Test Server Feedback

Here is an obvious problem that will probably never get fixed, lol.

First off: the t2 siege module, please understand the math before saying its only a 6.66% scan res bonus.
Say you have 100 scan resolution and go siege with a t1 siege module. That leaves you at 25 scan res. Go siege with a t2, you end up with 30. And what percentage increase is that? 20%, not 6.66%.

As far as triage t2 is concerned, adding a cap recharge bonus to t2 triage modules would severely jack up WH space carriers. In systems with either high cap recharge bonus (pulsars) or high resists (wulf-rayets), making their tank even stiffer is just a bad move. Most of the serious WH roaming gangs carry 1-2 (sometimes 3) bhaalgorns for neuts, and dmg comes from t3s which isnt exactly the best. Certain WH fights go on for hours just because of a carrier's impact (see failheap challenge), and buffing them more would just be a bad move. Maybe offer decreased cap usage for remote reps instead?

As far as t3 ganglink bonuses: they really need to be readjusted to give only a slight increase and not a massive one like the t2 changes are showing. Its not uncommon to find tengus, lokis, etc sitting in a pos with 6 warfare links running. HOWEVER, you must remember that you need warfare link specialist to 5 to use the command processors, something command ships don't need to run their 3.

Anyone take a look at the T2 bubble yet? I saw it last night, but I didn't have the skills to fit it and try it out on my Onyx.

+1 to Yahrr.

Offgrid boosters help locals, not roamers, who have to bring a ship anyway. Doesn't matter to them that much if it's a cloaked nullified T3 or a real CS.

Cmon CCP an increase of 0.5% command bonus for across the board for T2 Gang Assist Modules.

This should be looked at as the base command bonus of T1 gang modules varies from 2% to 4.5% and the T2 bonus needs to reflect 25% increaase across the board.

Also inventong the T2 Modules will be very expensive as BPC copy time is over 4 hours per single copy.
This will make it only practical to invent single run T2 copies and will make them expensive.

As an example you get less than a 1km range increase using the T2 Mining Laaser Field Enhancemnet Module which is pretty poor, so will it be worth the invention cost?

These issues applies to :
Information Warfare Link - Sensor Integrity base Bonus of 3%
Mining Foreman Link - Mining Laser Field Enhancement base Bonus of 4.5%
Skirmish Warfare Link - Interdiction Manuvers base bonus of 3%

CCP Please readdress these issues.

I can't read nothing about Interdiction Sphere Launcher II ?

what about a range bonus to the T2 triage module, so our RR goes farther . . . It just seems odd that logistics cruisers can project their remote rep farther than a triage carrier.

and giving it extra cap wouldnt make them overpowered? I think that would be worse than making their sphere of influence larger . . .

The small, medium and large t2 remote hull repair systems all require Remote Hull Repair Systems V. That seems odd, at the very least, and breaks from the pattern for t2 remote armor, shield and cap transfer mods. Why not levels III, IV and IV, respectively?

Yep fix that,and we all can live with T2 links then. Reminder : risk vs. reward