These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP road to nerfdom continues

First post
Author
Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#61 - 2014-01-28 07:59:56 UTC
Kryptik Kai wrote:
Honestly... HTFU already. There are still ways to pick fights with HS mission runners.

Or hell.. you could pick fights with mission runners in low/null...
Honest question.

Aren't there lowsec people doing this already?

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#62 - 2014-01-28 08:03:30 UTC
Im not entirely sure what you're asking but... SURE! ;)

Improvise, adapt, and overcome. Just don't cry on the forums when a game mechanic changes.

"Shiny.  Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#63 - 2014-01-28 08:11:44 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
Asia Leigh wrote:
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
How is this a nail? I mean seriously. Before Rubicon you never could do this.
CCP's intent is that they have to press a button to start a limited engagement. I have no issues with that, it brings drones in line with every other weapons system, rather than drones having aberrant behaviour with the MTU's & other deployable's. You can still steal their loot, suspect bait them then bump them while yellow to try and taunt them into shooting like you had to before Rubicon.

So yea, HTFU Pirates, this one isn't a slow boil.


^^^ This ^^^

They inadvertently gave you an easy button, and they nerfed it. I see no issues here. You still have all the tools you had before the deployables were introduced in November. OP really needs to stop whining >.>

That's not the point. The point is, they added a new tool and now they're taking it away and taking content away with it. This contradicts the design philosophy many players expect of CCP.

Welcome to my world... pretty much everything they added in 2003 in terms of decent pvp has been taken away... HTFU...

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#64 - 2014-01-28 08:15:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Angelica Dreamstar
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
Kryptik Kai wrote:
Honestly... HTFU already. There are still ways to pick fights with HS mission runners.

Or hell.. you could pick fights with mission runners in low/null...
Honest question.

Aren't there lowsec people doing this already?



Kryptik Kai wrote:
Im not entirely sure what you're asking but... SURE! ;)

Improvise, adapt, and overcome. Just don't cry on the forums when a game mechanic changes.

As you obviously know that there are mission runners in lowsec, I thought you also might know if people of lowsec hunted these mission runners already, thus leaving no room for highseccers. There aren't that many mission runners in lowsec to begin with, as you probably know.

Your response post confuses me. It's as if you had no idea what you were saying.

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#65 - 2014-01-28 08:24:08 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Welcome to my world... pretty much everything they added in 2003 in terms of decent pvp has been taken away... HTFU...
What's been taken away? Mines?
Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#66 - 2014-01-28 08:32:48 UTC
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
Kryptik Kai wrote:
Honestly... HTFU already. There are still ways to pick fights with HS mission runners.

Or hell.. you could pick fights with mission runners in low/null...
Honest question.

Aren't there lowsec people doing this already?



Kryptik Kai wrote:
Im not entirely sure what you're asking but... SURE! ;)

Improvise, adapt, and overcome. Just don't cry on the forums when a game mechanic changes.

As you obviously know that there are mission runners in lowsec, I thought you also might know if people of lowsec hunted these mission runners already, thus leaving no room for highseccers. There aren't that many mission runners in lowsec to begin with, as you probably know.

Your response post confuses me. It's as if you had no idea what you were saying.

The coffee is not yet flowing in my blood, so yeah my brain isn't particularly functional.

Yeah, there are people trying to gank low sec mission runners already. This just means the HS gankers have LS mission runners AND LS gankers to choose from as targets! Big smile

And the adapt/overcome thing wasn't directed at you.

"Shiny.  Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb

Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#67 - 2014-01-28 08:36:50 UTC
Kryptik Kai wrote:
The coffee is not yet flowing in my blood, so yeah my brain isn't particularly functional.
Coffee. Ohhh that'd be great. I haven't slept. Coffee! That'd be so bad! I haven't slept! -.-

Quote:
Yeah, there are people trying to gank low sec mission runners already. This just means the HS gankers have LS mission runners AND LS gankers to choose from as targets! Big smile
Besides the highseccers not wanting to deal with lowseccers ...

