These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014

First post First post First post
Author
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#281 - 2013-12-03 01:13:03 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:

Promiscuous Female wrote:
incidentally the addition of bastion mode relieved a significant tank requirement from Marauders, and the introduction of the mobile tractor unit means that you don't even have to stick around to loot the L4

if it looks like a highsec buff and quacks like a highsec buff


Does bastion mode not work in nullsec? That's news. I also thought mobile tractors worked in nullsec. Strange. Perhaps you should file a bug report.

Bastion mode is suicide in nullsec but thanks for playing
Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#282 - 2013-12-03 01:18:16 UTC
Promiscuous Female wrote:
Except for the fact that there are two (three? not sure if the third one got converted back) L4 agents in Osmon for SOE compared to all of one in X-7, meaning that a highsec dude is able to stack missions and earn way more purchasing power than the nullsec dude can


Boohoo. You are already in nullsec while you do this, giving you access to all manner of other revenue streams, and that singular L4 agent will give substantially more LP/hour than anything in highsec.

Also: SoE ships are a bubble. It's not like this profitability will last forever. The market is self correcting.

Promiscuous Female wrote:
Bastion mode is suicide in nullsec but thanks for playing


Interesting. You must not have any friends or support, being in goonswarm and all.

Also, this still leaves the problem of mobile tractor units apparently not working in nullsec Roll. Don't forget to file a bug report!
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#283 - 2013-12-03 01:19:53 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:
Promiscuous Female wrote:
Except for the fact that there are two (three? not sure if the third one got converted back) L4 agents in Osmon for SOE compared to all of one in X-7, meaning that a highsec dude is able to stack missions and earn way more purchasing power than the nullsec dude can


Boohoo. You are already in nullsec while you do this, giving you access to all manner of other revenue streams, and that singular L4 agent will give substantially more LP/hour than anything in highsec.

Also: SoE ships are a bubble. It's not like this profitability will last forever. The market is self correcting.

Promiscuous Female wrote:
Bastion mode is suicide in nullsec but thanks for playing


Interesting. You must not have any friends or support, being in goonswarm and all.

Also, this still leaves the problem of mobile tractor units apparently not working in nullsec Roll. Don't forget to file a bug report!

The loot value of highsec missions vastly outweighs the loot value of the average nullsec anom, making the MTUs a much better tool for highsec

there's a reason why L4 mission runners loot things religiously and no one in nullsec bothers
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#284 - 2013-12-03 01:20:19 UTC
Promiscuous Female wrote:

Except for the fact that there are two (three? not sure if the third one got converted back) L4 agents in Osmon for SOE compared to all of one in X-7, meaning that a highsec dude is able to stack missions and earn way more purchasing power than the nullsec dude can

1. No there is only 1 lvl 4 combat agent in Osmon for SOE.
2. Stacking Combat missions hardly makes a difference, it might save you a couple of jumps, however the time to do said mission still matters.
3. SOE income is a very short lived thing due to a new release of ships designed for Low Security use.
4. Risk has been significantly increased due to the popularity providing a very easy hunting ground for Gankers.

So.... Osmon is not a magical font of all isk in EVE. It's certainly not better than Null Sec ratting when Null Sec is done right.
Also, oh no, High Sec can make an income! We must Nerf them till they are so poor they can't afford to do anything if they live in highsec! Because, really, that's what you are coming off like.
It's blatantly obvious you aren't interested in discussing actual figures and are just trying to scream anyone suggesting that High Sec doesn't need a nerf out of the thread. There is nothing wrong with High Sec players being able to turn a good income.

As I've said in a number of threads, all systems need more overall content, (Missions needing a redesign in my mind also). To allow for higher population density, and sure, Null needs buffs in certain areas. Buffing however does not = power creep. Power creep is when you buff something because something else is better. Not because something is poor. And in this case Null is poor in certain aspects and needs a significant buff to those.
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#285 - 2013-12-03 01:20:42 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:

Promiscuous Female wrote:
Bastion mode is suicide in nullsec but thanks for playing

Interesting. You must not have any friends or support, being in goonswarm and all.

http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/item.php?type_id=28646
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#286 - 2013-12-03 01:23:12 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Promiscuous Female wrote:

Except for the fact that there are two (three? not sure if the third one got converted back) L4 agents in Osmon for SOE compared to all of one in X-7, meaning that a highsec dude is able to stack missions and earn way more purchasing power than the nullsec dude can

1. No there is only 1 lvl 4 combat agent in Osmon for SOE.

http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/sisters-of-eve-temporarily-promote-two-agents/
Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#287 - 2013-12-03 01:24:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Pinky Hops
I don't know a single mission runner who realistically claims that it's more profitable than nullsec activity.

It isn't.

