Player Features and Ideas Discussion

yes, multiboxing software, input broadcast in particular, should be considered as automation thus prohibited.
They allow things for 1 person, which are only possible for a group of people without such software.
Bomber fleets, suicide ganking fleets, smartbombing camps and have a huge potential for smartbomb ratting.

But, since CCP is making tons of money with them, they will keep them legal as long as somehow possible.

lol starburst, ya im looking at you john kri...er rain

G-keyboards that execute a sequence of keystrokes with the press of a button. Isboxer that duplicates mouse and keystrokes to multiple clients. I can understand why these feel unfair, perhaps toeing the "botting" line. However, they are supported by CCP.

Hell, one of the NEO 2 teams was a single player isboxing multiple clients, where ccp devs were talking it up. The truth is, they really aren't cheating or spoiling the game. And what grounds do you have for complaining?

Isboxing bombers for a coordinated bombing run, isboxing catalysts for a coordinated suicide gank, isboxing miners to mine out a roid. Each account is still controlled by a player. That player tells the ships when to warp, when to attack, when to target. I really don't understand the ire against them.

I understand the jealousy that someone has that many accounts.
I understand the confusion about why someone would go down that path.
But so what. Let them play how they want to play. If their play interferes with your own, then do something productive about it (fyi, bitching on the forums is not something productive).

Alos this is borderline "My neightbour cooks better than me. Therefore she must be a witch. BURN HER!"