These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

corebloodbrothers made csm 9 "we did it, thank u voters & believers"

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
June Ting
Nobody in Local
Deepwater Hooligans
#381 - 2014-04-01 21:54:40 UTC
Cavalira wrote:
June Ting wrote:
I think it's clear Core believes Provibloc will elect him without the contribution of any outside support and without any need on his part to be accountable or work to articulate any kind of platform.

He'll probably get 1000-1200 votes at best that way. Whether that's enough this year, I don't know. Last year it wouldn't have worked.


I guess most of the provibloc that actually votes for him, haven't read this thread, and have no idea of how bad this candidate is.

I mean, you can see a list of the supporters that CTA +1 posted the thread and evemail them to let them know if you're sufficiently non-lazy. Personally, I can't be assed to and also would be seen as having an axe to grind, so...

I fight for the freedom of my people.
Speedkermit Damo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#382 - 2014-04-03 11:38:44 UTC
June Ting wrote:
Cavalira wrote:
June Ting wrote:
I think it's clear Core believes Provibloc will elect him without the contribution of any outside support and without any need on his part to be accountable or work to articulate any kind of platform.

He'll probably get 1000-1200 votes at best that way. Whether that's enough this year, I don't know. Last year it wouldn't have worked.


I guess most of the provibloc that actually votes for him, haven't read this thread, and have no idea of how bad this candidate is.

I mean, you can see a list of the supporters that CTA +1 posted the thread and evemail them to let them know if you're sufficiently non-lazy. Personally, I can't be assed to and also would be seen as having an axe to grind, so...


Absolutely no axe to grind from you. That much is obvious.

LOL

Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#383 - 2014-04-03 21:17:53 UTC
I have removed a rule breaking post.

The Rules:
10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.

Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Elmnt80
Life. Universe. Everything.
#384 - 2014-04-04 02:23:14 UTC
Hello.

Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper?
Chris Libby
Gallente Heavy Industries
#385 - 2014-04-05 13:25:36 UTC
Go Core Go!
Abla Tive
#386 - 2014-04-05 14:54:02 UTC
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#387 - 2014-04-05 15:49:05 UTC
I have removed a rule breaking post.

The Rules:
11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.

The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
republicov
Zebra Corp
Goonswarm Federation
#388 - 2014-04-05 16:01:05 UTC
alwais there too help ppl +1


also alwais someone too batphoone incase we tackle some caps somewhere Pirate

gl
Angel Lightbringer
Absolute Order
Absolute Honor
#389 - 2014-04-06 00:49:51 UTC
+1 for Core, no matter how bad some posters try to make him look Blink
Two step
Aperture Harmonics
#390 - 2014-04-06 02:27:40 UTC
Angel Lightbringer wrote:
+1 for Core, no matter how bad some posters try to make him look Blink


I'd say core not even bothering to visit this thread for the last 9 days makes him look pretty darn bad. Gosh, I hope CCP never needs a response in less than 9 days for any question they might ask. I'm glad he apparently isn't dead, since he was on some kills just yesterday. I'm sorry, but that is a level of disrespect for his potential voters that is right up there with riverini.

CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Angel Lightbringer
Absolute Order
Absolute Honor
#391 - 2014-04-06 06:49:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Angel Lightbringer
Two step wrote:
Angel Lightbringer wrote:
+1 for Core, no matter how bad some posters try to make him look Blink


I'd say core not even bothering to visit this thread for the last 9 days makes him look pretty darn bad. Gosh, I hope CCP never needs a response in less than 9 days for any question they might ask. I'm glad he apparently isn't dead, since he was on some kills just yesterday. I'm sorry, but that is a level of disrespect for his potential voters that is right up there with riverini.


Because of course not posting means not reading...
Beside, the only questions worth of an answer are within about 36h old, I would not make too much of a fuzz about it.

