to debunk me, and rather than use any hard evidence, you simply want to keep calling me a liar like a broken record. If you're not willing to show numbers, please stop insisting I show mine.

If you can link me some threads that show that booster manufacturing and sales fixes were a high priority to past players, I'll happily concede this point to you.

As for it being a waste of time, that's completely subjective. Sure, you can get more out of a boosting alt than out of blue pill, but there's plenty of pilots who do both. Again, no one's taking sympathy because you've had bad luck with boosters, your bad experience is not enough to ask CCP to change them all cause you can't handle the penalties. a dozen other pilots at least have come forward and said the penalties are quite manageable.

Do you fit shield extenders or plates on all your active tanks? Why or why not? Do we really need to have a lesson on why EHP takes lower precedence over absorbed DPS rate when designing active fits? This is pretty basic stuff. If you're relying on active tank, more HP per boost cycle is vastly more significant than a bit more shield buffer. The boosters make you more vulnerable to an alpha, sure, but thats just something to tactically consider before you pop it. Again, your bad luck doesn't mean much when a lot of other pilots in the several threads about this topic have said that the side effects are quite manageable.

Strong Exile is one of the most popular boosters for carrier pilots. Not a single one of them is whining because they take a EHP hit when they pop one. The increased repair rate more than makes up for that hit.

As for me making money off this, I only would have stood to gain by the changes. The billions in stock gas, pure boosters, and finished products I already own could have been sold for a large multiplier after Crucible went live. I would have made a fortune. But this is not about me personally profiting - its about fighting a silly nerfbuff that removes all danger, risk, and complexity from a system that is working just fine. If you don't have the balls to use boosters because of side effects, thats fine. But plenty of other pilots do. Go back and read the first few pages of the thread if you don't believe me.

And besides, your last statement is pure hypocrisy, you've already blatantly said in multiple posts how much you want these change so that you can make more isk off the regions you live in. You have no business calling me out for the exact same thing, especially since now that we've gotten the changes fixed I stand to profit no more in 5 days than I did before this argument even started.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#244 - 2011-11-25 18:40:11 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
If you're not willing to show numbers, please stop insisting I show mine.




This is the only part of your post that matters at all, and its a door that swings both ways.



You can't say "OH I'M NOT GOING TO SHOW YOU MY NUMBERS" and then in the same breath demand and call the argument in your favor by demanding I provide anything at all.


Its fine that you don't care if lowsec or nullsec get a boost, this would have been a nice one that for once didn't center around shooting stupid rats.

But hey, we get it, you don't care about making the game better, you only care about your silly little drug farm and hiding your magical numbers.

Pro Tip, you aren't doing anything new, the numbers are easy to figure out, its akin to a veldspar supplier going "I'M NOT GOING TO TELL YOU HOW I MAKE MY VELD", there is no secret sauce in your booster, your dope isn't any better than the hommie down the block, so you can give up on the whole "MY SECRETS" bit.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#245 - 2011-11-25 19:16:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Hans Jagerblitzen
Grath Telkin wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
If you're not willing to show numbers, please stop insisting I show mine.


This is the only part of your post that matters at all, and its a door that swings both ways.


Well, I'm glad that we can put this to rest. If this is all that matters to you, is me showing you what I buy where from whom at what price, and what I sell where, and to whom and at what price, than we can just call it good and move on.

LOL and no, there's no "secret sauce" in my boosters. They work just the same as everyone else :) You've severely misunderstood me if you think I've been trying to say I've developed a magical system to make boosters differently or better than anyone else. Trade is Trade, both open market and black market. If you've found things you can buy cheaply in one place (or acquire yourself and skip the part where you pay someone else to do it and lose profit), and sell for more in another, and you use this to generate income, you don't share the details with everyone. Same thing with if you've developed a way to observe or predict patterns in the market that you trade to take advantage of. Explaining those discoveries to everyone else means you'll eliminate that advantage in no time. That doesn't make me a monster, or a liar. That's just common sense.

Thanks for at least clarifying what you were really after here, I think others in the thread were beginning to wonder whether your rants were actually serious or not because you kept bouncing from one complaint to the next. And, everyone will be happy to see an end to the ranting, and my verbose explanations about why such rants are unfounded.

