These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

You're either with me or against me.

First post
Author
John Caesse
Just Post Inc.
#1 - 2011-11-07 19:02:39 UTC
It seems that by the day the EVE community becomes more and more divided. In every thread, players are splitting off into camps: you are either Highsec or Nullsec, Carebear or PVP, WiS or FIS, etc, etc...

Only a few months ago a shaky unity was formed around the collective frustration at the state of the game. We posted, and crashed trade hubs, and generally raged until we got CCP's attention...

...then CCP did the worst thing they could do; they relented.

They recognized that some pretty big wheels were squeaking and needed some oil, so they got their supplies together and went to work trying to make sure everything would function smoothly again. And for a little while, it seemed like things were back on track.

Then the little wheels saw what happened, and decided they wanted their day. Now every small cause and pet issue has a vocal minority raging on the forums and in game about the importance of their particular gripe. Heaven forbid if CCP decides to focus their efforts on something other than their topic of choice - as a whole we seem to have taken to heart the view that anything done for another area/play style/point of view than the one we champion will negatively impact our cause.

You're either with me, or against me.

The careful ballet of implementing change to a system as large and complex as EVE Online cannot be viewed as a zero sum game. Everything that does not directly benefit you and your game experience does not have to be viewed as a loss.

We have demonstrated the power of a united playerbase, and CCP has shown that they can recognize their mistakes and are willing to listen to the players in order to produce the best experience they can. However, we as players need to recognize that we cannot see all the cards, do not know every detail, and cannot always see what is best for the game. Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.

This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.

So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed.
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#2 - 2011-11-07 19:04:41 UTC
URDEAD2ME
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#3 - 2011-11-07 19:08:40 UTC
John Caesse wrote:
It seems that by the day the EVE community becomes more and more divided. In every thread, players are splitting off into camps: you are either Highsec or Nullsec, Carebear or PVP, WiS or FIS, etc, etc...

Only a few months ago a shaky unity was formed around the collective frustration at the state of the game. We posted, and crashed trade hubs, and generally raged until we got CCP's attention...

...then CCP did the worst thing they could do; they relented.

They recognized that some pretty big wheels were squeaking and needed some oil, so they got their supplies together and went to work trying to make sure everything would function smoothly again. And for a little while, it seemed like things were back on track.

Then the little wheels saw what happened, and decided they wanted their day. Now every small cause and pet issue has a vocal minority raging on the forums and in game about the importance of their particular gripe. Heaven forbid if CCP decides to focus their efforts on something other than their topic of choice - as a whole we seem to have taken to heart the view that anything done for another area/play style/point of view than the one we champion will negatively impact our cause.

You're either with me, or against me.

The careful ballet of implementing change to a system as large and complex as EVE Online cannot be viewed as a zero sum game. Everything that does not directly benefit you and your game experience does not have to be viewed as a loss.

We have demonstrated the power of a united playerbase, and CCP has shown that they can recognize their mistakes and are willing to listen to the players in order to produce the best experience they can. However, we as players need to recognize that we cannot see all the cards, do not know every detail, and cannot always see what is best for the game. Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.

This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.

So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed.



i couldnt of put it better myself .

+1
Morganta
The Greater Goon
#4 - 2011-11-07 19:10:34 UTC
John Caesse wrote:
It seems that by the day the EVE community becomes more and more divided. In every thread, players are splitting off into camps: you are either Highsec or Nullsec, Carebear or PVP, WiS or FIS, etc, etc...

Only a few months ago a shaky unity was formed around the collective frustration at the state of the game. We posted, and crashed trade hubs, and generally raged until we got CCP's attention...

...then CCP did the worst thing they could do; they relented.

They recognized that some pretty big wheels were squeaking and needed some oil, so they got their supplies together and went to work trying to make sure everything would function smoothly again. And for a little while, it seemed like things were back on track.

Then the little wheels saw what happened, and decided they wanted their day. Now every small cause and pet issue has a vocal minority raging on the forums and in game about the importance of their particular gripe. Heaven forbid if CCP decides to focus their efforts on something other than their topic of choice - as a whole we seem to have taken to heart the view that anything done for another area/play style/point of view than the one we champion will negatively impact our cause.

You're either with me, or against me.

The careful ballet of implementing change to a system as large and complex as EVE Online cannot be viewed as a zero sum game. Everything that does not directly benefit you and your game experience does not have to be viewed as a loss.

We have demonstrated the power of a united playerbase, and CCP has shown that they can recognize their mistakes and are willing to listen to the players in order to produce the best experience they can. However, we as players need to recognize that we cannot see all the cards, do not know every detail, and cannot always see what is best for the game. Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.

