These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for K162s

First post First post First post
Author
Ab'del Abu
Atlantis Ascendant
#821 - 2014-07-31 21:24:14 UTC
Ang Min wrote:
And require all sites to be scanned down...it's supposed to be mysterious after all.



All the sigs? Maybe a bit excessive ... ore sites is nough
Zara Arran
Ehefkae
#822 - 2014-08-01 18:33:11 UTC
I am not a fan of the delay in sig appearance (imho it shouldnt be there in the first place without effort). I didn't read all the 40+ pages on this topic, so perhaps something similar was already suggested.

Possible solution:

A bit of a middle ground... but would it be possible to have the "detection" of this new WH be done by a POS / TCU/ POCO or some sort of new structure (which takes time to anchor but also can be destroyed)? This structure would then only pass the fast appearance of the sig to dscan of that certain corp/alliance (owner of that structure). Everyone else in the system will have a delayed sig appearance.

This means an investment in time and effort (maybe isk) is required to get intel and it can be destroyed/offlined(?). If it takes time and effort to set it up, people wont just place it in their chain for the hell of it and leaving them behind (esp if they are destroyable and would appear on the KB). Meaning only in your home systems you have that little bit of extra safety. To solve it in a way that K-space have the sig appear for everyone could be done through detection by stargates/stations (like how people in local are detected)

Obviously there are many variations possible and probably variations that would be better then what I propose. I hope they entire sig appearing without effort/scanning will be removed anyway then no middle ground is needed.
Rek Seven
The Persuaders
#823 - 2014-08-03 22:58:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Bleedingthrough
#824 - 2014-08-04 13:43:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Bleedingthrough
ups wrong fred