I only see a singular group/alliance claiming that in this thread, which they seem to be doing under guise while they beg/ask for free gimme gimmes (which I find pathetic)
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#288 - 2013-12-03 01:24:53 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Promiscuous Female wrote:

Except for the fact that there are two (three? not sure if the third one got converted back) L4 agents in Osmon for SOE compared to all of one in X-7, meaning that a highsec dude is able to stack missions and earn way more purchasing power than the nullsec dude can

1. No there is only 1 lvl 4 combat agent in Osmon for SOE.
2. Stacking Combat missions hardly makes a difference, it might save you a couple of jumps, however the time to do said mission still matters.
3. SOE income is a very short lived thing due to a new release of ships designed for Low Security use.
4. Risk has been significantly increased due to the popularity providing a very easy hunting ground for Gankers.

So.... Osmon is not a magical font of all isk in EVE. It's certainly not better than Null Sec ratting when Null Sec is done right.
Also, oh no, High Sec can make an income! We must Nerf them till they are so poor they can't afford to do anything if they live in highsec! Because, really, that's what you are coming off like.
It's blatantly obvious you aren't interested in discussing actual figures and are just trying to scream anyone suggesting that High Sec doesn't need a nerf out of the thread. There is nothing wrong with High Sec players being able to turn a good income.

As I've said in a number of threads, all systems need more overall content, (Missions needing a redesign in my mind also). To allow for higher population density, and sure, Null needs buffs in certain areas. Buffing however does not = power creep. Power creep is when you buff something because something else is better. Not because something is poor. And in this case Null is poor in certain aspects and needs a significant buff to those.


Highsec is better than nullsec so...

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#289 - 2013-12-03 01:25:13 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:
I don't know a single mission runner who realistically claims that it's more profitable than nullsec activity.

It isn't.

I only see a singular group/alliance claiming that in this thread, which they seem to be doing under guise while they beg/ask for free gimme gimmes (which I find pathetic)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#290 - 2013-12-03 01:27:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Weaselior wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
The only thing I will comment on as to what has been discussed in the last few pages is the assertion that it is far too easy to project massive amounts of power in Null Sec.

This is exactly true and has been a literal Pandora's Box of trouble since the system was introduced, and it is far too difficult to disrupt this ability.

Hopefully this is one of the "chunks" that will be dealt with in the near future.

I largely agree with this, though I'm not really sure how to fix it without utterly breaking basic 0.0 <-> highsec logistics. Geography is no barrier in the current meta, and so every war is a world war. That eliminates the ability of small entities to break into 0.0 and grow away from the big guys.

I think 0.0 <-> highsec logistics can survive some pretty significant changes in that regard.

Long before Jump Freighters were introduced we were running full on escorted logistics caravans. These runs often ended in (or entailed en route) confrontations that were quite tense. It's a lot more difficult to keep a group of freighters alive than it is to kill them. It was often pretty enjoyable for all concerned, and a good source of conflict (or at least a prime opportunity for a show of force to the locals). It also encouraged the growth of local trade hubs.

I personally don't mind a long trip, if the odds are decent there will be action along the way.

However I also recognize that there are many who would get very upset if things went back to that all the time, and I understand why they would feel that way.

That's why I'm a fan of making it easier to interdict "easy" travel modes without taking them away completely. That way life is easy and profitable in times of peace, but can quickly become much more difficult and dangerous (but by no means impossible) thru a modest effort on the part of an adversary.

The key being it is just as easy for you to interdict their easy travel modes, and their ability to focus large fleets quickly and easily. This encourages smaller, faster moving groups on both sides... and provides more objectives and targets for smaller scale combat.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#291 - 2013-12-03 01:27:20 UTC
Promiscuous Female wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:
I don't know a single mission runner who realistically claims that it's more profitable than nullsec activity.

It isn't.

I only see a singular group/alliance claiming that in this thread, which they seem to be doing under guise while they beg/ask for free gimme gimmes (which I find pathetic)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum


Let's look at the development of this thread.

It started out as people talking about sov mechanics, which is valid.

It progressed into people talking about how "terrible" the income in nullsec was. All of the people with this opinion are from the same group.

This complaining/whining was packaged along with suggestions to make nullsec more profitable. This group happens to have a lot of control over various spaces of nullsec.

Aka: Begging for free gimme gimmes.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#292 - 2013-12-03 01:29:07 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:
I don't know a single mission runner who realistically claims that it's more profitable than nullsec activity.

It isn't.

I only see a singular group/alliance claiming that in this thread, which they seem to be doing under guise while they beg/ask for free gimme gimmes.


You know one now.

Smaller initial outlay, much less attention paid, nearly comparable income. (especially the LP)

I can multibox a trading/hauling/PI alt and a ninja salvager while missioning without any real strain on my attention to further increase my isk/hr.

It's more profitable than finding and running anoms while having to scout and watch my ass. Easier too, I am less likely to take a billion isk hit from losing my ship, since it's just about impossible to actually die in highsec now if you are awake.

I do this with 2, sometimes 3 wardecs active, and I have NEVER once died doing it. Almost as much isk, next to no risk.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#293 - 2013-12-03 01:31:03 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:

It progressed into people talking about how "terrible" the income in nullsec was. All of the people with this opinion are from the same group.


as a reminder you're a highsec pubbie who is claiming their opinion is valid because they're secretly in nullsec

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#294 - 2013-12-03 01:34:31 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:

It progressed into people talking about how "terrible" the income in nullsec was. All of the people with this opinion are from the same group.


as a reminder you're a highsec pubbie who is claiming their opinion is valid because they're secretly in nullsec


1) I don't play in highsec.

