EVE General Discussion

In the way that it is scrunched up, has a short tuft of nappy hair, and produces great quantities of steaming ****.


You asked, daft bint.


Lol

Any other 5 accounts is incredibly vague so I'll go ahead and define a scenario for you.

CaptDildong has 5 accounts and he uses ISboxer to control 5 rohks to focus down and kill NPC battleships.

He spends 1 hour controlling 5 accounts farming.

MjrSnozberry, Yakmaster3000, tubularTed, FranksNBeanz, and MongoWantFootball are 5 dudes playing their singular accounts choosing to fly their rohks, focusing down and killing NPC battleships.

They control their 5 accounts seperately, individually for 1 hour peforming said action.

Total manhours spent by CaptDildong performing action: 1 hour

Total manhours spent by 2rude4u Crew: 5 man hours.

So essentially he's saving himself 4 hours, what would take Ordinary Game players a total of 5.


Now the automation involved in multiboxing is sending each of those 5 ships the commands automatically, instead of manually.

Automatically: The player uses isboxer to select the ship to target, the other 4 ships target that ship. The player uses isboxer while telling his ship to fire at targeted ship, telling the other 4 ships to fire at the targeted ship.

Now if he were to do this manually, individually, without the software, he'd have to: Select the ship to target. Alt tab, tell 2nd ship to target. alt tab, tell 3rd ship to target. Alt tab, tell 4th ship to target. alt tab, selected 2nd ship that already targetted, try to find the 5th ship, ok found it, tell it to target. Go to first ship, tell it to fire. Alt tab, go to 2nd ship, tell it to fire. Alt tab, go to 3rd ship, tell it to fire. Alt tab, tell 4th ship to fire. alt tab, selected 3rd ship, this sucks, i hate this, find 5th ship and tell it to fire.

Look at all that saved time, he's just saved himself like 2 minutes worth of time because of that 3rd party software. He's getting all of the benefit of his increased potential by using 5 accounts without any of the drawback of the needing to control those 4 other ships individually.

I see the level of converstion you wish to have, and as I am older than 5 years old, I think I shall desist conversing with you.

Wait, so not only is ISboxer entirely automated according to you, but it also some how makes isk in an accelerated manner? Please share your secret to this!

No, with the effect that when they make a rule against automation of gameplay, they and they alone decide what qualifies. Something that requires player input to do anything does not qualify.

Check out the security section in the last CSM minutes.

By listening to their very clear explanation of what they mean. Such as them saying that if it requires player input to do anything, it is not automation. Such as them saying that multiboxing (even software- or hardware-assisted) does not qualify. It is not hard to find and it has been probably their most consistent enforcement policy for many years now.

Not per any definition that matters.

No, you don't. You earn the same amount, or even slightly less since you can't adjust for the individual peculiarities of each of those accounts. You see, all you're saying is that juggling lots of accounts on the same computer is less efficient; you're not actually getting to the point where it becomes more efficient through the use of software — the best you can ever hope for is parity, and the very nature of multiboxing prevents even that.

Convenience and not having to build complicated hardware solutions.

It saves about 3 seconds, but you haven't answered the question: How does ISboxer acquire resources at an accelerated rate?

they use english language and well defined terms in their EULA so someone would be able to understand it.
They cant redefine meaning of well known terms in our world, otherwise their EULA wasnt worth a crap.
What they can do is not enforcing their EULA policies even despite obvious violations, its their thing and thats what they are doing.


link? And well of course they would say they ban this many, what else would they say otherwise? We dont care about bots? lol.
Obvious fact is that isboxer are running around uncontested by CCP.


this is what I mean with excuses. They feed you excuses why they dont enforce a particular policy in a particular case, in reality its because of money.



per common definition of english language, EULA is written with.

Or he could arrange the clients in to smaller windows & turn on a couple of options in windows that prevents butan press on only the top or last clicked window.

you do.
isbox allows you what you wouldnt be able to handle otherwise, by automation.
It saves you majority of time running a fleet of clients for certain tasks its use is viable for.


no, efficiency and even doability.
There is just 1 guy out there who realized mechanical automation, from me, feel free to build this **** but it shouldnt be able per 3rd party tools.