These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

LEGIT ideas to improve wormhole space

First post
Author
Allna
Aim High
#161 - 2014-03-03 19:21:12 UTC
Axloth Okiah wrote:
Xtrah wrote:
Seems like most people wants personal SMAs and so on. Am I the only one who enjoy having this completely different environment where you sort of need to trust the ones you live with? Don't make w-space more equal to k-space, remember why most of us came here in the first place.
I see your point but this is imho the most significant hurdle in bringing more and new people into wspace.



I agree. I think some of the "RP" part of it is applicable here. People went out to the 'old west' in the USA back in previous centuries for various reasons, and when first arriving communal homes were not uncommon, or even living out of the vessel that got you there (wagon, etc).

Over time, people built their own homes, for a variety of reasons - privacy, safety, keep people from stealing their gold, etc.

I think its not a big deal for an evolution of the 'living situation' in any aspect of EVE, w-space being no exception.

Realistically though, things like shared SMA's and stuff are precisely what keep very small organizations in low-class wormholes from recruiting in the first place, thus never growing in size, thus never moving up to higher class wormholes. I come from such an organization. We understand the significant risk of allowing unknowns access to that sort of thing, and we don' thave the manpower/resources to setup "dedicated" towers for "less than trusted recruits", so we don't recruit, and we don't grow in size, and we stay where we are because we're not big enough for anything more.

Its a chicken/egg situation, and some quality of life improvements like personal SMA's and the like would go a long way towards helping groups like ours to grow.

Risk/reward is one thing, but when the RISK is significantly higher than the REWARD (ie, gaining ONE person, just one body could yield the entire destruction of your corporation if you're not careful enough), and the manpower to "maintain" the 'right' level of security to handle new recruits not being available, it leads to a situation where we can't do much other than stick with the status quo (ie, no growth/change).

dan skirata
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#162 - 2014-03-03 19:51:47 UTC
Allna wrote:
Axloth Okiah wrote:
Xtrah wrote:
Seems like most people wants personal SMAs and so on. Am I the only one who enjoy having this completely different environment where you sort of need to trust the ones you live with? Don't make w-space more equal to k-space, remember why most of us came here in the first place.
I see your point but this is imho the most significant hurdle in bringing more and new people into wspace.



I agree. I think some of the "RP" part of it is applicable here. People went out to the 'old west' in the USA back in previous centuries for various reasons, and when first arriving communal homes were not uncommon, or even living out of the vessel that got you there (wagon, etc).

Over time, people built their own homes, for a variety of reasons - privacy, safety, keep people from stealing their gold, etc.

I think its not a big deal for an evolution of the 'living situation' in any aspect of EVE, w-space being no exception.

Realistically though, things like shared SMA's and stuff are precisely what keep very small organizations in low-class wormholes from recruiting in the first place, thus never growing in size, thus never moving up to higher class wormholes. I come from such an organization. We understand the significant risk of allowing unknowns access to that sort of thing, and we don' thave the manpower/resources to setup "dedicated" towers for "less than trusted recruits", so we don't recruit, and we don't grow in size, and we stay where we are because we're not big enough for anything more.

Its a chicken/egg situation, and some quality of life improvements like personal SMA's and the like would go a long way towards helping groups like ours to grow.

Risk/reward is one thing, but when the RISK is significantly higher than the REWARD (ie, gaining ONE person, just one body could yield the entire destruction of your corporation if you're not careful enough), and the manpower to "maintain" the 'right' level of security to handle new recruits not being available, it leads to a situation where we can't do much other than stick with the status quo (ie, no growth/change).




If only one thing could be added/changed, I would want a Personal SMA or at least restrict access of ships to certain people in the corp SMA.

Buddy Invite Program. Sign up with my link using valid payment methods and you will get 80% of the value of a Plex plus free lifetime advice.

Link to Post

roxtarr
State War Academy
Caldari State
#163 - 2014-03-03 20:26:49 UTC
Allna wrote:
[quote=Axloth Okiah][quote=Xtrah]
I agree. I think some of the "RP" part of it is applicable here. People went out to the 'old west' in the USA back in previous centuries for various reasons, and when first arriving communal homes were not uncommon, or even living out of the vessel that got you there (wagon, etc).



Ok. Since someone mentioned RP or lore, we shouldn't have to go to highsec for anything. Pioneers lived off the land.

