These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Concord response time stealth changed?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Les Strout
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2014-03-01 09:36:18 UTC
Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days?
Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short.

I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster?
Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#2 - 2014-03-01 10:22:30 UTC
Yes, it's been changed. Either intended or not intended by CCP.
Les Strout
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2014-03-01 10:26:48 UTC
Ammzi wrote:
Yes, it's been changed. Either intended or not intended by CCP.

No doubt its intended, so yet another attempt to ninja convert Eve into "Risk free isk harvesting Online" Ugh

Any ideas on how much was changed? Seems like 10-15% was shaved off response timer or so?
Shizuken
Venerated Stars
#4 - 2014-03-01 11:39:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Shizuken
Les Strout wrote:
Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days?
Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short.

I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster?


I think this is the closest to rage tears I will see from a griefer. Show me on this toy catalyst where the bad concord touched you...
Dsparil Mal
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#5 - 2014-03-01 12:32:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Dsparil Mal
I don't think so. I thought so at first but i think the new ship warp times are playing a part in it combined with the current location of the concord ships. Also take into consideration whether or not there was a previous gank in the system after downtime. Terrorizing a few 0.6 amarr systems with no problem. Even got a pod kill earlier this morning.

Erotica 1 for CSM 9!
Les Strout
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2014-03-01 13:18:00 UTC
Shizuken wrote:
Les Strout wrote:
Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days?
Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short.

I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster?


I think this is the closest to rage tears I will see from a griefer. Show me on this toy catalyst where the bad concord touched you...


Nah just wondering, I'll just adapt to target size.
Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#7 - 2014-03-01 21:36:10 UTC
This just in, "ganker fails ganking miner, blames eve devs, not pilots lack of talent/skills."

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith
Haedonism Bot
People for the Ethical Treatment of Rogue Drones
#8 - 2014-03-02 09:56:07 UTC
Dsparil Mal wrote:
I don't think so. I thought so at first but i think the new ship warp times are playing a part in it combined with the current location of the concord ships.


CONCORD doesn't warp, it spawns, so warp times and location (unless they are already within 150 km of you) don't affect their response. It is possible the OP is just noticing the 6 second difference between a system where CONCORD has been pre-spawned and one where it has not.

www.everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com

Vote Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido for CSMX. Keep the Evil in EVE!
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#9 - 2014-03-02 10:00:05 UTC
Haedonism Bot wrote:
Dsparil Mal wrote:
I don't think so. I thought so at first but i think the new ship warp times are playing a part in it combined with the current location of the concord ships.


CONCORD doesn't warp, it spawns, so warp times and location (unless they are already within 150 km of you) don't affect their response. It is possible the OP is just noticing the 6 second difference between a system where CONCORD has been pre-spawned and one where it has not.



hahahahaha
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#10 - 2014-03-02 10:45:54 UTC
Shizuken wrote:
Les Strout wrote:
Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days?
Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short.

I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster?


I think this is the closest to rage tears I will see from a griefer. Show me on this toy catalyst where the bad concord touched you...

I've seen you post 3 times today and each post was filled with rage tears about gankers. Honestly, if you're going to berate gankers, you could at least try to act nonchalant about it.

Oh god.
Dsparil Mal
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#11 - 2014-03-02 13:14:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Dsparil Mal
Haedonism Bot wrote:
Dsparil Mal wrote:
I don't think so. I thought so at first but i think the new ship warp times are playing a part in it combined with the current location of the concord ships.


CONCORD doesn't warp, it spawns, so warp times and location (unless they are already within 150 km of you) don't affect their response. It is possible the OP is just noticing the 6 second difference between a system where CONCORD has been pre-spawned and one where it has not.

Ok well might be wrong about that. All I know is if I want to clear a belt of concord I just go to the gate and start shooting it with a noob alt and they leave the belt and show up there. Looks like warping to me.


Good to know that. Means I don't need to be going all the way to the dawn gate to make shenanigans happen lol.

Erotica 1 for CSM 9!
Alastair Ormand
Mine all the things
#12 - 2014-03-03 08:30:53 UTC
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.

I discourage running with scissors.
Danalee
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2014-03-03 09:23:53 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.


Got a newsflash for you: Nullsec = Carebear Trammel lalaland, let's all hold hands and shoot structure while AFK.
Hi and lowsec is where the action is.

D.

Bear

Proud member of the Somalian Coast Guard Authority

Member and Juror of the Court of Crime and Punishment
Haedonism Bot
People for the Ethical Treatment of Rogue Drones
#14 - 2014-03-03 10:12:40 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.


Haters gonna hate.

www.everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com

Vote Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido for CSMX. Keep the Evil in EVE!
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#15 - 2014-03-03 10:27:43 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.


The idea that PvP isn't supposed to exist except in specific places is precisely the hateful concept that makes many of us do this in the first place.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
Morganta
The Greater Goon
#16 - 2014-03-04 19:11:12 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.


null is terrible
target rich environments is where its at

and saving space penguins from filthy rock lickers
Tengu Grib
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#17 - 2014-03-04 20:56:35 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.


I tried living in Null. I was very bored. Now I live in High sec. Never had more fun in PVP!

Rabble Rabble Rabble

Praise James, Supreme Protector of High Sec.
Zan'der Hakaari
Hakaari Industrial Ventures
#18 - 2014-03-05 02:09:28 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.


They don't want PVP though. They want PVS (player versus sheep). In null sec the targets shoot back and when they explode it's their own lack of skill to blame. If they fail at ganking miners or freighters that don't fight back the game hands them a perfect excuse for their failure. "It's Concords fault!" Roll
Taoist Dragon
Okata Syndicate
#19 - 2014-03-05 06:17:12 UTC
Zan'der Hakaari wrote:
In null sec the targets shoot back


I have to find this area of null. Most of the time when I go into nul the vast majority of time everyone just docks up. On the few occasions someone does undock they usually come ount with so much overkill (I normally fly T1 frigs/cruisers) that I usually just fly away. So in essence they are even worse than the 'carebear pvp'er' you are having ago at. Twisted

There is a reason they are called null-bears! P

That is the Way, the Tao.

Balance is everything.
BadAssMcKill
Aliastra
#20 - 2014-03-05 20:18:47 UTC
Morganta wrote:
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.


null is terrible
target rich environments is where its at

and saving space penguins from filthy rock lickers



There are penguins in space?
12Next page