These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why hi sec players will NOT move into low or null no matter how much you cry about it.

First post
Author
Jita Alt666
#201 - 2011-11-14 00:20:22 UTC
Would people go to 0.0 if the power blocs were broken, I don't know but the idiot who wrote this thinks so:
Idiots Idea
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#202 - 2011-11-14 00:22:46 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
It si itneresting how this kind of threads are beginning to give voice to what used to be a silent majority....

Let me tell you a story. One of the languages most used in Internet is English, yet, every study around tells the same: most people who speaks english are not native english speakers. Actually, there is a kind of english that only existes outside of english-speaking coutnries; it is an english adapted to the grammar, syntaxes and lexicon of languages that are NOT english. Truly, most people who speaks english in the world speaks "foreigner's english" and not "true" english, and true english speakers are increasingly facing difficulties talking english to people who speaks english as a second language...

The point here is that some players are convinced that they play the "real " EVE (nullsec endgame, and combat PvP), but now they are meeting the harsh reality (a harsh reality CCP must face in order to survive) that most people who pay to play EVE don't play "real " EVE and aren't interested to do so.

We all play EVE, as we all speak english here. But never mistake who is in the majority. The majority here does not speak english outside of EVE, and does no play nullsec nor combat PvP EVE. The majority are not part of an alliance, are not griefers, and never have been to nullsec nor plan to.

Now it's becoming aparent beyond the anual survey:

EVE si NOT what nullsec dwellers and veterans think. EVE is what EVE players do, and what EVE players do it's a hisec, economy PvP, PvE funded sci-fi game.


Actually, a very large percentage play in both null sec and empire space. And frankly, the mythical "silent majority" has never been very silent either. Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Fille Balle
Ballbreakers R us
#203 - 2011-11-14 00:38:38 UTC
Akirei Scytale wrote:
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
Grarr Dexx wrote:
Why do you need the money?

The exact same reasons you need your kills. Because it's how some measure their success in game. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.


who gives a rat's ass about kills, money, any of that ****. i play eve to have fun, not get my panties in a bundle over a few digits in a database in iceland.


Sorry, but as I am a member of the international nitpickers association, I really feel a strong urge to correct you.

The servers are based in London UK. Not in iceland.

Apologies for the interruption. Please carry on the good debate.

PS: Some people enjoy measuring their progress by comparing it to the success of others. This in it self makes the activity rather meaningless in terms of fun, but the competition makes the activity fun.

Stop the spamming, not the scamming!

Fille Balle
Ballbreakers R us
#204 - 2011-11-14 00:45:05 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Actually, a very large percentage play in both null sec and empire space. And frankly, the mythical "silent majority" has never been very silent either. Smile


Actually, I think what Ishtanchuk Fazmarai was referring to is that now more players that enjoy the life in highsec are speaking up. I tend to agree. I see a lot more posters that are more inclined to support a less pew pew oriented eve than a totalhelldeath eve.

Another strange occurance is that more pvp'rs are speaking up on behalf of the highsec carebears, which was certainly a very rare occurance a year ago. The real question is why. The fact is that when people are content or happy with something, they tend not to speak up. It's when they're unhappy or if somehting changes that they tend to speak up.

These are strange times indeed.

Stop the spamming, not the scamming!

Mrs Sooperdudespaceman
Doomheim
#205 - 2011-11-14 01:46:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Mrs Sooperdudespaceman
this forum ate my post
Mrs Sooperdudespaceman
Doomheim
#206 - 2011-11-14 02:02:44 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Bubbles in 0.0 NPC space is griefing


Stop posting. You don't even understand 0.0 let alone Eve.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#207 - 2011-11-14 02:05:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Fille Balle wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Actually, a very large percentage play in both null sec and empire space. And frankly, the mythical "silent majority" has never been very silent either. Smile


Actually, I think what Ishtanchuk Fazmarai was referring to is that now more players that enjoy the life in highsec are speaking up. I tend to agree. I see a lot more posters that are more inclined to support a less pew pew oriented eve than a totalhelldeath eve.