I don't like the fact that Ice doesn't exist in W-space. Is there science behind this? As a conflict driver, I'd consider adding a 4th type of ice and 'sleeper' towers which is better than any of the empire variants. And, what's up with moons? W-space moons are made of different stuff? Why no harvesting for some of the tech2 mats? Maybe someone else has an idea to introduce new content here without duplicating k-space moons. And then there's a probem with selling things... maybe a mobile marketplace depot- shop at your own risk :)


Axloth Okiah
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#164 - 2014-03-03 20:42:17 UTC
Theres a case in making wspace more habitable and theres a case in keeping it different. These shouldnt be confused and while adding pSMAs would go long way towards making it more habitable, adding moongoo, ice and other crap would just make it lose its special flavour.
Shevai Asan
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#165 - 2014-03-04 02:19:36 UTC
Ice in Wormhole Space - As nice as the idea sounds; I don't know if it would benefit much. Granted since everyone uses different kinds of towers, and the random spawn of ice fields would atleast make one go "oooh an ice belt!" and it's not for the POS type that you use. Could be interesting, but then the ice miners in empire might feel abit "miffed". Possibly a good idea, but I entirely understand the notions of why it most likely won't happen.

A Sleeper-based tower and Wormhole type of ice, would be astounding awesome.

Moon Goo - Meh. Let the 0.0 alliance blocks have their moon goo. I'm ok with the fact that the moons we have are barren; it means when we fight, it's for the fight and not for someone else's moons. I like the fact that typically, there's no real reason to burn anyone out of their system unless they consistently run behind POS shields and log off, are a true arch-enemy/**** talkers, etc. Maybe we could get a moon goo that lets us make new variants of T3s down the line; that way we're not stepping on the toes of anyone else in known space. Everyone in W-space has tons of moons in their systems, so no need to burn people out for the resources, just go find an empty system with the moon goo you want and make it your home...and hopefully you can defend it if all you're there for is the goo.


Personal SMA/Hangers - For smaller corps, I can fully understand why you'd want them and their importance. But for The Night Crew; trust and honesty are very important. Any theft is grounds for 'termination'. With Personal SMA's and hangers, someone plucks a ship thats sitting in space behind pos shields, puts it in their personal SMA; now no one except that person has access to it. Same goes for personal hangers. You just faction out your ship, leave it in space for a moment; here comes Unknown Corp Thief, jumps in it and strips the fittings, puts them in his personal hanger and now, again, only he can touch it.

Pros and Cons; but I'm not against people wanting them. More options for how corps operate is never a bad thing.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#166 - 2014-03-04 11:52:43 UTC
I think adding ice to wormhole space is a great idea as long as you make the sites rare. The more people that mine in WH space, the more potential targets there are.

Moon/ring mining would only work (IMO) if it was a new type of goo not available in empire space.
Sum Olgy
Perkone
Caldari State
#167 - 2014-03-04 12:10:41 UTC
Absolutely NO to ice in WH space. EVE is hard and wormholes were never designed to have permanent occupants. Don't make this easy. If people want easy targets go to K space.

And I don't want more ships, especially T3's - just make the existing unused subs useful.

What makes Eve so special is all of the un-legit ideas the players come up with to bend this sandbox in ways never envisaged by the developers. So I'm a no to inventing new game play - we're quite capable of doing that ourselves. Just tweek the existing anomalies (pardon the pun) in the game, like POS interraction, unused/useless modules and the like.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#168 - 2014-03-04 13:05:36 UTC
Sum Olgy wrote:
Absolutely NO to ice in WH space. EVE is hard and wormholes were never designed to have permanent occupants.


Can you explain how ice in wormhole makes things easy? Maybe if you are the one in your corp who is responsible for bringing in the ice but if not, it makes absolutely no difference.

I don't think this will happen but if it did, i think the pros would outweigh the cons.
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#169 - 2014-03-04 14:30:25 UTC
I think a lot of the 'no ice' and 'no moon goo' sentiment comes from the desire to keep w-space unique and the way it is.

Moon goo is a terrible idea. You want to give a 1000 man alliance a reason to mob stomp wh space - put moon goo in there. Just no. There is nothing passive in wh space. You start putting passive income in wh space and you create a reason to do the meta game hoo haw and bring numbers to control large numbers of systems.

To me the point of w-space is pretty simple. A wh can only support a finite number of folks. It forces smaller scale conflict. There just isn't enough isk to support a 500 pilot corp/alliance in any given wh. Passive moon isk will just enable a larger number of folks to inhabit a given wh. I say no to that. You want to blob up and have massive epic fights - I'm cool with that, but the eve place for it is low and null. You want small gang where small groups can survive independantly and where F1 alone won't get it done - that's wh space.

