EVE General Discussion

I'm semi pro. And my toaster told me to say: you are completely right, and it wants your crumpets. But it also said mean things so I glared at it.
I like the fact you can take the **** taking.
I like the fact sometimes you are right.
I like your exuberance.
If you can take it, you can say what you bloody well want, rawr
(Altho, failed goon lawyer is a bit harsh. No one likes them, but c'mon - don't turn into the thing you despise)

The nullsec cartel leaders [as I mentioned before Ezwal violated me with his brushes] are collectively brain damaged from their erotic encrounters and screaming competititons. (ps no one gives a toss what they say anyway, it's more a matter of uhuhuhmm)
But anyway, doesn't hurt to call them names etc - maybe the flunkies deserve it more - just do it properly.

I have further things to say about your experiences with griefers and nasties, which you may ignore - or are you playing?

It is if you ask Dindin.

…and he wasn't addressing you either so that turns out fine.

…based on numbers you concocted out of misunderstandings, ignorance, and pure assumptions. In actuality, there's very little to suggest that anything of the kind will actually happen, and the one thing we do know is that production capacity will increase as a direct result of compression being moved away from the production sphere.

…because you said it was “huge nerf”, which is what he disputed by mentioning the 3.7% reduction? No wait, that was Dindin.

He was addressing what you said to refute Dindin's claim that you had offered anything that resembled “facts”.

I'm sorry that you can't follow this very basic structure of “Dindin says X; baltec1 responds with Y”. So yes, it's about income, because that's what Dindin's rants are (pretty much) always about. It is also about Dindin only approving facts fiction that supports his wilfully ignorant doomsday proclamations.

Its bad for him?

You will be drowned out by the cartel propagandists who don't want those inconvenient facts to gain any traction.

Which nobody cares about in the slightest.

Since hulls consume the most minerals and sink the minerals out of game, all that happens is the playerbase occasionally performs class substitution to economise on minerals, combined with making mining a bit more lucrative so a bit more worth doing, means that the overall supply vs demand will not be as stark as you want to make it out to be.

Tieracide + removal of alloys moved the vexor from 4.5m to 10m, but I don't see new players not being able to afford a vexor. Making it 11 instead of 10 is kinda trivial in comparison.

Also for any new player that goes out and mines, it makes little difference, because it takes however long it takes to mine a vexors worth of minerals and only changing the BPO influences that.

Also for anyone that wants to mine in nullsec, as it turns out one thing that is in abundance is F, H, J, G and K class (and 1s) systems all of which basically have lowsec belts - if there is peaking of lowsec ore values, then a miner that wants to have some sort of progression path to low or null, just got it.

Again: why is The Cartel system bad?

Dino has a problem with the NWO taking over the universe and is upset that his vast stock of minerals saved for Armageddon is being nerfed to specificly get him

The rest of most posters are crunching the numbers using facts

The minority are in here to get a sit down and a glass of milk to rest from the great Puritans Vs Libertarians argument raging elsewhere

Because not everyone wants to be an F1 goon lemming?

Have you ever actually encountered them? You know, fought them, fought with them, had a chat with any of them besides headbutting the wall on the forums?

Or are you just taking that talking point from people who appear to align with you as a "highsec player"?

My point is, did you ever bother to find out for yourself?