These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

An actual thread to discuss AFK cloaking, without discussing local

First post
Author
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1 - 2013-11-30 21:26:47 UTC
This thread is for people to discuss what options there are to deal with AFK cloaking. Most threads of this nature get instantly filled up by the guys stating that they want local removed. While this is valid, there is currently another thread designed to discuss this, where all other ideas instantly get trolled by people stating "local has to be removed, waah".

So this thread is simple. It's here to disucss ideas to remove AFK cloaking that do NOT involve the removal of local.

ISDs, I'd like to request that this not get merged with Tecko Pech's thread, as that is a discussion about the removal of local, not about the removal of AFK cloaking, so this is not a duplicate. I'd also like to ask you to help keep this thread on track by removing any discussion of removing local as off topic, since It's clearly stated here that this thread is not to discuss that.

Now the idea I support for removing the ability to AFK cloak is to implement an AFK timer that warps you to deadspace (like logging off) without actually logging you off, makes you unscannable and marks you as AFK in local. Upon returning to your keyboard, you get e-warped back to where you were. This would have minimal impact on active players and any client interaction would prevent you getting warped out.

Please discuss below your thoughts on what ideas you think would be best of dealing with AFK cloakers.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-11-30 21:32:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Astroniomix
What is it with you and your gods damned fetish for "AFK" flags.

Why do they have to be moved to a random location? Isn't marking them as "AFK" enough, or are you worried that people might find a way to turn your "AFK" flag against you?

Also the entire premise of this thread is moronic, you want to discuss something whilst ignoring the thing it is used to counter.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2013-11-30 21:38:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
Hey guys, I made this thread thats really the same as the rest but I'm going to ask ISD not to put it in the "same as the rest" pile because I feel like I'm a snow flake.

Theres even a gigantic thread for it.

So here let me help:


1) they wont be adding an AFK time out feature to EVE, people have been asking for it for years, and theres never been any traction, if I want to sit still and stare at the prettiness of EVE space without touching my computer at all for 20 hours that is my right as a paying subscriber.

2) the local discussion which you brush aside and say 'we're not talking about that here' is tied into the AFK cloaker discussion permanently, you can't simply dismiss it out of hand because it doesn't fit your narrative. If Local weren't there you'd never know the guy was in your system. If you feel threatened by a guy just standing around then i feel bad for you in public places.

3) ISD won't listen, this will get locked and or shuffled in with the rest because thats exactly what it deserves to have happen, you're not putting through any new or unique ideas, you're rehashing things that have been suggested a dozen times before (theres even a list).

4) The ability to wage psychological warfare in EVE is a legitimate tactic, you don't get to tag that person so you know he's safe and thus ruin that entire meta.

Sorry, work it out boss, is he there, or isn't he, I guess you'll h ave to work with other people to sort that out.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#4 - 2013-11-30 21:40:41 UTC
Before presenting any solution, you must present the problem.

You (and all who have gone before you) have singularly failed to demonstrate what actual problem this solves except making EVE safer; which I'm pretty all but the careiest of bears are against.


So - what problem are you 'solving' here?
Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-11-30 21:44:15 UTC
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
Before presenting any solution, you must present the problem.


I'll actually bite on this one.

The interaction between local's member list and people who may or may not be active and are also not blue to the residents, results in a stale mate which, while relatively balanced, is boring.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#6 - 2013-11-30 21:52:53 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Hey guys, I made this thread thats really the same as the rest but I'm going to ask ISD not to put it in the "same as the rest" pile because I feel like I'm a snow flake.
This is not the same. The other thread is entirely about local. It's impossible for anyone to discuss any other suggestions. Read it. There over 160 pages and on every single page is posts stating that the ONLY solution is removing local, then heavy trolling of anyone that disagrees.

Honestly, all opinions are valid and deserve discussion. If you don't want to discuss them, then go find another thread.

Grath Telkin wrote:
1) they wont be adding an AFK time out feature to EVE, people have been asking for it for years, and theres never been any traction, if I want to sit still and stare at the prettiness of EVE space without touching my computer at all for 20 hours that is my right as a paying subscriber.
By that logic, they won;t remove local. And in fact they won;t ever nerf anything. So why aren;t you going to every thread discussing the nerf of anythign and posting this tehre?