Another strange occurance is that more pvp'rs are speaking up on behalf of the highsec carebears, which was certainly a very rare occurance a year ago. The real question is why. The fact is that when people are content or happy with something, they tend not to speak up. It's when they're unhappy or if somehting changes that they tend to speak up.

These are strange times indeed.


I am well aware of what was inferred, thanks.

Since EVE went gold the debate has raged on, with ebb's and flows depending on what other current issues fixate the player bases attention temporarily, and will likely continue until the server goes silent.

I personally see no need to try and force people out of high sec space, although comparative earnings in a relatively risk free environment will periodically need to be adjusted. It is preferable by far to offer incentives and richer game play for those that choose to live in a more challenging environment.

That is as long as high sec dwellers recognize the fact that without the element of danger and competitiveness inherent in a not totally safe high sec environment their interest in playing EVE (whether they realize it or not) would wane rapidly. If high sec becomes too safe, subscriptions drop... and that's not good for anyone.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Comrade Commizzar
Eve Revolutionary Army
#208 - 2011-11-14 02:08:41 UTC
Zagam wrote:
Alexandra Alt wrote:
Zagam wrote:

Have you EVER lived in nullsec? I mean, seriously... its not like that. And if it is, you're in the wrong alliance/corp.


Zagam wrote:

There is so much misinformation here, that its no wonder people don't want to go to null...


Really dude, stop with the condescending tone like if your truth is the only truth out there.

We all speak of our experience, and I've experienced pretty much all you can in null, and the big majority of my null life is/was what I described, you might have other experience, I won't call your alliance as an argument about what you perceive to be one reality because that would deviate to the crux of the subject.

There are exceptions ? yes obviously they are, pretty sure if you dwell quite inside DRF space you'll be able to bear/bot all your way without any repercussions or other quieter zones in null, but were talking here is the constant QQ of the null sec dwellers that there's no targets and force people go into null, well, make them instead of whining.

My points there you commented upon are a reply to the subject of hardcore players in null that some fundamentalists believe to be absolute, which is not true, was pretty ironical (in which you failed to detect) but at the same time isn't far away from the truth.

Save your condescending tone for local smack talk with TEST.


Two things:

First, my experience is across several alliances and corps. Your mileage may vary.

Secondly, if you are so outspoken about how bad nullsec is, why don't you post from your main?

*********
Uh.. because he doesn't want to be black balled?? Are all you meat puppets in zero as dense as you? nevermind answering.. of course you are... and you were asking him an honest question. Lol
Comrade Commizzar
Eve Revolutionary Army
#209 - 2011-11-14 02:11:16 UTC
Alexandra Alt wrote:
Famble wrote:

I've seen the light! You recruiting? I only have an hour or two most weeknights. "What's that? You need us all online next Wednesday at 10?" Oh there's an emergency and you need me to come right now? "Sorry brotini, I'd love to but no can do."

Or:

"Ok, I'm here let's do this!"

5 minutes later

"Dudes, sorry but I gotta go! Something came up!"

In mmo's I've played back when I had time I'd see to it that guy was removed from clan/corp/guild

In hi-sec, though, no problem.

I aint looking for huge benefits as a casual, I don't deserve them. But don't wee on my back and tell me it's raining by suggesting a casual can move to null. Can't be done.


The benefits of being an hardcore PvP player in EvE living in null sec:

- alarm clocks to make you get up at specific times to fall asleep later on while shooting a POS
- getting your reading/film watching up to date while camping a gate waiting for some action
- spending either real life money buying plex to finance your pvp or be called a bear by your alliance and rat/anom to fund it
- big huge fights with thousands of players where you mindlessly only just lock/shoot whatever you're told like a robot
- big huge fights where you many times either get DC to log back in dead, or take loads of time to even move not even shooting something
- mandatory objectives (like X kills/month/week/whatever) just so you keep doing the above

There are many others, there's also advantages obviously, but those are subjective to personal taste of each one.