I think as it stands now - you have to choose what style of play you want and go to that area of the game. Moon goo would just be a blob enabler. Let's face it, sky fighters are probably the biggest right now and there is now way in hell they could invade delve. So if the blobs follow the goo into wh space and push out the little guys - Blobs gain a new play area and smaller scale fun folks lose the only playground they have. It's not about moons are moons and all should have goo. It's about this is a game and should do what is needed to support the multiple styles of play that presently exist.

TL - you want moon goo - go to delve and get it.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#170 - 2014-03-04 15:02:33 UTC
It seems like a lot of people don't actually read what is being suggested...
bubble trout
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#171 - 2014-03-04 15:58:45 UTC
This whole thread........................


http://i.imgur.com/16MCf.gif
dan skirata
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#172 - 2014-03-04 16:19:33 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
It seems like a lot of people don't actually read what is being suggested...


I wouldn't doubt it. "Oh there is 9 pages, I'll just read part of the last one."

For example, I've seen other people mention a mobile trade post for WHs when if you look in the thread I was the first to think of it and mention it.

Buddy Invite Program. Sign up with my link using valid payment methods and you will get 80% of the value of a Plex plus free lifetime advice.

Link to Post

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#173 - 2014-03-04 17:08:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
I'm talking about the people that seem to be responding to the posts above them but still fail to read it properly. Straight
dan skirata
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#174 - 2014-03-04 17:30:08 UTC
That too Smile

Buddy Invite Program. Sign up with my link using valid payment methods and you will get 80% of the value of a Plex plus free lifetime advice.

Link to Post

Marox Calendale
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#175 - 2014-03-04 18:26:18 UTC
Dmitry Wizard wrote:
with as much hate as i will receive for saying this... I am also in favor of DESTROYABLE (you can actually kill this) outposts in wormholes. stations that can be destroyed. I want the Small gang feel of wormholes but i also want the freedom an outpost gives you when it comes to corp roles and hangers (also im lazy and no one in my corp likes to fuel their pos on a regular basis) a "mini-outpost" that costs about 15 billion isk and takes 4-6 hours to anchor. all the same skills apply to anchor can only be brought in with a freighter or jump freighter. two timers within 24 hours shield and armor.

let the hate begin

Wormhole Outposts looking like Sleeper Enclaves that only can be anchored at the sun of a Wormhole System, including Corp Hangars and a Little market for easier trading. They would be destroyable, pos gunners could also defend them, but without a force field.
Industry Slots should be still at the poses. But Pos mechanics should easier allow and control alliance industry, so better control of borders between Corps inside the same alliance.
Shevai Asan
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#176 - 2014-03-04 20:25:45 UTC
I see people saying to have destroyable, anchored objects outside of POS. You realise that in WH space; as was stated; we're smaller numbers, which means there's never truely 100% coverage of the system.

If a group of 15-20 roll into a hole and there are things to pop; guess what they're going to do? They're going to pop what they can and move on. So what was the 'conflict driver'? If there's no one there capable of defending the 'conflict driver', then how much conflict other than a pinata to be beat on was really added?

I think the best thing about WH space is the stealth factor. You don't get notified of someone logging in or jumping into your system unless you're using overwatch(and I absolutely detest the new system scanner that updates you, even if it is abit delayed). If someone is running solo or doesn't have proper scouts; then as the game dictates they should be at a greater risk than those who do.

Risk vs Reward: Do I run these three combat sites solo for a payout all to myself; or do I wait for more corpmates to login so we can all have a go and be prepared for any hot-drops..."

Moon Goo - This is always an interesting idea; but I do tend to agree that the only real 'passive' income we should have in WH space is PI. It's decent money, and there's still a solid risk when doing it.(You gotta fly to the CO at some point to pick up/drop off). Moon Goo has it's place, but unless what we get in WH space is specific for T3 production, I don't see much use for it. I agree that 0.0 is more than welcome to maintain the control of moon goo.

Serendipity has it right. Smallish corp/alliance space, limited numbers via mass and viability for what can be done. Cohesive, mixed fleets of varying ship sizes and specialties, not blob warfare.

