These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

corebloodbrothers made csm 9 "we did it, thank u voters & believers"

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Drossc
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#141 - 2014-02-20 02:23:19 UTC
+1 CSM 9
Lucidgrey
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#142 - 2014-02-20 02:38:10 UTC
"this last bastion of NRDS does do good for many players all over Eve." -core
ProviPride o7 +1 for Core!
Torgon
Athena Foundation
#143 - 2014-02-20 03:10:10 UTC
+1 ! Go CORE
Dustmite Audanie
Cherry Defense Systems
The Initiative.
#144 - 2014-02-20 03:19:23 UTC
+1 for Core
Snoddynose
Doomheim
#145 - 2014-02-20 03:29:56 UTC
Core for CSM9
+1
Chase Reinhold
Horde Armada
Pandemic Horde
#146 - 2014-02-20 04:39:49 UTC
+1 for core!
Golt Msibi
Sma Inc
#147 - 2014-02-20 05:15:28 UTC
+1 for CORE!!!
Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#148 - 2014-02-20 05:29:07 UTC
Question. You write:

Quote:
In a fitting way, i want to be elected to give a voice to those same players, some enjoying empire, some coming from empire to learn about Null Sec in Providence and of course some being residents of Providence. All of whom would not normally be heard under the much louder voices of the large null sec power blocs and there representatives. Its also about prioritisation being proportional to what people enjoy doing what for example.


So, you're a voice that would not normally be heard from a small bloc asking for CCP to prioritize proportional to "what people enjoy doing." The statement's a bit vague; for instance, are you saying that CCP should prioritize NRDS and similar gameplay in proportion to the percentage of EVE players who enjoy it? Because that percentage is not very large. Would you be focusing on high sec and NBSI null sec gameplay, since those are what most EVE players seem to enjoy? If you didn't mean that, what did you mean?

I ask because I like the idea that there's more than one way to do sov. It adds texture to the game, and it seems from my perch that it could make actual, self-sustaining economies (more!) possible without blueing up the whole part of space. So if I were a Provident, I would want you to argue your case not for what it currently is, but for what it could potentially bring to the game.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!
Van Xan
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#149 - 2014-02-20 07:01:32 UTC
+1 for corebloodbrothers.
Arthur Great
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#150 - 2014-02-20 07:32:31 UTC
+1 for core
corebloodbrothers
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#151 - 2014-02-20 08:01:50 UTC
Dersen Lowery wrote:
Question. You write:

Quote:
In a fitting way, i want to be elected to give a voice to those same players, some enjoying empire, some coming from empire to learn about Null Sec in Providence and of course some being residents of Providence. All of whom would not normally be heard under the much louder voices of the large null sec power blocs and there representatives. Its also about prioritisation being proportional to what people enjoy doing what for example.


So, you're a voice that would not normally be heard from a small bloc asking for CCP to prioritize proportional to "what people enjoy doing." The statement's a bit vague; for instance, are you saying that CCP should prioritize NRDS and similar gameplay in proportion to the percentage of EVE players who enjoy it? Because that percentage is not very large. Would you be focusing on high sec and NBSI null sec gameplay, since those are what most EVE players seem to enjoy? If you didn't mean that, what did you mean?

I ask because I like the idea that there's more than one way to do sov. It adds texture to the game, and it seems from my perch that it could make actual, self-sustaining economies (more!) possible without blueing up the whole part of space. So if I were a Provident, I would want you to argue your case not for what it currently is, but for what it could potentially bring to the game.



I think any csm member shoudl reflect eve community as a whole, with it peopel bring thier own expertise and knowledge of. Wgta they like/ understand best. I see how provi works, and how. Content is created, versus tons of empty space. But i think any csm candidate runnign to push his own points will be disapointed, but doesnt stop u from having ideas and views.
Ahura Mashada
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#152 - 2014-02-20 09:20:50 UTC
+1 For Core One of the few FC's I truely respect. +, he's Dutch (win=win)
Made Wilson
Khanid Royal Institute of Technology
#153 - 2014-02-20 11:47:42 UTC
+1 for core
Cyber Ralph
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#154 - 2014-02-20 11:52:00 UTC
+ 1 gogogo core
Prelate Arrakis
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#155 - 2014-02-20 12:46:11 UTC
+1 for Core
jonoaod
Regrediens
OnlyHoles
#156 - 2014-02-20 15:15:38 UTC
+1 for Core
Gangster Chief Spillo
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#157 - 2014-02-20 15:18:43 UTC
javascript:insertsmiley('Big smile','/Images/Emoticons/ccp_smile-big.png')+1 core for CSM
John MoonHawk
The Frog Pond
Ribbit.
#158 - 2014-02-20 15:19:45 UTC
+1 good luck core
HANS STOKHOLM
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#159 - 2014-02-20 15:48:25 UTC
+1
Bommel B
ObObO
#160 - 2014-02-20 16:32:49 UTC
No question +1 Core for CSM