These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Summer Expansion Speculation Thread

First post First post
Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#41 - 2014-02-15 19:25:34 UTC
Almethea wrote:
"balancing 3% here, 2% there
nerf that and that and also that"

taadaa >> new expansion


You should count up the number of new ships, modules, gameplay mechanics and features that have been added since CCP's "Road to Damascus" moment after Incarna. I think you'll find the list is longer than you assume.

As I said, now that they're releasing expansions gradually as point releases, we don't get the big dramatic reveals.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#42 - 2014-02-15 19:27:17 UTC
Hiton Kado wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Hiton Kado wrote:
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Why do we need 'new' content? This isn't a traditional MMO that makes some 'new' content that makes every single old piece of content obsolete. Everything stays relevant in EVE. So the amount of relevant content doesn't decrease by an expansion.

So, in your opinion the introduction of for example wormhole space and all related features was a waste of development time and should have been spent on reiterating older features?


Apocrypha was an oustanding expansion concept, but it also took a level of crunch effort that's not realistically repeatable now. And it laid up a store of problems that contributed to a lot of the grief in the following :18 months:

Realistically, we're not going to see another Apocrypha class expansion released in a single 6 month cycle.

CCP Seagull laid out her vision at fanfest last year in the keynote speech.. That's what's going to happen. Rubicon, Odyssey, and the expansions that follow them will all be building up to that. CCP have a "to do" list that needs to be completed before we can see that vision of player built stargates and new space finally realised, and they're on it. For exapmple, one of those items is ship balancing, and that project has nearly completed its first iteration. Another was exploration, and that was addressed in the last expansion. There are other items of similar magnitude, and I'm sure that you can probably guess most or all of them if you think about what still needs doing. Meanwhile, CCP are gradually introducing the new tools that will be part of that vision, such as the deployables.

If CCP deliver what they showed us, then a lot of people engaged in everyday EVE activities are going to be very happy with the summer expansion. People expecting another "Apocrypha" will be disappointed. They're always going to be disaapointed. I think if CCP execute it well, it'll be more like another "Retribution".

And don't forget that a significant percentage of the next expansion will be delivered in point releases; the days of giant expansion changelogs and patchnotes are over. (It's worth remembering that we haven't even had all of Rubicon yet!) There is an emphasis on making sure that the core game experiences are good, and gradually infiltrating new features rather than a sudden dramatic "OH WOW" change as we got in Apocrypha.

I know it's not as exciting to anticipate, and it sure does make the marketing guys job harder, but it's a better and more productive way to develop the game. It's a change that the players begged CCP for years to make.

Okay, maybe wormholes was an extreme example. I understand that Apocrypha was kind of a one time thing. But something of the size of Incursions maybe?


Well all I can tell you is this: after what they showed us in January, I'm preparing to engage in gameplay that will be new to me.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Davon Mandra'thin
Das Collective
#43 - 2014-02-15 19:29:18 UTC
Hiton Kado wrote:

Okay, maybe wormholes was an extreme example. I understand that Apocrypha was kind of a one time thing. But something of the size of Incursions maybe?


Incursions is a worse example. Incursions started the steady fall in player subs that cost CCP 20% of their staff.
Sylveria Relden
#44 - 2014-02-15 19:31:29 UTC
Placing bets on 95% bugfixes and 5% new content introduction.

TL;DR If you didn't read the entire post perhaps you're probably ADHD. (seek help)

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#45 - 2014-02-15 19:32:00 UTC
Malcanis wrote:


Well all I can tell you is this: after what they showed us in January, I'm preparing to engage in gameplay that will be new to me.


You libidinous bastard! You know full well that's much worse than no hint at all.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#46 - 2014-02-15 19:38:02 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Why do we need 'new' content? This isn't a traditional MMO that makes some 'new' content that makes every single old piece of content obsolete. Everything stays relevant in EVE. So the amount of relevant content doesn't decrease by an expansion.


Considering we haven't had an "Expansion" in close to three years, expectations are extremely low.

Signature removed - CCP Eterne

Dave Stark
#47 - 2014-02-15 19:39:25 UTC
we've had an industry survey, i vaguely remember something being mentioned about an industry focused expansion next.

i'm going to go with; industry changes.

maybe they'll make player corps worth joining as a miner, or maybe they'll overhaul all the tedious and ****** method for setting up PI planets...
or maybe they'll do nothing of the sort and it'll be a few irrelevant deployables and some deep space transport rebalances.
Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#48 - 2014-02-15 19:39:45 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Almethea wrote:
"balancing 3% here, 2% there
nerf that and that and also that"

taadaa >> new expansion


You should count up the number of new ships, modules, gameplay mechanics and features that have been added since CCP's "Road to Damascus" moment after Incarna. I think you'll find the list is longer than you assume.

