These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

The Stratios

Author
Skeln Thargensen
Doomheim
#21 - 2013-11-20 15:26:48 UTC
it's just a better way to nerf it for PvP than taking away DPS or tank. compared to the bombers the SoE ships can actually stand up in a fight. the bomber and coops need to be able to gtfo because they really can't.

forums.  serious business.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#22 - 2013-11-20 15:27:39 UTC
Because it is not a covops ship.

Also see the parallel thread for the exact same question.
Trii Seo
Goonswarm Federation
#23 - 2013-11-20 15:31:01 UTC
Bombers (especially Assbombers) and some recons (Hello, my name is Pilgrim, if you wondered where did your cap go - it was delicious!) can pack a surprisingly nasty kick in combat. Not to mention some have the ungodly ability to prevent things from running away as they light the cyno and unleash the monkeys.

That said, having a 30s recloak delay isn't much of a nerf. It just forces you not to be terrible, especially in a Stratios. Astero may be on the shorter end of the stick here, being a frigate and being at its destination much, much faster.

Proud pilot of the Imperium

Arek'Jaalan: Heliograph

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2013-11-20 15:50:14 UTC
CannonFodder82 wrote:
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Posting in a "gimmie OP win button" thread...

not the case at all, its an exploration ship, and waiting 30 seconds to re-cloak after uncloaking is far too long, but cheers for showing your intelligence, or lack of it anyways
Hey pot!
Meet kettle!
Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2013-11-20 16:18:05 UTC
I believe my corp had the first PVP loss of this ship (according to Mittani) and the loss was to a gate camp due to this cloak reactivation delay. TS became a far happier place (apart from one pilot) as we discussed cloaking delays and everyone started playing around with vaious cov ops ships to more exactly understand the mechanics.
i am glad it wasn't my SOE ships that learnt this lesson the hard way but for the sake of future hilarity could you all stop drawing attention to the cloak delay feature as you will lower the amount of fun to be had from ignorance + gate camps.

Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#26 - 2013-11-20 16:44:12 UTC
Silvetica Dian wrote:
I believe my corp had the first PVP loss of this ship (according to Mittani) and the loss was to a gate camp due to this cloak reactivation delay. TS became a far happier place (apart from one pilot) as we discussed cloaking delays and everyone started playing around with vaious cov ops ships to more exactly understand the mechanics.
i am glad it wasn't my SOE ships that learnt this lesson the hard way but for the sake of future hilarity could you all stop drawing attention to the cloak delay feature as you will lower the amount of fun to be had from ignorance + gate camps.

Big smile

Yeah, for a lot of pilots when they stumble onto a gate camp the last thing they actually think to do is wait... observe... make sure any timers are done.... before they make their move.

It's kind of an iconic feature of EVE compared to other more twitch based games. Here it pays to be calm, cool, and collected when in a hazardous situation (so as to better think your way out of it), where in other games your best bet is to let your reflexes (and creative bunny hopping) be your defense.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#27 - 2013-11-20 16:50:27 UTC
woah, so if you uncloak on a gate... jump into a new system, you can get hit by the 30s timer?

Thats ******* terrible and has nothing to do with OMG PVP BALANCE.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2013-11-20 16:52:33 UTC
Batelle wrote:
woah, so if you uncloak on a gate... jump into a new system, you can get hit by the 30s timer?

Thats ******* terrible and has nothing to do with OMG PVP BALANCE.

It's really, really easy to work around.
And it has lots to do with PVP balance.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley
New Eden Tech Support
#29 - 2013-11-20 17:48:57 UTC
CannonFodder82 wrote:
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Posting in a "gimmie OP win button" thread...

not the case at all, its an exploration ship, and waiting 30 seconds to re-cloak after uncloaking is far too long, but cheers for showing your intelligence, or lack of it anyways


What kind of asshat asks for help then ridicules other people's attempt at helping said person?? Trolls, that's who. And also, characters named OP.

Fly something without that delay?? We should be grateful that the Stratios is capable of fitting a CovOps Cloak in the first place.
Also, your breath stinks and I hate your mom because "you."
Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2013-11-20 18:02:51 UTC
Batelle wrote:
woah, so if you uncloak on a gate... jump into a new system, you can get hit by the 30s timer?

Thats ******* terrible and has nothing to do with OMG PVP BALANCE.


