These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Mobile Tractor Units generating killmails
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Katrina Warsong
Skynet Security Division
#1 - 2014-01-07 19:22:41 UTC
Hello everyone,

When doing some mindless carebearing in l4s some random guy got in and flagged him self in hope of me taking the bait, bothered by my ignorance he destroyed the MTU i had on the field. Didn't bother me either since it had only junk inside. Only later i noticed the loss in my kill mails.

Personally i think it's an unfairly easy +1 kill.

Why don't these things get protected by concord rules?
Why are you free to get a +1 kill on pilot owned object?

Let's be clear, i have nothing against pilots who do this, it's quite a good income and may lead you to a nice billionare ship kill.

I just want to read other people's opinion on this.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2014-01-07 19:24:32 UTC
They do get protected by CONCORD rules.
CONCORD looks the other way if you attack the person who attacks them.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#3 - 2014-01-07 19:24:48 UTC
CONCORD already does too much for Highsec, including leading them to believe that HIghsec is 'safe'.




Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#4 - 2014-01-07 19:26:31 UTC
If you don't want them to get the KM, stop them from killing it.

Oh god.
Dave Stark
#5 - 2014-01-07 19:28:59 UTC
Katrina Warsong wrote:
I just want to read other people's opinion on this.


it's fine.
Almethea
Trans Stellar Express
#6 - 2014-01-07 19:32:06 UTC
i like how the regular " goons pack of sh-it" jump on every post to claim hi sec are too safe.

and before you ask, i never undock so nobody kill my mtu

there's so many thing to fix in eve.... and they fix forum ! GJ! but ok i like it !

CCP Fozzie : AFK cloaking, however, is an entirely social form of power
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#7 - 2014-01-07 19:32:25 UTC
Katrina Warsong wrote:
Why don't these things get protected by concord rules?
Because they're meant to be easy to attack and to work as conflict creators.

Quote:
Why are you free to get a +1 kill on pilot owned object?
Because it makes no real difference.
Dave Stark
#8 - 2014-01-07 19:35:19 UTC
Almethea wrote:
i like how the regular " goons pack of sh-it" jump on every post to claim hi sec are too safe.

and before you ask, i never undock so nobody kill my mtu


i love how everyone that disagrees with a bad idea regarding high sec is a goon.
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#9 - 2014-01-07 19:35:43 UTC
Almethea wrote:
i like how the regular " goons pack of sh-it" jump on every post to claim hi sec are too safe.

and before you ask, i never undock so nobody kill my mtu


Grrrrr Me.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2014-01-07 19:35:45 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Almethea wrote:
i like how the regular " goons pack of sh-it" jump on every post to claim hi sec are too safe.

Funny, all I said was that you get to attack anyone that attacks your MTU. A total lack of CONCORD protection would mean that they'd blow you up for doing so.

Also, nice censor evasion there. That's totally smart. It's not as if people don't already know what word you mean via context.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Almethea
Trans Stellar Express
#11 - 2014-01-07 19:38:50 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Almethea wrote:
i like how the regular " goons pack of sh-it" jump on every post to claim hi sec are too safe.

and before you ask, i never undock so nobody kill my mtu


i love how everyone that disagrees with a bad idea regarding high sec is a goon.


goon or cfc or whatever you want be called (and you can try to hide your true natue by corp jumping, you still a little sma)

there's so many thing to fix in eve.... and they fix forum ! GJ! but ok i like it !

CCP Fozzie : AFK cloaking, however, is an entirely social form of power
Paranoid Loyd
#12 - 2014-01-07 19:39:23 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Almethea wrote:
i like how the regular " goons pack of sh-it" jump on every post to claim hi sec are too safe.

Funny, all I said was that you get to attack anyone that attacks your MTU. A total lack of CONCORD protection would mean that they'd blow you up for doing so.

Also, nice censor evasion there. That's totally smart. It's not as if people don't already know what word you mean via context.


Everyone who says something I don't agree with is a Goon by association.Roll

Grrrr goonsLol

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!
Dave Stark
#13 - 2014-01-07 19:40:59 UTC
Almethea wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Almethea wrote:
i like how the regular " goons pack of sh-it" jump on every post to claim hi sec are too safe.

and before you ask, i never undock so nobody kill my mtu


i love how everyone that disagrees with a bad idea regarding high sec is a goon.


goon or cfc or whatever you want be called (and you can try to hide your true natue by corp jumping, you still a little sma)


not even close to being a goon, that's why i find your comment so hilarious and incorrect.

for some one who didn't undock and get their MTU shot, you sure seem mad.
Almethea
Trans Stellar Express
#14 - 2014-01-07 19:46:33 UTC
yeah yeah, i'm mad or i'm just bored to read always the same argument coming for "your" point of view (trying to stay polite :)

there's so many thing to fix in eve.... and they fix forum ! GJ! but ok i like it !

CCP Fozzie : AFK cloaking, however, is an entirely social form of power
Dave Stark
#15 - 2014-01-07 19:51:16 UTC
Almethea wrote:
yeah yeah, i'm mad or i'm just bored to read always the same argument coming for "your" point of view (trying to stay polite :)



erm, what?
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#16 - 2014-01-07 19:54:37 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
If you don't want them to get the KM, stop them from killing it.


Or kill it yourself? Do you go suspect if you shoot your own MTU? I'll have to try this.
Dave Stark
#17 - 2014-01-07 19:56:36 UTC
Ptraci wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
If you don't want them to get the KM, stop them from killing it.


Or kill it yourself? Do you go suspect if you shoot your own MTU? I'll have to try this.


or just don't deploy it?
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#18 - 2014-01-07 19:57:57 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
If you don't want them to get the KM, stop them from killing it.

^^
This.
Man-up and fight for your stuffs. Or watch it become other peoples' stuffs (including KMs).

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#19 - 2014-01-07 20:01:03 UTC
silens vesica wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
If you don't want them to get the KM, stop them from killing it.

^^
This.
Man-up and fight for your stuffs. Or watch it become other peoples' stuffs (including KMs).


::effort::

Please remember, this is Highsec we are talking about.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Carmen Electra
AlcoDOTTE
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#20 - 2014-01-07 20:10:49 UTC
Katrina Warsong wrote:
I just want to read other people's opinion on this.


Are you one of those who lives and dies by the almighty killboard?

Bacon makes us stronger
123Next pageLast page