These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Create new ships instead of ruining Guristas.

First post
Author
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#21 - 2014-04-12 23:18:05 UTC
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
It's sad that even an obvious try-hard troll can be successful these days. You people should be ashamed of yourselves for being baited so easily.


I had kind of suspected that's what we had on our hands here, but he puts so much more effort into it than your usual breed of troll these days that it seemed most logical that he was being sincere.
Gigan Amilupar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2014-04-12 23:22:54 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
It's sad that even an obvious try-hard troll can be successful these days. You people should be ashamed of yourselves for being baited so easily.


I had kind of suspected that's what we had on our hands here, but he puts so much more effort into it than your usual breed of troll these days that it seemed most logical that he was being sincere.


I thought he was sincere too, then saw the reply to my post and how he cherry picked from what I wrote in order to support his argued points...which I actually covered in the part of my post that he didn't quote. I immediately felt bad about myself for taking the time to respond.

Verdict: Decent troll, 7/10.
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
#23 - 2014-04-12 23:29:11 UTC
Cunningham's Law Strikes again!
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#24 - 2014-04-12 23:30:12 UTC
Paikis wrote:
Cunningham's Law Strikes again!


Which is?
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#25 - 2014-04-13 01:07:30 UTC
If people are this butthurt about losing access to sentry drones, it just goes to show how overpowered they really are.

The Worm, Gila, and soon to be the Rattlesnake are going to be awesome ships. No one is "getting **** on", you just don't get the one size fits all sentry drone of overpoweredness as a crutch anymore.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Kasife Vynneve
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2014-04-13 01:10:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Kasife Vynneve
Want a sentry focused ship then put the time in for the Ishtar. The gila is something I have wanted for a long time but felt I didn't quite have the skills for to use well, now with these changes its even better that my missile skills will mean something in addition to it. Only concern is the lack of ability to use a full flight of lights.

New ships are well and good but creating a distinct identity for existing ships is equally important. Many times I've looked at the Rattlesnake and thought that i'd like one but every thing it does you can do with a Domi bar have missiles. Till they release the Pirate BB changes we will just have to keep speculating, but its bound upset someone no matter what is done.

If that someone is you then your just going to adapt or quit.
Talleria Lange
Pheonix Light Industries
#27 - 2014-04-13 12:29:45 UTC
Alright how bout an opinion form some one that has flown Gallente drone boats and is currently flying Caldari missile boats. The only reason I have quite flying drone boats is because I don't like to micro-manage my primary weapon system. Witch is why I quit flying Gallente drone boats. Now I only use drones to kill things that my guns/missiles have a hard time hitting.

While I have never flown the Snake in combat. I have flown the Gila. (and got it blown up but that's another matter). I think the changes to them are going to be a good thing. I know most people right now like to fly both the Gila and the Snake as kitting sentry boats. They do a wonderful job at it form what I understand. But I think that is what the Gallente are suposed to be good at. The Guristas are suposed to be more of a brawler, witch is what they are being turned into.

The changes that are coming though will leave you with some faction ships that still do the same job (missile+drone DPS) but do it better. Your drones will be hitting harder (if you use the right drones) and your missiles will be hitting harder (no matter what size you use from what I understand). In all the ships will be better for it, and you wont have to manage as meany drones.

If you still want to fly a kiting drone boat with sentries then switch to Gallente, though you will lose your missiles you will still be able to shield tank. If you want drones and missiles but don't care if the drones don't get a bonus then switch to Amarr (well at least up to cruiser if you want a BS with drones and missiles i have herd the Minmatar have one).

If you have any more comments on the matter I might check back latter.

Talleria Lange
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#28 - 2014-04-13 12:41:55 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:


try to form an proper argument if you want any respect, forum clowns.

the ironyLol
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#29 - 2014-04-13 12:43:14 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
Paikis wrote:
Cunningham's Law Strikes again!


Which is?

Cunningham's Law "the best way to get the right answer on the Internet is not to ask a question, it's to post the wrong answer."
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#30 - 2014-04-13 13:00:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Fabulous Rod wrote:


try to form an proper argument if you want any respect, forum clowns.

the ironyLol


says the moron whose only response to the thread is "the irony". How can you clowns ever expect to be taken seriously?
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#31 - 2014-04-13 13:03:14 UTC
Talleria Lange wrote:
Alright how bout an opinion form some one that has flown Gallente drone boats and is currently flying Caldari missile boats. The only reason I have quite flying drone boats is because I don't like to micro-manage my primary weapon system. Witch is why I quit flying Gallente drone boats. Now I only use drones to kill things that my guns/missiles have a hard time hitting.

