These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Office of the Chairman: A ~chill place~ for constituent issues

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Levy Break
State War Academy
Caldari State
#601 - 2012-02-09 20:57:09 UTC
EVE Programs you so that you become a bot while playing it, it's that un-interactive. Bots hurt the economy blah blah blah, just have CCP make the game more fun to play and bot numbers go down. Simple as that.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#602 - 2012-02-09 21:45:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
No it isn't



Yes it is for the reasons I spelled out at great length.

But if you want to keep thinking that faction war/low sec players, and sov null sec players are after the same things in eve, thats your right. Just like its your right to mindlessly defend mittani for any of his other idiotic suggestions for the game.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
#603 - 2012-02-09 22:40:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Imryn Xaran
Richard Desturned wrote:
learn what the word "active" means

also he said it's for his constituents, so get out

i love how you manage to inflate "thou shalt not file petitions against other goons" into "WE ACTIVELY PROTECT BOTTERS LOL" i guess that's just autism at work???


Osabojo wrote:
What's really dumb about your posting is not so much your deliberate refusal to understand things that have been explained more clearly and patiently than you deserve, but your seeming expectation that other people reading this thread are going to share your deliberate misunderstandings and false presuppositions, and go along with the implied claim that you are trying to bludgeon them with.

Perhaps I am overestimating the average reader of this thread, but I think most of them will find your hamfisted attempts to manipulate the discourse rather insulting, regardless of how they feel about The Mittani as CSM Chair.


More goonie stooges spewing crap to cover for the Mittanis failure to address my question. To dignify the above posts more than they deserve:

1. If he is a candidate for chairman surely every EVE player is his constituent? Or did I misunderstand, and he is only running for chairman of 0.0 and theres going to be 2 other chairmen for the other two zones? Stupid goonie.

2. How is "If you report a goonie for botting I will kick you out of the corp" not protecting botters. Unless you are asking me to believe that no goonie has ever run a bot? Please make that claim, because I think everyone could do with the laugh.

3. I agree that lots of goonies have confirmed that I am right about your Alliance policy, but none have offered any real explanation of how the Mittanis position is not contradictory. More importantly, the first post in this thread states that the Mittani will offer clarification on issues of concern. I'm not interested in hearing from random goonie stooges, I want to hear from him.

Fact is he clearly offered this thread as a place where he would answer questions, but it seems he is only willing to answer "certain" questions, and not ones where he seems to be on dodgy ground.

I'm not going anywhere, still waiting for that answer.
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#604 - 2012-02-09 22:44:56 UTC
A constituent is a person who voted for you. They elected you to represent them, so you represent them.
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#605 - 2012-02-09 22:49:24 UTC
Imryn Xaran wrote:

I'm not going anywhere, still waiting for that answer.

whatever will we do with yet another nameless pubbie angryposting about goonies
Ogi Talvanen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#606 - 2012-02-09 22:49:38 UTC
Imagine that. Politicians representing their voters. Crazy idea.
Sullivar N
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#607 - 2012-02-09 23:18:31 UTC
Dear Mittani:

I'm having somewhat conflicting feelings at this point. I've worked my way up to the KV, gotten the derp gun, can penetrate the better tanks, yet I don't feel like I've ~arrived~; I'm still trying to grind my way up to the KV-3 and through other trees. This wasn't supposed to happen! I want to have fun with the KV! Any tips on how to play well with it and to enjoy the experience to boot?

So far my "strategy" has been to snuggle up against the higher-teir heavy tanks and use them as protection, ducking out to fire, and generally just react to what they do. This generally ends up for worse than for the better, since if they do stupid things my choices are to follow and be useless too or to go out on my own and still be generally ineffective/die. Am I playing too passively? Is this just an indication of a lack of skill on my part?
Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
#608 - 2012-02-09 23:32:13 UTC
Akirei Scytale wrote:
A constituent is a person who voted for you. They elected you to represent them, so you represent them.


Really? suggest you buy a dictionary.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#609 - 2012-02-09 23:37:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Retar Aveymone wrote:
whatever will we do with yet another nameless pubbie angryposting about goonies

The same thing we do with every nameless pubbie angryposting about goonies, Retar Aveymone.

Get out our Strip Miner IIs and load them with Pubbie Tears crystals.
Ogi Talvanen wrote:
Imagine that. Politicians representing their voters. Crazy idea.

Haha, let me tell you about the time there were tons of pubbies running for the CSM.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#610 - 2012-02-09 23:53:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Akirei Scytale
Imryn Xaran wrote:
Akirei Scytale wrote:
A constituent is a person who voted for you. They elected you to represent them, so you represent them.


Really? suggest you buy a dictionary.


Noun: constituent kun'sti-choo-unt

1) An artifact that is one of the individual parts of which a composite entity is made up; especially a part that can be separated from or attached to a system
"a component or constituent element of a system";

2) A member of a constituency; a citizen who is represented in a government by officials for whom he or she votes
"needs continued support by constituents to be re-elected"

//

con·stit·u·ent noun

1) one who authorizes another to act as agent : principal
The Mittani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#611 - 2012-02-09 23:58:52 UTC
my furnace blew when it got down to 14 last night, got it up and running again and i'm going to chill out and play some tribes tonight; will hit up the new questions from actual humans later

i see that the roleplaying publord has been frantically trying to imitate a demagogue while i've been away and posting up a storm

heh

~hi~
The Mittani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#612 - 2012-02-10 00:00:05 UTC
incidentally the publord's question was answered in the previous 30 pages, but he's too cool for school to actually read the thread rather than smearing poop on the walls and howling for validation from me

~hi~
doombreed52
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#613 - 2012-02-10 02:31:19 UTC
publord if i like one of your posts will you take a hike? or go play in traffic whatever ppl do in highsec....
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#614 - 2012-02-10 02:35:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
The Mittani wrote:
i see that the roleplaying publord has been frantically trying to imitate a demagogue while i've been away and posting up a storm

Well I guess, but he's irrelevant, we're now discussing how much we love having you represent us.

As kun'sti-choo-unts.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Osabojo
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#615 - 2012-02-10 03:07:27 UTC
Imryn Xaran wrote:

More goonie stooges spewing crap to cover for the Mittanis failure to address my question. To dignify the above posts more than they deserve:

1. If he is a candidate for chairman surely every EVE player is his constituent? Or did I misunderstand, and he is only running for chairman of 0.0 and theres going to be 2 other chairmen for the other two zones? Stupid goonie.

2. How is "If you report a goonie for botting I will kick you out of the corp" not protecting botters. Unless you are asking me to believe that no goonie has ever run a bot? Please make that claim, because I think everyone could do with the laugh.

3. I agree that lots of goonies have confirmed that I am right about your Alliance policy, but none have offered any real explanation of how the Mittanis position is not contradictory. More importantly, the first post in this thread states that the Mittani will offer clarification on issues of concern. I'm not interested in hearing from random goonie stooges, I want to hear from him.

Fact is he clearly offered this thread as a place where he would answer questions, but it seems he is only willing to answer "certain" questions, and not ones where he seems to be on dodgy ground.

I'm not going anywhere, still waiting for that answer.


I've met lots of people like you. You are too dumb to know how stupid you are. There can never be an actual discussion with someone like you.

The next time you are in a crowded place, take a look around. Over 99% of the people you look at are significantly smarter than you are. The sad part is, I'm not talking about any kind of innate intelligence, but rather a deliberate decision on your part not to use your mind.
Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
#616 - 2012-02-10 03:15:25 UTC
Osabojo wrote:
I've met lots of people like you. You are too dumb to know how stupid you are. There can never be an actual discussion with someone like you.

Basically, you are saying he's a Dunning-Kruger poster child.

Lobbying for your right to delete your signature
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#617 - 2012-02-10 03:26:59 UTC
Or George Lucas.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#618 - 2012-02-10 03:32:48 UTC
The likihood he's George Lucas is pretty small.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#619 - 2012-02-10 03:35:31 UTC
Anything is possible with the Force.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
Jinli mei
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#620 - 2012-02-10 04:06:25 UTC
Imryn Xaran wrote:

More goonie stooges spewing crap to cover for the Mittanis failure to address my question. To dignify the above posts more than they deserve:


It's mostly because you're an idiot. Here's why:

Quote:
1. If he is a candidate for chairman surely every EVE player is his constituent? Or did I misunderstand, and he is only running for chairman of 0.0 and theres going to be 2 other chairmen for the other two zones? Stupid goonie.


Think about this in the way that republican candidates care about strong democratic and liberal values when they have office (hint: they don't). He got chairman because 0.0 players had enough votes for him to cater to their needs (although, in reality, he caters to the needs of the game and making it not poop)

Quote:
2. How is "If you report a goonie for botting I will kick you out of the corp" not protecting botters. Unless you are asking me to believe that no goonie has ever run a bot? Please make that claim, because I think everyone could do with the laugh.


Because that's screwing over your friends and you deserved to get the boot for it. Or because it's not an alliances job to police what its member base does. Or because CCP doesn't (as of writing) care enough to deal with bots. Or because ratting is so unrealistically boring that it's easy to sympathize with people who bot. Pick an answer that makes you mad the most so you can mash words about it while I go back to ignoring these terrible forums.

Quote:
3. I agree that lots of goonies have confirmed that I am right about your Alliance policy, but none have offered any real explanation of how the Mittanis position is not contradictory. More importantly, the first post in this thread states that the Mittani will offer clarification on issues of concern. I'm not interested in hearing from random goonie stooges, I want to hear from him.


You won't hear it from him because you want to hear it from him. I hope this is obvious to you, but it probably isn't so here are the words.

Quote:
Fact is he clearly offered this thread as a place where he would answer questions, but it seems he is only willing to answer "certain" questions, and not ones where he seems to be on dodgy ground.


I don't think he stated he was going to answer all questions. And you can jerk and preach this point as much as you want but it won't really have any value because nobody cares.

Also, botting effects every region and every space. Revising PVE will best combat botting as I have a feeling a significant portion of it is because people who enjoy PVPing a lot won't **** with the shooting red crosses part

Also did anyone ever tell you your posting makes you look senile? you should probably get that looked at.