These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Consent versus Acknowledgment

First post
Author
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#21 - 2014-02-13 18:20:05 UTC
I think it's more about setting an expectation than any of the other **** that has been described here. If you undock with the expectation that someone else is going to blow you up as soon as the loading screen has you outside the station, you are better equipped to prepare for and prevent said blowing up of stuff.

If, on the other hand, you undock without that expectation - well that's on you.

If I shoot an ostrich with a rifle, it isn't going to matter if he has his head in the sand. That ******* bird is going to die.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Notorious Fellon
#22 - 2014-02-13 18:21:56 UTC
Shrewd Tsero wrote:
Batelle wrote:
You're right, however there is a reason people choose to use the word "consent" in this context. Players who describe undocking as "consent" are intentionally misusing the word in order to communicate clearly an important idea. That idea is that consent is never a requirement for pvp, and players should not be surprised or feel wronged by CCP if pvp happens to them without their consent. If you can equate undocking with consent, that eliminates the basis for outrage.


This I can get behind.

It's all probably just trivial semantics anyway to try and make a distinction, but I know that using that phrase riles people up (as evidenced by some of the responses here). Personally, I expect to be engaged whenever I fly about in my ship (a lesson I leared the hard way). I can, however, appreciate when it pisses someone off. Telling them afterward that "they asked for it" just seems douchlike.



The very reason that some people use such language is *because* it *does* rile people up. That is the very concept of trolling. Saying something with the intent to get a rise out of someone; usually something on the extreme end of the discussion that is so marginal it should just be ignored.

Same is true for those who take jabs at someone after they have violenced their spaceship; they are hoping for a response. Generally due to some kind of love-me-daddy issues or attention-whore disorder.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.

Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#23 - 2014-02-13 18:49:10 UTC
Notorious Fellon wrote:

The very reason that some people use such language is *because* it *does* rile people up. That is the very concept of trolling. Saying something with the intent to get a rise out of someone; usually something on the extreme end of the discussion that is so marginal it should just be ignored.


People get riled up by the idea because it challenges their assumptions of what they may be entitled to in the game. Using "consent" is the most direct way to challenge those assumptions. This is not trolling.

Quote:

Same is true for those who take jabs at someone after they have violenced their spaceship; they are hoping for a response. Generally due to some kind of love-me-daddy issues or attention-***** disorder.


You also seem to have missed the "Eve players are psychopaths" thread. Please project your value judgements somewhere else where people will care.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Serene Repose
#24 - 2014-02-13 18:55:05 UTC
Pssst...don't listen to Tippia. Twisted

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

stoicfaux
#25 - 2014-02-13 18:58:14 UTC
Okay, how about this:

I consent to playing in a PvP focused game.
I acknowledge that fact by how I fit my ship or by what cargo I carry or by how I fly.
Do I consent to having my ship blown up? Not really, especially if I was trying to avoid it in the first place.

Probably the only time people consent to have their ship blown up is for things like insurance fraud, or for that FW isk/LP currency manipulation the goons did a while back.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Pok Nibin
Doomheim
#26 - 2014-02-13 19:01:47 UTC
I ACKNOWLEDGE the presence of rattlesnakes on the Mojave.
When I go out there, I don't CONSENT to being bitten by one.

The right to free speech doesn't automatically carry with it the right to be taken seriously.

Notorious Fellon
#27 - 2014-02-13 19:19:00 UTC
Batelle wrote:
Notorious Fellon wrote:

The very reason that some people use such language is *because* it *does* rile people up. That is the very concept of trolling. Saying something with the intent to get a rise out of someone; usually something on the extreme end of the discussion that is so marginal it should just be ignored.


People get riled up by the idea because it challenges their assumptions of what they may be entitled to in the game. Using "consent" is the most direct way to challenge those assumptions. This is not trolling.

Quote:

Same is true for those who take jabs at someone after they have violenced their spaceship; they are hoping for a response. Generally due to some kind of love-me-daddy issues or attention-***** disorder.


