These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Mobile Depot - Game Breaking Feature

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#281 - 2013-11-27 00:18:17 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Casanunda wrote:
3 words for you that completely blow the bolded and underlined statement out of the water:

Giant Secure Container

To be fair, GSCs sport a pretty nasty tank, so there's protection there as well…

…unlike with a depot, which can be disabled in one shot by a single stealth bomber. P

It took me two shots, but my stealth bomber skills are (ironically) complete ****.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#282 - 2013-11-27 00:19:38 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Infinity's just trying to get this thread locked now that he's made a fool of himself.


I doubt that. I have spent a fair amount of time arguing with this particular wall, and he's actually stupid enough to believe all of these things. It is mildly shocking to me that he's actually gotten to be even more of a shitposter, however. If he keeps digging any lower, he's going to hit magma pretty soon.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#283 - 2013-11-27 00:20:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Infinity Ziona
Rhes wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You don't care because... Timers lol

That's the whole point. Everything you eject and anchor in space is 100% protected from damage by timers. Of course you don't care. That's what's wrong with the timers.

You are precious. Allow me to quote one of your own posts back to you:

Infinity Ziona wrote:
My take on it is if you didn't like the mechanics when you joined you should STFU and leave. Not whine like little girls till the devs cave in and make it easy like your last game was

Why doesn't this apply to your whining about reinforcement timers?

When I joined in 2003 there were no reinforcement timers. People actually had to fight for and hold their space. And don't give me Goons fight for their space. Goons wait for their timers, fill the system with as many people as possible and turkey shoot anyone stupid enough to jump in at 10% tidi.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#284 - 2013-11-27 00:21:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
It took me two shots, but my stealth bomber skills are (ironically) complete ****.

Fair enough. I'm looking at the ever-present (Lol) all-V skillset.
4717 alpha with arbalests and navy torps; 8000 with ze beumb. But again, the threshold is 3750 so you probably wouldn't have to push those skills very far to get there.

Infinity Ziona wrote:
When I joined in 2003 there were no reinforcement timers. People actually had to fight for and hold their space.
So much like now then. Well, probably more now, since there's no ping-pong that just flips everything back and forth overnight with little to no actual fighting needed.
Rhes
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#285 - 2013-11-27 00:23:05 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
When I joined in 2003 there were no reinforcement timers


So the game should be exactly like it was in 2003? Your arguments keep getting more and more insane...

EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise
Casanunda
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#286 - 2013-11-27 00:24:56 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Casanunda wrote:
3 words for you that completely blow the bolded and underlined statement out of the water:

Giant Secure Container

To be fair, GSCs sport a pretty nasty tank, so there's protection there as well…

…unlike with a depot, which can be disabled in one shot by a single stealth bomber. P


That's fair, the GSC does have a rather nice 500,000HP, I was more aiming at disproving the "Everything you eject and anchor in space is 100% protected from damage by timers" statement from IZ.

The fact that I am not a gazillionaire Gallente aristocrat with the sexual capacity of a rutting rhino is a constant niggle.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#287 - 2013-11-27 00:31:57 UTC
Casanunda wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Casanunda wrote:
3 words for you that completely blow the bolded and underlined statement out of the water:

Giant Secure Container

To be fair, GSCs sport a pretty nasty tank, so there's protection there as well…

…unlike with a depot, which can be disabled in one shot by a single stealth bomber. P


That's fair, the GSC does have a rather nice 500,000HP, I was more aiming at disproving the "Everything you eject and anchor in space is 100% protected from damage by timers" statement from IZ.

Obviously when I said "You" eject and anchor I was not speaking of GSC, I was talking about SOV structures which was the topic of the conversation.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#288 - 2013-11-27 00:33:06 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Obviously when I said "You" eject and anchor I was not speaking of GSC, I was talking about SOV structures which was the topic of the conversation.

Obvious or not, what you said was still incorrect. Again.
Casanunda
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#289 - 2013-11-27 00:37:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Casanunda
Infinity Ziona wrote:

Obviously when I said "You" eject and anchor I was not speaking of GSC, I was talking about SOV structures which was the topic of the conversation.


Be more specific in your posting then, the phrase "everything you eject and anchor" encompasses GSCs as well as sov structures, because they are also anchorable. FYI the actual topic of conversation is actually mobile depots, your little crusade to make life in nullsec easymode for you, and you alone (screw everybody else) is irrelevant to the topic at hand.

The fact that I am not a gazillionaire Gallente aristocrat with the sexual capacity of a rutting rhino is a constant niggle.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#290 - 2013-11-27 00:39:47 UTC
Casanunda wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:

Obviously when I said "You" eject and anchor I was not speaking of GSC, I was talking about SOV structures which was the topic of the conversation.


Be more specific in your posting then, the phrase "everything you eject and anchor" encompasses GSCs as well as sov structures, because they are also anchorable. FYI the actual topic of conversation is actually mobile depots, your little crusade to make life in nullsec easymode for you, and you alone (screw everybody else) is irrelevant to the topic at hand.

Hey I'm not the one that brought it up. Speak to Jenn if you have issues with her posts.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#291 - 2013-11-27 00:41:41 UTC
Rhes wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
When I joined in 2003 there were no reinforcement timers


So the game should be exactly like it was in 2003? Your arguments keep getting more and more insane...

No I didn't say that. Timers however need to removed. Time to take off the training wheels and experience some of the negative aspects of holding massive amounts of space.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Shadow Love
Strategic Exploration and Development Corp
Silent Company
#292 - 2013-11-27 00:49:24 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Rhes wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
When I joined in 2003 there were no reinforcement timers


So the game should be exactly like it was in 2003? Your arguments keep getting more and more insane...

No I didn't say that. Timers however need to removed. Time to take off the training wheels and experience some of the negative aspects of holding massive amounts of space.


I'm a newb regarding null/sov matters so excuse my ignorance, but who exactly would be able to consistantly hold space if single players/small groups of players just rolled around knocking down structures of sleeping alliances?

Next you will want docking removed, with all of our ships going into deadspace and being scannable while we are logged off because you should be able to shoot us anytime, anywhere, any way you want... but mostly just when no one is around to defend themselves.
Casanunda
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#293 - 2013-11-27 00:49:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Casanunda
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Hey I'm not the one that brought it up. Speak to Jenn if you have issues with her posts.

You may, or may not be the poster who brought it up, but you're more than happy to continue spouting your, usually incorrect, thoughts about it.

You're known for being a poster with a bee in their bonnet about goons and nothing of value to say about anything, you even make obvious trolls look like reasonable people. Jenn aSide on the other hand usually has something of value to add to the conversation.

Shadow Love wrote:
I'm a newb regarding null/sov matters so excuse my ignorance, but who exactly would be able to consistantly hold space if single players/small groups of players just rolled around knocking down structures of sleeping alliances?

Next you will want docking removed, with all of our ships going into deadspace and being scannable while we are logged off because you should be able to shoot us anytime, anywhere, any way you want... but mostly just when no one is around to defend themselves.
Welcome to the wonderful and delusional world of Infinity Zionas Eve Online. TBH some of the ideas/demands that spout forth from IZs cakehole would kill Eve in about 2 weeks.

The fact that I am not a gazillionaire Gallente aristocrat with the sexual capacity of a rutting rhino is a constant niggle.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#294 - 2013-11-27 00:51:13 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Rhes wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
When I joined in 2003 there were no reinforcement timers


So the game should be exactly like it was in 2003? Your arguments keep getting more and more insane...

No I didn't say that. Timers however need to removed. Time to take off the training wheels and experience some of the negative aspects of holding massive amounts of space.


So instead we should add training wheels for the people who can't be bothered to back up their actions and show up for a timer?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#295 - 2013-11-27 00:53:15 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Rhes wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
When I joined in 2003 there were no reinforcement timers


So the game should be exactly like it was in 2003? Your arguments keep getting more and more insane...

No I didn't say that. Timers however need to removed. Time to take off the training wheels and experience some of the negative aspects of holding massive amounts of space.



Why shouldn't you have to actually engage in a fight in order to take space?

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
#296 - 2013-11-27 01:54:07 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Rhes wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You don't care because... Timers lol

That's the whole point. Everything you eject and anchor in space is 100% protected from damage by timers. Of course you don't care. That's what's wrong with the timers.

You are precious. Allow me to quote one of your own posts back to you:

Infinity Ziona wrote:
My take on it is if you didn't like the mechanics when you joined you should STFU and leave. Not whine like little girls till the devs cave in and make it easy like your last game was

Why doesn't this apply to your whining about reinforcement timers?

When I joined in 2003


When you joined in 2003 you probably had more hair, less fat and a better smell. You also probably had a chance at getting a piece of calming poontang so 10 years later a small change in a video game wouldn't send you into a fit of rage...see things change.

Maybe take this chance to get a toupe, rent a fancy car and go look for some poor unsuspecting lady to knock up so she can't run away when she finds out the car is rented, the hair is fake and you get enraged by video games.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#297 - 2013-11-27 02:10:56 UTC
Minmatar Citizen160812 wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Rhes wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You don't care because... Timers lol

That's the whole point. Everything you eject and anchor in space is 100% protected from damage by timers. Of course you don't care. That's what's wrong with the timers.

You are precious. Allow me to quote one of your own posts back to you:

Infinity Ziona wrote:
My take on it is if you didn't like the mechanics when you joined you should STFU and leave. Not whine like little girls till the devs cave in and make it easy like your last game was

Why doesn't this apply to your whining about reinforcement timers?

When I joined in 2003


When you joined in 2003 you probably had more hair, less fat and a better smell. You also probably had a chance at getting a piece of calming poontang so 10 years later a small change in a video game wouldn't send you into a fit of rage...see things change.

Maybe take this chance to get a toupe, rent a fancy car and go look for some poor unsuspecting lady to knock up so she can't run away when she finds out the car is rented, the hair is fake and you get enraged by video games.




I wish I read this in the morning, it's not the same without spitting coffee on the keyboard.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#298 - 2013-11-27 02:12:02 UTC
Minmatar Citizen160812 wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Rhes wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
You don't care because... Timers lol

That's the whole point. Everything you eject and anchor in space is 100% protected from damage by timers. Of course you don't care. That's what's wrong with the timers.

You are precious. Allow me to quote one of your own posts back to you:

Infinity Ziona wrote:
My take on it is if you didn't like the mechanics when you joined you should STFU and leave. Not whine like little girls till the devs cave in and make it easy like your last game was

Why doesn't this apply to your whining about reinforcement timers?

When I joined in 2003


When you joined in 2003 you probably had more hair, less fat and a better smell. You also probably had a chance at getting a piece of calming poontang so 10 years later a small change in a video game wouldn't send you into a fit of rage...see things change.

Maybe take this chance to get a toupe, rent a fancy car and go look for some poor unsuspecting lady to knock up so she can't run away when she finds out the car is rented, the hair is fake and you get enraged by video games.



I'm not sure if this is the best post I've ever read, but by god it's up there.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Rhes
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#299 - 2013-11-27 02:20:03 UTC
Minmatar Citizen160812 wrote:
When you joined in 2003 you probably had more hair, less fat and a better smell. You also probably had a chance at getting a piece of calming poontang so 10 years later a small change in a video game wouldn't send you into a fit of rage...see things change.

Maybe take this chance to get a toupe, rent a fancy car and go look for some poor unsuspecting lady to knock up so she can't run away when she finds out the car is rented, the hair is fake and you get enraged by video games.


Never stop posting.

EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise
Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
#300 - 2013-11-27 02:22:00 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Nexus Day wrote:
Inquisitor Ageri wrote:
l2p & biomass yourself.

I love L2P responses regarding items in game less than a week.

Items that have been on the test server for a while.
Items whose behavior is already quite well documented.
Items which aren't exactly complicated to figure out.
The Raven pilot learned how to use them. The OP failed to learn how to counter them. It's not surprising who came out on top.

99% of the players don't use the test server.

But my guess you think CCP has all the angles figured out when they release an item or feature. And that every feature on release is WAI.

Brotha please.