... where are these mission runners? How many ? Are we talking one per constellation ... or even less? OR MORE ??? O_O

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#68 - 2014-01-28 08:38:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
As you obviously know that there are mission runners in lowsec, I thought you also might know if people of lowsec hunted these mission runners already, thus leaving no room for highseccers. There aren't that many mission runners in lowsec to begin with, as you probably know.

Your response post confuses me. It's as if you had no idea what you were saying.


There's still plenty of room for highsec pvpers to hunt mission runners in lowsec.

In the factional warfare systems there are few mission runners (often explorers though) but outside the FW systems there are a lot of opportunities to scan down both mission runners and explorers. Many of them are switched on to the dangers though, so it takes work to get them.

The easiest ones to hit tend to be in systems with a highsec connection as it seems highsec mission runners end up in these systems and they aren't as switched on to their own safety and/or they try to run an anomaly in lowsec. They would be quite easy to target for highsec pvpers as they are adjacent to highsec anyway.
Victor Andall
#69 - 2014-01-28 08:40:55 UTC
So let me get the timeline of this thing correctly...

Pre-Rubicon: No way to bait drone aggro into engagement.
Rubicon 1.0: A way to bait drone aggro into engagement for 2-3 months
Rubicon 1.1: Again no way to bait drone aggro into engagement.

So right back to pre-Rubicon.

A downward slope only applies if there wasn't a climb before it, OP.

I just undocked for the first time and someone challenged me to a duel. Wat do?

19.08.2014 - Dinsdale gets slammed by CCP Falcon. Never forget.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#70 - 2014-01-28 08:41:09 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Well its clear CCP has given up the ghost on the HTFU core that made EvE great, as well as documented in detail here they are now doubling-down on Disneyland with the next patch that has a little more nerfing for the little carebears of hisec buried in the patch notes...

Evidently shooting at mobile tractor units owned by a bear with drones out in aggressive mode will *no longer* cause his drones to attack the agressor.

" Drones that are set to aggressive will no longer perform automatic actions against a target if those actions would trigger a new Limited Engagement, unless explicitly instructed to engage that target."

Why?

Because gosh no you cant expect the little bears to use their brains and the right drone setting, they must be bubble wrapped to prevent an inventive pirate from getting a limited agression on them while they are farming mission sites.

I am really getting disgusted with this water-torture drip of hisec nerfs that keep coming and make it abundantly clear CCP has lost the plot. With each one of these it becomes clear they care more about aquiring WoW reject subs, than retaining mine.

F
So to be clear, what you want is to keep ways of forcing a player into a limited engagement they did not want by tricking their drone AI? It's dumb that it ever was a feature in the first place, since it means you either have to manually serve up every target to your drones or risk them getting you into an LE. They either need to change the setting like this, or add a third setting that is to do exactly this while leaving the aggressive one in, and setting the third setting to default.

It seems pretty hypocritical to bang on about how the "bears" are going to have it too easy, while you want to be able to force people that are totally unable to fight you into a fight. Just go out ganking like everyone else.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#71 - 2014-01-28 08:41:11 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Welcome to my world... pretty much everything they added in 2003 in terms of decent pvp has been taken away... HTFU...
What's been taken away? Mines?

Solo in anything medium to large is dead unless you like dying non-stop or only engaging pve ships.
Small gang is almost dead unless you like dying a lot or flying small ****** ships.
Warp to 0 means no more catching people.
Battleships nerfed to complete garbage for anything but fleet fights.
Null sec convoys vanished replaced by insta travel jump drives and bridges.
Stations and POS in every null sec system means everyone has a place to hide before you load local up.

Its a long list... the game which was promised to be harsh and mean has been carebearified to hell... which is why you're here whining you can't kill defenseless mission runners by shooting their MTU's and exploiting a likely unintended feature, instead of out in low sec or null sec like I used to be hunting the same sorts of ships with a decent chance of success.



CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#72 - 2014-01-28 08:46:49 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
which is why you're here whining you can't kill defenseless mission runners by shooting their MTU's and exploiting a likely unintended feature, instead of out in low sec or null sec like I used to be hunting the same sorts of ships with a decent chance of success.
I've never shot an MTU.
KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#73 - 2014-01-28 08:57:46 UTC
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:
This is horseshit.