While I have never flown the Snake in combat. I have flown the Gila. (and got it blown up but that's another matter). I think the changes to them are going to be a good thing. I know most people right now like to fly both the Gila and the Snake as kitting sentry boats. They do a wonderful job at it form what I understand. But I think that is what the Gallente are suposed to be good at. The Guristas are suposed to be more of a brawler, witch is what they are being turned into.

The changes that are coming though will leave you with some faction ships that still do the same job (missile+drone DPS) but do it better. Your drones will be hitting harder (if you use the right drones) and your missiles will be hitting harder (no matter what size you use from what I understand). In all the ships will be better for it, and you wont have to manage as meany drones.

If you still want to fly a kiting drone boat with sentries then switch to Gallente, though you will lose your missiles you will still be able to shield tank. If you want drones and missiles but don't care if the drones don't get a bonus then switch to Amarr (well at least up to cruiser if you want a BS with drones and missiles i have herd the Minmatar have one).

If you have any more comments on the matter I might check back latter.

Talleria Lange


fine if they are made into more brawler-type ships but there is no reason to take away anything from them. The only commonality between guristas and gallente is that they both use drones. Everything else is different.
King Fu Hostile
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#32 - 2014-04-13 13:32:58 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
If CCP wants to introduce some "new and interesting" ships with beefed up drones, that is great! But why do Guristas need to be ruined for so many people to do it?

We spent too long training for these versatile and skill-intensive ships for negligent devs to **** all over them due to some ridiculous uncompromising vision.

The concerns on these Guristas pirate faction ships have not being addressed in the official 45+ page thread.

These concerns are centered mainly the lack of ability to use sentry drones, and foreseen total ineptness at combating non-specialized targets and possible removal of missile velocity that would greatly effect torpedo and cruise missile fits which the Rattlesnake currently has bonuses for.

If this callous trend to Guristas contines, the great versatility Guristas ships once had will be tremendously reduced and a lot of people will be very angry with CCP for letting this happen.

We spent our time and money training for these ships and now you want to drastically change them? Totally unacceptable.


Try to form a proper argument if you want any respect, forum clown.
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#33 - 2014-04-13 17:31:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
These forum clowns and their totally inability to come across as anything other than degenerate angsty man-children. Lol
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#34 - 2014-04-13 18:08:17 UTC
Stop posting.

Oh noooooo! Your Gila can't be another immobile sentry platform! What am I even going to do with these ultra hammerheads and possibly frigate-wasting tracking valkyries? Which are both getting a huge speed boost?

This change is only good, because it makes the Worm and Ishkur, the Gila and Ishtar, and the Rattlesnake and Dominix unique from eachother while likely still not sacrificing the power of Guristas ships. This has been a huge complaint for the entire time I've been active, that the Gila and Ishtar especially have basically been the same ship. And the Guristas ships also get the bonus of non-irrelevant missile damage. I can only hope that this is paired witha surprise big damage application fix for cruiser sized missiles, too.
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#35 - 2014-04-13 18:18:02 UTC
Aglais wrote:
Stop posting.

Oh noooooo! Your Gila can't be another immobile sentry platform! What am I even going to do with these ultra hammerheads and possibly frigate-wasting tracking valkyries? Which are both getting a huge speed boost?

.


Its called versatility, dumbass.

That is what we trained into the otherwise lackluster Guristas for, not to be forced into some impossibly niche role that nobody wants to play.

There is no good reason to change Gurstas so drastically. Many Guristas pilots trained to use sentries for a Snake and that is what we want to use, not be forced into switching into Gallente ships due to an inability to see reason on the part of certain devs. Currently the only commonality between Guristas is the use of drones. Missiles, shield bonuses and the hull and ship maneuverability all belong to Caldari. There is no overlap with Gallente.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#36 - 2014-04-13 18:33:00 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Fabulous Rod wrote:


try to form an proper argument if you want any respect, forum clowns.

the ironyLol


says the moron whose only response to the thread is "the irony". How can you clowns ever expect to be taken seriously?

