These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev blog: Twitch integration is here!

First post
Author
Caldari 5
D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F. S.A.S
Affirmative.
#61 - 2013-12-10 03:31:11 UTC
Tam Althor wrote:
This seems like a real waste of development resources. Putting time into making something that is substandard to any of the 3rd party programs that people already use. Really what is the % of the player base that's even going to bother with this non space game toy?

I'm with you on this dude.

What percentage of the player base is actually going to use this, I doubt that it is even 1%.

For me I can't see any use for it in my game play.

I can see it's uses for EveUni showing people how to do things, but most of the useful Videos are already on YouTube (along with a heap of unuseful ones :) ).

Frankly I had never even heard of Twitch prior to CCP broadcasting Fanfest through it. And the only time I go back to the site is when CCP broadcast something else. Apart from the Alliance Tournaments cause that **** is boring as.

TLDR: A Complete Waste of Dev Resources as far as I'm concerned.
Gilbaron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2013-12-10 04:16:42 UTC
sooo, spectator mode ? :D
Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
#63 - 2013-12-10 04:22:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Yonis Kador
I don't think I agree. Maybe there won't be live streams of all 7500 systems, but I bet the larger alliances will employ cloaky alts live streaming from all the gates bordering their territory. Why bore a dozen players to gate camp when one guy can monitor a dozen gates instead? I'm betting the road between Amarr and Jita will be live-streamed. Certainly all the hubs. I'm seeing the potential for educational streams and tutorial videos sure, but once this really takes off, the potential for reconnaissance and intel are almost limitless. This could become a game-changer. Merc corps contracted to pod specific targets can live-stream the attack back to their clients. Every freighter moving anywhere could potentially be tagged and an intercept party dispatched from one guy loading streams on the opposite end of the galaxy. We could witness the birth of corps entirely devoted to surveillance. I've barely scratched the surface and my brain runs wild with potential scenarios. I've yet to see a tool introduced in this game that wasn't used, abused, and made to function in unexpected ways. And given the ways I've already dreamt up this could possibly be used, I can't wait to see what happens. This is potentially one of the most-powerful tools ever introduced into the client and pretty damn exciting, imo.

YK
Hoarr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#64 - 2013-12-10 04:24:40 UTC
How has no one picked up that CCP Rise was flying on kil2 again in the screen shots? BRING SOLO BACK, PLEASE!
Phoenix Jones
Small-Arms Fire
#65 - 2013-12-10 04:54:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Phoenix Jones
Yonis Kador wrote:
I don't think I agree. Maybe there won't be live streams of all 3000 systems, but I bet the larger alliances will employ cloaky alts live streaming from all the gates bordering their territory. Why bore a dozen players to gate camp when one guy can monitor a dozen gates instead? I'm betting the road between Amarr and Jita will be live-streamed. Certainly all the hubs. I'm seeing the potential for educational streams and tutorial videos sure, but once this really takes off, the potential for reconnaissance and intel are almost limitless. This could become a game-changer. Merc corps contracted to pod specific targets can live-stream the attack back to their clients. Every freighter moving anywhere could potentially be tagged and an intercept party dispatched from one guy loading streams on the opposite end of the galaxy. We could witness the birth of corps entirely devoted to surveillance. I've barely scratched the surface and my brain runs wild with potential scenarios. I've yet to see a tool introduced in this game that wasn't used, abused, and made to function in unexpected ways. And given the ways I've already dreamt up this could possibly be used, I can't wait to see what happens. This is potentially one of the most-powerful tools ever introduced into the client and pretty damn exciting, imo.

YK


1) Those corps already exist (and probably vanished when they realized what it entailed)
2) doing that is BORING AS F**K
3) It would take A LOT of isk to make people commit to that. Even that won't be enough because you cannot AFK that. You have to Actively stare at the screen to see who comes in/out, then figure out who the person is (can't click on their name and see in a stream), and then relay that info to someone who cares.

I don't know if you've ever done surveillance before, but it is time consuming, intel heavy, and boring as hell. This is not infiltration or intel gathering, this is watching someone's afk ALT sit on a gate for 9 hours straight. I can easily tell you this. If someone (or even multiple someones) put up live streams of 20, 30, 40 gates... so what. The entire eve universe now knows Where the Damn camp is, and can either go around, or go kill them. No more running around 30+ systems looking for pew, someone just put there gatecamp on twitch, Onward.

But that is the exciting part. I believe your concern is the random alt streamer. Remember that this isn't some entertaining streaming broadcast, this is some alt, sitting cloaked off a gate for the sole purpose to see who jumps in, and streaming that online.

Now the potential is there for making people quit a corporation if they attempt to mandate something that silly. You would have to......