2) One of these days I am going to make a goonswarm insult generator. It shouldn't take too many lines of code. The only ones I ever see are "pubbie" "sperglord" and "go biomass"

3) I don't understand the "secret" comment.
Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#295 - 2013-12-03 01:35:55 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:
I don't know a single mission runner who realistically claims that it's more profitable than nullsec activity.

It isn't.

I only see a singular group/alliance claiming that in this thread, which they seem to be doing under guise while they beg/ask for free gimme gimmes.


You know one now.

Smaller initial outlay, much less attention paid, nearly comparable income. (especially the LP)


Ah ha. Nearly. So, basically. it's not as profitable as nullsec.

Got it.
Stahlregen
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#296 - 2013-12-03 01:36:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Stahlregen
Pinky Hops wrote:
Promiscuous Female wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:
I don't know a single mission runner who realistically claims that it's more profitable than nullsec activity.

It isn't.

I only see a singular group/alliance claiming that in this thread, which they seem to be doing under guise while they beg/ask for free gimme gimmes (which I find pathetic)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum


Aka: Begging for free gimme gimmes.


~citation needed~

EVERY MORNING I WAKE UP AND OPEN PALM SLAM A VHS INTO THE SLOT. IT'S CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK AND RIGHT THEN AND THERE I START DOING THE MOVES ALONGSIDE THE MAIN CHARACTER, RIDDICK. I DO EVERY MOVE AND I DO EVERY MOVE HARD. MAKIN' WHOOSHING SOUNDS WHEN I SLAM DOWN SOME NECRO BASTARDS. NOT MANY CAN SAY THEY ESCAPED THE GALAXY'S MOST DANGEROUS PRISON. I CAN.

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#297 - 2013-12-03 01:37:21 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:
Weaselior wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:

It progressed into people talking about how "terrible" the income in nullsec was. All of the people with this opinion are from the same group.


as a reminder you're a highsec pubbie who is claiming their opinion is valid because they're secretly in nullsec


1) I don't play in highsec.

2) One of these days I am going to make a goonswarm insult generator. It shouldn't take too many lines of code. The only ones I ever see are "pubbie" "sperglord" and "go biomass"

3) I don't understand the "secret" comment.


~Citation Needed~

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#298 - 2013-12-03 01:37:34 UTC
Stahlregen wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:
Promiscuous Female wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:
I don't know a single mission runner who realistically claims that it's more profitable than nullsec activity.

It isn't.

I only see a singular group/alliance claiming that in this thread, which they seem to be doing under guise while they beg/ask for free gimme gimmes (which I find pathetic)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum


Let's look at the development of this thread.

It started out as people talking about sov mechanics, which is valid.

It progressed into people talking about how "terrible" the income in nullsec was. All of the people with this opinion are from the same group.

This complaining/whining was packaged along with suggestions to make nullsec more profitable. This group happens to have a lot of control over various spaces of nullsec.

Aka: Begging for free gimme gimmes.


~citation needed~


Read the thread.

I could quote every single post in the thread as a citation, but that would just double the length of the thread and probably make the moderators angry.
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#299 - 2013-12-03 01:37:39 UTC
Okay I am back to this one, I had to pick some low-hanging fruit in replies below this one first

Nevyn Auscent wrote:

1. No there is only 1 lvl 4 combat agent in Osmon for SOE.
2. Stacking Combat missions hardly makes a difference, it might save you a couple of jumps, however the time to do said mission still matters.
3. SOE income is a very short lived thing due to a new release of ships designed for Low Security use.
4. Risk has been significantly increased due to the popularity providing a very easy hunting ground for Gankers.


stacking combat missions is extremely effective because it's not just the mission runner who is doing it -- it's the mission runner and a variable and asymptotically infinite number of additional accounts in alpha clone pods who leech standings by being in fleet with the mission runner, then go and bookmark the combat sites and come back, allowing for, again, an asymptotically infinite number of missions that can be chained together

furthermore, this behavior is often botted, even if the mission running is not, and it's very difficult to differentiate from legitimate play

regarding SOE income -- SOE LP has been 2000 isk/LP since time immemorial, there's little indication that the addition of additional rewards is somehow going to lower this conversion rated
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#300 - 2013-12-03 01:38:04 UTC
Promiscuous Female wrote:
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Promiscuous Female wrote:

Except for the fact that there are two (three? not sure if the third one got converted back) L4 agents in Osmon for SOE compared to all of one in X-7, meaning that a highsec dude is able to stack missions and earn way more purchasing power than the nullsec dude can

1. No there is only 1 lvl 4 combat agent in Osmon for SOE.

http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/sisters-of-eve-temporarily-promote-two-agents/

Neither of which are in Osmon. Given your lack of ability to even use an agent finder, you apparently are utterly unqualified to talk about Lvl 4 missioning.