What does the sign says? Oh yeah, "Don't feed the trolls"
corebloodbrothers
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#392 - 2014-04-06 06:49:47 UTC  |  Edited by: corebloodbrothers
deleted
corebloodbrothers
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#393 - 2014-04-06 07:03:37 UTC  |  Edited by: corebloodbrothers
Two step wrote:
Angel Lightbringer wrote:
+1 for Core, no matter how bad some posters try to make him look Blink


I'd say core not even bothering to visit this thread for the last 9 days makes him look pretty darn bad. Gosh, I hope CCP never needs a response in less than 9 days for any question they might ask. I'm glad he apparently isn't dead, since he was on some kills just yesterday. I'm sorry, but that is a level of disrespect for his potential voters that is right up there with riverini.


i could explain how i maybe had a death in rl in my family and only been logging on and shoot **** to get a distraction, but the fact u make assumptions based on nothing, and extend them to make someone look bad says more then enough. i hope that does not represent who you are in RL or in game, tbh i exspected more from you.

dont wurry about my voters, they dont rely on propaganda, nor me campainging just to rally votes. Anyone who eve mailed me or contacted me through email, facebook and so on still received an answer. People that listen to my interview or read up also get what i stand for, same goes for vote match, debates with NRDS stake holders and other people that contacted me. And ofc i kept an eye sideways, and noticed the nice comments that have been removed further up.

thnx for your concern about my absence on forum though,
Two step
Aperture Harmonics
#394 - 2014-04-06 12:37:12 UTC
corebloodbrothers wrote:


i could explain how i maybe had a death in rl in my family and only been logging on and shoot **** to get a distraction, but the fact u make assumptions based on nothing, and extend them to make someone look bad says more then enough. i hope that does not represent who you are in RL or in game, tbh i exspected more from you.

dont wurry about my voters, they dont rely on propaganda, nor me campainging just to rally votes. Anyone who eve mailed me or contacted me through email, facebook and so on still received an answer. People that listen to my interview or read up also get what i stand for, same goes for vote match, debates with NRDS stake holders and other people that contacted me. And ofc i kept an eye sideways, and noticed the nice comments that have been removed further up.

thnx for your concern about my absence on forum though,


Well, I am sorry to hear that. I didn't make assumptions based on "nothing", I made them based on you not responding to anything in this thread for over a week. If you had simply posted this a week ago, it wouldn't have been an issue.

Of course, trying to turn this around and make me out to be some sort of bad guy does say something about you, and it isn't something good.

If you think this thread is about keeping in touch with your voters, I'm afraid you don't understand how an election works. This thread should be about attracting more voters, and responding to questions from them. Here, let me re-post my totally legit questions from 9 days ago that I am still waiting for answers for:

Two step wrote:
I'm confused by this whole thread. Firstly, you apparently don't have time to write a new post, yet you think you will have time to do all the work one would have to do on the CSM?

Secondly, you appear to think the election is decided by the number of your alliancemates who post meaningless "+1" posts in your thread. Do you perhaps think that sort of mindless agreement might turn off non-provibloc voters? I think you didn't actually understand why Ali Aras got elected last time, it wasn't pure Provibloc voters, it was because she actually ran a campaign and tried to appeal to people outside her natural voting block.

Thirdly, You have the crazy ideas on this page about not needing to tell potential voters about how you personally feel on various issues. While the CSM are not game designers, what the kind current CSM members are trying to tell you here is that they do have a lot of input into game design decisions, and they need to have opinions of their own.

Fourthly, you don't seem to be doing a great job of being a clear communicator. Can your voters expect posts full of "u" instead of "you", and lowercase i's when you are posting on the internal CSM-only forums? Do you think CCP will value that sort of communication as highly as someone who uses actual words and capital letters?


If you don't feel that is worthy of a response, great. That tells me more than enough about the sort of candidate you are, and the sort of CSM delegate you might be.

There are also a couple of reasonable other questions from Elmnt80 and Abla Tive up above that you haven't replied to as well.

CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Angel Lightbringer
Absolute Order
Absolute Honor
#395 - 2014-04-06 14:30:37 UTC
Two step wrote:

Well, I am sorry to hear that. I didn't make assumptions based on "nothing", I made them based on you not responding to anything in this thread for over a week. If you had simply posted this a week ago, it wouldn't have been an issue.

Of course, trying to turn this around and make me out to be some sort of bad guy does say something about you, and it isn't something good.

