These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Slavery, Blessing or curse: The account of an Amarrian who truly cares for those under his charge.

First post
Author
Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#61 - 2013-11-23 22:30:19 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
And you call us bigots.


Indeed I do. Arrogant, immoral, condescending, myopic, and foolish ones. Your pride in your "rescue" efforts blinds you to the reality of what you're doing. You've brainwashed yourself, pilot. Very effectively, I might add.

You weep for the horrors those people have endured even as you lay another one upon them. You can't be surprised at the contempt I'm expressing.





I have reaped no such horrors upon them. I know what it is like to be on their side, and I know what I wished I could have had. Since then I have done better than those before me.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2013-11-23 22:38:15 UTC
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Unfortunately, fiends such as yourself that are not even worthy of kissing my excrement are also given that freedom.

Every one of my slaves, including being in their current uneducated state, are more worthy to give an opinion on this than the likes of you. You need to read what I have said before you continue.

I. Shall. Dare. For I have said my piece, and explained it quite well, and the swine still squeals at me.

And here, of course, we see the dagger that hides behind the smile of every "compassionate" slaver.

You're no different to the child-abusing psychopaths who make up the vast majority of slaveholders, except in that you're less honest about it.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#63 - 2013-11-23 22:41:39 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Unfortunately, fiends such as yourself that are not even worthy of kissing my excrement are also given that freedom.

Every one of my slaves, including being in their current uneducated state, are more worthy to give an opinion on this than the likes of you. You need to read what I have said before you continue.

I. Shall. Dare. For I have said my piece, and explained it quite well, and the swine still squeals at me.

And here, of course, we see the dagger that hides behind the smile of every "compassionate" slaver.

You're no different to the child-abusing psychopaths who make up the vast majority of slaveholders, except in that you're less honest about it.


So my standing up to someone who insults my best efforts to assist those under my care automatically places me in the same category with the rare abuser? I fail to see the logic in your accusations.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#64 - 2013-11-23 22:47:03 UTC
Slavery is just one of those subjects that it is impossible to have a nuanced and calm open debate on.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#65 - 2013-11-23 22:49:23 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Slavery is just one of those subjects that it is impossible to have a nuanced and calm open debate on.



I agree. The purpose of this post was as informing, not a debate. Thus my frustration.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#66 - 2013-11-23 22:52:32 UTC
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
So my standing up to someone who insults my best efforts to assist those under my care automatically places me in the same category with the rare abuser? I fail to see the logic in your accusations.

You defend the system that creates the abusers, who are by no means whatsoever rare, comprising the vast majority of slaveowners. The fact that you resort to scatological insults and comparisons to slaves (which clearly indicates you consider them to be of intrinsically less value than yourself) belies the lack of substance in your arguments.

Any system that places human beings as the property of other human beings (including those systems that conveniently reclassify the victims as "subhuman" to escape such a definition via semantics, which from vast amounts of evidence includes the Amarr system) is intrinsically and fatally flawed. There is no hope of reforming such a system because the system is itself the problem. Defending such a system is itself an indefensible action.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#67 - 2013-11-23 22:53:25 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Slavery is just one of those subjects that it is impossible to have a nuanced and calm open debate on.

Which is a good thing, because nuanced and calm open debates would lend slavery undeserved legitimacy.

Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
I agree. The purpose of this post was as informing, not a debate. Thus my frustration.

Then stop holding slaves.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#68 - 2013-11-23 22:57:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
The purpose of this post was as informing, not a debate. Thus my frustration.


The IGS is not your personal soapbox: it is a place of discussion and debate. EVERYTHING said here is a debate. If you didn't understand that when you came here, consider yourself educated.

If you want to peddle your delusions and "inform" people then that's your prerogative, but if you do it here, where all voices may speak, then you have no right to object when some of them speak in opposition to you. If you wish to speak unopposed, create your own newsfeed, set up your own portal, hell, buy a broadcast node. But this is why I said "don't you dare": If you come to a place of discussion, and demand that what you say not be discussed, then you only make yourself seem foolish.

If you can't stand the heat, then don't work the forge.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#69 - 2013-11-23 22:57:49 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
So my standing up to someone who insults my best efforts to assist those under my care automatically places me in the same category with the rare abuser? I fail to see the logic in your accusations.

You defend the system that creates the abusers, who are by no means whatsoever rare, comprising the vast majority of slaveowners. The fact that you resort to scatological insults and comparisons to slaves (which clearly indicates you consider them to be of intrinsically less value than yourself) belies the lack of substance in your arguments.