Hopefully our "dialogue" here will at least be useful to other players, in terms of learning more about a system that is still a mystery to most. There's some value in that at least, even if you and I aren't about to change our minds about our viewpoints.

And for the record, I fully support nullsec and lowsec improvements. We simply disagree that the best way to improve these regions is to drop a few more rare drops into the game for everyone to camp and fight over. There have been myriad more creative solutions to improving gameplay in these regions than just dumping more isk out there. That's the lazy way to do it. Fixing sovereignty mechanics in conjunction with increased resource value is what is truly needed, most feedback has been about how boring structure shoots are.

Just in case you haven't been paying attention, CCP are already buffing nullsec regions in terms of value. So its not like your cause is being ignored and booster changes were "our only hope for improvement" I totally get that you're not into ratting, but guess what, running LADAR sites is basically ratting too. And the mining itself, even more boring than ratting. I completely agree we need to work on these two regions of the game (null and low) and you should certainly go argue that case. However, if ratting, no matter how lucrative, isn't a good enough solution for you than increasing the value of LADAR sites (which include ratting or worse, mining) certainly is not improvement.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#246 - 2011-11-25 19:20:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Emperor Salazar
Any chance you morons can learn how to consolidate your thoughts a bit better so I don't have to read an essay in every post?

Thanks.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#247 - 2011-11-25 19:28:52 UTC
Emperor Salazar wrote:
Any chance you morons can learn how to consolidate your thoughts a bit better so I don't have to read an essay in every post?

Thanks.


I'm not forcing anyone to read my posts if they don't want to. I'm quite content if slow readers find it to be a chore and skip to the one-liners. Those that are interested, will read, those that won't, won't. Since most of my response is directed at Grath, who certainly is reading everything I type, there's no need to abbreviate anything.

The fact that this exchange happens in a public thread serves as a resource for those that might be interested. Talking about my experience with the booster trade could be useful to someone here, but it won't if me and Grath just emailed back and forth. Again, anyone finding me to verbose is welcome to skip and post about something else.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#248 - 2011-11-25 19:44:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Emperor Salazar
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Emperor Salazar wrote:
Any chance you morons can learn how to consolidate your thoughts a bit better so I don't have to read an essay in every post?

Thanks.


I'm not forcing anyone to read my posts if they don't want to. I'm quite content if slow readers find it to be a chore and skip to the one-liners. Those that are interested, will read, those that won't, won't. Since most of my response is directed at Grath, who certainly is reading everything I type, there's no need to abbreviate anything.

The fact that this exchange happens in a public thread serves as a resource for those that might be interested. Talking about my experience with the booster trade could be useful to someone here, but it won't if me and Grath just emailed back and forth. Again, anyone finding me to verbose is welcome to skip and post about something else.


Learn to be more concise and get to the point. Take a class or something.

You're not being verbose. You're being excessive. There is a difference.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#249 - 2011-11-25 19:55:15 UTC
Emperor Salazar wrote:

Learn to be more concise and get to the point. Take a class or something.

You're not being verbose. You're being excessive. There is a difference.


Fine - here's a concise version, just for you my friend. Now that Grath has stated that all he cares about is me revealing what I trade where at what price, which I won't (as any smart trader protecting his advantage wouldn't), there's nothing more for the two of us to debate.

Also, he has complained that the side effects are simply too much for him to handle. That's fine, he can decline to use them, but anyone reading the thread in entirety can see many many other players that think the side effects are more than worth the benefits.

Lastly, my dedication to this thread is not about trying to protect personal profit. I would have made a fortune with the proposed changes, now that they were rolled back, I won't. Grath is a hypocrite because he has stated in multiple posts that he wants boosters changed so that he can make more isk off them.

Are we all happy now?

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Khudin Hadashur
Doomheim
#250 - 2011-11-25 21:01:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Khudin Hadashur
Don Pellegrino wrote:
Really all this is going to do is add another must-have, like faction ammo. It's also going to break several fits and tactics.
Do you have any idea how much of an effect everyone having Motion Prediction level 9 (level 5 + Drop) is going to have on pvp and combat in general?

This is just silly, I can't see ANY benefit to this change at all. The system currently works because the low consuption fits with the low production. And no, increasing demand won't increase production significantly in this case because producers are already fighting for those BPC's.