1) Have to have people actually actively watching all 20, 30, 40 streams all the time to see who comes in and out
2) Hope those people have enough braincells to a) Tag the person, b) Get the name, c) communicate that someones jump in, d) have people in their intel channel actually give a damn.

Like I said, nothing stopped people from doing this, and there are not enough people that would commit the time and accounts just to live stream a few systems 24/7 (or even 8 hours a day). Ontop of that, have people watching it all the time. The threats aren't from 1 or 2 people running through a gate, it's from 300 to 400 people running through a gate. And in all honesty, you would probably know WAY before then that they were coming anyway.

oh wait.. they can Jump Bridge, Titan Bridge, and Utilize wormholes to get to places too....

You want to draft a memorandum to send out to an alliance dictating that each and every person (or maybe just each and every recruit) you have must watch these 20+ streams and report who comes in for 8 hours straight 5 days a week... and you'll have one empty as fk alliance. I'm sure people will try, but the more people try to dictate eve as a 9 to 5 job, the more people will vanish because the directors of the corp and alliance just turned their game into a job.

CTA's is one thing, stating that you have to monitor a bunch of streams and report every tom **** and harry that jumps into a system or you'll be awox'd, kicked, demoted, etc...

Good luck enforcing something like that. Kiss all your players goodbye.

This is self promotion of eve, a good teaching tool, maybe someone will show some fights we don't normally see.

But that is about it.

Yaay!!!!

Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
#66 - 2013-12-10 05:22:21 UTC
The San Diego Zoo has I think 14 webcams pointed at everything from pandas to mole rats. Visitors can only view each feed for maybe 15 minutes because there's a queue and they are always viewed to capacity. That's for 15 minutes to stare at a live feed for just the chance to see a mole rat move around on screen. 9/10 times nothing happens and you re-enter the queue for another shot. You would be amazed at what people will watch anonymously. I don't suppose that anyone outside of a niche group would watch these feeds continuously but if a network of live feeds existed and you were about to move a freighter from Amarr to Jita, for example, why wouldn't you quickly scroll through each of the 9 gates to see if any are being camped if you had the ability to do so? If you usually keep 6 guys on guard duty at 6 gates, doesn't it make just as much sense to have them take turns monitoring all 6 at once if it were possible? The other 5 previously required to do the same job are free to do whatever else they wish now. I didn't suggest anyone be mandated to watch any stream but since it was mentioned, I don't see much difference between requiring them to watch a stream or watch a gate. This is simply a tool like any other tool. All I'm recognizing is that depending on how it's employed, it has the potential to be a game-changing surveillance tool. And you can bet that even if you're unwilling to use a tool in a certain way, if it exists and there's a way to gain a tactical advantage, someone else will.

YK
Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#67 - 2013-12-10 06:44:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Abdiel Kavash
Yonis Kador wrote:
I don't think I agree. Maybe there won't be live streams of all 3000 systems, but I bet the larger alliances will employ cloaky alts live streaming from all the gates bordering their territory. Why bore a dozen players to gate camp when one guy can monitor a dozen gates instead? I'm betting the road between Amarr and Jita will be live-streamed. Certainly all the hubs. I'm seeing the potential for educational streams and tutorial videos sure, but once this really takes off, the potential for reconnaissance and intel are almost limitless. This could become a game-changer. Merc corps contracted to pod specific targets can live-stream the attack back to their clients. Every freighter moving anywhere could potentially be tagged and an intercept party dispatched from one guy loading streams on the opposite end of the galaxy. We could witness the birth of corps entirely devoted to surveillance. I've barely scratched the surface and my brain runs wild with potential scenarios. I've yet to see a tool introduced in this game that wasn't used, abused, and made to function in unexpected ways. And given the ways I've already dreamt up this could possibly be used, I can't wait to see what happens. This is potentially one of the most-powerful tools ever introduced into the client and pretty damn exciting, imo.

YK

You're talking as if streaming was impossible before this. If there was any significant strategic value for the effort required, people would already be doing it.

P.S. using paragraphs makes you look like you passed elementary school.
Gilbaron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#68 - 2013-12-10 06:47:31 UTC
i love how little you guys know about the intel game :D

yeah, we totally watch over our space, don't you know about the massive damage even a single roaming gang can cause to our infrastructure
Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
#69 - 2013-12-10 07:10:16 UTC
It may have been possible before, but it wasn't practical. With every account being able to stream directly from the client, it does become practical. It adds an ability that did not previously exist without 3rd party software. Whether a network of live streams is eventually employed along New Eden's most-trafficked routes, during wardecs, or for any number of special circumstances, remains to be seen, but it certainly wouldn't surprise me to learn that the players took a tool given to them and used it in an unconventional manner.

And if you don't like the way I format my responses, cupcake, don't read them. Your validation was not solicited. I write maybe 4-5 times a month on these forums and I certainly do not do so to appease the anal retentive grammar police.

YK
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#70 - 2013-12-10 07:50:48 UTC
EI Digin wrote:
Quote:
Maintaining an mp3 player inside EVE, while there are much better media players out there doesn‘t make much sense to us. Keep in mind that all code in EVE needs to be maintained. UIs are upgraded, codecs need upgrading, code is refactored, defects need to be resolved. By removing redundant pieces of code from our codebase, we free up engineering time to maintain, iterate and develop other features which are more important and core to the spaceship game EVE. As we move forward with EVE development, iterating and adding features, we have to be ready to cut off dead branches and prune our garden so to speak.

This is what you guys said approximately a year ago.

The rhetoric still holds true, the most important features (delayed streaming, blacking out certain sections of the screen) are impossible as you have researched or just haven't been done yet in this iteration of the client, while there are third-party streaming programs which are much, much better.

There are real reasons why people don't stream EVE. Not having the proper streaming tools is not one of them at this point in time.


Good find. We can't play the game's music within the game because of ~resources~, but now can stream video with a sub-par ingame feature.... pet projects are so much pet projects.Roll

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#71 - 2013-12-10 08:03:44 UTC
From the devblog, streaming simply required implementing the Twitch SDK into EVE. This is much much less programmer work than designing and integrating a full separate application into the client. CCP didn't have to build a full streaming client from the ground up.
Rammix
TheMurk
#72 - 2013-12-10 08:35:49 UTC
If you add streaming, you also need to add an ingame vlc-like videoplayer, or to integrate flash video into the ingame browser.
BTW, IGB needs love, much more love than twitch. And, as a side note, you could add adjustable transparency feature to the IGB - it would make IGB much more usable.

OpenSUSE Leap 42.1, wine >1.9

Covert cyno in highsec: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=296129&find=unread

Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#73 - 2013-12-10 08:41:20 UTC
Rammix wrote:
If you add streaming, you also need to add an ingame vlc-like videoplayer, or to integrate flash video into the ingame browser.
BTW, IGB needs love, much more love than twitch. And, as a side note, you could add adjustable transparency feature to the IGB - it would make IGB much more usable.

CCP should also add an integrated operating system, industrial crane controller, and a coffee maker.
seth Hendar
I love you miners
#74 - 2013-12-10 08:44:43 UTC  |  Edited by: seth Hendar
+1 for the coffee maker, this is long overdue
CCP Rise wrote:
I wish delay was easier to do, it's obviously the most attractive feature addition. Unfortunately it's also the least probable. Currently we can stream straight to twitch from the client without having to taken on any extra server load but to provide delay we would have to store the buffer on our own hardware for a huge scale of players. It would be difficult to say the least, and would likely mean a giant investment in new hardware.

Hopefully getting the option through twitch gets easier over time but for now partnership is the only option.

maybe store the buffer client side?

also, i do stream more or less often, and having the ability to hide part of the screen is, for me, mandatory in some situation.

currently, OBS remains a better alternative to me....
seth Hendar
I love you miners
#75 - 2013-12-10 08:53:04 UTC  |  Edited by: seth Hendar
OutCast EG wrote:
Grandma Squirel wrote:
OutCast EG wrote:
ITT: people who don't understand what an 'entry level tool' is.

An entry level tool includes at least the minimum functionality to make it not suck. That would be like calling a car with a top speed of 20mph an 'entry level car'. Some people may have a use for such a vehicle, but it wouldn't meet the minimum expectations of what people think a car is.

Your analogy is not relevant.

I'm not sure if i want CCP to waste dev-hours reinventing the wheels called OBS and XSplit.

Can it stream? Yes. Does it give you basic quality settings? Yes. Good enough.

I'm not sure if i want CCP to waste dev-hours working on things that nobody will use because it is half baked and ppl will still use OBS (or other) to stream.

especially when there are so many things broken in game

ex: half my fleet was caught "jumping" for 5 minutes yestarday night (a 8 man fleet, i don't watn to know what happen for big fleets of hundreds we hear about sometimes, system not even able to handle 8.....).

on their screen: jump animation loop.

they were still on the system, lockable (and so, killable) but without any control.

some needed to log out and back 2-5 times to actually be able to get control back on their ships.

pretty sure if they ost anything, i already know CCP answer would have been "everything went normal"

FIX your game, then yes, you can waste time on such things.... BUT NOT TILL IT'S DONE FFS
Octoven
Stellar Production
#76 - 2013-12-10 09:02:02 UTC
Want a way to solve the mac integration issue? It is really quite simple it will blow your mind. Stop emulating a client that was designed for a completely opposite OS and make a PROPER client that IS. I mean come on CCP its been what 10 years? Must I compare you to the dark lords over at Blizzard who has successfully made a native mac client for their games including wow. Seems a bit odd you have just given up on that being an option.

At this point you need to either create a native mac client OR stop offering the emulated client because to be honest the current wine emulated crap doesn't work half the time. Eve voice is shot because wine gets in the way of incoming audio signals, the graphics are ****, and the RAM required to play has been increased thus making it a processor hog. If you knew anything about macs the whole concept is to design software that conserves power usage, the current emulation of eve via wine goes against everything the computer is designed to do and thus it tries its best to compensate.
Rammix
TheMurk
#77 - 2013-12-10 09:09:28 UTC
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
Rammix wrote:
If you add streaming, you also need to add an ingame vlc-like videoplayer, or to integrate flash video into the ingame browser.
BTW, IGB needs love, much more love than twitch. And, as a side note, you could add adjustable transparency feature to the IGB - it would make IGB much more usable.

CCP should also add an integrated operating system, industrial crane controller, and a coffee maker.

Hmmm. If you can record video, you also should be able to watch the record and/or the stream. We have IGB which wasn't upgraded for years.

Damn. I have a strong impression that some devs have absolutely nothing to do. If you don't know how to kill time, go revamp the pos system.
Or, if you sincerely want to do something not-so-needed - integrate Teamspeak into eve instead of the crappy eve voice. Even devs have problems using eve voice, not mentioning the players.

OpenSUSE Leap 42.1, wine >1.9

Covert cyno in highsec: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=296129&find=unread

Octoven
Stellar Production
#78 - 2013-12-10 09:14:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Octoven
EI Digin wrote:
Quote:
Maintaining an mp3 player inside EVE, while there are much better media players out there doesn‘t make much sense to us. Keep in mind that all code in EVE needs to be maintained. UIs are upgraded, codecs need upgrading, code is refactored, defects need to be resolved. By removing redundant pieces of code from our codebase, we free up engineering time to maintain, iterate and develop other features which are more important and core to the spaceship game EVE. As we move forward with EVE development, iterating and adding features, we have to be ready to cut off dead branches and prune our garden so to speak.

This is what you guys said approximately a year ago.

The rhetoric still holds true, the most important features (delayed streaming, blacking out certain sections of the screen) are impossible as you have researched or just haven't been done yet in this iteration of the client, while there are third-party streaming programs which are much, much better.

There are real reasons why people don't stream EVE. Not having the proper streaming tools is not one of them at this point in time.


To be honest here I think its the same problem just a different face. Instead of UI upgrades, codec upgrades, code re-factoring, defects resolving to mp3 (audio) they will have to do the same except with video. Furthermore, and I am sorry but this is just my viewpoint, to just toss out a feature half designed in favor of something similar that less people will use is both lazy and terrible dev work on the part of CCP. It is literally wasting valued develop time.

However, you also have to remember:
Quote:
This is probably the most controversial thing we are planning for this release. As part of building a cohesive experience, marrying graphics, design and sound, we want the music to play in context of where you are and what you are doing. This means separate playlists for hisec, losec and zerosec. Hisec will contain the more bright and jovial tracks for the eve soundtrack, while losec will contain the more darker tracks from the existing playlist. Zerosec and W-space will be darker and more ominous. We‘ve created new, highly atmospheric musical soundscapes (for this we invented a whole new paradigm – the so called „muscape“ J) for zerosec, that‘s partially procedurally done, with 20 base tracks that have around 500 permutations to them. Those new tracks will change and become even darker and more moody in systems that have seen a number of players ships destroyed in the last 24 hours.


In essence, we at CCP shall henceforth dictate what you will listen to...in a sandbox game where you can do almost anything except choose your own music.
Octoven
Stellar Production
#79 - 2013-12-10 09:20:23 UTC
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
Rammix wrote:
If you add streaming, you also need to add an ingame vlc-like videoplayer, or to integrate flash video into the ingame browser.
BTW, IGB needs love, much more love than twitch. And, as a side note, you could add adjustable transparency feature to the IGB - it would make IGB much more usable.

CCP should also add an integrated operating system, industrial crane controller, and a coffee maker.


Can we get a free sofa with every ship too?!
Rammix
TheMurk
#80 - 2013-12-10 09:29:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Rammix
Octoven wrote:
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
Rammix wrote:
If you add streaming, you also need to add an ingame vlc-like videoplayer, or to integrate flash video into the ingame browser.
BTW, IGB needs love, much more love than twitch. And, as a side note, you could add adjustable transparency feature to the IGB - it would make IGB much more usable.

CCP should also add an integrated operating system, industrial crane controller, and a coffee maker.


Can we get a free sofa with every ship too?!

You didn't get the sofa?? You should sue those who sold you that ship.

OpenSUSE Leap 42.1, wine >1.9

Covert cyno in highsec: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=296129&find=unread