Any system that places human beings as the property of other human beings (including those systems that conveniently reclassify the victims as "subhuman" to escape such a definition via semantics, which from vast amounts of evidence includes the Amarr system) is intrinsically and fatally flawed. There is no hope of reforming such a system because the system is itself the problem. Defending such a system is itself an indefensible action.


I am defending my usage of the system, not the system itself. That is an entirely different subject. Every system has flaws, mine no less than yours.

Take the plank out of your own eye before attempting to point out the speck in ours.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Slavery is just one of those subjects that it is impossible to have a nuanced and calm open debate on.

Which is a good thing, because nuanced and calm open debates would lend slavery undeserved legitimacy.

Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
I agree. The purpose of this post was as informing, not a debate. Thus my frustration.

Then stop holding slaves.


Then stop helping the needy. Stop providing for those who, by no fault of their own, are less fortunate than you.

Stop caring about people.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#70 - 2013-11-23 22:58:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Vulxanis Viceroy
Stitcher wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
The purpose of this post was as informing, not a debate. Thus my frustration.


The IGS is not your personal soapbox: it is a place of discussion and debate. EVERYTHING said here is a debate. If you didn't understand that when you came here, consider yourself educated.

If you want to peddle your delusions and "inform" people then that's your prerogative, but if you do it here, where all voices may speak, then you have no right to object when some of them speak in opposition to you. If you wish to speak unopposed, create your own newsfeed, set up your own portal, hell, buy a broadcast node. But this is why I said "don't you dare": If you come to a place of discussion, and demand that what you say not be discussed, then you only make yourself seem foolish.

If you can't stand the heat, then don't work the forge.


There is a difference between debate, and outright attack. Choosing to debate this and choosing to take this as an opportunity to lash out at what you do not understand are two different things.

Educate yourself on the difference.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#71 - 2013-11-23 23:00:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Then stop helping the needy. Stop providing for those who, by no fault of their own, are less fortunate than you.

Stop caring about people.



There it is again! that arrogance!

Slavery is not a means to help people: Slavery is a means to own and control them.

If you want to help, help. But you don't need to enslave people in order to do that.

Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
There is a difference between debate, and outright attack.


You're deflecting : you're trying to discredit your critic rather than address the point said critic is making. A word of advice: that never works.

Yes, I'm attacking. I do that. That fact has no bearing whatsoever on whether or not I'm correct, and your repeated assertions that I'm not have received no substantive support, only your repeated bleats of protest. You'll get a lot further in making me look like the bad guy if you calmly address the thrust of my opinion rather than my insults. Right now I just seem morally outraged, rather than bullying.

If I'm wrong, prove it, don't just claim it with a sneer. Or are you too afraid to actually think about your position for a minute? I appreciate that exercising your malnourished introspection may prove painful, but be brave, won't you?

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#72 - 2013-11-23 23:00:23 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Slavery is just one of those subjects that it is impossible to have a nuanced and calm open debate on.



That is because there are no nuances or complexity in the fundamental foundations of slavery. It is one of the very few things in New Eden that truly is black and white at the core with mountains of religion, bad philosophy, self-delusion, poor justification and piles of so called "tradition" making it appear otherwise.

Once you remove all the fedo droppings like the dribblings of Vulx here you are left with a morally reprehensible and financially inefficient system of human misery and suffering. There is really nothing to debate, except the exact depth of barbarism and cruelty a society needs to contain before such a thing can be viewed as a good option.

It concerns me that our "allies" are demonstrably one of the most vile societies in New Eden, rivaled only by the most depraved and cruel pirates and terrorists. Good to have in a fight, I'm sure. Less nice to have at our backs should the unifying enemy ever fade away.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#73 - 2013-11-23 23:07:53 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Then stop helping the needy. Stop providing for those who, by no fault of their own, are less fortunate than you.

Stop caring about people.



There it is again! that arrogance!

Slavery is not a means to help people: Slavery is a means to own and control them.

If you want to help, help. But you don't need to enslave people in order to do that.


I did not enslave them! And they are the ones who choose to stay legally under my charge. Have you forgotten I gave them a choice with a nuetral party helping them see both sides? I also was not even in the system at the time.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#74 - 2013-11-23 23:11:37 UTC
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
I am defending my usage of the system, not the system itself.

By continuing to make use of a fatally flawed system, the distinction of whether you do it "compassionately" or not becomes entirely irrelevant. You lend legitimacy to all those who abuse it for their own purposes.

Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Take the plank out of your own eye before attempting to point out the speck in ours.