I always enjoy being surprised by what comes through a k162 or up the chain; almost as much as I love a well mixed fleet landing on someone else's fleet and having a nice level of chaos ensue. We all have fun and rarely does anyone take it personal(and if you're taking it personal that you got killed, you're playing the wrong game. Take it personal if someone talks trash, not just because you got popped/podded.)
Bloodmyst Ranwar
State War Academy
Caldari State
#177 - 2014-03-04 23:05:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Bloodmyst Ranwar
Turn off the SFX when a pilot jumps through a wormhole.

There shouldn't be sound in space anyway. Also, want more PvP opportunities? This is a huge step in the right direction. Less carebears more Pew Pew!

Now those scouts will have to actually.... you know.. scout. Not just listen for a sound.
BayneNothos
United Electro-Magnetic Federation
Business Alliance of Manufacturers and Miners
#178 - 2014-03-05 02:17:18 UTC
Manufacturing outside POS:
Bad idea as it'll just push those who do this out of W-Space. As much as you may wish it, removing this stuff won't make all those miners and manufacturers suddenly go jump into a 20 man Tech3 fleet to PvP you. It's not what they're primarily interested in and as such they'll leave. Just like you'll leave if CCP added 1.0sec Concord to W-Space.
So end result, you still have nothing to shoot in W-Space.

This constant harassing of PvE guys and wanting to destroy their gameplay is going to turn W-Space into Non- FW LS, where there's nothing but dead space and gatecamps. What I've always liked about W-Space is that there's a bit of everything out here. The PvE guys are mixed in with the PvP ones. The miners are just next door and there's haulers running through the system now. Two WH's over is a PvP fleet getting ready to do something. It's all here. Nowhere else in Eve could you find everything about Eve so intermingled and so close together.

Yet slowly it's getting worn away and turning into everywhere else in EVE. We've lost the most of the miners due to Gravs now being anomalies rather than scannable sites. Those miners that did stay, most of those are back in POS before you even enter the system due to the Discovery Scanner. I haven't seen a PI runner this year. I'd like to know where they've all gone and I suspect that the warp changes are making it not worthwhile anymore.

Some of the best fun I've had out here is stalking through Grav Sites sneaking up on unsuspecting miners who didn't notice my scan probes. Chasing down PI runners, having to make split second decisions on which of the overlapping icons of Customs Offices he warped to. These are all things that CCP has changed to make the game better elsewhere that's negatively (in my opinion) changed W-Space.

#Back in my day
#Rant

Ice Mining:
This could be cool out here if it's something more W-Spacey than just another grav site. Means loosing fuel runners, but gaining ice miners.

Trading Stuff:
Kind of surprised no one has tried something out here yet with like secure cans or something. I think if there was a W-Space Chribba there probably would be, but as none of us really trust each other and without something game mechanic wise to help this out it won't happen.
Maybe a new Secure Can/Deployable type thing you can see the contents of but only remove via password or Isk to the owner? I don't think we need a full blooded station market thing to start this stuff up, just something to help make transactions between players a bit less reliant on trust. Space Contracts more or less.

WH Sound Effects:
Maybe not a full removal but just covops capable ships can go through with a lower sounding sfx and animation.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#179 - 2014-03-05 09:36:57 UTC
Shevai Asan wrote:
I see people saying to have destroyable, anchored objects outside of POS. You realise that in WH space; as was stated; we're smaller numbers, which means there's never truely 100% coverage of the system.

If a group of 15-20 roll into a hole and there are things to pop; guess what they're going to do? They're going to pop what they can and move on. So what was the 'conflict driver'? If there's no one there capable of defending the 'conflict driver', then how much conflict other than a pinata to be beat on was really added?


Any new structures could have a shorter reinforce timer or something similar to how the POCO reinforce timer works. Either way, there is always going to be someone that is too big for you to defend against as long as you think like that but don't forget, you are probably more that other groups can handle and you can just go and take their stuff when you get online. The cycle of bullying continues.
Duke Wendo
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#180 - 2014-03-05 21:01:46 UTC
Oh well, I didn't realise having stuff outside of a massive POS or station would inconvenience the residents of the most dangerous area of space and they might lose their stuff to dangerous fleets of dangerous pvp people! What was I thinking!

We must have everything inside the POS or station to protect us all from nasty timezone warriors. I also think POCOs should have double their hit points and their reinforce timer should be at least 10 days to give adequate time for a defence fleet to form.

We should have clone jumps and wormhole generators and stations and conveniences like high sec space.

Where are all the people that want w-space to be difficult?

You guys sicken me. I want my money back.

:/