You also seem to have missed the "Eve players are psychopaths" thread. Please project your value judgements somewhere else where people will care.


Whether or not you specifically "care" about my posts in no way prevents them from happening. Get off your high horse.

Sending an in game mail, or shouting in local after a pvp match such things as "you suck noob" is poor sportsmanship at best. Look at that; even though Batelle wanted to stop me from posting, it still happened. And I was judging someone's actions. Crazy.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.

Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#28 - 2014-02-13 19:23:14 UTC
Notorious Fellon wrote:

Whether or not you specifically "care" about my posts in no way prevents them from happening. Get off your high horse.


Of course it doesn't prevent them. That's why I said "please" in my post, and phrased as a request rather than a demand.

Quote:

Sending an in game mail, or shouting in local after a pvp match such things as "you suck noob" is poor sportsmanship at best.

See, I agree with you 100%, but this is off-topic.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Clementina
University of Caille
#29 - 2014-02-13 19:29:26 UTC
Really, you don't have to subscribe to this video game. You give your money freely to CCP and in return they let you authenticate to the servers. The game has always been advertized as a place with Player vs. Player combat. You might win said PvP or even lose. It was part of the package that was sold to you, this package is deliverable when you hit the undock button.

When you undock, and fly around the world of Eve you might get blown up; by an ebil pirate, by a fluffy carebear, by anyone in between. Everyone has to deal with this; Me, Tippia, Harkonnan, even you Shrewd Tsero.

If you're mad at losing a ship recently you're probably thinking about things from the prospective of the gankee. Take some time though to imagine yourself as the ganker. There is the thrill of victory for ganking a ship, but also the possibility of defeat if ships get away, or put you down instead, or end up being a trap. Embrace the fighting, once you do some fights become fun even to lose, you'll know the reason why people say the undock button is consent to PvP, and you'll have a much more enjoyable game.

P.S. The original poster does fly some pretty slutty ships.
Galen Darksmith
Sky Fighters
Rote Kapelle
#30 - 2014-02-13 19:30:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Galen Darksmith
Shrewd Tsero wrote:
Batelle wrote:
You're right, however there is a reason people choose to use the word "consent" in this context. Players who describe undocking as "consent" are intentionally misusing the word in order to communicate clearly an important idea. That idea is that consent is never a requirement for pvp, and players should not be surprised or feel wronged by CCP if pvp happens to them without their consent. If you can equate undocking with consent, that eliminates the basis for outrage.


This I can get behind.

It's all probably just trivial semantics anyway to try and make a distinction, but I know that using that phrase riles people up (as evidenced by some of the responses here). Personally, I expect to be engaged whenever I fly about in my ship (a lesson I leared the hard way). I can, however, appreciate when it pisses someone off. Telling them afterward that "they asked for it" just seems douchlike.


It's implicit consent, but it's still consent.

Mainly I see it's use for people who come from other MMOs. In those games, you usually have to choose to "flag" yourself for PvP. Otherwise, no one can touch you without your consent. On PvP server, you are automatically flagged if you leave certain "safe zones": In essence, your consent was automatically given when you chose to roll on a PvP server and leave the safe zone.

In EVE, there is no PvP server, and the closest thing to a safe zone is a station. Hence why, when you undock, you consent to that the fact that your boat MAY be violenced. You're not "asking for it" (and honestly, don't try to equate victim blaming of a horrific real life crime with losing internet space pixels. I'm sure you didn't mean offense, but...), but you've opened yourself up to the possibility. People coming from other MMOs need to understand this important concept.

"EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for." -CCP Wrangler

Shrewd Tsero
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#31 - 2014-02-13 19:48:08 UTC
Clementina wrote:
P.S. The original poster does fly some pretty slutty ships.


You should see what I'm wearing....

It is good to have substance to one's existence.  But in the absence of substance, one can do much yet with style.

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2014-02-13 19:50:01 UTC
I see it as riding a motorcycle. You know that you'll be in an accident, not a question of if, but when. At the same time it's reasonable to expect that not everyone on the highway is going to cut you off or try to hit you soon as they see you.