As I said, now that they're releasing expansions gradually as point releases, we don't get the big dramatic reveals.


Adding a few new niche ships, dumb modules and fixing mechanics that have been broken for years != an expansion.

Signature removed - CCP Eterne

Chastiser
Sensible People
Sigma Grindset
#49 - 2014-02-15 20:08:47 UTC
I'm hoping for a Star Trek style warp effect
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#50 - 2014-02-15 20:12:03 UTC
Beekeeper Bob wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Almethea wrote:
"balancing 3% here, 2% there
nerf that and that and also that"

taadaa >> new expansion


You should count up the number of new ships, modules, gameplay mechanics and features that have been added since CCP's "Road to Damascus" moment after Incarna. I think you'll find the list is longer than you assume.

As I said, now that they're releasing expansions gradually as point releases, we don't get the big dramatic reveals.


Adding a few new niche ships, dumb modules and fixing mechanics that have been broken for years != an expansion.


Ye ye it's not an expansion unnless it has Pandas in it

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Dave Stark
#51 - 2014-02-15 20:12:56 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Beekeeper Bob wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Almethea wrote:
"balancing 3% here, 2% there
nerf that and that and also that"

taadaa >> new expansion


You should count up the number of new ships, modules, gameplay mechanics and features that have been added since CCP's "Road to Damascus" moment after Incarna. I think you'll find the list is longer than you assume.

As I said, now that they're releasing expansions gradually as point releases, we don't get the big dramatic reveals.


Adding a few new niche ships, dumb modules and fixing mechanics that have been broken for years != an expansion.


Ye ye it's not an expansion unnless it has Pandas in it


you may mock, but pandas are content.
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#52 - 2014-02-15 20:15:28 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Almethea wrote:
"balancing 3% here, 2% there
nerf that and that and also that"

taadaa >> new expansion


You should count up the number of new ships, modules, gameplay mechanics and features that have been added since CCP's "Road to Damascus" moment after Incarna. I think you'll find the list is longer than you assume.

As I said, now that they're releasing expansions gradually as point releases, we don't get the big dramatic reveals.


target spectrum breaker anyone?

serious though it would be cool if blops got a bonus to the TSB that made it so it would not break friendly locks...

that would be epic.

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#53 - 2014-02-15 20:16:43 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Well all I can tell you is this: after what they showed us in January, I'm preparing to engage in gameplay that will be new to me.


Tease.

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#54 - 2014-02-15 20:17:34 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Beekeeper Bob wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Almethea wrote:
"balancing 3% here, 2% there
nerf that and that and also that"

taadaa >> new expansion


You should count up the number of new ships, modules, gameplay mechanics and features that have been added since CCP's "Road to Damascus" moment after Incarna. I think you'll find the list is longer than you assume.

As I said, now that they're releasing expansions gradually as point releases, we don't get the big dramatic reveals.


Adding a few new niche ships, dumb modules and fixing mechanics that have been broken for years != an expansion.


Ye ye it's not an expansion unnless it has Pandas in it


true it would get more people on the chinese server if there were pandas.

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#55 - 2014-02-15 20:19:09 UTC
i dunno about you but after 2 years of good fixes and slight changes to the game I am totally ready for a baby jesus feature like the one ccp bagull talked about last year.

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#56 - 2014-02-15 20:32:57 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
i dunno about you but after 2 years of good fixes and slight changes to the game I am totally ready for a baby jesus feature like the one ccp bagull talked about last year.


You're going to get that. She's laid out a development plan, it's realistic, the deliverables are scheduled at a pace that can be delivered with the resources she has now. I'd like it right now too, but I'll settle for a real plan.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Dave Stark
#57 - 2014-02-15 20:39:21 UTC
we should turn malcanis upside down and shake him until he tells us what the plan is.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#58 - 2014-02-15 20:41:55 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
we should turn malcanis upside down and shake him until he tells us what the plan is.


Have you considered just sending me gigantic amounts of ISK?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Dave Stark
#59 - 2014-02-15 20:53:51 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
we should turn malcanis upside down and shake him until he tells us what the plan is.


Have you considered just sending me gigantic amounts of ISK?


yes, but i don't have gigantic amounts of isk. :(
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#60 - 2014-02-15 21:01:24 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
i dunno about you but after 2 years of good fixes and slight changes to the game I am totally ready for a baby jesus feature like the one ccp bagull talked about last year.


You're going to get that. She's laid out a development plan, it's realistic, the deliverables are scheduled at a pace that can be delivered with the resources she has now. I'd like it right now too, but I'll settle for a real plan.



so like over 3 expansions? another 18 month thing?

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.