Ships & Modules

The other translation for the above is (as usual) someone with entitlement issues.

Please OP, just be honest. Tell the class how your "main" could kill whole frig gangs without any risk before the chamge. And how that is proper as you spent x+1 isk more than they did. (Since you have gone back to the isk balance argument). Just what do you feel is the correct isk to immunity ratio? Should a navy drake be able to trump your hac? It has cruiser sized weapons and costs more? That seems to be the sum of your points.

It's an empty argument at best.

RLML are actually very very good in their niche environment.
They do a huge amount of front loaded damage that applies well to small targets.
If anything i am seeing more RLML setups now that frigs are cool again than i ever did before (nullsec).
I pretty much assume that caracals are RLML now and i am seeing oh so many caracals.

no its called frig killing weapon system actually kills frigs. i repeat a weapon system that doesn"t suck complete donkey balls.
*Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.

rlml are not good in their niche environment. most of the eve community agrees with me. *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.

So can you kill the frig or not? You just said you could kill 1 or 2 of them earlier then said you cant kill any. Your caps lock has you confused I think. Surely you cant have it both ways. I will ask again, "Just how many frigs SHOULD your solo cerb be able to kill?" Are you honestly suggesting that isk should be at a 1:1 ratio purely based on one wep system? So by your thought is that a single cerb should be able to (as you put it) derp into that frig gang and kill 200-300 of them? Really now?

If two of them is insufficient to your sense of "correctness" I should think you can back this up with other cases in eve where big ship X can kill similar number of smaller ships Y based on your argument of it's cost. Oh wait you're a tracking titan fellow aren't you. That explains it.

As someone with no KB history at all your argument is invalid. Please try again

So then stake your claim and say that the caracal your link shows should have been able to (as a T1 cruiser) kill all of those assault frigs. Oh wait by that cost logic it shouldnt have as the Harpy costs more.

But we cant have any question of your real motives here can we.

However, you said I am not able to speak about pvp and linked a KM where a CAP was clearing out a warzone. So I ask where is your qualification, besides hidden behing this forum alt? Are you afraid to show that you are also just "blobbing" or where your falcon alt shows up? Some other "elite" pvp you are chosing to hide so we don't call you out on it and make you look more foolish perhaps?

If you want to take shots at people fine, just be aware that doing so behind a sock puppet makes you look like the one who is afraid to have your ideas stand on their own merit. Or lack there of.

And since were on the subject, I for one think that a possible middle ground solution might be to allow a "normal" reload time if you do not have a combat timer on you. That way you can get back to selectable damage, but once you are commited then you are stuck with what you have.

That seems to be the summation of your argument.

That a cerb with RLML should be able to kill more than some unknown number of frigs based just on the launchers. You've thus far avoided stating how many would be a correct number. (As it would prove my point I think.)

Please enlighten us. How many Frigs of any type should a RLML Cerb be able to kill. This should be interesting.

I tell you what. Hit me up in game for a duell on this toon and i will show you all about what i can handle and what not.

You can bring your PvP toon alright.

You argument is moot. ISK balance is a non-factor. RLML caracal and cerb is fine. You are not right just becasue you scream the loudest.