These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE Online: Rubicon 1.1 Feedback Thread

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Musashibou Benkei
State War Academy
Caldari State
#21 - 2014-01-28 13:09:25 UTC
CCP ninja nerfing coalitions by implementing "standings not showing up" bug.

I LIKE THE WAY YOU THINK, CCCCP!!!
Saavik Ambraelle
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#22 - 2014-01-28 13:14:56 UTC
Titan Tez wrote:
urmm new sisters battle ship guns only ! im caldari damm you ! you ccp devs talk about balance " you don't know what the word means ! Caldari is gutted once again.. Cry

Gallente master race reporting in.
I don't think you understand what a rebalance is if you think introducing the Nestor was part of the balance.

Intoxication is the most effective of warp scramblers.
Needmore Longcat
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#23 - 2014-01-28 13:18:24 UTC
Broken standings? Looking forward to the "my alliance pos killed me" killmails.
Skittles Turisas
Hellsing Arms Weapon Industrials
#24 - 2014-01-28 13:19:45 UTC
War Histories on corps are no longer showing either

- not sure if I double posted this/
hawt weewoo
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2014-01-28 13:23:50 UTC
CCP Gargant wrote:
EVE Online: Rubicon 1.1 has now been released!

1.1 introduces the new Encounter Surveillance System; the Nestor, a Sisters of EVE Battleship; the Micro Jump Unit and the Mobile Scan Inhibitor, two brand new mobile structures; two variations of the Mobile Siphon Units; and a slew of other changes!

Full patch notes are available here.

This thread is for general feedback only. To report issues, please use the EVE Online: Rubicon 1.1 issues thread.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#26 - 2014-01-28 13:25:07 UTC
Georgiy Giggle wrote:
ESS is still a crap.
Increase bounty for 5% so we have our 100% again.
So we could stop crying (about nerfing) and would stop (would not start) using ESS as most of us would not care about this silly structure same as many do not care about new missile launchers for battleships (new missile launchers didn't nerf anything).


Very much this. Seems CCP didn't learn from that misadventure they had when they tried to force people to use the captains quarters instead of making it optional. now it's "use ESS or accept nerf". Nope, it's holler at yall, see you in high sec.
Catherine Kestrel
Everyone vs Everything
#27 - 2014-01-28 13:25:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Catherine Kestrel
So with this patch CCP brought 5 new things (which are totally useless), fixed 10 minor bugs (which many of us didnt know they were in game), but they made 150 new ones, which are even worse. GJ CCP you did it again.
Chaosstation
Mercurialis Inc.
Goonswarm Federation
#28 - 2014-01-28 13:26:24 UTC
Great stuff......patch is ****** and has now borked my client. Thanks CCP
Midgen
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#29 - 2014-01-28 13:27:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Midgen
Love the link that brought me here: EVE Online launcher "Patch successfully Deployed".......O_O
asteroidjas
Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Services
The Possum Lodge
#30 - 2014-01-28 13:29:27 UTC
The "mouse over info pop-up' when comparing ships is still showing the Lore/history of the hulls. Less helpful than say...the 'traits'....which is what i thought was made just for this....strange
Needmore Longcat
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#31 - 2014-01-28 13:29:39 UTC
I tried to leave my captain's quarters, said something about contamination. ccp pls fix
Kalb777
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2014-01-28 13:29:51 UTC
All those complaining never make mistakes right?

Goons ... Persians .... meet the 300!
durka S
Les chevaliers de l'ordre
Goonswarm Federation
#33 - 2014-01-28 13:36:11 UTC
My fedo's have formed an army and raided my panty drawer. CCP please fix/neuter them.
Nira Zork
SAS Veterinarians
#34 - 2014-01-28 13:36:49 UTC
Well as for Feedback, I do not like the Omnidirectional changes at all.

For the Factional ones for example:

Range: 1.30 > 1.24
Tracking: 1.30 > 1.175

This is a big reduce and overloading them is not an option, since most pvp fights last way longer then 20 sec and missions up to 40 minutes, dominix incursions as long as you are being online °°.

And scripts aren't really helping either since fighting with drones effectively as a solo pilot for instance means heavy managing for ranges countering aggro and so forth, switching them on and off to change scripts for different waves too is really a hassle and not why I would chose drones.

My conclusion is a minus all across the board. The reduces tracking could be part of a drone nerf and if it is I could get it and accept it, the change to an active module I don't mind either, since most drone boats have no use for cap so it won't matter, but the nerf to balance overload and scripts is a mistake and bothers me more then any option it might offer.

SadSadSad

For your consideration Ugh
I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
#35 - 2014-01-28 13:37:00 UTC
Kalb777 wrote:
All those complaining never make mistakes right?


This standings 'mistake' potentially affects thousands of people. You ever make a mistake that affected that many people?

Anyway, would love to know the true optimals on my drones now since show info doesn't show it any more with the change to omnidirectionals.
CCP Punkturis
C C P
C C P Alliance
#36 - 2014-01-28 13:37:59 UTC
Skittles Turisas wrote:
War Histories on corps are no longer showing either

- not sure if I double posted this/



thanks, this has now been fixed internally Big smile

♥ EVE Brogrammer ♥ Team Five 0 ♥ @CCP_Punkturis ♥
Arcos Vandymion
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#37 - 2014-01-28 13:45:59 UTC
Titan Tez wrote:
urmm new sisters battle ship guns only ! im caldari damm you ! you ccp devs talk about balance " you don't know what the word means ! Caldari is gutted once again.. Cry


*looks at SoE racials*

Amarr and Gallente - let me get this straight:
Missile users by Priority
1. Caldari
2. ?
3. Minmatar / Amarr
4. Gallente

You'd probably have more luck asking for more missiles on things that are more caldari inspired. Though I see no point for Nightmares launching Mjolnir Rage.
The Nestors graphics leave me way dissapointed - the frig and cruiser look way cooler than that BS.
Maggenta Fox
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2014-01-28 13:47:03 UTC
can we have some info on whats going on with standings being displayed please
Needmore Longcat
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#39 - 2014-01-28 13:50:29 UTC
Maggenta Fox wrote:
can we have some info on whats going on with standings being displayed please


This is actually a little disconcerting. The overviews appear to have them right, though.
Nira Zork
SAS Veterinarians
#40 - 2014-01-28 13:52:31 UTC
Arcos Vandymion wrote:


You'd probably have more luck asking for more missiles on things that are more caldari inspired. Though I see no point for Nightmares launching Mjolnir Rage.
The Nestors graphics leave me way dissapointed - the frig and cruiser look way cooler than that BS.


Yes, not sure anyone is familiar with EVE lore °° SOE aren't really friends with Caldari ... so no reason to expect a missile boat.

Regarding the look, I don't like it either as a battleship and considering the look of the other SoE ships, but as an industrial it could work in the 2001 Odyssey stile.

On graphic representations I have many issues with the chosen designs of the ships and the technological parts and skins, since i prefer as much realism in SciFi as possible and a lot of ships make even superficially no sense at all - but thats for the art department 8).