IMO what needs most changing to cater people in null is not really any game changing, but a mentality changing on big alliances/corps in null over how things are taken/handled etc.

******************

and while I'm at it let me second your opinion. Your impression of zero is pretty accurate. Forget Zagam, he's an idiot.
Comrade Commizzar
Eve Revolutionary Army
#210 - 2011-11-14 02:50:02 UTC
K Suri wrote:
imho there is only one reason people stay in highsec >>> Possession.

A highseccer cannot live in 0.0 because he wants to run his 10 man corp, by himself and with all his possession under his control and in 0.0, there is an absolute requirement to be part of something much bigger. It goes way beyond "me".

As an ex-alliance boss who had managed to grow to an 5 corp, 80 man alliance with a LOT of hard work, I tried desperately to form it into a single corp entity to make ourselves attractive to an 0.0 alliance.

All I got was "what about my towers", "what about me" bla bla bla. I gave up.

Zagdul is partly right that 0.0 is in fact safer than empire most of the time. What he fails to state is that most alliances have ALL of the assets, moons etc. under tight control and consequently there is very little provision for those "me" type corps.

0.0 either needs to be bigger, the lords need to be more generous and/or corp sizes need to reduce.

For me, until there is more to have, do and build for SMALLER corps, apart from endless CTA's and sanctums, I have no need nor any interest in going back.

************

In other words, since you are wise to their servitude ploy, you refuse to play the part of "serf" on their Plantation.
Education is the first step to Liberation. Congrats !
Gealla
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#211 - 2011-11-14 03:00:36 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Navigator
Grarr Dexx wrote:
You should just uninstall because you seem to need handholding wherever you go.



This^^ is whats wrong with EVE.

Pvp'ers whinge for lack of targets, complain that CCP needs to force carebears to accept pvp....and then spend half the time telling folks to unsub because they'r etoo soft/too casual/a carebear/ need thier hand held

When are you going to realise that people un-subbing is actually BAD for the game and not a good thing?

Not bad becasue boohoo less targets, bad because boohoo CCP lays off more staff and reduces the amount of money fed back into the game dev.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#212 - 2011-11-14 03:15:20 UTC
Gealla wrote:
Grarr Dexx wrote:
You should just uninstall because you seem to need handholding wherever you go.



This^^ is whats wrong with EVE.

Pvp'ers whinge for lack of targets, complain that CCP needs to force carebears to accept pvp....and then spend half the time telling folks to unsub because they'r etoo soft/too casual/a carebear/ need thier hand held

When are you fucktards going to realise that people un-subbing is actually BAD for the game and not a good thing?

Not bad becasue boohoo less targets, bad because boohoo CCP lays off more staff and reduces the amount of money fed back into the game dev.


I do agree that there is no need to encourage people to quit the game because they are of a differing opinion.

I also feel that there is no need to "complain that CCP needs to force carebears to accept pvp".

Primarily because CCP knows full well that a certain amount of risk in even the safest area's of the game (bar beginner systems) it what keeps interest in the game alive for all parties concerned.

Carebears don't have to be forced to accept the possibility of PVP, because it is part of the fabric of the game whether they accept it or not. They may not like it, they may not realize that this element of danger is a large part of the spice that keeps them playing, but there it is. And fortunately CCP is well aware of this.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Elyssa MacLeod
Doomheim
#213 - 2011-11-14 03:44:28 UTC
Mrs Sooperdudespaceman wrote:
this forum ate my post


I dont understand how they think these forums are adequate. Was the web dept part of the 20% and now they dont have ppl to fix it?

GM Homonoia: Suicide ganks are a valid and viable tactic in EVE.

Where is your God now carebear?

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#214 - 2011-11-14 06:18:15 UTC
Mrs Sooperdudespaceman wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Bubbles in 0.0 NPC space is griefing


Stop posting. You don't even understand 0.0 let alone Eve.



I have yet to see a bubble in a place that was intended for anyone that knows how to avoid bubbles.