Grath Telkin wrote:
2) the local discussion which you brush aside and say 'we're not talking about that here' is tied into the AFK cloaker discussion permanently, you can't simply dismiss it out of hand because it doesn't fit your narrative. If Local weren't there you'd never know the guy was in your system. If you feel threatened by a guy just standing around then i feel bad for you in public places.
No it's not. It's a post trying to ridicule all other ideas that should have been closed as a troll post to start with that has run on for 160 pages of trolling.

Grath Telkin wrote:
3) ISD won't listen, this will get locked and or shuffled in with the rest because thats exactly what it deserves to have happen, you're not putting through any new or unique ideas, you're rehashing things that have been suggested a dozen times before (theres even a list).
I disagree. The other thread is a troll thread talking about local. It's not discussing AFK cloaking at all. If anything, it should be merged with Nikk's thread since they are about the same thing. The rules are there to stop duplicate discussions. This is not that. This is an actual discussion about the topic, rahter than a troll thread to attack people with ideas about it.

Grath Telkin wrote:
4) The ability to wage psychological warfare in EVE is a legitimate tactic, you don't get to tag that person so you know he's safe and thus ruin that entire meta.
AFK playing is not psychological warfare. It's not playing the game, but at the same time removing content.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#7 - 2013-11-30 21:54:30 UTC
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
Before presenting any solution, you must present the problem.

You (and all who have gone before you) have singularly failed to demonstrate what actual problem this solves except making EVE safer; which I'm pretty all but the careiest of bears are against.

So - what problem are you 'solving' here?
The issue is that players that are not at their PC are able to present themselves as a threat 24/7. I am a believer that in order to play the game you should actually have to play the game. If not, then they should just replace us all with AI and we can just log in once a week to see what our AI did.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#8 - 2013-11-30 21:56:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Mike Voidstar
The problem is with infinite and uncounterable threat projection. The problem is made worse in that it's possible to do this in ships that cost pocket change with alts that take almost no time to train to be effective doing it.

As requested, I won't get into local being just as bad in the other direction, though it totally is. However, a local-like function is completely logical in a sci-fi game, though perhaps it should depend on a combination of skill, ship, and sensory equipment.

The problem of tackle being completely effective if landed with few reasonable counters, the disparity between PVP and PVE combat styles that render PVE ships dead upon engaging and therefore having zero reason to even try and stay and fight once a hostile is detected anywhere in system is also tied into this.

In the end the real problems lie with initiative. The only meaningful decision to be made is to engage or not to engage, with anyone not actively seeking PvP being reduced to victims rather than players. There is no balancing decision to defend or not to defend, because defense in EVE is almost always an automatic loss unless you are looking for PvP activity.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2013-11-30 22:01:55 UTC
It is impossible to address AFK cloaking without addressing local chat, one exists because the other is there.

At the most basic level, if local did not exist neither would AFK cloaking.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#10 - 2013-11-30 22:09:00 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
No it's not. It's a post trying to ridicule all other ideas that should have been closed as a troll post to start with that has run on for 160 pages of trolling.


I take it you missed the whole thing on cynos.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#11 - 2013-11-30 22:09:21 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
It is impossible to address AFK cloaking without addressing local chat, one exists because the other is there.

At the most basic level, if local did not exist neither would AFK cloaking.
Well no, it's not at all impossible. There are several ideas that address the issue without touching local.
What you really mean is it's your preference to discuss local, which is fine, however this thread is not for that. The other thread is. This one is to discuss alternative solutions.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#12 - 2013-11-30 22:16:29 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
It is impossible to address AFK cloaking without addressing local chat, one exists because the other is there.

At the most basic level, if local did not exist neither would AFK cloaking.
Well no, it's not at all impossible. There are several ideas that address the issue without touching local.
This one is to discuss alternative solutions.

You don't want a "solution" you want it to be impossible for people to affect you.

Honestly I say let CCP implement your terrible idea, I just want to point and laugh when you come back crying because they aren't as AFK as you think they are.
Linkxsc162534
Silent Scourge
#13 - 2013-11-30 22:17:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Linkxsc162534
HEHEHEHE. AFK without local. Well seeing as the only reason you know the AFK cloaky is there is because of local. Ofcourse local needs to come into the argument somewhere.


Now as far as methods to deal with AFK cloaking.

First, mine at gravmetrics, not regular belts. They'll have to pop probes if they're gonna find your miners at all. And then there you have an early warning system to them attacking miners. You might fail though, they may have scanned down that site earlier. But risk/reward. Perhaps you could make sure your miners have a webber with them so they can warp out quick


Edit. Wow I've been out of game a while, so WTF you don't need probes to get to ore sites anymore. Well thats effed. Guess you win this 1 cloakys, Still can aboid ship death against a bomber pretty easy. Like really, just have a cane loaded with med artys and sebos and down the bomber before he can get a second volley off.


Second, when doing anoms/plexes, don't sit on warpin. Move around all the time. MJDs are a wonderful addition to the game, embrace them. What your afraid of a bomber or 2 downing your precious ratting battleship? I dunno, I'm pretty sure most of the ships I fly would be hard pressed to be taken out by a bomber in the time it takes a friend of mine to arrive in a rifter to eat the bomber. Also light drones are nice. As far as hot drops. With 1 cloaker, how can they hot drop you? Theyd need to decloak and pop their cyno, to do anything. And if they are running their cyno, then they definitely aren't scramming you.

Third, PVP. Well seeing as any good group will have a handful of cloakers spread around their area to look for attackers/ scout for targets ANYWAYS, quit your whining.


Seriously, its always AFK cloakers. They pose 0 immediate threat to players who pay attention. Sorry, you can't AFK mine for hours if theres 1 in your system. But even then, switch from your hulk to a Covenator, or the 1 laser ones with the huge tank. The few mil to replace a t1 mining barge are pennys to the cost of your whole mining fleet hiding because theres 1 person in system, somewhere.
And what, so they can provide intel to a roving gang? Maybe you should get a better intel network amongst yourselves and your neighbors so you can see these gangs coming. Then when you see local spike with nonblues, then you go into hiding. Quit whining about people who aren't even there/are usually alts to someone else sitting in a system ratting
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#14 - 2013-11-30 22:19:47 UTC
Astroniomix wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
It is impossible to address AFK cloaking without addressing local chat, one exists because the other is there.

At the most basic level, if local did not exist neither would AFK cloaking.
Well no, it's not at all impossible. There are several ideas that address the issue without touching local.
This one is to discuss alternative solutions.

You don't want a "solution" you want it to be impossible for people to affect you.

Honestly I say let CCP implement your terrible idea, I just want to point and laugh when you come back crying because they aren't as AFK as you think they are.
Look.
I want to discuss alternative solutions. I really don't care how valid you think they are.
Now, if you want to discuss local, go to the other thread. It's that simple. Go troll someone else.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#15 - 2013-11-30 22:23:25 UTC
Linkxsc162534 wrote:
HEHEHEHE. AFK without local. Well seeing as the only reason you know the AFK cloaky is there is because of local. Ofcourse local needs to come into the argument somewhere.


Now as far as methods to deal with AFK cloaking.

First, mine at gravmetrics, not regular belts. They'll have to pop probes if they're gonna find your miners at all. And then there you have an early warning system to them attacking miners. You might fail though, they may have scanned down that site earlier. But risk/reward. Perhaps you could make sure your miners have a webber with them so they can warp out quick

Second, when doing anoms/plexes, don't sit on warpin. Move around all the time. MJDs are a wonderful addition to the game, embrace them. What your afraid of a bomber or 2 downing your precious ratting battleship? I dunno, I'm pretty sure most of the ships I fly would be hard pressed to be taken out by a bomber in the time it takes a friend of mine to arrive in a rifter to eat the bomber. Also light drones are nice. As far as hot drops. With 1 cloaker, how can they hot drop you? Theyd need to decloak and pop their cyno, to do anything. And if they are running their cyno, then they definitely aren't scramming you.

Third, PVP. Well seeing as any good group will have a handful of cloakers spread around their area to look for attackers/ scout for targets ANYWAYS, quit your whining.


Seriously, its always AFK cloakers. They pose 0 immediate threat to players who pay attention. Sorry, you can't AFK mine for hours if theres 1 in your system. But even then, switch from your hulk to a Covenator, or the 1 laser ones with the huge tank. The few mil to replace a t1 mining barge are pennys to the cost of your whole mining fleet hiding because theres 1 person in system, somewhere.
And what, so they can provide intel to a roving gang? Maybe you should get a better intel network amongst yourselves and your neighbors so you can see these gangs coming. Then when you see local spike with nonblues, then you go into hiding. Quit whining about people who aren't even there/are usually alts to someone else sitting in a system ratting

I'm going to point out that while the things listed in this post most certainly require effort, they also require effort on the part of the hunter to counter. It doesn't take much effort to cloak in a system, but neither does it take much to undock and shoot rats in a belt.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#16 - 2013-11-30 22:25:47 UTC
Linkxsc162534 wrote:
First, mine at gravmetrics, not regular belts. They'll have to pop probes if they're gonna find your miners at all. And then there you have an early warning system to them attacking miners. You might fail though, they may have scanned down that site earlier. But risk/reward. Perhaps you could make sure your miners have a webber with them so they can warp out quick
This was changed a while back. Gravs appear without probes.