At what point did I say I wanted to be taken seriously,
Also, given that you clearly crave it yourself I'd recommend you don't open up by calling the devs incompetent.
It kind of detracts from the whole "rational adult" thing when one goes off like this over a ship rebalancing (and a verry cool one I'll add).

Had you posted something that warranted a Proper argument you might have gotten one however it's dam near impossible to take you seriously when you're clearly bleading profusely from your arse.
So yes, somewhat ironic
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#37 - 2014-04-13 18:39:18 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
Aglais wrote:
Stop posting.

Oh noooooo! Your Gila can't be another immobile sentry platform! What am I even going to do with these ultra hammerheads and possibly frigate-wasting tracking valkyries? Which are both getting a huge speed boost?

.


Its called versatility, dumbass.

That is what we trained into the otherwise lackluster Guristas for, not to be forced into some impossibly niche role that nobody wants to play.

There is no good reason to change Gurstas so drastically. Many Guristas pilots trained to use sentries for a Snake and that is what we want to use, not be forced into switching into Gallente ships due to an inability to see reason on the part of certain devs. Currently the only commonality between Guristas is the use of drones. Missiles, shield bonuses and the hull and ship maneuverability all belong to Caldari. There is no overlap with Gallente.


Nice importing, word for word, of your argument from the Cruiser thread, while adding absolutely nothing to it save for calling me a dumbass.

Personally, I'll take a ship that trades some of it's "versatility" and overall lackluster performance for one that decides to become slightly more specialized and suddenly becomes a lot better at doing things despite (or perhaps because of) the alteration. Also please explain to me how "high DPS, high shield tank brawler" is an "impossibly niche role that nobody wants to play".
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#38 - 2014-04-13 18:42:42 UTC  |  Edited by: ShahFluffers
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Has anyone worked up exactly how many HP these medium drones will have, and how that compares to the ship itself?

On the Worm, the lights have a good bit more HP, until you start figuring in resists. It would be wonderful if T2 drones could inherit the resist profiles of their race.

Sentries are not the be-all, end all drone. These ships will be effective.

Drone stats for the new Gila (3x Drone Damage Aug, 1x Drone Nav, 1x Tech 2 durability rig) + the coming drone re-balance: http://i.imgur.com/sejpB1Y.png
Rowells
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#39 - 2014-04-13 18:44:20 UTC
ShahFluffers wrote:
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Has anyone worked up exactly how many HP these medium drones will have, and how that compares to the ship itself?

On the Worm, the lights have a good bit more HP, until you start figuring in resists. It would be wonderful if T2 drones could inherit the resist profiles of their race.

Sentries are not the be-all, end all drone. These ships will be effective.

Drone stats for the new Gila + the coming drone re-balance: http://i.imgur.com/sejpB1Y.png

damn, dat fed navy hammerhead
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#40 - 2014-04-13 19:12:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
Aglais wrote:
Fabulous Rod wrote:
Aglais wrote:
Stop posting.

Oh noooooo! Your Gila can't be another immobile sentry platform! What am I even going to do with these ultra hammerheads and possibly frigate-wasting tracking valkyries? Which are both getting a huge speed boost?

.


Its called versatility, dumbass.

That is what we trained into the otherwise lackluster Guristas for, not to be forced into some impossibly niche role that nobody wants to play.

There is no good reason to change Gurstas so drastically. Many Guristas pilots trained to use sentries for a Snake and that is what we want to use, not be forced into switching into Gallente ships due to an inability to see reason on the part of certain devs. Currently the only commonality between Guristas is the use of drones. Missiles, shield bonuses and the hull and ship maneuverability all belong to Caldari. There is no overlap with Gallente.


Nice importing, word for word, of your argument from the Cruiser thread, while adding absolutely nothing to it save for calling me a dumbass.

Personally, I'll take a ship that trades some of it's "versatility" and overall lackluster performance for one that decides to become slightly more specialized and suddenly becomes a lot better at doing things despite (or perhaps because of) the alteration. Also please explain to me how "high DPS, high shield tank brawler" is an "impossibly niche role that nobody wants to play".


Its easy to say that when you don't fly one. Get a clue. Creating new ships is the best idea if CCP wants to create more brawlers with bonused drones. Nothing need be taken away from Guristas. This narrow focus between the Guristas ships has got to be the dumbest and most thoughtless way to make them different. How many more balance failures does CCP have to have before they take a moment and consider if they could be less single minded in their demented visions of change.