And I won't stop posting. nyah nyah nyah. The forums are a sandbox too. P


Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Psychophantic
#215 - 2011-11-14 06:40:48 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Mrs Sooperdudespaceman wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Bubbles in 0.0 NPC space is griefing


Stop posting. You don't even understand 0.0 let alone Eve.



I have yet to see a bubble in a place that was intended for anyone that knows how to avoid bubbles.

And I won't stop posting. nyah nyah nyah. The forums are a sandbox too. P




Sorry, you're playing the forums wrong.

Mrs Sooperdudespaceman
Doomheim
#216 - 2011-11-14 18:21:21 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Mrs Sooperdudespaceman wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Bubbles in 0.0 NPC space is griefing


Stop posting. You don't even understand 0.0 let alone Eve.

I have yet to see a bubble in a place that was intended for anyone that knows how to avoid bubbles.


You said 'griefers are putting bubbles in 0.0 NPC space to catch new players and this is griefing'. I'm telling you that it isn't even remotely close to 'griefing'. Why don't you petition these bubbles as 'griefing' and see where it gets you.

Next thing you will be saying that anyone that shoots at you in nullsec is a griefer and sov holding alliances are griefing you when they shoot you for entering their space.




Pok Nibin
Doomheim
#217 - 2011-11-15 12:23:09 UTC
Why Carebears hadn't said much in the past had a lot to do with being bum rushed by a well-organized and vociferous few who thought they ruled the game. When the talk of changing the game mechanics to bring more victims to these "honestly just looking for mutual enjoyment" types who were running out of victims (which is always the case), then the Carebears felt it might be necessary to make their presence felt to offset the tendency for the vocal few to get their ways - because intelligent people find it hard to believe a corporation would alter its product to satisfy a handful of yahoos with big mouths. This confidence in CCP has been shaken of late, so enlightened self-interest demands Carebears remind them they pay for accounts too.

I'm tempted to recount a bit of history to explain why null sec seems empty. BoB had it sewn up but for a few corners. BoB didn't really have the active membership to actually occupy the space they claimed. A loosely formed alliance finally figures this out and takes BoB out in a few days (what took so long?) All that space BoB once "held" becomes empty.

Now, instead of being bunched up in a few leftover corners, creating a certain amount of density, null sec players have virtually the entire map to spread out in and essentially have done that...demonstrating the density of players they once knew was a result of BoB squeezing them into a corner. You'll probably find that's the only real difference in player distribution.

It's hard to see why null/low sec players feel the need to drag hi sec players out to where they play. If their intentions are honorable (please don't spew your coffee at that) then they'd recruit into their corps and help new players make the adjustment. If their intentions are all self-centered and greedy...as if...then they'd complain about it in forums and beg the management to change the game so they get their wish - more victims faster.

That null sec has its advantages isn't in dispute. If you carefully read the OP you'd know the issue is: Things being the way they are, is it really that SMART a thing to do? Several posts on this thread have more than adequately laid-out precisely why it ISN'T a smart thing to do. There you have it. As Ms. Repose said, "Read it and weep."



The right to free speech doesn't automatically carry with it the right to be taken seriously.

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#218 - 2011-11-15 13:46:33 UTC  |  Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Pok Nibin wrote:
Why Carebears hadn't said much in the past had a lot to do with being bum rushed by a well-organized and vociferous few who thought they ruled the game. When the talk of changing the game mechanics to bring more victims to these "honestly just looking for mutual enjoyment" types who were running out of victims (which is always the case), then the Carebears felt it might be necessary to make their presence felt to offset the tendency for the vocal few to get their ways - because intelligent people find it hard to believe a corporation would alter its product to satisfy a handful of yahoos with big mouths. This confidence in CCP has been shaken of late, so enlightened self-interest demands Carebears remind them they pay for accounts too.