If you think this thread is about keeping in touch with your voters, I'm afraid you don't understand how an election works. This thread should be about attracting more voters, and responding to questions from them. Here, let me re-post my totally legit questions from 9 days ago that I am still waiting for answers for:

Two step wrote:
I'm confused by this whole thread. Firstly, you apparently don't have time to write a new post, yet you think you will have time to do all the work one would have to do on the CSM?

Secondly, you appear to think the election is decided by the number of your alliancemates who post meaningless "+1" posts in your thread. Do you perhaps think that sort of mindless agreement might turn off non-provibloc voters? I think you didn't actually understand why Ali Aras got elected last time, it wasn't pure Provibloc voters, it was because she actually ran a campaign and tried to appeal to people outside her natural voting block.

Thirdly, You have the crazy ideas on this page about not needing to tell potential voters about how you personally feel on various issues. While the CSM are not game designers, what the kind current CSM members are trying to tell you here is that they do have a lot of input into game design decisions, and they need to have opinions of their own.

Fourthly, you don't seem to be doing a great job of being a clear communicator. Can your voters expect posts full of "u" instead of "you", and lowercase i's when you are posting on the internal CSM-only forums? Do you think CCP will value that sort of communication as highly as someone who uses actual words and capital letters?


If you don't feel that is worthy of a response(1), great. That tells me more than enough about the sort of candidate you are, and the sort of CSM delegate you might be.

There are also a couple of reasonable other questions(2) from Elmnt80 and Abla Tive up above that you haven't replied to as well.


Firstly, my opinion is my own and I don't speak for Core, he does not need that. I alone quickly evaluated the content being worthy of an answer or not, not Core, and yet I left your post out of the count, yes.

You say his thread is not up to par as per political/candidacy standard? Neither are your posts, full of attacks disguised as pseudo questions. Your lame flame-bait is lame, you've been spotted, nice try, now move along.

The said reasonable other questions were what I had in mind in my last post.
Two step
Aperture Harmonics
#396 - 2014-04-06 16:04:45 UTC
Angel Lightbringer wrote:

Firstly, my opinion is my own and I don't speak for Core, he does not need that. I alone quickly evaluated the content being worthy of an answer or not, not Core, and yet I left your post out of the count, yes.

You say his thread is not up to par as per political/candidacy standard? Neither are your posts, full of attacks disguised as pseudo questions. Your lame flame-bait is lame, you've been spotted, nice try, now move along.

The said reasonable other questions were what I had in mind in my last post.


I'd say someone does need to speak for him. I'd also say that the 7 people who liked my post might appreciate an answer to the questions. Frankly, I don't care if you see them as full of attacks. I've done my time on the CSM, 2 years of it, and I think I might just know a tiny bit more than someone that has only posted in this thread in their entire forum history (at least on the new forums).

Since you are such a new poster, here is a little hint. You aren't helping your candidate. In fact, you are hurting him. You are showing that he isn't able to deal with criticism, and that he can't defend himself. That isn't going to fly here, and it certainly isn't going to fly on the CSM, where he doesn't have minions to back him up.

CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
corebloodbrothers
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#397 - 2014-04-06 20:05:31 UTC
Two step wrote:
corebloodbrothers wrote:


i could explain how i maybe had a death in rl in my family and only been logging on and shoot **** to get a distraction, but the fact u make assumptions based on nothing, and extend them to make someone look bad says more then enough. i hope that does not represent who you are in RL or in game, tbh i exspected more from you.

dont wurry about my voters, they dont rely on propaganda, nor me campainging just to rally votes. Anyone who eve mailed me or contacted me through email, facebook and so on still received an answer. People that listen to my interview or read up also get what i stand for, same goes for vote match, debates with NRDS stake holders and other people that contacted me. And ofc i kept an eye sideways, and noticed the nice comments that have been removed further up.

thnx for your concern about my absence on forum though,


Well, I am sorry to hear that. I didn't make assumptions based on "nothing", I made them based on you not responding to anything in this thread for over a week. If you had simply posted this a week ago, it wouldn't have been an issue.