"My system" doesn't profit from the unpaid labour, suffering, sexual abuse, forced breeding, cultural eradication, dehumanisation and in one case outright mass murder of hundreds of billions of people.

Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Then stop helping the needy. Stop providing for those who, by no fault of their own, are less fortunate than you.

Stop caring about people.

If you ever get a chance to visit Gallente Prime, walk down Genero Boulevard in Caille. It's not on any of the main tourist routes - it's in a fairly poor neighbourhood, in fact - so you'll probably have to find it on a holomap. You will see a building marked with an old-fashioned kite shield emblazoned with a bow and arrow, called the "Caille Huntsman Society Shelter." It's a shelter for the homeless and those unfortunates in Caille living below the poverty line. If you ask very nicely - I suggest leaving the outrageously supercilious attitude you've displayed throughout this thread at the door, or even better at the Amarr-Gallente border - they'll show you around the facilities. They're basic, spartan, worlds removed from the sort of opulent luxury I imagine even the most minor of Holders is accustomed to living in, but to people living on the streets of Caille who have nothing or as good as nothing, it's like a palace. A place where they can sleep, get a hot meal, a shower, some new clothes, perhaps even get help kicking a drug addiction or finding a job - somewhere they can go to feel like they aren't completely alone.

Ask them to show you the plaques they put up on the common room wall. They put one up for every single person who makes a significant donation to the Huntsman Society.

See if there's a face there that you recognise.

Check out how much I donated.

Tell me that I don't care about the disadvantaged and the unfortunate. Tell me I need to place them beneath me on the celestial ladder just so I can "provide" for them.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#75 - 2013-11-23 23:11:42 UTC
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
I did not enslave them! And they are the ones who choose to stay legally under my charge. Have you forgotten I gave them a choice with a nuetral party helping them see both sides? I also was not even in the system at the time.


Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Every slave I have ever acquired was rescued.


There are two possibilities here: Either they ARE slaves, or they are NOT slaves.

Your own words make it seem like the former - "every slave I have ever acquired". So either you mis-spoke in your opening "information" post (forgivable, but stupid), or else you are lying now to defend yourself. Which is it? Are they slaves, or are they not?

And if they are not slaves, then why are you defending the institution of slavery that you do not subscribe to?

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#76 - 2013-11-23 23:12:39 UTC
Jinari Otsito wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Slavery is just one of those subjects that it is impossible to have a nuanced and calm open debate on.



That is because there are no nuances or complexity in the fundamental foundations of slavery. It is one of the very few things in New Eden that truly is black and white at the core with mountains of religion, bad philosophy, self-delusion, poor justification and piles of so called "tradition" making it appear otherwise.

Once you remove all the fedo droppings like the dribblings of Vulx here you are left with a morally reprehensible and financially inefficient system of human misery and suffering. There is really nothing to debate, except the exact depth of barbarism and cruelty a society needs to contain before such a thing can be viewed as a good option.

It concerns me that our "allies" are demonstrably one of the most vile societies in New Eden, rivaled only by the most depraved and cruel pirates and terrorists. Good to have in a fight, I'm sure. Less nice to have at our backs should the unifying enemy ever fade away.


I challenge you to actually travel the Amarrian empire. See all the forms of this relationship that you can.

Then make your assessment, not before. Mind you this will take an extremely long time.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#77 - 2013-11-23 23:16:07 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
I did not enslave them! And they are the ones who choose to stay legally under my charge. Have you forgotten I gave them a choice with a nuetral party helping them see both sides? I also was not even in the system at the time.


Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
Every slave I have ever acquired was rescued.


There are two possibilities here: Either they ARE slaves, or they are NOT slaves.

Your own words make it seem like the former - "every slave I have ever acquired". So either you mis-spoke in your opening "information" post (forgivable, but stupid), or else you are lying now to defend yourself. Which is it? Are they slaves, or are they not?

And if they are not slaves, then why are you defending the institution of slavery that you do not subscribe to?


They are slaves. However, only legally. They are not treated like animals, as you keep insinuating. The only reason I am keeping them legally "enslaved" is for their own legal protection, as I have also previously stated, they agreed to. When they are capable of handling themselves on their own, as determined by a neutral party, they shall be given the employment of their choice.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#78 - 2013-11-23 23:26:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
They are slaves. However, only legally. They are not treated like animals, as you keep insinuating. The only reason I am keeping them legally "enslaved" is for their own legal protection, as I have also previously stated, they agreed to. When they are capable of handling themselves on their own, as determined by a neutral party, they shall be given the employment of their choice.


