These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

High Sec war has just begun

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Bloodmyst Ranwar
Menace of Morons
#21 - 2014-04-01 11:00:22 UTC
Am I the only one who thinks The Code closely resembles a kid chucking a tantrum?

Well good luck with your endeavours, may all those evil miners and haulers die!!!! How dare they mine and haul in high sec!

On a serious note: Loving this type of content, although no one apart from the Code actually gives a **** about it. I might have to get in on this myself. :)

Capt Starfox
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#22 - 2014-04-01 11:28:43 UTC
There are obviously two sides of the fence. On my side you have some individuals who rattle the cage to provide content. Sometimes the cage is rattled quite a bit, but never to the point of intentionally causing real world harm to someone else. Regardless of whether or not you believe Sohkar was put through real life torture.. Ero1 was banned for his actions and Sohkar walked. By CCP's own behavior everyone who ever made anyone sing a song over comms is now and should be subject to investigation and possible banning and scrutiny. These are essentially the results of the rules that were recently fabricated to cater CCP's statement and the decision of banning Ero1 for events that took place over a month ago. If we're going to start digging up the past, then everyone should be bound to that, past and present, not just a select few.

There are too many inconsistencies here and CCP's quick fix magic wand trick only made matters worse; like it usually does. I'm not saying that Sohkar didn't have a tough time, nor am I saying that Ero1 is completely blameless. I'm still working on my conclusion of all this, but what I am saying is that Ero1 did not deserve a permanent ban for rules that technically did not exist; let alone Sohkar not receiving any type of punishment whatsoever for what he did on his part.

Furthermore, why aren't we digging up events that took place a month, or two ago? Clearly they fall under the new rules as per Ero1.

Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet
loyalanon
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#23 - 2014-04-01 11:33:53 UTC  |  Edited by: loyalanon
Another two bot aspirants taken down.

http://theconference.eve-kill.net/?a=home&scl_id=20
Desert Ice78
Gryphons of the Western Wind
#24 - 2014-04-01 11:51:28 UTC
Attempting to care.

Check back later.

I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg

CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused.
Luwc
State War Academy
Caldari State
#25 - 2014-04-01 12:26:32 UTC
loyalanon wrote:
Greetings Esteemed Community,

Due to recent controversies surrounding a brother in arms in the glorious Code Alliance.

I have decided to escalate the current situation in regards to the Bot-Aspirant, Non-code compliant dwellers of high sec with the blessing from our Saviour James 315.

Todays battle report -

http://i.imgur.com/5gDEHLw.png

Battle of Isanamo Battle Report -

http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/03/kills-of-week-freighter-edition.html


It is not hard to follow the Code, yet 95% of High Sec continues to violate the commandments from our supreme commander.

Your miners will continue to die, your freighters are going to be non-existent in high sec.

Concord will not save you
CCP will not save you
Your petitions will fall on deaf ears

High sec is worth fighting for.

This will continue to happen until Ripard Teg is removed from the CSM

Do not say you have not been warned.

How you can do your part -

Take a ship/any ship and go out and shoot at someone showing bot-aspirant behaviour in high security space.

Donate ISK to the New Order treasury by donating to James 315, this isk will be in turn used to support the war on high sec.

Contact me if you are available to turn up to put bodies into ships, and for fleet times.

Haters keep hating.


and I have no idea who you actually are... but I like it

death to carebears I guess

http://hugelolcdn.com/i/267520.gif
Anslo
Scope Works
#26 - 2014-04-01 12:39:00 UTC
loyalanon wrote:
WouldYouEver HaveSexWith aGoat wrote:
No offense but 6 freighters and 2 battleships is pretty pathetic considering what your goals were for that night. You should easily have more than twice as many victims in that time frame. Gotta work on your gank game or something...

Big smile

I'm not kidding though. But I am. But I'm not...


considering you havent killed anything worthwhile, we will await for you to astound us with something.