Of course, trying to turn this around and make me out to be some sort of bad guy does say something about you, and it isn't something good.

If you think this thread is about keeping in touch with your voters, I'm afraid you don't understand how an election works. This thread should be about attracting more voters, and responding to questions from them. Here, let me re-post my totally legit questions from 9 days ago that I am still waiting for answers for:

Two step wrote:
I'm confused by this whole thread. Firstly, you apparently don't have time to write a new post, yet you think you will have time to do all the work one would have to do on the CSM?

Secondly, you appear to think the election is decided by the number of your alliancemates who post meaningless "+1" posts in your thread. Do you perhaps think that sort of mindless agreement might turn off non-provibloc voters? I think you didn't actually understand why Ali Aras got elected last time, it wasn't pure Provibloc voters, it was because she actually ran a campaign and tried to appeal to people outside her natural voting block.

Thirdly, You have the crazy ideas on this page about not needing to tell potential voters about how you personally feel on various issues. While the CSM are not game designers, what the kind current CSM members are trying to tell you here is that they do have a lot of input into game design decisions, and they need to have opinions of their own.

Fourthly, you don't seem to be doing a great job of being a clear communicator. Can your voters expect posts full of "u" instead of "you", and lowercase i's when you are posting on the internal CSM-only forums? Do you think CCP will value that sort of communication as highly as someone who uses actual words and capital letters?


If you don't feel that is worthy of a response, great. That tells me more than enough about the sort of candidate you are, and the sort of CSM delegate you might be.

There are also a couple of reasonable other questions from Elmnt80 and Abla Tive up above that you haven't replied to as well.



you are truly full of asumptions, but your reply does fill my mailbox with people who have a different aproach towards csm, elections and good manners. So i should have to say thank you. But ill try to asnwer them as good as i can. i have no doubt you will find a angle on my answers to try to colour them again but, thats fine.

1. the post is good as it is, no need to change it much as the subject hasnt changed. I rather have a meaningfull NRDS debate in provi we held last week, then polish my politician speech.

2. the +1 i didnt ask for, its peopel expressing they like to vote for me, know me or like me from reading, talking or listening to me, u try to drag in ali and other stuff, except the fact thats in the past. I see the post not as a way to promote a campaign, ist mroe of a sign on a doorbel. but fine. dont wurry abotu my campaign outside providence, we ll see ocne election is done how that went. nice of you to care though. I run my campaign as i feel fit, and its going well.

3. "crazy idea" nice interpretation again of someone you never met or heared from. And wrong even. as i explained previous page, personal agenda's and ideas are great input for debate, discussion and creative processes, but i hope and know that if your succes depends on achieving your personal goals then a 14 man csm will have a lot of disapointements. So yes i rather focus on a team effort then a personal achievement. i dont feel much for politicians who dont deliver. My personal ideas are clear, and stated in posts, interview and forums. I believe isk should flow bottom up, i believe in content drivers as introduction of meaningfull cruiser, i hate empty null sec these days, i am a big fan of NRDS and provi, i believe eve shoudl maybe nto try to fix null sec , as i dotn feel its broken, but focus on new stuff with entirely new rules. I also believe CCP steered away from controversial releases, and is refurbishing more and more. and i dislike that. I hate the new ceptors, i would love to see null sec PI to non blues, i liek allaince fittings and bookmarks, i feel fleet boosters is to much hassle, and partially broken. i am against destructable stations, and so on. grab a beer and we can go on for hours.

4. not gonna comment on it, again u find a negative angle to aproach someone who you dont know nor have met.

5. your assumption of not worthy a response is again showing a negative tone of voice, even concluding how a csm i would be is not very nice

goodluck with the answers, i am sure u ll find a angle to bash em

hf
core
wuce brillis
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#398 - 2014-04-07 07:03:30 UTC
+1 for core !
Crystal Arbiter
#399 - 2014-04-07 10:47:03 UTC
You've got my +1 Core.

EVE Trade/Industry Blog: www.evetradewinds.com
Reece Davis
Destructive Influence
Northern Coalition.
#400 - 2014-04-07 15:39:04 UTC
+1 for Core!