And on top of all that, reducing the maximum potential of any of those boosters is going to harm solo pvpers that build very thought-out fits around boosters to fight outnumbered.

There is simply no benefit to this change the way it is being planned. It's a major disappointment for us solo pvpers in an otherwise great expansion.


Well put and fully agreed with.

*edit* furtheron I read this:

CCP wrote:

This has been a long day in the office, but after chasing various people here and discussing this internally based on your feedback, we have decided not to change boosters for Crucible.


Good one.
Caulk H0lster
Kazakh Ministry of Wealth Redistribution
#251 - 2011-11-25 21:20:51 UTC
CCP was just trollin the speculators, nothing more to see here, move along.
Midori Tsu
Evolution
Northern Coalition.
#252 - 2011-11-25 21:26:59 UTC
The only booster problem i see is in the production of them.
Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#253 - 2011-11-25 21:53:59 UTC
Midori Tsu wrote:
The only booster problem i see is in the production of them.


Then you're an idiot.

The production process is quite fine.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#254 - 2011-11-26 01:39:52 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:



Now that Grath has stated that all he cares about is me revealing what I trade where at what price



Ok this is an honest question, are you stupid?


Out of all my posts this is what you took away?

Let me help you

ALL I CARE ABOUT IS MAKING 0.0 AND NULLSEC MORE DESIRABLE YOU MONGOLOID


I do not care how much you make, or where you trade it, why? Because the amount of effort I have to put in for the profit I get out just isn't worth it, ever, at all, its just too mind numbingly boring for me to ever undertake drug manufacturing.



But other people would, if it was worth more isk.


You are literally so damn stupid that out of every post I've made you somehow think that what I'm worried about is how or why and where you do what you do, even though my last post flat out says i don't need you to tell me that because its not a big mystery, its not like you're the first guy to ever make drugs, or the only guy currently making drugs.



This change was flat out the best change they could have made for 0.0 and lowsec, point blank, its a boost that would have made money without directly injecting it into the economy (THIS IS A GOOD THING STUPID).

This change would have made parts of 0.0 that are literally worth nothing at all worth fighting over.


This change would have brought new explorers and corps out to lowsec because the Strong and Standard boosters would have been worth soo much more.




1) There is no way to make them must have, the price would have been too much, because the supply is limited. Pith A Type Medium Shield Boosters are pretty must have, they drop out of the low sec exploration plexes, and they sell for over a billion isk. Why, because they're rare.

2) The only person who cares what you sell, where you sell it, and how much you sell it for is you mouthbreather


3) The greedy assholes in this thread are literally only concerned with how this change would effect their own manufacturing supplies and their upset that there would be a lot of competition


4) This was one of the boosts that low sec and 0l0 needed, you all just killed it, good job.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#255 - 2011-11-26 02:00:49 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Sweet, sweet, tears


/emote drinks up and enjoys.

Ahhhh, refreshing!

Also, thanks for keeping things respectful here. Good to know that you can keep your composure and have a decent discussion based on facts instead of resorting to emorage and name calling.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#256 - 2011-11-26 02:10:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
Sweet, sweet, tears


/emote drinks up and enjoys.

Ahhhh, refreshing!

Also, thanks for keeping things respectful here. Good to know that you can keep your composure and have a decent discussion based on facts instead of resorting to emorage and name calling.


After 3 pages of telling you why the change was needed, and the summation of your responses being "GRATH WANTS TO KNOW HOW I DO WHAT I DO", I no longer feel the need to keep things respectful, as you are literally not concerned about the game at all, but your own bottom line.

If the game sickens and dies more, you don't care, you just care about your booster production.

If 0.0 withers a bit more, you don't care, because it would interfere with your booster production.


You are literally a parasite.


EDIT: Oh, and the tears thing, maybe you could hang out on a forum and pick up a more current meme, its a little old and makes you look pretty stupid every time you type it. I'd ask if you felt dumb every time you were making a keystroke typing it out, but you've done it like 5 times in this thread so that point is moot.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Tek Terasi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#257 - 2011-11-26 02:12:44 UTC
Caulk H0lster wrote:
CCP was just trollin the speculators, nothing more to see here, move along.