Stronger individuals will survive a "Lord of the Flies" environment, but I think EVE is enriched by "carebears" as much as it is defined by the "don't trust anyone" mentality.

There are penalties to being too nice though. Your house (EVE) will be filled with freeloaders. Can't have that..

/蘭

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#33 - 2014-02-13 19:53:10 UTC
Galen Darksmith wrote:
Shrewd Tsero wrote:
Batelle wrote:
You're right, however there is a reason people choose to use the word "consent" in this context. Players who describe undocking as "consent" are intentionally misusing the word in order to communicate clearly an important idea. That idea is that consent is never a requirement for pvp, and players should not be surprised or feel wronged by CCP if pvp happens to them without their consent. If you can equate undocking with consent, that eliminates the basis for outrage.


This I can get behind.

It's all probably just trivial semantics anyway to try and make a distinction, but I know that using that phrase riles people up (as evidenced by some of the responses here). Personally, I expect to be engaged whenever I fly about in my ship (a lesson I leared the hard way). I can, however, appreciate when it pisses someone off. Telling them afterward that "they asked for it" just seems douchlike.


It's implicit consent, but it's still consent.

Mainly I see it's use for people who come from other MMOs. In those games, you usually have to choose to "flag" yourself for PvP. Otherwise, no one can touch you without your consent. On PvP server, you are automatically flagged if you leave certain "safe zones": In essence, your consent was automatically given when you chose to roll on a PvP server and leave the safe zone.

In EVE, there is no PvP server, and the closest thing to a safe zone is a station. Hence why, when you undock, you consent to that the fact that your boat MAY be violenced. You're not "asking for it" (and honestly, don't try to equate victim blaming of a horrific real life crime with losing internet space pixels. I'm sure you didn't mean offense, but...), but you've opened yourself up to the possibility. People coming from other MMOs need to understand this important concept.


Well that and the fact we don't have any stupid pandas.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#34 - 2014-02-13 19:56:19 UTC
Please, dig more into dictionary while your pixels go boom.

Invalid signature format

Pew Terror
All of it
#35 - 2014-02-13 19:57:49 UTC
Dont split hairs when all you have is half knowledge, hearsay and conjecture.

If you really want an answer to that question instead of trolling around in the most pedantic nerdway imaginable go ask your lawyer and be done with it.
Josef Djugashvilis
#36 - 2014-02-13 19:58:06 UTC
I tend to think that by undocking you accept that you may be attacked.

This is not a signature.

Maxpie
MUSE LLP
#37 - 2014-02-13 20:00:00 UTC
I think the term you are looking for is 'tacit consent'.

No good deed goes unpunished

Dread Vixen
Dread Vixen's House of Whores
#38 - 2014-02-13 20:21:48 UTC
Galen Darksmith wrote:
In EVE, there is no PvP server, and the closest thing to a safe zone is a station. Hence why, when you undock, you consent to that the fact that your boat MAY be violenced. You're not "asking for it" (and honestly, don't try to equate victim blaming of a horrific real life crime with losing internet space pixels. I'm sure you didn't mean offense, but...), but you've opened yourself up to the possibility. People coming from other MMOs need to understand this important concept.


*love*

best post I seen in a long time! have a like. heck.. have a truckload of likes!
Imiarr Timshae
Funny Men In Funny Hats
#39 - 2014-02-13 20:57:26 UTC
djentropy Ovaert wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Yes.
By undocking, you permit people to PvP you and you agree to fly around in a full-PvP environment.


Yup.

This is how the game works, people.


Undocking, warping to an instaundock and then cloaking until downtime "permits" people to PvP with you? Please tell me how so I can deal with this annoying afk cloakers Blink
Vyl Vit
#40 - 2014-02-13 21:04:01 UTC
Pok Nibin wrote:
I ACKNOWLEDGE the presence of rattlesnakes on the Mojave.
When I go out there, I don't CONSENT to being bitten by one.
The truth of this subtle point (well done, Pok) doesn't seem to appeal to the various agendae spamming the thread.

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.