This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.

So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed.


I've been trying to put this into words for a week now
GJ
+1
MeestaPenni
Mercantile and Stuff
#5 - 2011-11-07 19:12:21 UTC
URDEAD2ME wrote:


i couldnt of put it better myself .


Actually, you could have.

/pet peeve

I am not Prencleeve Grothsmore.

Drifterin Thedark
#6 - 2011-11-07 19:17:22 UTC
This is what the people who believed in CCPs vision for EVE felt when everyone who was against their vision was rioting. Now that CCP has abandoned their vision and the people who wanted to see it are quitting, you're saying they should instead believe in your vision for EVE.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#7 - 2011-11-07 19:19:24 UTC
John Caesse wrote:
You're either with me, or against me.


I am indifferent to you. Just too tired to care any more.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Jita Alt666
#8 - 2011-11-07 19:33:04 UTC
MeestaPenni wrote:
URDEAD2ME wrote:


i couldnt of put it better myself .


Actually, you could have.

/pet peeve


While I agree with the accuracy of your "peeve", I am going to suggest that by using the word "of" instead of the word "have" in the sentence; "I couldn't of put it better myself ." The poster is demonstrating though words and sentence structure that indeed he/she couldn't have put it better. The poor use of grammar adds to the meaning of the post thus creating additional emphasis for those who notice.
MeestaPenni
Mercantile and Stuff
#9 - 2011-11-07 19:41:23 UTC
Jita Alt666 wrote:

While I agree with the accuracy of your "peeve", I am going to suggest that by using the word "of" instead of the word "have" in the sentence; "I couldn't of put it better myself ." The poster is demonstrating though words and sentence structure that indeed he/she couldn't have put it better. The poor use of grammar adds to the meaning of the post thus creating additional emphasis for those who notice.


That's funny.

I am not Prencleeve Grothsmore.

Iceni
Doomheim
#10 - 2011-11-07 19:47:42 UTC
EVE has always been like the OP describes, it's nothing new.

That doesn't make it right of course, but it is how it is and it aint gonna change.

My CQ door will open - Soon™

Brock Nelson
#11 - 2011-11-07 21:24:28 UTC
Crashed Trade Hub? Wanna come up with something more realistic for everyone to chew down?

Signature removed, CCP Phantom

Trainwreck McGee
Doomheim
#12 - 2011-11-07 21:27:26 UTC
Other then that few months where we were all screaming at the top of our lungs for CCP to change directions these boards have always been a QQ about every little thing that ever happens

This will not change and hell it should not change b/c CCP has no idea wtf they are doing.

CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool

non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
#13 - 2011-11-07 21:44:36 UTC
People always seem to have different opinions on everything. Why would it be different with EVE?
Vigdis Thorisdottir
Doomheim
#14 - 2011-11-07 23:10:35 UTC
I agree with the OP. Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets the grease. Most of the time though, he just looks like a whiner and gets ignored. Keep your mouth shut until it really matters. That will lend more weight to your cause than anything you can post on these forums.
Jita Alt666
#15 - 2011-11-07 23:15:21 UTC
Vigdis Thorisdottir wrote:
I agree with the OP. Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets the grease. Most of the time though, he just looks like a whiner and gets ignored. Keep your mouth shut until it really matters. That will lend more weight to your cause than anything you can post on these forums.



Pick your battles. Sage advice.
KFenn
State War Academy
Caldari State
#16 - 2011-11-07 23:22:28 UTC
John Caesse wrote:
It seems that by the day the EVE community becomes more and more divided. In every thread, players are splitting off into camps: you are either Highsec or Nullsec, Carebear or PVP, WiS or FIS, etc, etc...

Only a few months ago a shaky unity was formed around the collective frustration at the state of the game. We posted, and crashed trade hubs, and generally raged until we got CCP's attention...

...then CCP did the worst thing they could do; they relented.

They recognized that some pretty big wheels were squeaking and needed some oil, so they got their supplies together and went to work trying to make sure everything would function smoothly again. And for a little while, it seemed like things were back on track.

Then the little wheels saw what happened, and decided they wanted their day. Now every small cause and pet issue has a vocal minority raging on the forums and in game about the importance of their particular gripe. Heaven forbid if CCP decides to focus their efforts on something other than their topic of choice - as a whole we seem to have taken to heart the view that anything done for another area/play style/point of view than the one we champion will negatively impact our cause.

You're either with me, or against me.

The careful ballet of implementing change to a system as large and complex as EVE Online cannot be viewed as a zero sum game. Everything that does not directly benefit you and your game experience does not have to be viewed as a loss.