Yet another nail in the coffin that is being prepped for high security piracy.

vOv

::CCP::
Blame yourself. And the others.


I would, Angelica, however I do not mission bait. Doesn't mean I cannot be sad for those I know who do. And they will abide, as they did before. Most will use the same tactics they used before, and all will be well. It'll suck not seeing LOL mails posted, but that is life.

Hubris and e-peen stroking is what caused this to be changed. Too many laughs, too many tears, and too many hits against too many high value targets. Tbh, CCP should be happy that it exists. Because the 5-10 PLEX that the player bought for that that 1-5bil isk mission ship (or more) is simply money in CCP's pocket, because both you and I know that the loot fairy sucks at times, and we know why that is. Isk sink, plain and simple.

Also does not change the fact that it was a viable mechanic, that CCP acknowledged as a viable mechanic. Drones, while a weapon system, are the only weapon system to feature a passive and aggressive toggle. But rather than changing the drone UI, and how it works, like players have asked for years, they change one small little thing, that quite frankly, played right into the mythos that CCP is trying to create via it's newfound "The Empires Are Losing Control/Empire Vs. CONCORD" lore. If we, as capsuleers, are becoming the controlling entity in New Eden as CCP advertises, would logic not dictate that mechanics such as these should be commonplace?

And most importantly, this was not the first nerf to HS piracy. Hulkageddon, a player created event that a great many took part in, is a relic of the past. Barge buffs made sure of that. Before, you have to choose...isk per hour vs. safety. Risk vs. Reward. The core nature of the game itself. In a game which the developers promote (to the point of ignoring their own EULA), player created content. Sure, MB rose up to replace that, but it is not quite what it used to be. It is a mainstay now. Not a once a year bloodbath.

I mean, let's be honest, during those events, how much press coverage did CCP reap at the expense of those of us who would participate? All due respect to James and Co., but because it has become a permanent profession, it is no longer viable as press coverage...Press coverage, which in turn increases sub numbers. Does curb botting, and afking, though. So that is a plus. But for how long?

Or how about Crimewatch in general? Now, I could see becoming suspect to the corp you stole/baited/whatever from. Even an NPC corp, to be quite honest. At any given time, in numerous NPC channels, there are on average 200+ in the channel. But to become suspect to the entire community? You did not steal/bait/whatever from the entire community. And again, with we supposed demi-gods becoming the controlling power in the universe, what logic does it serve?

Or how about taking player choice/mistakes out of the equation? A green safety takes that away. In my early days I had to learn the hard way that if you shot someone in HS, you were CONCORDED. We didn't have a little green button that kept us from learning from our mistakes. No, instead, we were told to HTFU. Which in turn caused those of us who learned the hard lessons to HTFU, and keep that message alive.

And, most importantly, it begs the question..."What's Next?" Make no mistake, I could care less about the MTU, or the OP's tears over losing a viable, albeit cheap, tactic. Is what it is. I am more concerned about a playstyle many people enjoy.

What happens if war-dec's go away?

What happens when a player can no longer shoot corp members, destroying awoxing?

What happens when shares are removed from the game, preventing heists and hostile takeovers?

What happens when ganking becomes "too much for high sec to bear?"

What happens when all PvP is forbidden in high-sec, essentially Trammel-izing EvE, a game that at it's core, is about PvP?

What happens when the common EvE adage of "When you undock, you consent to PvP" becomes a long forgotten memory?

Where does it end? And is it, or is it not, counter-intuitive to the story/lore/mythos that CCP themselves are trying to sell with their 3-5 year "vision?" If anything, HS piracy should be getting buffed to serve that mythos. Because the nerfing playstyles only takes the player created content out of the picture...like Hulkageddon.

So, by all means, tell me...where does it end?

That, is the real question.

Blink

Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#74 - 2014-01-28 09:11:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
Besides the highseccers not wanting to deal with lowseccers ...


It's a pity. There's just as many skilled pvpers in highsec as there are in lowsec and nullsec, the main difference I have found is not in the skill level but in the style of the pvp.