Yes that's exactly how it works.
no need to do any further research on this.
nothing more to see here.

Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
Sedition.
#31 - 2013-11-20 19:15:37 UTC
CannonFodder82 wrote:
Why does my Stratios have a 30 second re-cloak delay? this is not normal for covops ships?

Because it isn't a covops ship? Its a faction ship that can fit a covops cloak, its not in the T2 covops line.
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#32 - 2013-11-20 19:28:45 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
The Stratios is NOT a covert ops ships and therefore does NOT have the covert ops cloaking delay reduction.

Be ******* happy that you even get to use the covert ops cloak on a non covert ops or Recon or BR..because they could have just as easily made it so that they can only use a standard cloak..and I couldn't image the crocodile tears youd be pouring in my GD if that was the case.



Pasted from other thread. changed one word to make it relevant here.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Dun'Gal
Myriad Contractors Inc.
#33 - 2013-11-20 19:36:08 UTC
Just so we're clear here, the covops cloak has the 30s recloak delay built into it. This is nothing new. It just so happens that covops ships have a neat little bonus that reduces this.
Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#34 - 2013-11-20 19:57:32 UTC
the distinction between covert ops ships and SOE ships is tenuous at best, especially if you are familiar with the history of supposed covert ops ships.

Within the supposed class of covert ops ships you have many varying abilities, none of which seem to apply to all of the ships.

Old bombers couldn't warp cloaked and had a speed bonus while cloaked. Black Ops battleships are still like this.
New bombers, old bombers, and black ops battleships have 100% reduction in targeting delay.
New bombers can warp cloaked.
All ships that can fit a covert ops cloak have reactivation reduction. Except for SOE and maybe tournament reward ships.
No ships that cannot fit a covert ops cloak have cloak reactivation reduction. Except Black Ops.
All ships that can fit a covert ops cloak can fit covert cyno generators and use black ops bridges. No ship that cannot fit the covert ops cloak can fit the covert cyno gen or use a black ops bridge. Except for the black ops battleships, which can light covert cynos and cannot fit covert ops cloaking devices.
SOE ships can both fit covert cyno gens and use covert ops bridges.
Only the t2 scanning frigate is formally known as a covert ops ship.


Its pretty silly to take the lack of reactivation delay as a sign that SOE ships are not covert ops ships. Lets just say that they are and be done with it, accepting the fact that this is one more wrinkle of variation in a varied class. In any case, this was either overlooked by CCP, or intended as a balance feature that was specific to these ships. Its also a pretty gigantic troll that will get people killed, as the ships behave exactly like other covert ops ships in every respect save the need to hold gate-cloak slightly longer (and not be able to jam-cloak or whatever, but these seems irrelevant).

What's more interesting is WHY CCP decided not to give them reactivation delay. Possible reasons.

1. to troll the **** out of people who jump into a gatecamp and forget that their ship behaves slightly differently than every other ship.
2. to force SOE ships to be revealed on D-scan when they drop probes.
3. to force SOE ships to be revelaed on D-scan and on grid when they chase you into a plex and have to decloak for various reasons, they cannot do it briefly like a t3 or other covert ops ship can.
4. to make them visible and probable for longer when using a mobile depot.
5. to make them far more vulnerable to accidental decloaks than other ships, and to perhaps encourage them to pre-emptively decloak in certain situations.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Doomheim
#35 - 2013-11-20 21:11:42 UTC
Well I understood 'exploration' as its principle targetted usage, but T3's still do a much better job at that...so in short the Stratios is fail IMHO.

It looks pretty, but like a hot tranny who is all flash and no substance it falls down in two major ways vs. intended purpose. With a T3 I can fit an interdiction nullifier and feasibly fly down to null to work relic sites for the mad cheddar, and also not blow my brains out struggling with the crappy hacking mini game, because I can fit two Memetic Algorithm Bank rigs on a T3, but only one on the Stratios...

Stop trying to make the Stratios all things to all people or another 'meh' combat ship -- nerf its pew abilities to boost virus strength to +15 (or add a boost to virus coherence as well) and put an interdiction nullifier on it. Then it might fit its described main role as a kick ass exploration ship.

As it is right now it just seems like another Odyssey-type tactic just to get more newbs down into null to meet their deaths while trying to run the sites that actually pay out.


Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#36 - 2013-11-20 21:21:48 UTC
Remissus Rinah wrote:
Arline Kley wrote:
Consider this - the Sisters of EVE are not in anyway a war like organisation. Their ships have weapons, yes, but they are designed to defend themselves, and not go as the first gun; think of the 30 seconds delay as them having an older variant of the Covert Ops computer systems, which while having the computational ability to handle the Covert Ops system, does not have the capacity to handle the immense requirement to re-cloak immediately:

They after all a Humanitarian organisation and not one of the major 4 empires.


Huh! I... hadn't really thought about it like that, in all honesty. That's actually a really good point! I retract my earlier statement.


Unless this is someone answering themselves with an alt it's something i can't recall seeing in GD.
Refreshing change from the usual smart alec replies and goblin gabble.
As you were.


Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Aracimia Wolfe
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#37 - 2013-11-20 21:47:09 UTC
err deja vu......

This looks just like the Astero thread.

The ships fine as is, I spent time pre release with this ship on Sisi and it's an absolute beast even after they nerfed the drone bandwidth. I've seen it used to devastating effect as an ambusher and used it as one myself.

If you're doing it right it's nigh impossible to catch this thing on a gate

Kill it with Fire!

Janna Sway
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#38 - 2013-11-20 22:42:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Janna Sway
Ladies and Gentlemen!
This is the first "Buff Cloak Thread" in EVE History!
Let this moment sink in...

OP, be realistic please...
You cannot really believe that a "Servant Sisters of EVE" offer you a ship that outperforms a specialized T2 racial Recon ship, made for military operations.

A noobship with a doomsday weapon would be truly something what you would deserve, and I wished I could offer you that, but sorry, that's not gonna happen.
Likewise, try to accept that you cannot get a invincible OP-ship like this Stratios that would offer you better performance than a T2 Recon ship...
The Stratios is OP already, the way it is.

Furthermore, the Stratios is currently pretty expensive of course. Not really worth the price anyway. Even a Curse/Pilgrim would perform much better at cost of 100-150M ISK, and they have natively high explosive armor resistances.
Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#39 - 2013-11-21 20:10:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Batelle
Janna Sway wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen!
This is the first "Buff Cloak Thread" in EVE History!
Let this moment sink in...

OP, be realistic please...
You cannot really believe that a "Servant Sisters of EVE" offer you a ship that outperforms a specialized T2 racial Recon ship, made for military operations.


Yet the stratios already does outperform them, and outperform them specifically in the role of killing things? The RP-loremaster angle is pretty weak, since humanitarian ship kills better than the military ship and hides worse.

The whole notion that they aren't covops ships is absurd. Lacking a short reactivation delay does not make them non-covops. It merely makes them covops ships that happen to have a long reactivation delay.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Janna Sway
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#40 - 2013-11-22 07:22:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Janna Sway
Batelle wrote:
Janna Sway wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen!
This is the first "Buff Cloak Thread" in EVE History!
Let this moment sink in...

OP, be realistic please...
You cannot really believe that a "Servant Sisters of EVE" offer you a ship that outperforms a specialized T2 racial Recon ship, made for military operations.


Yet the stratios already does outperform them, and outperform them specifically in the role of killing things? The RP-loremaster angle is pretty weak, since humanitarian ship kills better than the military ship and hides worse.

The whole notion that they aren't covops ships is absurd. Lacking a short reactivation delay does not make them non-covops. It merely makes them covops ships that happen to have a long reactivation delay.


The Stratios price tag is currently pretty sick. Shocked

However, concerning the CovOps, one could use the SOE ships for CovOps operations, but by far not very efficiently.
With CovOps I do not refer to exploration but to espionage in hostile environment.
The SOE have the reactivation delay of prototype and improved cloaking devices, and espionage is basically impossible with those cloaking devices already. not only because one cannot warp while cloaked, but also because of the extended reactivation delay.
The extended reactivation delay destroys pretty much the concept of "espionage and CovOps".

The purpose of CovOps operations is not to kill anything anyway. The strength of CovOps, especially in hostile environment, is the "potential" and the "threat factor".

I would not tag the SOE ships as "CovOps" but as "Commando" ships.

Hm, I must stop right here in order to not drift into a 10 page-long post about CovOps, for I love its concept and beauty. Roll
Previous page123Next page