We have demonstrated the power of a united playerbase, and CCP has shown that they can recognize their mistakes and are willing to listen to the players in order to produce the best experience they can. However, we as players need to recognize that we cannot see all the cards, do not know every detail, and cannot always see what is best for the game. Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.

This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.

So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed.


+1. Although I will say everything we've been shown so far is needed. However, all this rage about suicide ganking being too easy is ridiculous.

Commanding Officer of the Treacle Tart Brigade

Mariner6
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2011-11-07 23:25:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Mariner6
CCP has rediscovered the old adage: "The customer is always right." Any company that is involved in providing a service that forgets this simple rule, will ultimately fail. The CEO in his letter realized and admitted to that temporary gaff. It would be equally foolish to not have a feedback loop to the company in an attempt to evaluate your product. That feedback loop is represented in the forum mechanic as we all know so well. To ask people to not voice their opinions and camp themselves is like asking: "please stop being human." It is what it is.

CCP will look at all our bitching, camps, politicking, "your with me or against me" etc etc and try to find compromises and solutions that satisfy the largest population base that they can. Their success to navigate this difficult task of making the majority happy will be represented by the bottom line. If they get it right... more players... get it wrong... less players and bankruptcy.

They know that can't make everyone happy all the time. But that's not the goal and they have to have the guts to make the hard calls. Just use prior communication when doing it to ease the blow to the "other camp."

But that doesn't mean people should stop voicing their opinions as vociferously as they want. Indeed a smart CCP would be one that would answer threads more often, even one liners or short responses; even if they said things like "nice idea, but not possible at this time." or something to that effect. When they make each player feel like their contributions and ideas are important it creates a sense of ownership by the player base. The fact that people are as vociferous as they are in their passion for this game is evidence of a loyal and dedicated customer.

Don't ask for less bitching.... just embrace the chaos and friction and make it work for you CCP.

NOW FIX GALLENTE and MY HYBRIDS! Big smile
K Suri
Doomheim
#18 - 2011-11-07 23:34:52 UTC
John Caesse wrote:
Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.

This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.

So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed.

Has it occurred to you that some players are deliberately and repeatedly creating and driving "the sky is falling" topics to reduce the effectiveness of future campaigns as we saw with "Nexgate"?

There is a minority of rebel-rousers (I use the term loosely) - and this includes some 0.0 leadership and some high-sec stirrers - that stir trouble for their own ends, not for the benefit of the game. Add a huge number of newer, less politically savvy players prepared to jump on pony posts just so they feel they "fit" into Eve, the manipluation of these very players is easily achieved. I think someone once called them "the cool guys". Fairly apt I think too.

To counter, those rebellious efforts are being deliberately hidden behind lots of posting smoke to reduce their effectiveness. The people doing this are genuinely concerned about CCP's reaction to short-term riotous behaviour (and subsequent changes based on this short term popularity) rather than CCP keeping their focus on the long-term game.

An RL example of this is Climate Change. Enough people are "anti-climate change" for a variety of reasons and/or agendas and by repeatedly reducing the seriousness of the potential cause and effects, there is enough doubt and uncertainty created forcing the effect of the protest to be watered down. We all know politicians follow the short-term votes, not the long-term future and they won't mandate change if they feel they have not got majority support.

Turning any debate into an "either believe" or "you don't" is great for reducing polarisation and the greatest benefit is that the indifferent voter usually sides with the "you don't" side because he doesn't like being bullied or forced into a position.

TLDR. You counter "sky is falling" spin by creating more "sky is falling" spin. It is an effective method of reducing the effectiveness of any protests by generating tedium in the subject. It's used frequently by spinners in RL.

That's my view anyway.
Cpt Fina
Perkone
Caldari State
#19 - 2011-11-07 23:43:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Cpt Fina
Heated debate is usualy a very good sign that things are not down the drain.
It's when things looks the most grim and fear grab a hold of people that everyone - no matter their background - rallies behind a common goal.


And most changes DOES affect everyone. Wether you notice it or not – increasing another players nominal income – ceteris paribus – is a nerf to your income.
KaarBaak
Squirrel Team
#20 - 2011-11-08 00:40:23 UTC  |  Edited by: KaarBaak
/disagree 133%

This is the most luducrous suggestion I've heard in a long time. It must be the most idiotic concept posted today. It's utter nonsense and if anyone else...especially CCP agrees with th OP, I shall wardec the lot of you and cancel my 8 accounts forthwith.

GOOD DAY, SIR!

Dum Spiro Spero

12Next page