These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

DevBlog Abuse!
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Anthar Thebess
#81 - 2014-01-10 07:39:24 UTC
This is not adapt to die.
It is only about what is better to eve :

- stagnation and big renting empires
- new players able to hit "the old guard" keeping them under constant pressure

Stop discrimination, help in a fight against terrorists

Show your support to The Cause!
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#82 - 2014-01-10 07:45:26 UTC
Tarsas Phage wrote:
Even consider that it's because you don't deserve one?

No, it's because they haven't gotten around to the inevitable capital balance pass yet.
It's not even as if you can pretend it isn't going to happen, since it's an explicit goal of tiercide that every ship in the game be rebalanced.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
hedge betts Shiyurida
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#83 - 2014-01-10 07:50:05 UTC
Goons are just but hurt that they didn't field large slowcat fleets first. You took the obligatory goon I'm great thread away from them.

Pog mo thoin

Anthar Thebess
#84 - 2014-01-10 08:21:42 UTC
But that's the whole point eve is at point where force fielding bigger slowcat fleet can block others from achieving any thing in case of sov war.
Mobility of Slowcat fleet allows small group of players controlling vast area of space.
The only option for new players is to RENT space as they are unable to take it by them self.

My point is to stop this force projection.
If CFC/ SW / N3 will not be able to drop 255 man slowcat fleet in any corner of eve within 1 hour - then , and only THEN new entities will have the ability to grow and take sov.


Why?
Because :
- they will not have to get 1.000 or more people to counteract the capital fleet.
- their ( big coalition ) enemy will have to move larger subcap fleet across regions - this take way more time than dropping slowcats that need only fuel
- without keeping constant deployment in far corners of eve (big coalitions) will have hard time to keep their ground.


Just question to all the people that posted in this thread.

Do you relay want eve nullsec to become one big renting empire ?

Don't tell me *think, act outside ....
The only way to stop bloob of slowcats is to have much , much more bigger bloob - and this leads again to big blue $%@$Y@@!!!



Stop discrimination, help in a fight against terrorists

Show your support to The Cause!
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2014-01-12 21:01:31 UTC
Zulu Death Mask wrote:
ElQuirko wrote:
Zulu Death Mask wrote:
There's quite a few threads about this problem.
CCP seems to be avoiding it like the plague.

I can't find a single dev comment on the issue.
Shocked

I think the only comment will be "Working as intended. Stop crying, wait for tiericide. For now, adapt or die."

After all that sperg about naglfar fleets, the CFC sure are crying hard. Did they not work out or something? And if they did, do you need to whine so much?


I don't think anything can work if one side can crash the node whenever they wish.
And please let's not confuse critique with whining... have we not graduated kindergarden?

The point isn't who will win... it's how the winning is done and whether it includes fun in the recipe ;/

Habloobloo. You know you can petition purposefully causing lag, right?

Dodixie > Hek