It wouldn't take long at all for a regular highsec pvper to adjust to a different style if they chose to go to lowsec or nullsec. Similarly, a nullsec or lowsec dweller who decided to go to highsec for some pvp would also have to go through a short period of adjustment. All areas have quality pvpers, but I think it is rare to find someone who is equally comfortable in null, low and highsec as they all have their peculiarities.
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#75 - 2014-01-28 10:03:51 UTC
Your tears are delicious OP. Don't agree with any of your points, improvements in EvE that attract more players are always welcome. If that means we lose your sub cause you can't handle change, then so be it. You can expect EvE to continue to change, expand and evolve, so anyone that can't handle it shouldn't be playing anyway. EvE is designed to appeal to everyone's playstyle, it doesn't conform to any specific viewpoint. The game is what you make of it.

And all of this, because they stopped one method in which you can gank defenceless targets? There is no end to the whining of the gank-bears. They already play EvE on easymode, what else do they want served to them on a silver plate? I suggest you express your opinions of highsec players in the time honoured EvE fashion, by exploding them! Lol

Not that you would actually unsub. People only mean that if they give away their stuff...... Shocked

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Janeway84
Insane's Asylum
#76 - 2014-01-28 10:08:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Janeway84
Can't you still can flip wrecks in the mission to get the mission runners attention? P
Im a bit sad i never got around to trying mission bait myself since i heard it was so easy with the MTU Sad
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#77 - 2014-01-28 10:12:39 UTC
Janeway84 wrote:
Can't you still can flip wrecks in the mission to get the mission runners attention? P
Im a bit sad i never got around to trying mission bait myself since i heard it was so easy with the MTU Sad


Yes you can still can flip to bait mission runners.

The OP is pissed off because after the patch the drones won't automatically begin the LE - allowing the mission runner to make the choice- take the bait or, you know, not.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#78 - 2014-01-28 10:24:00 UTC
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:
because both you and I know that the loot fairy sucks at times, and we know why that is. Isk sink, plain and simple.


I guess it's safe to assume that the rest of your post is inaccurate.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

seth Hendar
I love you miners
#79 - 2014-01-28 10:34:44 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Well its clear CCP has given up the ghost on the HTFU core that made EvE great, as well as documented in detail here they are now doubling-down on Disneyland with the next patch that has a little more nerfing for the little carebears of hisec buried in the patch notes...

Evidently shooting at mobile tractor units owned by a bear with drones out in aggressive mode will *no longer* cause his drones to attack the agressor.

" Drones that are set to aggressive will no longer perform automatic actions against a target if those actions would trigger a new Limited Engagement, unless explicitly instructed to engage that target."

Why?

Because gosh no you cant expect the little bears to use their brains and the right drone setting, they must be bubble wrapped to prevent an inventive pirate from getting a limited agression on them while they are farming mission sites.

I am really getting disgusted with this water-torture drip of hisec nerfs that keep coming and make it abundantly clear CCP has lost the plot. With each one of these it becomes clear they care more about aquiring WoW reject subs, than retaining mine.

F

waah waah, so much whine, Droens are a weapon system, when under green-flag in Crimewatch, it is SUPPOSED to not be possible to start limited engagements, drones circumvented that mechanic.

sorry that your easy-kill button is now working under game mechanics as they were implied to work.

(and no, i dont use drones, hate them for everything, but the people whining about why drones should circumvent crimewatch safety settings need to learn to find real kills instead of sitting aroudn waiting for stupid noobs with loot pinatas)

then set the drones to passive only and automaticaly when safety is set to green.

ho, yeah, in the mean time, this would also prevent AFK missioning, maybe that's why they create yet another "exception".....
KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#80 - 2014-01-28 10:37:14 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:
because both you and I know that the loot fairy sucks at times, and we know why that is. Isk sink, plain and simple.


I guess it's safe to assume that the rest of your post is inaccurate.


Why's that? Because you believe it is safe to assume that a random dice roll to see whether you get loot, is not a mechanic put into place to specifically remove isk from the game? Hence, Isk sink.

C'mon, huh.

Roll

Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.