Considering you can't kill more than a few indys and miners, I'd say this is a case of pot calling kettle black.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]
Tarojan
Tarojan Corporation
#27 - 2014-04-01 12:46:40 UTC
Capt Starfox wrote:
There are obviously two sides of the fence. On my side you have some individuals who rattle the cage to provide content. Sometimes the cage is rattled quite a bit, but never to the point of intentionally causing real world harm to someone else. Regardless of whether or not you believe Sohkar was put through real life torture.. Ero1 was banned for his actions and Sohkar walked. By CCP's own behavior everyone who ever made anyone sing a song over comms is now and should be subject to investigation and possible banning and scrutiny. These are essentially the results of the rules that were recently fabricated to cater CCP's statement and the decision of banning Ero1 for events that took place over a month ago. If we're going to start digging up the past, then everyone should be bound to that, past and present, not just a select few.

There are too many inconsistencies here and CCP's quick fix magic wand trick only made matters worse; like it usually does. I'm not saying that Sohkar didn't have a tough time, nor am I saying that Ero1 is completely blameless. I'm still working on my conclusion of all this, but what I am saying is that Ero1 did not deserve a permanent ban for rules that technically did not exist; let alone Sohkar not receiving any type of punishment whatsoever for what he did on his part.

Furthermore, why aren't we digging up events that took place a month, or two ago? Clearly they fall under the new rules as per Ero1.



The only thing I took from all this is its ok to scam people, racially abuse people and make death threats (and all your petitons will be ignored/laughed at), unless and until someone E famous enough to rouse a mob decides today he wants to get you banned. In the ideal world of Tarojan land, where carebears frolic in the fields without a care in the world would Er1 be unwelcome? absolutely. This isnt Tarojan land though its EVE, you know, the place where its advertised you can scam people?

Will gank for food
Walter Kramer
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#28 - 2014-04-01 12:54:36 UTC
WouldYouEver HaveSexWith aGoat wrote:
No offense but 6 freighters and 2 battleships is pretty pathetic considering what your goals were for that night. You should easily have more than twice as many victims in that time frame. Gotta work on your gank game or something...

Big smile

I'm not kidding though. But I am. But I'm not...



LoL, For a spur of the moment call put for a freighter gank gang, these numbers to more than speak for themselves. They show that the New Order can and will strike anywhere at anytime.


Erotica1 - Never Forget
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#29 - 2014-04-01 12:57:50 UTC
loyalanon wrote:
This will continue to happen until Ripard Teg is removed from the CSM.


Does this include Ripard not getting onto CSM 9 because he's not standing as a candidate?

Day 0 Advice for New Players
Volar Kang
Kang Industrial
#30 - 2014-04-01 13:36:57 UTC
As a miner, I am ok with this. Blowing up the non-tanked bots means more minerals for me to mine/less competition and blowing up big expensive ships means more demand for my minerals.
Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#31 - 2014-04-01 15:08:48 UTC
Hahaha this is rich, you All better step up your game because is nothing new and you'd need to have the ability to kill every ship

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith
Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#32 - 2014-04-01 15:21:19 UTC
Bring it on!
KuroVolt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2014-04-01 15:54:58 UTC
New Order still has alot more bark than it has bite.

And now that Ero is gone, they barely have any bark left either. P

BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2014-04-01 15:55:55 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
loyalanon wrote:
This will continue to happen until Ripard Teg is removed from the CSM.


Does this include Ripard not getting onto CSM 9 because he's not standing as a candidate?

lmao why did you tell them that. Hoping it'd go for years.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#35 - 2014-04-01 16:04:33 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
loyalanon wrote:
This will continue to happen until Ripard Teg is removed from the CSM
As the only entity that can remove someone from the CSM is CCP, this in essence is a blackmail/extortion thread aimed at them.
Now as there is a minute chance this is an April 1st prank, I will just lock it. For trolling.

The Rules:
rule 5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.

route rule 66. April 1st jokes and CCL.

If April 1st jokes involve threads being started on the forum, CCL reserves the right to lock them for any reason whatsoever.
The only exception is when the April 1st joke in question makes at least one member of the ISD CCL division online at that time laugh out loud. In that case the thread will only get locked if in violation with forum rules 1 to 34.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Previous page12