I'm tempted to recount a bit of history to explain why null sec seems empty. BoB had it sewn up but for a few corners. BoB didn't really have the active membership to actually occupy the space they claimed. A loosely formed alliance finally figures this out and takes BoB out in a few days (what took so long?) All that space BoB once "held" becomes empty.

Now, instead of being bunched up in a few leftover corners, creating a certain amount of density, null sec players have virtually the entire map to spread out in and essentially have done that...demonstrating the density of players they once knew was a result of BoB squeezing them into a corner. You'll probably find that's the only real difference in player distribution.

It's hard to see why null/low sec players feel the need to drag hi sec players out to where they play. If their intentions are honorable (please don't spew your coffee at that) then they'd recruit into their corps and help new players make the adjustment. If their intentions are all self-centered and greedy...as if...then they'd complain about it in forums and beg the management to change the game so they get their wish - more victims faster.

That null sec has its advantages isn't in dispute. If you carefully read the OP you'd know the issue is: Things being the way they are, is it really that SMART a thing to do? Several posts on this thread have more than adequately laid-out precisely why it ISN'T a smart thing to do. There you have it. As Ms. Repose said, "Read it and weep."




Sir, you have a way with words and I shamelessly envy you.

I'll add that I especially wholeheartedly agree with you on (see bold above). It's quite disheartening to see that the majority of null alliances are not just reluctant at accepting guests but outright make it their mission to close and seal their doors making of them target practice.

Now I understand there are spies and moles. But let's be honest, if spies and moles wanted to infiltrate your alliances they will find ways to do it. And smart leaderships will know to keep things on a need-to-know basis anyway. And in my opinion, gaining twenty or hundreds of players that are willing to strengthen an alliance at the cost of one that is willing to destroy it is a fair deal. But I realize that's just my opinion.

My dream in Eve is that some day null sec alliances see individuals (especially carebears) as invaluable assets to their organizations. Unfortunately that is not the case now. We're viewed more as thorns. And alliances prefer to keep their eyes closed and continue to face the fact that null sec is empty because of this propagated culture. In other words, it isn't CCP's fault that you refuse to welcome a great portion of the Eve population.

As idiotic and childish as Goonswarm is, they welcome their own, regardless on playstyle. They've built a massive power bloc that at the very least we should admit is quite a force to be reckoned with. Sure, 4chan (or whatever the hell it is they come from) leaves much to be desired, but my point is that they actually see value in their individuals. And if the rest of Eve saw even a tiny bit of that Goonswarm would have a hell of a time standing on its two legs.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#219 - 2011-11-15 14:10:25 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
I have yet to see a bubble in a place that was intended for anyone that knows how to avoid bubbles.


Then you haven't travelled much.

The majority of 0.0 residents know how to avoid bubbles we also know that sometimes we are going to get caught no matter what we do. Placing bubbles is very much like fishing, sometimes you get the placement right or you catch someone being careless and get a good haul and some times the fish just swim on past and are gone. As anything in 0.0 all it takes is a bit of concentration and most problems can be avoided.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Serene Repose
#220 - 2011-11-16 05:56:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Serene Repose
Bubbles are kind of funny. It's like fishing with sticks of dynamite, then bragging about your skill with a rod and reel. Why actually have to nail your victims when you can do it en masse with a little...thingy? If I had a bubble and an epeen I'd be using one to stroke the other, too!

I do want to thank the more thought provoking and insightful people who helped make this thread the definitive response to the disingenuous rabble wanting a mechanics change so they can use their bubbles on us. I'd hate to think I went to all the trouble to figure out how to blow bubbles, and be sitting out there in nowhere waiting for someone to come stumbling into it so I can effortlessly blow them to bits and crow to my friends as I suck down another cheap beer. One can't help but empathize.

Unfortunately, the FU-Bears aren't able to put subtle and intricate ideas together. That would take some of that beer-soaked grey matter to do and of course it's otherwise occupied. But, if this issue does interest you and you do feel expanding null/low sec player density is doable, you should by now have more than a good idea what to do about it.

As the Taoist monk said, "We'll see."

We must accommodate the idiocracy.