Linkxsc162534 wrote:
Third, PVP. Well seeing as any good group will have a handful of cloakers spread around their area to look for attackers/ scout for targets ANYWAYS, quit your whining.
Anyone with a handful of cloakers about should just go PVE/mine in high sec. Null sec would need to be twice as effective to warrant keeping a PVPer on standby, and since it's actually less effective to anom in null that the L4 mission, that's not really the best idea.

Linkxsc162534 wrote:
Seriously, its always AFK cloakers. They pose 0 immediate threat to players who pay attention. Sorry, you can't AFK mine for hours if theres 1 in your system. But even then, switch from your hulk to a Covenator, or the 1 laser ones with the huge tank. The few mil to replace a t1 mining barge are pennys to the cost of your whole mining fleet hiding because theres 1 person in system, somewhere.
And what, so they can provide intel to a roving gang? Maybe you should get a better intel network amongst yourselves and your neighbors so you can see these gangs coming. Then when you see local spike with nonblues, then you go into hiding. Quit whining about people who aren't even there/are usually alts to someone else sitting in a system ratting
I donp;t really see an issue with AFK cloakers, since I rarely undock in a PVE ship being a trader and all. It also helps that I'm part of the biggest blue blob. But I understand why it's an issue that a single barely skilled pilot can appear as a threat 24/7 for a whole system. If an active player were to do this, that's fine, but not an AFK player.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Linkxsc162534
Silent Scourge
#17 - 2013-11-30 22:27:09 UTC
Recheck my above post, I edited it. Didn't realize that in the modern game you didnt need to probe for gravmetrics.

Still, for all the so-called "effort" It takes an awful lot more effort on the part of a cloaky, to actually deal any material damage then it does for a nullsec corp to counter the possible damage that a bomber can deal.
Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#18 - 2013-11-30 22:30:15 UTC
Lucas you sill haven't explained why it's necesary for the game to warp you upon going "afk".
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#19 - 2013-11-30 22:31:44 UTC
Linkxsc162534 wrote:
Still, for all the so-called "effort" It takes an awful lot more effort on the part of a cloaky, to actually deal any material damage then it does for a nullsec corp to counter the possible damage that a bomber can deal.
I'd heavily argue that. Remember we are not just talking about bombers. The new SOE ships are combat able and covops T3s can be deadly. It's unlikely a bomber would be the thing you'd worry about encountering.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Linkxsc162534
Silent Scourge
#20 - 2013-11-30 22:40:14 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Anyone with a handful of cloakers about should just go PVE/mine in high sec. Null sec would need to be twice as effective to warrant keeping a PVPer on standby, and since it's actually less effective to anom in null that the L4 mission, that's not really the best idea.

I don't really see an issue with AFK cloakers, since I rarely undock in a PVE ship being a trader and all. It also helps that I'm part of the biggest blue blob. But I understand why it's an issue that a single barely skilled pilot can appear as a threat 24/7 for a whole system. If an active player were to do this, that's fine, but not an AFK player.



Well in my experience, I was in an aillance that lived in deadend drone space, and usually had only 30 people around at any time other then if there was a CTA. But there was good enough communication all around, and a couple PVErs would specifically anom in chokepoint systems to keep an eye out for incoming gangs. And as far as keeping a PVPer around is only really a necessity when theres actually a threat.

The trick is, and you alluded to it in the second paragraph, is that a lowskilled player is a 23/7 apparent threat. Whereas in reality, they really don't amount to jack, because of how little a bomber can actually do.

And as far as anoming effectiveness. Well i mission in high before, and i do it now in a tricked out golem, but I'm very sure that when I was in drone space with a POS abaddon, doign the anoms there was more economically effective then the golem has ever been at missioning (or my CNR, or tengu.) And thats dronespace which up till just recently didn't even have loot drops.

Actually would have liked to drag a golem out to the dronespace to anom with, that or my paladin.
123Next pageLast page