Indeed, delicious trader tears in those last 4 pages...
Everything after #167 is about "thank you CCP" and "omg my wallet was raped by CCP"...
Hope there´s something constructive here soon or i´ll stop lurking....
Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#258 - 2011-11-26 15:55:48 UTC
I ♥ Grath.

I'm dying from laughter after reading those last two posts.

And while I agree with his sentiments that the proposed changes would have made some areas of low/null much more desirable, I still think no downside other than isk is quite bad for the game. Side effects need some looking into, but everything else with boosters is quite fine (seriously those of you complaining about the production process are literally brain dead).

Drop rates of improved/strong bpcs is right where it needs to be. The amount of potential gas out there is.... infinite as the the sites just keep respawning (one of which has a huge cloud and respawns in the same damn constellation after being harvested). And they better not change how improved/strong boosters are made from gases from different regions; this is an awesome mechanic that will keep improved/strong boosters difficult to make, but not impossible. It will also keep their prices up.

tl;dr dumb down side effects a bit CCP, everything else is fine.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#259 - 2011-11-27 01:47:15 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
this should spike their price a lot, making the act of producing them worth more.

As somebody who lives in Amamake, I am excited by this ( Amamake is a drug producing constellation).

Prices would have skyrocketed.

The areas in lowsec where the gas clouds are located would have become hotbeds of activity, and extremely lucrative. That means for once, people want something lowsec has.

In 0.0 suddenly theres people looking to mine gas because the strong boosters have SUCH a high demand. I was expecting to see strong boosters selling for 3-500 million per dose, because thats what its worth, maybe even more.


Ahhh, Grath, I totally understand you here. You want to make more isk where you live.

Quote:
no, drug manufacturing does in fact NOT make money

Theres simply no way it is, as its margins are so small that if you even try to source any one component from the actual market all your profit is suddenly just gone.

Its a waste of money and a waste of time


Fine fine, you got me, I'm a total liar. I cannot possibly be profiting off my activities at the moment. I'm totally wasting my isk!

Quote:
ALL I CARE ABOUT IS MAKING 0.0 AND NULLSEC MORE DESIRABLE YOU MONGOLOID

The amount of effort I have to put in for the profit I get out just isn't worth it, ever, at all, its just too mind numbingly boring for me to ever undertake drug manufacturing.


Sorry that isn't working out for you.

Quote:
The greedy assholes in this thread are literally only concerned with how this change would effect their own manufacturing supplies and their upset that there would be a lot of competition


Wait, I thought we weren't making any isk off this?? And now its suddenly wrong to want to earn more isk?

Quote:
I no longer feel the need to keep things respectful, as you are literally not concerned about the game at all, but your own bottom line.

If the game sickens and dies more, you don't care, you just care about your booster production.

You are literally a parasite.


Bottom line? But you explained to me that I had no bottom line. I was losing money, remember? You said so.

Please correct me if I misunderstand you - lets recap:

1) Grath wants to be rich, fights for changes so that he can be rich.
2) Grath says NO one could possibly be making money off boosters.
3) Grath says he is sad because he isn't making money off boosters.
3) Grath says Hans is only out to protect his own income (the one that doesnt exist).
4) Grath is calls Hans a parasite for wanting to be rich. (What a monster!)

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

S0NFANNA
Cause For Concern
#260 - 2011-11-27 01:58:03 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:


crap big fight time to pop this half billion isk strong blue pill, I NEED this boost.


You want to see an hour of a 25% shield boost from a strong blue pill cost more than the current price of plex? thats just silly.

CCP has stated that they want to make drugs more accessible to players, but at that price its not going to do that.

If CCP reviews boosters they need to look at all aspects at the same time, they can't just modify a small part of them like they were proposing.

I fully agree with making parts of 0.0 more valuable to encourage conflict, and these changes may have done that but the changes to the drugs were awful, and most people dont want them.

As a booster user I don't want my standard blue pill to be less good than it was, and I don't want the skills I bought (bearing in mind they were pretty expensive) to be turned into a waste of ISK and skill points. Just because these changes might have made 0.0 more profitable for you, doesn't mean that we should accept weak and poorly considered changes on the user end of it all.

With careful consideration, CCP can make it so that 0.0 is more valuable with respect to booster production, and they can still be viable for pilots to use.

You've played eve long enough to know that change doesn't happen quickly around here i'm sure you can wait until they get it right.