You're missing the point. It's not about how you treat them. It's not about how positive and loving your relationship with them is. It's not about whether they agreed to it.

It's about the fact that They. Are. Slaves.

That's it: That's the whole problem. I don't give a bent tritanium ingot if they worship the ground you walk upon, nobody, no matter how benevolent, is entitled to hold that kind of power over another human being. No matter the motive, no matter their morals, no matter the reason, and no matter the wishes of the enslaved. It is an institution that even when practice by the most morally upstanding person in New Eden would still be reprehensible.

If they can't look after themselves and you make them a slave, you are exploiting them whether you mean to or not. There are means to assist a person that do not require them to be legally your property - you had other options besides this, and you didn't take them.

THAT is the arrogance of it all. You think that their only hope is to be taken under your wing, to be protected. That it's all for their own good.

True aid is when you give people the tools to rebuild themselves. It's not folding them into your loving embrace and protecting them until the nasty universe goes away.

If you think this description of your relationship with your slaves was likely to make me think more highly of you, then you miscalculated - it sickens me. It tells me that you either genuinely believe that a person can be nurtured through stripping them of their status, or that you are a fantastically good liar who is also a terrible judge of character (I consider the former to be more likely)

It's quite plain at this point that you're drinking from the same water cooler you've introduced these "recovered" souls to. You're just another fanatic spreading his religion, and the rest of us can see it for what it is far more clearly than you can.

You're a victim, pilot. You've at least convinced me to take that pitying view of you rather than the contempt I would usually have for a holder. Count that as a victory.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#79 - 2013-11-23 23:28:00 UTC
The whole discussion is completely preposterous and unnecessary. Slavery is a simple fact and unalterable truth. Outsiders might have their opinions, but why should it concern us? Maybe the IGS is a popularity contest where public perceptions and profiles win the game. Our holdings are not a popularity contest.

I advise all holders to leave this discussion. The more some people say the more they look like the meat-eater who runs away in disgust and displeasure when the animal is slaughtered. But either you eat meat and accept the consequences or you become a vegetarian. You cannot be both.

Kind regards,
Odelya d’Hanguest
Vulxanis Viceroy
Vicarius Vitae
Khimi Harar
#80 - 2013-11-23 23:31:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Vulxanis Viceroy
Stitcher wrote:
Vulxanis Viceroy wrote:
They are slaves. However, only legally. They are not treated like animals, as you keep insinuating. The only reason I am keeping them legally "enslaved" is for their own legal protection, as I have also previously stated, they agreed to. When they are capable of handling themselves on their own, as determined by a neutral party, they shall be given the employment of their choice.


You're missing the point. It's not about how you treat them. It's not about how positive and loving your relationship with them is. It's not about whether they agreed to it.

It's about the fact that They. Are. Slaves.

That's it: That's the whole problem. I don't give a bent tritanium ingot if they worship the ground you walk upon, nobody, no matter how benevolent, is entitled to hold that kind of power over another human being. No matter the motive, no matter their morals, no matter the reason, and no matter the wishes of the enslaved. It is an institution that even when practice by the most morally upstanding person in New Eden would still be reprehensible.

If they can't look after themselves and you make them a slave, you are exploiting them whether you mean to or not. There are means to assist a person that do not require them to be legally your property - you had other options besides this, and you didn't take them.

THAT is the arrogance of it all. You think that their only hope is to be taken under your wing, to be protected. That it's all for their own good.

True aid is when you give people the tools to rebuild themselves. It's not folding them into your loving embrace and protecting them until the nasty goes away.

If you think this description of your relationship with your slaves was likely to make me think more highly of you, then you miscalculated - it sickens me. It tells me that you either genuinely believe that a person can be nurtured through stripping them of their status, or that you are a fantastically good liar who is also a terrible judge of character (I consider the former to be more likely)

It's quite plain at this point that you're drinking from the same water cooler you've introduced these "recovered" souls to. You're just another fanatic spreading his religion, and the rest of us can see it for what it is far more clearly than you can.

You're a victim, pilot. You've at least convinced me to take that pitying view of you rather than the contempt I would usually have for a holder. Count that as a victory.


I have seen the effects of those being left to their own devices when they have not been properly trained in how to provide for themselves, or how to do better than just get by.

I am giving them the tools, and I recognize I need more tools to give them. That is why I plan on building a small university on my island strictly for them.

I fail to see how my simply dropping them off on the nearest planet I came across after I rescued them as being helpful. I have provided them with counseling, medical care, etc.

You sicken me by your arrogance. Thus we are even.

We must simply agree to disagree.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy