These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

New post tactic

Author
How2FoldSoup
Hull Tanking Elitists
#21 - 2011-11-04 06:52:24 UTC  |  Edited by: How2FoldSoup
Lystrian wrote:
Large Collidable Object wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
I've found it's more effective to have a hideous avatar.



I agree.

Also, real bittervets don't post with their main.


this..

the eve forums are for entertainment purposes only



Bravo good chap.. /clap
The Apostle
Doomheim
#22 - 2011-11-04 10:53:46 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
I wonder if we ever had some VR sex whether you'd feel different about me.

Do you leave your hood on when you are making sweet sweet love?

Don't you remember?

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

Morganta
The Greater Goon
#23 - 2011-11-04 12:30:04 UTC
at first I was like :|

but then I was like :|
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2011-11-04 13:25:41 UTC
DarkAegix wrote:
Bittervets don't want WiS.
They want FiS, but without any of the new ships, nebulae, time dilation, engine trails, player owned customs offices, new old turret icons, new T2 modules, hybrid balance, supercap balance, new cyno effects or any other features.
Bittervets don't know what they want.


Bittervets want what they used to have before they got what they asked for.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Previous page12